Debain

2002-08-25 Thread Mike
hi i have a 6 gig drive on my old puter i wanna put debail on 3 gigs is that enough room, thank you

Re: Debain

2002-08-25 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 01:46:26AM -0400, Mike wrote: > hi i have a 6 gig drive on my old puter i wanna put debail on 3 gigs is that > enough room, thank you I guess it depends on what you want to do. I've fit debian on a 200MB drive and I've filled a 2GB drive as well. It just depends on what y

Re: Make python2.2 the python default

2002-08-25 Thread Moshe Zadka
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any reason to keep 2.1 ? Debian is used as a development system for portable apps. Many developers need to test their software works with Python 2.1.

Re: compiling clamav with pbuilder

2002-08-25 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 12:52:44 +1000, Brian May wrote: > Wehn compiling clamav in a woody chroot with pbuilder, I get > the following error: I can't reproduce that here (freshly generated woody chroot for pbuilder; clamav 0.24-1). > (cd docs && ps2pdf clamdeb.ps clamdeb.pdf) > Unable to

Re: compiling clamav with pbuilder

2002-08-25 Thread Brian May
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 10:00:33AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 12:52:44 +1000, Brian May wrote: > > Wehn compiling clamav in a woody chroot with pbuilder, I get > > the following error: > > I can't reproduce that here (freshly generated woody chroot for pbuilder; >

Unidentified subject!

2002-08-25 Thread Anthony Charles Thomas
Diamonds as An investment I took the liberty of getting your email address from the internet. I will not bother you again after this intrusion. My name is Anthony Thomas and I am an English diamond dealer. Diamonds are a great investment with their price rising app 8-10% per year without the ris

Re: compiling clamav with pbuilder

2002-08-25 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 18:12:54 +1000, Brian May wrote: > So I wonder what is different about my system that means it doesn't work > here, but it works everywhere else? > > Could it be related to devfs or something? It might be. You may want to do "pbuilder login --distribution woody" and try bu

Unidentified subject!

2002-08-25 Thread jeff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Aug 25 03:54:06 2002 X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 23287 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2002 08:54:06 - Received: from master.debian.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2002 08:54:06 - Received: from (buddy) [61.1

Bug#158102: ITP: spiralsynthmodular -- Object orientated modular softsynth / sequencer / sampler

2002-08-25 Thread Stefan Schwandter
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-25 Severity: wishlist * Package name: spiralsynthmodular Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : Dave Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.pawfal.org/Software/SSM/ * License : GPL Description : Object orie

Unidentified subject!

2002-08-25 Thread jeff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Aug 25 05:40:57 2002 X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 4964 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2002 10:40:57 - Received: from master.debian.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2002 10:40:57 - Received: from (buddy) [61.14

Re: Possible mass filing of bugs, take #2.1

2002-08-25 Thread Steve Kowalik
At 7:01 pm, Wednesday, August 21 2002, Anthony Towns mumbled: > linda doesn't run cleanly over the entire archive -- it misbehaves on > some packages (leaving /tmp/linda-* directories about), and just seems > to hang on others. I haven't tracked down what's causing this. I don't > believe it inclu

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Steve Kowalik
At 11:06 am, Sunday, August 25 2002, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh mumbled: > On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Brendan O'Dea wrote: > > Note that in addition, since perl 5.8.0 includes some modules which were > > previously stand-alone, any package declaring a versioned[0] dependency > > on: > > > > libdi

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Steve Kowalik wrote: > If they depend on those packages and perl (>= 5.8.0)? If they have any sort of versioned dependency on provides (we should make a list of those), actually. But since this is a non-local check, and hard to write, I guess tailoring it to detect dependenci

ITP: tix8.1 - The Tix library for Tk, version 8.1

2002-08-25 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Although not a new package (tix4.1 is in Debian), the 4.1 version is a bit rotten, so that it doesn't work with newer packages (visual-tcl and PyTix need 8.1). 8.1 was released 20 months ago and should be mature. Packages can be found at http://ftp-master.

ITP: f-prot-installer - Installer for an antivirus checker

2002-08-25 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Installer package for F-Prot Antivirus(tm) F-Prot(tm) is a tool for scanning individual files or directory trees for viruses. The license for F-Prot Linux for Small Business is without charge for personal users, when used on personal workstations. The packag

Re: ITP: tix8.1 - The Tix library for Tk, version 8.1

2002-08-25 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-25 16:34]: > Although not a new package (tix4.1 is in Debian), the 4.1 version is a > bit rotten, so that it doesn't work with newer packages (visual-tcl > and PyTix need 8.1). 8.1 was released 20 months ago and should be Is there any reason to keep ve

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can > make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which > still depend on perlapi-5.6.*. This list should take into account those > packages that were a

Machine usage policies

2002-08-25 Thread Oliver Elphick
I just took a close look at the machine usage policies at http://www.debian.org/devel/dmup 1. Section 1 says the document contains both policies and guidelines. There is a section headed policies, but none headed guidelines. I guess that the examples section should be part of guidelines. It may

优惠网络建站!

2002-08-25 Thread zdrwz
此邮件为商业信函,如果您对此不感兴趣请立即删除;如果您不希望再收到此邮件请到http://filter.21gold.com退订,我们将会把您的邮箱地址过滤出列表。谢谢!; This mail is a business letter. If you are uninterested in this , please delete it immediately;If you do not hope to receive this mail again , please go to http://filter.21gold.com ,fill in your mail address ,

Re: Machine usage policies

2002-08-25 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 04:49:21PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote: > I just took a close look at the machine usage policies at > http://www.debian.org/devel/dmup > > 1. Section 1 says the document contains both policies and guidelines. > There is a section headed policies, but none headed guidelines

Re: Machine usage policies

2002-08-25 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:19:36PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > There was a bug filed on www.debian.org but I can't recall what happened to > it. We certainly couldn't just change it, because that's not a random web > page, it's "owned" by debian-admin etc. Change it, then send it to -admin with th

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Joey Hess
Brendan O'Dea wrote: > On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > >perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can > >make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which > >still depend on perlapi-5.6.*. This list should take into account th

Re: Machine usage policies

2002-08-25 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:34:45AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > There was a bug filed on www.debian.org but I can't recall what happened to > > it. We certainly couldn't just change it, because that's not a random web > > page, it's "owned" by debian-admin etc. > > Change it, then send it to -a

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:44:00AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea écrivait: > On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > >perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can > >make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which > >still depend on perlapi

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Joey Hess
Raphael Hertzog wrote: > What happened to libdbi-perl ? > > Joey NMUed it in the pool, but it appears to not have been installed. Maybe a newer MU came out in between or something. I don't have the NMU anymore, but IIRC it was a simple rebuild. -- see shy jo

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Clint Adams
> Maybe a newer MU came out in between or something. I don't have the NMU > anymore, but IIRC it was a simple rebuild. Yes, two newer MU's actually. The latter was a rebuild for 5.8; unfortunately the build-deps weren't updated, so it was autobuilt inconsistently.

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 01:51:18PM -0400, Clint Adams écrivait: > > Maybe a newer MU came out in between or something. I don't have the NMU > > anymore, but IIRC it was a simple rebuild. > > Yes, two newer MU's actually. The latter was a rebuild for 5.8; > unfortunately the build-deps weren't upd

Re: Bug#158059: ITP: metacity-themes -- Themes for the Gtk2 metacity window manager

2002-08-25 Thread Colin Walters
On Sat, 2002-08-24 at 14:37, Mark Howard wrote: > Initial packages for this are available at > http://tildemh.com/tmp/metacity-themes/ Hmmwhere's the source package?

Unsubscribe

2002-08-25 Thread Lawrence Mulligan
Unsubsribe

Re: [buildd] brltty

2002-08-25 Thread Martin Schulze
Mario Lang wrote: > Hello. > > I noticed that buildd doesn't build brltty since 2.98-2. > > Well, I know I originally just had i386 in the architecture field, but > I am currently working with the upstream maintainer to > fix alot of different architectures, and it would be nice > if buildd coul

Re: [buildd] brltty

2002-08-25 Thread Martin Schulze
Martin Schulze wrote: > Ryan Murray told me that there is an override database for the > Architecture line which is used by the buildds, hence, the buildds > were ignoring the Architecture line of the debian/control file. > I've asked him to remove the entry and he's going to do some test > compile

Re: First experience with gcc-3.2 recompiles

2002-08-25 Thread Martin Schulze
Gerhard Tonn wrote: > As I have told in another thread, I am currently rebuilding all packages > depending on c++ on s390. All packages have been touched now. The results are: > > 406 packages have been built successfully > 222 packages depend on other packages built with gcc-3.2 >90 on q

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Ryan Murray
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 07:39:54PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:44:00AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea ?crivait: > > On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > >perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can > > >make testing though, we

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 01:33:36PM -0700, Ryan Murray écrivait: > while the build-depends on perl were updated, the build-depends for the > new libdbi were not. You need to update all build-depends that might be They were in 1.28-1.1 (NMU by Joey), but during the transition the maintainer uploade

Re: How to get rid of non-free packers?

2002-08-25 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 23 Aug 2002 16:01:15 +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote: >It's free to distribute on the network, but if you distribute for >the people who cannot access the network (by magazine or CD-ROM), >please send E-Mail (Inter-Net address) to the author before the >distribution. That's

Re: Problem with autobuilders installing python

2002-08-25 Thread Joe Drew
On Sat, 2002-08-24 at 15:34, James A. Treacy wrote: > Do entire dependency chains need to be specified for Build-Depends? No, absolutely not - only the packages the program needs directly. That is, all Depends: are automatically pulled in. -- Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Th

Preferred way to build shared objects from PIC archives?

2002-08-25 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
The shared libraries in ncbi-tools6 and related packages currently start out as static archives of PIC objects, which then get turned into shared libraries with commands of the form gcc -shared -Wl,-soname=libddvlib.so.6 -o libddvlib.so.6.1.20020426 \ -Wl,-whole-archive libddvlib.a -Wl,-no-wh

Haberdar olun

2002-08-25 Thread Turan Sezer
HABERDAR.COM - HABER VE MEDYA PORTALI Artýk tüm haberleri sadece tek siteden takip edebileceksiniz. Haberdar.com açýldý! Haber baþlýklarý, spor haberleri, teknoloji haberleri, kültür ve sanat haberleri, internet haberleri, bilim ve uzay, sinema, saðlýk... Aradýðýnýz içerik http://www.haberdar.co

印刷行业必备的工具书!!!

2002-08-25 Thread 网上工作室
《国内报刊名录大全》(2002年度)收录国内邮局发行和自办发行的报刊名录一万多家(含详细通讯地址、邮编、电话号码等),另有3000多家报刊的电子邮箱、2000多家报刊网址及全国所有出版社的联系方式。 是印刷行业与报刊杂志、出版社联系、开拓书报刊印刷及其他相关业务时必备的工具书。另:可根据客户需求订制电子版报刊名录数据库,可直接打印在信封上。详情请浏览:http://bk.tougao.com

Re: compiling clamav with pbuilder

2002-08-25 Thread Brian May
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 10:48:22AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > It might be. You may want to do "pbuilder login --distribution woody" and > try building it by hand in there, then do some traces on the ps2pdf > conversion. I found the problem. I had set TMP to /tmp for pbuilder instead of /