The results of your email command are provided below. Attached is your
original message.
- Results:
Invalid confirmation string. Note that confirmation strings expire
approximately 3 days after the initial subscription request. If your
confirmation has expired, please try to re-submit your o
Hans Fugal wrote:
* Andreas Jellinghaus [Wed, 6 Aug 2003 at 00:27 +0200]
mutt can do many nice things without /usr/sbin/sendmail.
a dependency is set if something is always required,
a recommends if is required for the common use, and
a suggestion is used if it improved the functionality.
so depen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi!
>
> Subject: RFP: GRubik -- A 3D Rubik cube game
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-06
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: GRubik
> Version : 1.16
> Upstream Author : John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http
Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > with. The MIA problem is significant enough that NM might be the only
> > way to tackle with it seriously. That means taking time to examine
> > applications.
>
> BTW, has anybody done any research into what
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathanael Nerode) writes:
> Steve Langasek said:
> >I don't think it irrelevant that those clamouring loudest for the DPL
> >to do something to fix the situation are people who don't actually have
> >a say in the outcome of DPL elections. While I'm not happy to see such
> >long
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 10:17:24AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
> > Martin Schulze is listed as the other DAM member. He's also the Press
> > Contact, so I certainly hope he has good communication skills!
>
> And the Stable Release Manager, and
"Dwayne C. Litzenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 01:09:47PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > 2001-01-24 - Dwayne Litzenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=dlitz%40dlitz.net
>
> For the record, I'm still interested in becoming a
Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Jamin W. Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-21 18:52]:
> > Perhaps that is because only the DPL can appoint them (as far as I can
> > tell) and we haven't seen a request from you for them.
>
> Request for help are usually
Hi!
Subject: RFP: GRubik -- A 3D Rubik cube game
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-06
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: GRubik
Version : 1.16
Upstream Author : John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/rubik/grubik.html
* L
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Oh, look, someone else who CCs when it is obvious the person they're
>> responding to is participating right here.
>
> Maybe you should stop whining and just set the Mail-Copies-To header,
> which is generall
Gustavo Noronha Silva dijo [Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 09:26:20PM -0300]:
> > Note that there is at least one project which is looking at doing exactly
> > that while retaining backwards compatability (GoboLinux). It may be worth,
> > on the long term, looking at how it may be possible to migrate from
>
Em Tue, 5 Aug 2003 10:19:53 -0700 (PDT), Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escreveu:
> > You can't get there from here, I think. Unix admins coming to Debian
> > will scream blue murder if it starts being "/My Variable Data/Logs", and
> > that group is important to us.
>
> Note that there is at le
Em Tue, 05 Aug 2003 17:39:06 -0500, Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Heh, teach yourself to type /Va* and you're going to get BURNED one day.
> > (Your co-sysadmin finds a rootkit on another machine and stores it
> > in /Various Danger
Hi,
i have built packages for the bootsplash tools (no package for the patch
itself though. just download and apply the diff).
They are available on http://people.debian.org/~erich/boot/bootsplash/
and work fine on my notebook as well as my sisters.
I didn't get the bootsplash support of swsusp wor
Hi,
[ note that I atm have the tendency to say that the Depends should
remain... ]
Hans Fugal wrote:
> * Andreas Jellinghaus [Wed, 6 Aug 2003 at 00:27 +0200]
> > mutt can do many nice things without /usr/sbin/sendmail.
> > a dependency is set if something is always required,
> > a recommends i
* Andreas Jellinghaus [Wed, 6 Aug 2003 at 00:27 +0200]
> mutt can do many nice things without /usr/sbin/sendmail.
> a dependency is set if something is always required,
> a recommends if is required for the common use, and
> a suggestion is used if it improved the functionality.
> so depending on
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Heh, teach yourself to type /Va* and you're going to get BURNED one day.
> (Your co-sysadmin finds a rootkit on another machine and stores it
> in /Various Dangerous Programs/ for later examination...)
And gee, your shell beeps, completes up to /Vari
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 23:30:11 +0100
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hixie's pretty well-known in certain other free software circles. What
> I've seen of him elsewhere implies to me that he isn't incompetent in
> the least, and frankly I think you're going way overboard in the
> hostility o
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh, look, someone else who CCs when it is obvious the person they're
> responding to is participating right here.
Maybe you should stop whining and just set the Mail-Copies-To header,
which is generally respected by posters on Debian lists?
--
Alan S
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 03:03:54PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
> Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And I'm a geek, one who has been using GNU-based distributions on multiple
> > machines on a daily basis for at least 3 years, and Sun for 6 years befor
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 12:12, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
> Since ruby 1.8.0 was released recently, ruby developers will go to
> ruby 1.8.x, so that we, ruby maintenance team (akira, tagoh, ukai),
> are discussing about how to deal with Ruby 1.8 transition and trying to make
> debian ruby policy soon.
>
> I can imagine a workstation without those packages but it is, IMO,
> mutilated box.
please keep your opinion outside the control file.
cron, at & friends __need__ an MTA (or to be exact:
a /usr/sbin/sendmail app), they will not work without.
mutt can do many nice things without /usr/sbin/sendma
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 12:16:43 -0400
"H. S. Teoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Downgrading sounds like overkill in this situation. I only had to edit
> /usr/src/linux/Makefile to change HOSTCC to gcc-2.95 and export
> CC=gcc-2.95 in the environment, and it worked fine for me. This is on
> 2.4.21, of c
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 21:42:43 +0200
"Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to know Md's opinion, but for me there are no reasons to relax
> dependencies for mutt (and other MUA). I would not like to do it without
> policy requirements because it concerns also other MUA's.
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 22:16:37 +0200
Emile van Bergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would even scream at
>
> /Variable Data/
>
> simply because it encourages slow and RSI-inducing click and drag
> behaviour, because such path names are impossible to type in (and this
> one even requires escaping t
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 21:38:19 +0200
Emile van Bergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apple has a great way of doing that. They don't dumb down, they don't
> belittle you, they assume an intelligent being who can grasp reasonably
> complex English sentences, but who has less knowledge of computer
> idiom
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:06:53PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Tab completion or using /Va* is about as fast as /var.
Heh, teach yourself to type /Va* and you're going to get BURNED one day.
(Your co-sysadmin finds a rootkit on another machine and stores it
in /Various Dangerous Programs/ for
First off, error messages can always be improved, and I bet the program
maintainers would be happy to accept patches, so long as those patches
don't *decrease* the amount of information available.
But in one area you're dead wrong:
On 05-Aug-03, 11:55 (CDT), Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh, look, someone else who CCs when it is obvious the person they're
responding to is participating right here.
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Steve Lamb wrote:
> What manual?
I rest my case.
> I receieved the machine
Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 07:21:00PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
>> OTOH this case concerns not only mutt but also other MUA's. Feel free
>> to discuss it on debian-devel mailing list or propose a changes
>> to Debian Packaging Policy. I will leave t
Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Steve Lamb wrote:
>>>
>>> Note that, if for some reason the user knew about the command
>>> "apropos", even that wouldn't help him -- none of dselect, aptitude,
>>> and apt-get come up for "apropos install" or "apropos setup".
>>
>> I do
* Emile van Bergen
| Hi,
|
| On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:19:53AM -0700, Ian Hickson wrote:
|
| > And I would scream if you called it "/_My_ Variable Data/" too... :-P
|
| I would even scream at
|
| /Variable Data/
|
| simply because it encourages slow and RSI-inducing click and drag
| behavi
Last weekend, python 2.3 was released. For an overview see
http://python.org/2.3/highlights.html
With the next python2.3 upload, python2.3 becomes the default python
version. Some packages become uninstallable until they are converted
to the new version. In this time you should not update
Debian should not change its attitude or methods to "meet the end
user's needs". Think of Debian as a the painter's palette. All of the
tools you need are available to you. It installs a base system and you
customize from there. Would I recommend Debian for John Doe user? As a
base raw install
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:00:03PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> There are enough SMTP/POP3 MUAs which do not need any MTA infrastructure on
> the local host, whatsoever. Mutt can fetch by pop-3, but I think it has no
> smtp support build in, or?
I just (actually few hours ago) find patch which
Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:00:03PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
There are enough SMTP/POP3 MUAs which do not need any MTA infrastructure on
the local host, whatsoever.
But there are some important packages which depends on MTA directly, like:
at, cron, debconf, logrotate
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:19:53AM -0700, Ian Hickson wrote:
> And I would scream if you called it "/_My_ Variable Data/" too... :-P
I would even scream at
/Variable Data/
simply because it encourages slow and RSI-inducing click and drag
behaviour, because such path names are impossible t
Package: wnpp
Version: reported 2003-08-05
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gngeo
Version : 0.5.9a
Upstream Author : M. Pepone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://m.peponas.free.fr/gngeo/
* License : GPL
Description : NeoGeo emulator
gngeo is an emulator
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 09:55:59AM -0700, Ian Hickson wrote:
[SNIP]
> Why can't we instead have nice friendly messages? e.g.:
>
>Startup logging has begun. Log will be stored in '/var/log/boot'.
>
> ...instead of "bootlogd".
[SNIP]
> > Error messages are there for people who know wha
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:00:03PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> There are enough SMTP/POP3 MUAs which do not need any MTA infrastructure on
> the local host, whatsoever.
But there are some important packages which depends on MTA directly, like:
at, cron, debconf, logrotate, mailx.
I can imagine
On Tuesday 05 August 2003 18:55, Ian Hickson wrote:
> Without meaning offense, that is a very selfish attitude. The number of
> future debian users is *significantly* larger than the number of existing
> users, unless something drastic happens to either humanity or debian
> itself. Why should every
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 07:21:00PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> OTOH this case concerns not only mutt but also other MUA's. Feel free
> to discuss it on debian-devel mailing list or propose a changes
> to Debian Packaging Policy. I will leave this wishitem open until
> an agreement is reache
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:33:18AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> > I think Debian's package system is remarkably nice. Unfortunately,
> > it's UI leaves a lot to be desired. The biggest problem is probably
>
> Which UI did you use? We have a few. apt-get is not an
Artur R. Czechowski dijo [Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 07:21:00PM +0200]:
> Hello
>
> I've found your bugreport:
> http://bugs.debian.org/202869
>
> I see no issue to not depending mutt on mail-transfer-agent.
>
> Mutt as is, is a software for reading, writing and sending emails.
> And to provide a full
Hello
I've found your bugreport:
http://bugs.debian.org/202869
I see no issue to not depending mutt on mail-transfer-agent.
Mutt as is, is a software for reading, writing and sending emails.
And to provide a full functionality it needs a kind of transfer-agent.
I am not convinced to only Recomm
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
>>
>> The term "dselect" means nothing to me. It isn't a usable name. That's
>> another example of the problem I mentioned.
>
> Tools have names, and they don't really have to be generic. I think it's
> quite acceptable for the installation manual to tell you
I agree with every word
There are lot's of packages to do Debian more user friendly, they are
available at install time and after by running tasksel.
Maybe the problem was the way that Debian was "pre-installed" I
think they only installed base. This isn't suitable for a "user". Maybe
i
At Mon, 4 Aug 2003 18:02:52 +0300,
Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
>
> As rightfully pointed out by Fumitoshi UKAI, this discussion belongs to
> the wider audience of debian-devel, especially since Ruby 1.8.0 was
> released today.
>
> NB: some points raised here can be of interest not only to Ruby
> dev
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Steve Lamb wrote:
>>
>> Note that, if for some reason the user knew about the command
>> "apropos", even that wouldn't help him -- none of dselect, aptitude,
>> and apt-get come up for "apropos install" or "apropos setup".
>
> I do believe they are mentioned several times in the
Em Tue, 5 Aug 2003 10:49:17 +0200, Frederik Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escreveu:
> Anyway, does this mean we need something like a GNU/Linux Debian and a
> GNU/Linux Debian For Dummies showing only icons?
Yes, I think so... Debian-Desktop should be that, probably. I would like
to see a packag
Could someone please NMU dovecot adding the patch in bug #203892?
Either gcc 3.3.1 sucks or I'm having another hardware problem,
...
Making all in lib
make[4]: Entering directory
`/home/jaldhar/src/dovecot/dovecot-0.99.10/src/lib'
i386-linux-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -g -O2 -Wall -
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Adam, where does it say anywhere in my sig or headers that I want a CC? I
> read the list just fine, you can reply to the list and only the list just
> fine. I don't appreciate replying to what I think is a private message only
> to see a copy of it in
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:14:23AM -0700, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 01:33:19AM -0700, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > > Part of the problem I had was that I had a vague understanding that
> > > there was something called "apt", but that I didn
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:43:36AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 11:06:26 -0400
> "H. S. Teoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Did you check your compile logs to see if it actually compiled with
> > gcc-2.95 or with just gcc (==3.3) ? It happened to me several times that
> > when bui
Adam, where does it say anywhere in my sig or headers that I want a CC? I
read the list just fine, you can reply to the list and only the list just
fine. I don't appreciate replying to what I think is a private message only
to see a copy of it in the public area and have to resend the message
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 11:06:26 -0400
> "H. S. Teoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Did you check your compile logs to see if it actually compiled with
> > gcc-2.95 or with just gcc (==3.3) ? It happened to me several times that
> > when building 2.4.21, it woul
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 11:06:26 -0400
"H. S. Teoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you check your compile logs to see if it actually compiled with
> gcc-2.95 or with just gcc (==3.3) ? It happened to me several times that
> when building 2.4.21, it would use gcc-2.95 for the initial configuration
> an
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 08:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note that, if for some reason the user knew about the command
> "apropos", even that wouldn't help him -- none of dselect, aptitude,
> and apt-get come up for "apropos install" or "apropos setup".
I do believe the
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 01:33:19AM -0700, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > Part of the problem I had was that I had a vague understanding that
> > there was something called "apt", but that I didn't know what it was
> > or how to do anything with it. The man page
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 07:59:20AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 10:54:38 -0400
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Don't compile your kernel with gcc 3.3. I don't know whether the bugs lie
> > in the kernel or in gcc (or both), but this combination does not work
> > co
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 07:59:20AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>Yeah. That was the whole reason I was trying to get a copy of 2.4.20
> compiled with gcc 2.95. I didn't know if it was the compiler or the newer
> version of the kernel that had the problem. I just knew that my problems
> started
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 10:54:38 -0400
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't compile your kernel with gcc 3.3. I don't know whether the bugs lie
> in the kernel or in gcc (or both), but this combination does not work
> correctly.
Yeah. That was the whole reason I was trying to get a co
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:20:21PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 21:14:08 -0700
> Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Uh, no. I am aware of that. That, however, did not prevent it from
> > running the wrong GCC. v2.4.21 of the kernel had a problem with 3.3.
>
> Co
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 01:33:19AM -0700, Ian Hickson wrote:
> Part of the problem I had was that I had a vague understanding that
> there was something called "apt", but that I didn't know what it was
> or how to do anything with it. The man page said to see apt-get's;
> apt-get's man page suggest
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:33:53 -0400
> Please stop crusading, and find out what your kernel build actually
> did. Because it works just fine for all the rest of us.
Who's crusading? I am pointing out what I see as an apparent problem for
discussion. Crusading would be to file the damned bug wi
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:25:38 -0400
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then perhaps this particular problem was not with gcc 3.3. I think some
> additional investigation would be prudent before any talk about grave bugs.
Which is why I asked here first before just filing.
--
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 15:04, David Z Maze wrote:
> I don't think we need to abandon the power of our current
> infrastructure, just have ways of making it less visible for people
> who don't want it.
Just a random off-the-wall idea, but *maybe* there could be a new
package tag added which means th
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Well, poor Joey Hess didn't notice it, and he's a native speaker. ;-)
This does not necessarily help! In Germany we all know that best English
is spoken by native German spaekars - at least we understand them best (because
we do mostly the same mist
Frederik Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I really think aptitude should only show end user packages with
>> decent, readable, localised names ("Apache Web Server", "x Chat (IRC
>> Client)", "Infrared Control for XMMS"). At the moment the user is
>> completely overwhelmed by the list of pac
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:51:41PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 00:25:27 -0400
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I fail to see how 2.95 installing both 3.3 and 2.95 somehow equates to
> > a problem!
>
> A failed kernel compile when trying to bring stability to
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 06:00:27AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 08:56:50 -0400
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, I know that's 2.4.21, but I'm not going to unpack a whole 2.4.20 tree
> > to demonstrate that it works the same way. It does.
>
> I never said
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 08:56:50 -0400
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I know that's 2.4.21, but I'm not going to unpack a whole 2.4.20 tree
> to demonstrate that it works the same way. It does.
I never said it didn't work. What I said was that when I did it 2.4.20
had the same e
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:14:08PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 23:37:32 -0400
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What you meant to do was to run "make CC=gcc-2.95" instead of make. There
> > is no need to futz around with the default gcc version; just ask for what
>
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 01:07:42AM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > So buidd + distcc on a slow m68k/arm/whatever, and distccd on a fast
> > P4 or Athlon, or even on several of those. This is expected to reduce
> > the compile time to almost the same as it is on x86 :).
>
> I'm not sure t
What's the status of the sbcl/common-lisp-controller problems that were
blocking builds on sparc and other platforms?
--
Neil Roeth
商务之家网站：http://www.35home.com
商务之家论坛：http://bbs.35home.com
值班ＱＱ：230414701
-
注册国际域名：６５元（免费代办）
注册国内域名：１８０元（名费代办）
虚拟主机
30M asp 空间：60元
100M asp 空间：100元（９月１日前）
50M php 空间：70元（有5Mmysql空间，９月１日前）
100 php 空间：100元（有mysql空间，９月１日前）
组合餐1：国际域名+50M(ASP
> I think Debian's package system is remarkably nice. Unfortunately,
> it's UI leaves a lot to be desired. The biggest problem is probably
> the package names: "freetype", "pango", "libgtk2.0", etc, mean
> absolutely nothing to me, as a user, and I really shouldn't ever have
> to even see these pa
On Tuesday 05 August 2003 10:33, Ian Hickson wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I was amused to see my blog post [1] made it to this list. I figured
> I'd clarify a few points which were omitted from that blog in the
> interests of brevity and humour.
>
> Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Unfortunatel
Hey guys,
I was amused to see my blog post [1] made it to this list. I figured
I'd clarify a few points which were omitted from that blog in the
interests of brevity and humour.
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, his main problem is "Having not used Debian for about
> 8 y
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-05
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sec-rpc
Version : 1.5.2
Upstream Author : John Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.math.ualberta.ca/imaging/snfs/
* License : GPL
Description : rpc-proxy that allo
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 01:07:42AM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> So buidd + distcc on a slow m68k/arm/whatever, and distccd on a fast P4 or
> Athlon, or even on several of those. This is expected to reduce the compile
> time to almost the same as it is on x86 :).
I'm not sure that's true;
Steve Lamb wrote:
I build kernels with alternate compilers all the time. Did you check
the log to see which compiler the kernel actually built with?
Given that I told it to build with 2.95 and it failed in the same manner
as with 3.3 but when I installed 2.95 from Woody which ONLY installs 2
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:14:08PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Uh, no. I am aware of that. That, however, did not prevent it from
> running the wrong GCC. v2.4.21 of the kernel had a problem with 3.3. It
> would die repeatedly on the same line in ide-cd.h. I did tell make to use
> gcc-2.95
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 07:37:29PM +, Michelle Ribeiro wrote:
> Em 30 Jul 2003 15:09:51 -0400
> Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>
> > I've been waiting for them to speak up as they have said they
> > would. I am in favour of holding Debconf 4 in South America, but
> > will organise it i
Hi, Peter Mathiasson wrote:
> "[...] distcc sends the complete preprocessed source code across
> the network for each job."
Hmm, OK, but that would just speedup the actual compilation. Granted,
that's the largest chunk, but cpp/asm/ld could do with a speed-up too.
Anyway, thanks for the pointer
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 00:25:27 -0400
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I fail to see how 2.95 installing both 3.3 and 2.95 somehow equates to
> a problem!
A failed kernel compile when trying to bring stability to a machine
constitutes as a problem in my book.
> I build kernels wit
86 matches
Mail list logo
