On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 07:12:28PM +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> Try to reorder your sources.list file.
So another words, it is not sufficient to simply disable an apt-get
source line by giving it a priority of -1, I must also delete that line
from sources.list too?
(as normally this entry is
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
> Sorry to interrupt your speculations about a gnuplot menu-entry but
> it's been in the package for ages (about 1997)... Yes, opening a xterm
> with the gnuplot commandline inside is a bit strange but nobody ever
> complained and at least it can be found
I'm still waiting for bdale to find time to look at the code I've
released so far. I would like to know whether he likes the direction
it's headed, before continuing..
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 04:36:07PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
>
> I was just about to file a wishlist against makedev to get su
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 08:59:47AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> anyone of you with fulfilling the subject's three requirements? i've
> been contacted about donations for debian in sweden, and if you would
> be able to, it would be great if you could proxy those.
Hi
I forgot to reply to this ma
On Sunday 25 August 2002 22:00, you wrote:
>
> > The build logs of the packages can be found at
> > http://people.debian.org/~gt/gcc-3.2_transition
>
> I hate to say, but the list of failed packages needs to get
> investigated a little bit, since not all failures seem to be GCC 3.2
> and syntax rel
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 09:33:40AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Fri, 23 Aug 2002 16:01:15 +0300,
> Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
> >It's free to distribute on the network, but if you distribute for
> >the people who cannot access the network (by magazine or CD-ROM),
> >please send
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:44:00AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> >perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can
> >make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which
> >still depend on perlapi-5.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 09:33:51AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:44:00AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
>> Note that in addition, since perl 5.8.0 includes some modules which were
>> previously stand-alone, any package declaring a versioned[0] dependency
>> on:
>>
>> l
ENGR.GEORGE MBA.
DIRECTOR, MINERALS & NATURAL
RESOURCES, SOUTH AFRICAN MINISTRY OF
MINING & MINERAL RESOURCES, (SMMR)
PRETORIA, REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Sir,
It is my pleasure to write you this letter on behalf
of my colleagues. I have decided to seek a
confidential co-operation with you in exe
Hello,
We understand you are interested in "genuine" home-based businesses that offer
security and peace of mind, as well as an excellent income.
If this is the case, we sincerely believe we may have just what you are looking
for ... superb incomes from low risk, financially sound companies ba
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-26
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cl-defsystem3
Version : 3.3ii
Upstream Author : Mark Kantrowitz and Marco Antoniotti
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/clocc
* License : DFSG compatible
Description :
I am posting this here because mail to the current Debian maintainer
of gpm, Zephaniah E. Hull, bounces.
gim can already serve fine as a "repeater" (pointer device for X)
itz> A sneak preview of gim is available at
itz> http://www.speakeasy.net/~itz/hacks/gim-0.9.1.tar.gz
itz> gim is a replace
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 05:57:50PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> > If those package are still going to be shipped separately (because
> > they're going to evolve outside the perl core), then they should stay
> > in the archive and perl must add Provides for them. Hence, the user
> > can still
On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 20:18, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-08-24 at 14:37, Mark Howard wrote:
>
> > Initial packages for this are available at
> > http://tildemh.com/tmp/metacity-themes/
>
> Hmmwhere's the source package?
http://tildemh.com/tmp/debian/
As this collection is not availa
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, +21:51:59 EEST (UTC +0300),
Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pressed some keys:
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, +16:01:15 EEST (UTC +0300),
> Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pressed some keys:
> Docs about format of LHA or LZH is here:
>
> http://www.osirusoft.com/joejar
域名注册主机申请网站建设一条龙为您服务
中国服务全球专业的域名注册提供商，现推出主机、域名注册优惠服务：
“特惠1+1企业上网套餐”是中国服务器网络有限公司为您推出的超值服务，
“先服务，后收费！”内容包括：
30M asp cgi,php +ACCESS 数据库,送国际顶级域名一个 250元/年
100M asp cgi,php +ACCESS 数据库,送国际顶级域名一个，只需 350元/年
200N asp cgi,php +ACCESS 数据库,送国际顶级域名一个,只需
域名注册主机申请网站建设一条龙为您服务
中国服务全球专业的域名注册提供商，现推出主机、域名注册优惠服务：
“特惠1+1企业上网套餐”是中国服务器网络有限公司为您推出的超值服务，
“先服务，后收费！”内容包括：
30M asp cgi,php +ACCESS 数据库,送国际顶级域名一个 250元/年
100M asp cgi,php +ACCESS 数据库,送国际顶级域名一个，只需 350元/年
200N asp cgi,php +ACCESS 数据库,送国际顶级域名一个,只需
On Sat, 24 Aug 2002, +05:00:59 EEST (UTC +0300),
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pressed some keys:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 04:01:15PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
> > It is not very bad thing if we can't create archives in formats like
> > ACE, ARJ, LHA or RAR with free software. But it is m
> * kaffe and other GPL-licensed JVMs can only be used with GPL compatible
> software (i.e. no Apache style licenses!). See
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#IfInterpreterIsGPL
> Not to mention that kaffe's classlib is GPL [1]
What exactly do you mean by this?
The interpreter can b
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 00:11, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> Otherwise, if more then one version of the symbol is
> available, none of the definitions is accepted and the search
> continues with the next
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> Both problems can be solved by simply writing the version scripts so
> that only a version tag is mentioned in each:
> libpng2.ver:
> LIBPNG_2.0 {global: png_*);
>
> libpng3.ver:
> LIBPNG_3.0 {global: png_*);
>
> However, we'll still get a warning messa
Hi,
I maintain the Lire package, which processes log files from e.g.
sendmail, bind, apache, boa and lots of other services. I don't want to
run any Lire processes as root. However, of course, the processes need
read access to log files. Unfortunately, there seems to be no rule or
policy on how
It appears that Sharp Systems systematically spammed writers to the
Debian-Laptop list, which certainly is an abuse of the debian lists.
(they did not spam the list, so they don't directly violate the
anti-spam rules of debian though) The spam arrived 12. Aug 2002.
I was spammed shortly after posti
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 17:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> > Both problems can be solved by simply writing the version scripts so
> > that only a version tag is mentioned in each:
> > libpng2.ver:
> > LIBPNG_2.0 {global: png_*);
> >
> > libpng3.ve
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Gerhard Tonn wrote:
> > apt: failed with "debian/rules:20: build/environment.mak: No such file or
> > directory" gg: failed with "/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljpeg"
> > hylafax: failed because textfmt wasn't built[1]
> > latte: failed with "Your STL string implementation is unu
On Monday 26 August 2002 18:55, you wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Gerhard Tonn wrote:
> > > apt: failed with "debian/rules:20: build/environment.mak: No such file
> > > or directory" gg: failed with "/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljpeg"
> > > hylafax: failed because textfmt wasn't built[1]
> > > latte:
CAPT. PAUL DIMANGO.
TEL. 27 73 234 9108.
FAX 27 72 486 3248.
Dear Sir,
URGENT INVESTMENT OFFER
I know you will be surprise to receive this email from me,
but please this letter is a request from
someone in dare need of assistance. I Capt. PAUL DIMANGO from Angola, a
personal aide
to the late
Hi!
At te moment, there are a lot of old ITP's hanging around in the WNPP,
with (seemingly) nothing happening to them. In order to clean out the
WNPP, I intend to rename the ITP's that have been open longer than 1 year
to RFP's. This will affect approximately 200 ITP's.
The renaming will be don
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:30:13PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> At te moment, there are a lot of old ITP's hanging around in the WNPP,
> with (seemingly) nothing happening to them. In order to clean out the
> WNPP, I intend to rename the ITP's that have been open longer than 1 year
> to RFP's. T
Il lun, 2002-08-26 alle 20:30, Bas Zoetekouw ha scritto:
> #68155 grassfiled: 1443, changed 1443
in Incoming by more than one month now.
--
Federico Di Gregorio
Debian GNU/Linux Developer & Italian Press Contact[EMAIL PROTECTED]
INIT.D Developer
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 19:30, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi!
>
> At te moment, there are a lot of old ITP's hanging around in the WNPP,
Hi,
When I was looking through the RFP list a while back, I noticed many
of them were for packages that were not maintained upstream - sometimes
they were still at
> > #87667 gstreamerfiled: 546, changed 546
>
> As an example, this package was uploaded to experimental on friday,
> and has been packaged upstream for about a year. It was last changed
> 62 days ago.
Why experimental?
I just noticed that IDE DMA is not enabled by default in woody, nor in the
kernel-image package (at least for 2.4.18 and I assume for the others
also). I can understand this, since there are some systems for which
enabling IDE results in hideous corruption. But for others it gives you a
a huge in
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:05:35PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > > #87667 gstreamerfiled: 546, changed 546
> >
> > As an example, this package was uploaded to experimental on friday,
> > and has been packaged upstream for about a year. It was last changed
> > 62 da
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 09:13:35PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> The shared libraries in ncbi-tools6 and related packages currently
> start out as static archives of PIC objects, which then get turned
> into shared libraries with commands of the form
>
> gcc -shared -Wl,-soname=libddvlib.so.6 -o
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> The other question is how it should be enabled. One way is "hdparm -d 1
> /dev/hd?" or moral equivalent in an init script. Another way appears to
> be "hda=dma ..." or "ide0=dma ..." on the kernel command line, though I
> haven't tested this yet. Appa
Il lun, 2002-08-26 alle 21:45, Nate Eldredge ha scritto:
> As for hdparm, this is complicated with ide-scsi. For ide-scsi to work
> you have to make the ide-cd module ignore the scsi-ified drive. In which
> case /dev/hdc or whatever it is won't work until you have loaded the
> ide-scsi module, p
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Nate Eldredge wrote:
>
> > The other question is how it should be enabled. One way is "hdparm -d 1
> > /dev/hd?" or moral equivalent in an init script. Another way appears to
> > be "hda=dma ..." or "ide0=dma ..." on the kernel com
On 26 Aug 2002, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> Il lun, 2002-08-26 alle 21:45, Nate Eldredge ha scritto:
>
> > As for hdparm, this is complicated with ide-scsi. For ide-scsi to work
> > you have to make the ide-cd module ignore the scsi-ified drive. In which
> > case /dev/hdc or whatever it is won
I have written a python script that allows you to compares locally
installed packages with those on security.debian.org. Furthermore it
provides a description of the problem/DSA name if the package is
mentioned in the DSA RDF.
The script is intended to be run as a normal user in a crontab, and th
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> Thoughts?
Propose a patch against the hdparm package?
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 12:45:54PM -0700, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> > The other question is how it should be enabled. One way is "hdparm -d 1
> > /dev/hd?" or moral equivalent in an init script. Another way appears to
> > be "hda=dma ..." or "ide0=dma ..." on the kernel command line, though I
> > ha
On Monday 26 August 2002 12:45 pm, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> As for hdparm, this is complicated with ide-scsi. For ide-scsi to work
> you have to make the ide-cd module ignore the scsi-ified drive. In which
> case /dev/hdc or whatever it is won't work until you have loaded the
> ide-scsi module, per
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Below's a list of the bug tahtw will be renamed. The "filed" and
> "changed" fields in the list are the number of days that have past since
> the bug was opened, and since any addition was made to the report,
> respectively.
> #85612 mixmaster
BTW: i also remember having read that certain hardware doesn't work with
ide-scsi, so enabling ide-scsi for all IDE hardware is a bad choice.
(i think one of the boot-floppies people tried using ide-scsi by
default, and got some problem reports)
And additional drawback IMHO is the following: devfs
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 11:11:03PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> The changed date is clearly wrong. I suggest you redo your stats and
> post an updated list.
and please include the email address of the reporter for better grepping.
Greetings
Bernd
* Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-26 23:43]:
> > The changed date is clearly wrong. I suggest you redo your stats and
> > post an updated list.
>
> and please include the email address of the reporter for better grepping.
Plus the one who did the last modification. (Image an RFP whi
Hi everybody.
This may be quite stupid or frivolous. :-)
I have noticed the migration of the extra documentation files from
/usr/doc/ to /usr/share/doc/ (as also describes the Debian Policy
chapter 13.3).
I am trying not to use exclusively the simbolic link to /usr/share/doc/
but to look directl
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, that should work fine. I don't know what's broken... you may wish
> to try extracting all the objects via ar and relinking them; that
> should be pretty easy, but I'm not sure it will help.
That's actually how upstream does it, but then there a
Hello, I'm using debian for like 6 months, I used Redhat before.
I gotta say Debian is **A LOT** Better then RH, I like the development and
all.
My only concern is your packages (Not that bad, Just wondering)
I'm wondering why there's only KDE2.2 for stable..
I'm SURE you'll have a lot more *custo
Petroleum (Special) Trust Fund
Contract Award Committee
National Secretariat
Victoria-Island
Lagos-Nigeria.
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATTENTION: THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,
The Petroleum Special Trust Fund was set up by the
late Head of State General Sani Abacha who died on 8th
June 1998, to manage th
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 03:37:14AM +0300, Nir Peled wrote:
> Hello, I'm using debian for like 6 months, I used Redhat before. I
> gotta say Debian is **A LOT** Better then RH, I like the development
> and all.
:-)
> My only concern is your packages (Not that bad, Just wondering) I'm
> wondering
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 03:37:14AM +0300, Nir Peled woke up, and decided to
spew forth:
> I'm SURE you'll have a lot more *customers* If you'll add KDE3.0.3 (Released
> few days ago) I'm also idleing in your server on the OPN network, And if
> you'll join #debian in there you'll see the request
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 16:31, Rob Bradford wrote:
> http://www.robster.org.uk/files/security-update-check.py
That's an interesting approach. What I do is:
#!/bin/sh
apt-get -qq update && apt-get -qq -s dist-upgrade
in /etc/cron.daily/local_aptupdate. Of course, this mails me if any
packages ar
Hello,
Considering how unstable perl 5.80 currently is, wouldn't it be
wise to regress sid back to perl 5.60 and move 5.80 into experimental
instead? So far this upgrade has done major damage to dpkg by breaking
install-info making any additional glibc builds in sid impossible.
I have also foun
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Hello,
> Considering how unstable perl 5.80 currently is, wouldn't it be
> wise to regress sid back to perl 5.60 and move 5.80 into experimental
> instead? So far this upgrade has done major damage to dpkg by breaking
> install-info making any additio
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, David D.W. Downey wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 03:37:14AM +0300, Nir Peled woke up, and decided to
> spew forth:
> > I'm SURE you'll have a lot more *customers* If you'll add KDE3.0.3 (Released
> > few days ago) I'm also idleing in your server on the OPN network, And if
>
Adam,
Well it will be one thing if the debian perl maintainers
are going to actively track down and fix these critical perl
bugs on their own. However if we are going to passively wait
for fixes from upstream, perhaps perl 5.80 will introduce
a bit too much breakage for right now. I mean dpkg IS
At Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:23:30 -0700,
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 09:33:40AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > At Fri, 23 Aug 2002 16:01:15 +0300,
> > Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
> > >It's free to distribute on the network, but if you distribute for
> > >the people who cannot acce
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 11:48:21PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Adam,
>Well it will be one thing if the debian perl maintainers
> are going to actively track down and fix these critical perl
> bugs on their own. However if we are going to passively wait
> for fixes from upstream, perhaps perl 5
Dan,
Then you might take a stab at debugging the testcase from the bugzilla
report...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
...since it sounds similar. If it isn't then we have another bug to fix.
Jack
Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But if it is reliable i would recommend using it. It makes lot of things
> much easier and probably is much more intuitive for beginners as well.
> (just thinking of /dev/discs/disc0/part1 and /dev/cdroms/cdrom0 )
What's especially cool is that it hardw
63 matches
Mail list logo
