Hello,
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 08:34:36PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Sean Middleditch writes:
> > Perhaps bugs should be filed against them, for their lack of
> > compatibility, if indeed there are problems?
>
> I filed a bug against gdialog (gnome-utils, to be exact) with a complete
> set of pa
On 14 Apr 2002, Roger Leigh wrote:
> I have added autoconf/make support, and repackaged it using debhelper.
Whoa. I tried the same two years ago, and failed. That's why I started a
rewrite in C++, based on APT, which should be ready for general use in
about three to six months (hopefully our IT d
Le Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 08:53:03PM +0100, Roger Leigh écrivait:
> Does anyone who uses buildd/wanna-build/rbuilder have any comments? I
> don't yet have a big enough HDD to run an autobuilder offline, so I
> have not tried to use it yet. I won't be able to do much more till
> June, but I'll have
Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Hi.. out of curiosity, does anyone know what's keeping the new libusb out of
> testing? I can't find anything useful in update_excuses.html and I can't
> make sense of the lines in update_output.txt.
The (obvious) problems were :
- sane-backends/san
Hello,
auric:~> madison postgresql
postgresql | 6.5.3-27 |stable | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k,
powerpc, sparc
postgresql |7.2.1-2 | unstable | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64,
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excu
> The (obvious) problems were :
> - sane-backends/sane-frontends RC bugs
> - gphoto2 not building on arm
> - kdegraphics not building on arm
Well, not obvious since they were already fixed AFAICT (unless I'm more
incompetent than I thought).
> The hidden problems were :
> - pencam depending on
Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The (obvious) problems were :
> > - sane-backends/sane-frontends RC bugs
> > - gphoto2 not building on arm
> > - kdegraphics not building on arm
>
> Well, not obvious since they were already fixed AFAICT (unless I'm more
> incompetent than I thought).
Y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there a particular reason why Supermount couldn't be included in the
debian unstable kernels as an option? It works brilliantly on Mandrake, and
makes things much easier to use. Thanks,
David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (G
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:17:38PM +1000, David Findlay wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Is there a particular reason why Supermount couldn't be included in the
> debian unstable kernels as an option? It works brilliantly on Mandrake, and
> makes things much easier to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 19:25, David Odin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:17:38PM +1000, David Findlay wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Is there a particular reason why Supermount couldn't be included in the
> > debi
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:49:12AM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html#postgresql :
>
> * postgresql (7.1.3-7 to 7.2.1-2)
>
> * Maintainer: Oliver Elphick
> * 12 days old (needed 5 days)
> * Valid candidate
>
> There is no link to p
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 09:49, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html#postgresql :
>
> * postgresql (7.1.3-7 to 7.2.1-2)
>
> * Maintainer: Oliver Elphick
> * 12 days old (needed 5 days)
> * Valid candidate
>
> There is no link to programs it d
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:44:21AM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 09:49, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> > http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html#postgresql :
> > * postgresql (7.1.3-7 to 7.2.1-2)
> > * Maintainer: Oliver Elphick
> > * 12 days old (needed 5 d
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:38:26PM +1000, David Findlay wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 19:25, David Odin wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:17:38PM +1000, David Findlay wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:52:48AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
>
> > Does anyone who uses buildd/wanna-build/rbuilder have any comments? I
> > don't yet have a big enough HDD to run an autobuilder offline, so I
> > have not tried to use it
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:40:32AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> On 14 Apr 2002, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > I have added autoconf/make support, and repackaged it using debhelper.
>
> Whoa. I tried the same two years ago, and failed. That's why I started a
> rewrite in C++, based on APT, which shoul
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 11:05, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Renaming packages -- even renaming them back -- is bad, mmkay?
I realise! On the other hand I found I had got myself into a hole with
libpgsql2.1 -- better to get rid of it once and for all.
--
Oliver Elphick[E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 20:06, David Odin wrote:
> Automount will mount the medium as soon as you access it. I fail to see
> any use of mounting a medium when it is put, and before it is accessed.
> The medium will be unmounted after a 'user defined' tim
Hi!
Can anybody tell me why the psi package in queue/new doesn't get
processed? I made an upload which only changed 'non-US' to 'net' nearly
three weeks ago. (I added another upload with new features last week)
If there is anything wrong with this package, please tell me, so I can
correct it.
Ja
Thanks for the bug report.
I just want to know which window manager you are using. I did not found
any policy statement about default icon locations. The documentation
of menu states:
...
please put all icon files in the directory
`/usr/X11R6/include/X11/{bitmaps,pixmaps}'
and I
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 12:44:24PM +0200, Jan Niehusmann wrote:
> Can anybody tell me why the psi package in queue/new doesn't get
> processed?
] You are free to distribute this software under the terms of
] the GNU General Public License.
] On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, David Findlay wrote:
> Well can the debconf for automount please make it easy to configure it that
> way? The default config doesn't do anything like it, and the documentation is
> not clear on setting it up. Everyone runs around saying they want to make
> Debian easy for the
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Roger Leigh wrote:
[buildd in C++]
> Thet sounds very cool. Would you like any help with this?
Difficult, since if this gets to be my project, I'm supposed to do it
without outside help. :-/
> At the very
> least, I can help document it and fix bugs (I can write troff, tex
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, David Findlay wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 21:31, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, David Findlay wrote:
> > > Well can the debconf for automount please make it easy to configure it
> > > that way? The default config doesn't do anything like it, and the
> >
I'm hitting a bit of a stumbling block in preparing SDL 1.2.4 packages for
woody. The problem is that SDL does not work with ALSA 0.9 yet (I will do
something about this at some point, really I will...)
Debian's libarts-dev depends on libasound2-dev, which conflicts with the
libasound1-dev which
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 05:17, David Findlay wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Is there a particular reason why Supermount couldn't be included in the
> debian unstable kernels as an option? It works brilliantly on Mandrake, and
> makes things much easier to use. Thanks,
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 09:29:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> ] Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), tmake, libqt3-mt-dev, libssl-dev
> ^^
> OpenSSL can't be used with GPL licensed software.
The psi binary package doesn't cont
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 01:21:05AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> That's ~9MB per binary package, * 2 for the two versions in the
> pool. Looking more closely at the current i386 package, unpacked:
>
> sledge:~/debian/evolution$ du -s usr/*
> 14548 usr/share
>
> Over half of the installed packa
Hi!
I want to package Kadu, a Gadu Gadu client for linux, but not for
debian, because I'm not yet developer. I want to package it for
author, because he want to publish package on Kadu's webpage.
But there is one problem. Kadu is written in QT3/KDE3 and in debian
there is not kdelibs3-dev, so Kadu
"Mateusz Papiernik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> I want to package Kadu, a Gadu Gadu client for linux, but not for
> debian, because I'm not yet developer. I want to package it for
> author, because he want to publish package on Kadu's webpage.
> But there is one problem. Kadu is written
> kdelibs-dev is what you want.
is it really devel for KDE3? Why it isn't kdelibs3-dev?
Thank's
Mati
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> > I want to package Kadu, a Gadu Gadu client for linux, but not for
> > debian, because I'm not yet developer. I want to package it for
> > author, because he want to publish package on Kadu's webpage.
> > But there is one problem. Kadu is written in QT3/K
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 04:15:21PM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> "Mateusz Papiernik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I want to package Kadu, a Gadu Gadu client for linux, but not for
> > debian, because I'm not yet developer. I want to package it for
> > author, because he want to pu
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 12:06:23PM +0200, David Odin wrote:
> Supermount is a very bad hack, and as the problem of letting a user
> 'lock' a removable medium, if it is "superunmounted" when still in use.
This flaw is notable, unfortunately. However, this is a matter of
permissions really. If onl
Package: micq
Version: 0.4.8.pl2-1
Severity: serious
When logging for first time, micq is supposed to ask for both uin and
passwd, but when entering uin it goes directly to proxy question leaving
blank passwd, then it exits without error. When trying to enter micq it
should ask for password but it
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 08:40:41PM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Apr 2002 11:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
> tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Darren Salt wrote:
> >
> > > xanim says that DIVX(44495658) is unsupported. :-\
> >
> > FYI, aviplay (in the avifile-player p
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I would like to package kronolith, part of the horde suite of applications.
Description: Web Based Calendar Manager
Kronolith is the Horde calendar application. It is currently in the
development stages, and makes heavy use of the Horde framework to provide
int
It works perfectly with sinek.
Regards,
// Ola
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 04:30:39PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 08:34:53PM +0100, Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
> > On Sun, 2002-04-14 at 17:46, Darren Salt wrote:
> > > I demand that Erich Schubert
#include
martin f krafft wrote on Mon Apr 15, 2002 um 01:09:20AM:
> > But then, perhaps they sue us over the name, so this might be a bad
> > idea...
>
> nah, i doubt it. i'll talk to a good friend who works there. it's not
> like they don't already know about debian's naming scheme...
>
> i'll
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 12:06:23PM +0200, David Odin wrote:
> > The way of acting is the same as supermount, but it won't let you do
> > stupid thing such as ejecting a medium in use.
Depending on what "use" means it's not the user that is stupid, bu
> I'm hitting a bit of a stumbling block in preparing SDL 1.2.4 packages for
> woody. The problem is that SDL does not work with ALSA 0.9 yet (I will do
> something about this at some point, really I will...)
I've already implemented simple ALSA 0.9 support in SDL CVS.
Possibly you could build a
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-15
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libnet-server-perl
Version : 0.82
Upstream Author : Paul T Seamons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://seamons.com/
* License : GPL + Artistic
Description : an extensible, ge
[Joseph Carter - Sun, 14 Apr 2002 02:54:15 PM CDT]
> And yet, completing level 50 takes several hours. If you're lucky.
Oh good, I thought it was just me. I zip through the levels fairly fast
on average, and then level 50 ... bink bink bink ... little crying
penguins every few minutes...
--
|
Le lun 15/04/2002 à 12:32, David Findlay a écrit :
> Well can the debconf for automount please make it easy to configure it that
> way? The default config doesn't do anything like it, and the documentation is
> not clear on setting it up. Everyone runs around saying they want to make
> Debian e
Le dim 14/04/2002 à 14:06, Rob Bradford a écrit :
> Package: frozen-bubble
> Version: 0.9.2-9
> Severity: critical
>
> Frozen-bubble is holding up the release process as all the developers
> are now hooked and are no longer working on woody, hence the RC status
> as this package is single handedly
Well, today I went and picked up the m68k machine kindly donated
by Anton Emmerfors some months ago.
It was already packaged and ready to go, so all I had to do was to
take it to the postoffice, and send it off to Ingo Juergensmann
in Germany, who will do OS and network card installations.
Hopefu
also sprach Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.15.1952 +0200]:
> Imagine that scene aus TS2, where Woody is riding on the horse through
> the black-white countryside... Now imagine him riding trough
> (black-white) terminal room, ie. on the table in front of keyboards.
> Behind him, everythi
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:54:48PM +0200, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Joseph Carter wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 12:06:23PM +0200, David Odin wrote:
>
> > > The way of acting is the same as supermount, but it won't let you do
> > > stupid thing such as e
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 16:54, David Odin wrote:
> Well, the main problem I have with supermount and not have with
> automount is the following:
> I'm a CS teacher, and the linux distribution in the computer room is
> mandrake. And, very often, a student use supermount to mount a floppy,
> do som
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 05:12:26PM -0400, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 16:54, David Odin wrote:
> > Well, the main problem I have with supermount and not have with
> > automount is the following:
> > I'm a CS teacher, and the linux distribution in the computer room is
> > man
My knowledge of gcc-2.95 vs gcc-3.0 intricacies and C++ specialities is
far too small to figure out what's going on here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=140032
and I estimate that I won't have the time to improve my knowledge
sufficiently either untill woody deadline so
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 11:43:19PM +0200, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
> My knowledge of gcc-2.95 vs gcc-3.0 intricacies and C++ specialities is
> far too small to figure out what's going on here:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=140032
>
> and I estimate that
--
___ _ _
/ __(_)__ _(_) [ http://nekton.mine.nu ]
| (_ | / _` | | [ "If anything can go wrong, it will" Murphy ]
\___|_\__, |_| [ GPG Key fingerprint ]
|___/[ C6F1 4997 0574 C302 EAE1 42B7 5A17 AA64 F909 FC99 ]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 22:43, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
> My knowledge of gcc-2.95 vs gcc-3.0 intricacies and C++ specialities is
> far too small to figure out what's going on here:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=140032
>
> and I estimate that I won't have
<#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign>
- - - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[ 3] Choice 1: Branden Robinson
[ 1] Choice 2: Raphael Hertzog
[ 2] Choice 3: Bdale Garbee
[ 4] Choice 4: None Of The Above
- - - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These
"Davide G.M.Salvetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> <#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign>
Hrm.
<#secure method=plaintext mode=whoops>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dear debian mates,
i'm in the same situation of tomas, i'm sure that aspell won't compile
on hppa in time for woody release. it has some kind of problem with
gcc 3.0 i cannot manage and i'm not receiving any help (see bug #139515).
i think that leaving current aspell out of woody would be a mis
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Maybe we have to find a way to prevent the game from working on the
> developers' machines.
> Does anyone mind my adding a conflict with debhelper (and maybe
> libc6-dev) ?
Actually, since both frozen-bubble and debhelper (and most of dpk-dev)
are written in perl, I've be
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 22:29, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dim 14/04/2002 à 14:06, Rob Bradford a écrit :
> > Package: frozen-bubble
> > Version: 0.9.2-9
> > Severity: critical
> >
> > Frozen-bubble is holding up the release process as all the developers
> > are now hooked and are no longer working
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> If you're testing this on your x86 (or similar) platform, the undefined
> references are to be expected. You can't link 2.95 and 3.0 C++ code,
> and QT is 2.95 C++ code. Try working on one of the architectures in
> question; they should be availabl
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:16:32AM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Hi.. out of curiosity, does anyone know what's keeping the new libusb out
> > of
> > testing? I can't find anything useful in update_excuses.html and I can't
> > make sense of
I have uploaded a new kernel-patch-2.4-lsm package that implements the V9
policy format and uses /etc/security/selinux to store it. I have also
uploaded a matching "selinux" package that will compile to the same format.
With the location change the upgrade path will be a lot smoother. If you
Ciao Domenico
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> i'm in the same situation of tomas, i'm sure that aspell won't compile
> on hppa in time for woody release. it has some kind of problem with
> gcc 3.0 i cannot manage and i'm not receiving any help (see bug #139515).
Maybe you're as
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:52:31 +0200
Matijs van Zuijlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 08:40:41PM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> > so does xine.
>
> Xine works, but can't seem to keep up: It just shows the first frame,
> then keeps saying:
>
> video_out: rejected, X frames t
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 11:27:15PM +0200, David Odin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 05:12:26PM -0400, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 16:54, David Odin wrote:
> > > Well, the main problem I have with supermount and not have with
> > > automount is the following:
> > > I'm a
Best Regards
BlueCom Danmark A/S
Worldwide IT Volume Distributor
Jens Fournais
Managing Director
Blokken 11-13, DK-3460 Birkeroed, Denmark
Phone: + 45 45 94 55 55, Fax: + 45 45 94 55 00
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.bluecom.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 08:53:03PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Does anyone who uses buildd/wanna-build/rbuilder have any comments? I
> don't yet have a big enough HDD to run an autobuilder offline, so I
> have not tried to use it yet. I won't be able to do much more till
> June, but I'll have ple
Jochen writes:
> I think I incorporated all gdialog patches you sent to the BTS. Or did I
> miss something?
All those bugs appear to have been fixed, though I see no mention of my
patches in the changelog.
> In any case I would be willing to incorporate any further patches sent to
> me.
I don't
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:20:35PM -0400, christophe barb? wrote:
-snip-
> It is currently not possible to compile a working gphoto2 in unstable
> without previously recompiling libusb.
> Otherwise it segfault early because usb_busses (from libusb.so) is not
> understood by gphoto2.
> I believe it
Chris,
I (christophe) am the packager of gphoto2.
The bug you mention is not related with the NEW problem.
It is impossible to compile something working (gphoto2 or something
else) with the current libusb packages. This is not your fault at
all. I can't explain it but something goes wrong between
Hi! (it's my first post here)
You are probably sick and tired of this topic, but ...
IT'S A QUARTER YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF 4.2.0 RELEASE!
Yes, it really has been three (3) months (!) since it was released.
Time to throw some gasoline on the flames ... Branden apparently is
incapable of releasing it
ObPleaseDon'tFeedTheTroll
--Adam
--
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Now you can start bashing me.
Since your remarks seem to be deliberately provocative,
let me just point out that X is a large package to take
care of yet there is reason to think that B.R. will
have 4.2 ready before very long, as he has said he will.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digit
Em Mon, 15 Apr 2002 12:06:23 +0200, David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Automount will mount the medium as soon as you access it. I fail to see
> any use of mounting a medium when it is put, and before it is accessed.
> The medium will be unmounted after a 'user defined' time. I've chosen
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:00:54PM -0400, christophe barb? wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I (christophe) am the packager of gphoto2.
> The bug you mention is not related with the NEW problem.
> It is impossible to compile something working (gphoto2 or something
> else) with the current libusb packages. This
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 05:14:51AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen wrote:
> Now you can start bashing me.
>
> - Tronic -
4.2.0 doesn't matter, as it's not going into Woody; what needs to be
done on the X packages is getting the highest quality packages X
packages for Woody, which he is doing just fine.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 05:14:51AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen wrote:
> Hi! (it's my first post here)
Fucking idiot. Yes, I can say that now. I'll only be DPL for another ~20
hours. Here, let me say it again. Fucking idiot.
Man that felt good.
Ben (not the DPL for much longer) Collins
--
Debi
better be careful, talk like that will get you re-elected. :-)
by me anyway!
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:29:06PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 05:14:51AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen wrote:
> > Hi! (it's my first post here)
>
> Fucking idiot. Yes, I can say that now. I'll only
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 21:14, Lasse Karkkainen wrote:
> Hi! (it's my first post here)
>
> You are probably sick and tired of this topic, but ...
> IT'S A QUARTER YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF 4.2.0 RELEASE!
>
> Yes, it really has been three (3) months (!) since it was released.
>
> Time to throw some gas
Someone said that X is a difficult package to maintain and that there is
nothing wrong if PACKAGING it takes 3+ months. People have managed to
install it from sources in matter of HOURS (well, that didn't work for
me, dunno why). Based on that packaging it during a single weekend
should be poss
>>"Lasse" == Lasse Karkkainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lasse> Hi! (it's my first post here)
We can tell.
Lasse> You are probably sick and tired of this topic, but ...
Lasse> IT'S A QUARTER YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF 4.2.0 RELEASE!
Lasse> Yes, it really has been three (3) months (!) si
* Lasse Karkkainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020415 21:16]:
> incapable of releasing it. So, I suggest that anyone, with enough
> knowledge and TIME, reading this, would volunteer as XFree package
Go to hell. Find a bug that is impacting a viable woody release for
may1st and *fix* it, or patch it, o
* Lasse Karkkainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020415 22:04]:
> should be possible. As we are talking about UNSTABLE here, no real
> testing needs to be done before releasing - that's what the Debian
> Unstable is for, right?
You need to do some serious thinking about time constraints of
developers and
Forgot to cc this to the list.. The message is attached.
--- Begin Message ---
I think your case would be more convincing if you mentioned some
particular reason why Debian ought to upgrade. Presumably it supports
more cards or something. Having the current version is not super
important in and o
"Lasse" == Lasse Karkkainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Surely this is a troll?
Lasse> Nope, I'm for real. Maybe a bit provocative, but for real.
No way!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This one time, at band camp, Lasse Karkkainen wrote:
>Time to throw some gasoline on the flames ... Branden apparently is
>incapable of releasing it. So, I suggest that anyone, with enough
>knowledge and TIME, reading this, would volunteer as XFree package
>maintainer. Branden's comments suggest
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Lasse Karkkainen wrote:
> nothing wrong if PACKAGING it takes 3+ months. People have managed to
> install it from sources in matter of HOURS (well, that didn't work for
> me, dunno why). Based on that packaging it during a single weekend
Installing anything from source is u
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 06:30:20AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen wrote:
> It's the hardware support. People are getting sick of VGA/VESA. I
> thought that it would be obvious.
Translation: I own one of the umpteen iterations of the Radeon that 4.1.0
doesn't support in a way I think it should, so I'm go
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 06:30:20AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> I guess you didn't read my original message: the problem is that I know
> next to nothing about Debian.
Yes, that sums it up pretty well.
I'm feeling a bit generous, so I'll hand you a piece o
Ack, I don't like doing this, but I'm provoked now...
Fucking idiot!!!
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 23:30, Lasse Karkkainen wrote:
> Forgot to cc this to the list.. The message is attached.
>
>
>
> From: Lasse Karkkainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re:
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 22:29, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Em Mon, 15 Apr 2002 12:06:23 +0200, David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>
> > Automount will mount the medium as soon as you access it. I fail to see
> > any use of mounting a medium when it is put, and before it is accessed.
> > T
Hello!
I'm trying to setup a buildd to make a port. This port is for
recompile with pentiumpro optimizations.
The problem is that I couldn't understand the buildd setup.
Where can I find some help about it?
Also AFAIK buildd is for stable unstable and frozen, but testing.
--
C
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 06:28:50AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen wrote:
> What comes to encouraging other people - guess what I'm doing right now.
No you are definetly not. You are pissing people off.
> Other platforms aren't nearly as significant as i386 (not many users, no
> much new hardware).
Y
93 matches
Mail list logo
