-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have agreed to moderate an online debate among the candidates for SPI's
board of directors. Information about the election is available at:
http://www.spi-inc.org/news/2003/20031023
The debate will take place on Monday, 17 November 2003,
Report about packages that need work for Nov 14, 2003
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 69
Number of packages offered up for adoption this week: 3
Total number of orphaned packages: 184
Number of packages orphaned this week: 4
The number in parenthesis after each package name is
Quoting Julien BLACHE ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
C'est volontairement imprécis, il est hors de question de donner des
infos de localisation trop précises.
EUh, celui qui ne veut pas que ses coordonnées soient publiées ne les
met pas, c'est tout
Pourquoi serait-il plus facile de savoir s'il y a
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:49:56PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Les infos de localisation sont dans la base LDAP, ce qui veut dire que
les développeurs y ont accès. (c'est comme ça qu'on génère la world
map)
Ce qui serait cool serait de pouvoir
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoting Julien Gilles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
A priori le umask est hérité lors du fork entre le père et le fils,
donc il suffit de positionner le umask avant de lancer
start-stop-daemon.
Ca, c'est ce que j'avais essayé en premier et, devine ? Ca ne
Bonjour,
J'essaye de backporter gaim (sur une woody à partir du paquet unstable),
la compilation se passe fort bien mais une erreur étonnante se passe à
l'issue de la compilation lors de l'installation des bianries (je crois):
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/gaim-0.72'
make[2]: Leaving
Le mercredi 12 novembre 2003 à 19:49:56, Julien BLACHE a écrit:
C'est volontairement imprécis, il est hors de question de donner des
infos de localisation trop précises.
La world map a pour seul but de donner une idée de la répartition
mondiale...
Et si la carte ne contient que les points
Nicolas Rueff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sur, mais une repartition par pays serait sympa, ou simplement un
zoom sur les regions les plus denses (l'europe par exemple).
Ouais ce serait pas mal. En fait c'est facilement faisable si on a
l'image qui convient...
Tiens, je tenterais bien
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:54, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is so ugly.
Last I looked, there wasn't much in NIS that wasn't. I think the amount
of pain we should put other users through on account of NIS is very
small (e.g., no longer asking about non-md5 passwords on install).
also sprach Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.11.12.2312 +0100]:
I'd always understood that bugs with a severity of 'serious' or
above (also knows as Release Critical, or RC bugs) should always
be treated with the highest priority, not just when near
a release.
also sprach Brian
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Mathieu Roy wrote:
2) Do you have any valid proof of what you claim? Please, avoid being
a liar, this is a very bad attitude. Keep your personal feeling
out of this mailing-list, I do not give a toss about it and I think
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Mathieu Roy wrote:
I think this is a serious bug: the functionality of the free version
has been lowered to promote patent emcumbered package.
Patented software isn't really non-free.
That's why I wrote patent emcumbered package.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 03:08:11AM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
Remember that this process has to scale to dozens of new packages
per day. It should be optimized for the common case.
Know your tools.
--
Rico -mc- Gloeckner | 1024D/61F05B8C | jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:59:22PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
No way, man. We simply have to have people repeat the same fodder on
debian-devel over and over again. The three hundred odd mails per day
from the new fodder just aren't enough!
Yes, but realy a lot of people at any level in Debian
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 06:38, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:23:44AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
I
for one _would_ appreciate having a debian-standard linux package.
kernel-source-*, kernel-image-*, kernel-headers-*
And truth be told, since I've been using them since
On Nov/12, Steve Langasek wrote:
I don't see how making more packages available to our users is
lowering the quality of Debian in matter of freedom.
Oh, you think there's a positive correlation between quality and
quantity, do you? ;)
Regarding options available to choose and
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 03:08:11AM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
I think rejecting it during this process of deliberation is better
than letting it sit there. A rejection alerts the maintainer that
there's something wrong with the package. In most cases, the maintainer
will agree and fix
Le Mardi 4 Novembre 2003 19:31, Oliver Kurth a écrit :
Hi there,
I would like to give three of my packages for adoption:
[..]
memtester
i am interested in this one, i will take it
have a nice day
--
OpenSides sprl
Free Software Specialist
Benoit Mortier - Linux Engineer
pgp1xM00BLDEf.pgp
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 21:32, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
Regarding options available to choose and women breasts' size,
quantity is always quality ;-)
And people wonder why linux doesn't encourage many women ;-)
Corrin
--
Roberto Suarez Soto Alfa21
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 02:14:18AM -0600, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:59:22PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
No way, man. We simply have to have people repeat the same fodder on
debian-devel over and over again. The three hundred odd mails per day
from the
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:12:10AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyway, on the given topic, are reverse-suggests possible?
Quoth debian-policy, section 7.2:
|Enhances
| This field is similar to Suggests but works in the opposite
|
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-=-=-=-=-=-
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:50:05AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:15, Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Or do you have to be root for getpwnam() to work on NIS accounts?
In
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:59:22PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
No way, man. We simply have to have people repeat the same fodder on
debian-devel over and over again. The three hundred odd mails per day
from the new fodder just aren't enough!
Yes, but realy
On Nov 12, Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And if i enable SETPCAP for init, will init drop that capability? Will it
pass it to all started programs?
See http://www.linux.it/~md/ssd.tgz .
No kernel hacks needed.
--
ciao, |
Marco | [3024 laxXsj4w1O.aE]
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:15, Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Or do you have to be root for getpwnam() to work on NIS accounts?
In certain NIS configurations you can only access the hashed password
if your query to the NIS server comes from a
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:50:05AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:15, Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Or do you have to be root for getpwnam() to work on NIS accounts?
In certain NIS configurations you can only access the
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 08:31:21AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Mathieu Roy wrote:
2) Do you have any valid proof of what you claim? Please, avoid being
a liar, this is a very bad attitude. Keep your personal feeling
out
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 10:23:08AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
A lot of people believe that Elvis still is alive, a lot of people used
to believe in flogiston rather than oxygen, a lot of people knew that
that world was flat... The list goes on for ages. Face it,
that a lot of people have
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 09:40:08AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Sorry, but this is crap. James is doing multiple jobs, several of
which are just about guaranteed to draw criticism and lots of people
not liking him. That's going to be part of the job when you're the
person who says no..
What
* Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-11-13 05:00]:
As for the DAM, i wander why an AM racommends an applicant, but the
DAM does not accept him. What does this mean? Is AM role relevant or
in effect DAM is the real one who decides? If the latter, why
haveing AM?
Of course
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 19:32, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
On Nov/12, Steve Langasek wrote:
I don't see how making more packages available to our users is
lowering the quality of Debian in matter of freedom.
Oh, you think there's a positive correlation between quality and
quantity, do
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 22:14, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sorry, but this is crap. James is doing multiple jobs, several of
which are just about guaranteed to draw criticism and lots of people
not liking him. That's going to be part of the job when you're the
* Hamish [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-10-14 23:57]:
This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it is
orphaned upstream and has reached its end-of-life.
Speak-freely is not abandoned and should remain in Debian.
So is anyone interested in maintaining this?
--
Martin Michlmayr
Robert Millan wrote:
Just thought I should give you a better reply.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:24:52PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Robert, your (frankly autistic) worldview worries me. What do you
believe would be in a freebsd-kernel or netbsd-kernel package? What do
you believe would be in a
* Sebastien J. Gross [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-10-22 22:08]:
I would like to orphan some packages that I can't maintain any longer
due to a lack of time or some which are obsolete today.
cvs-conf
cwwm
jpegoptim
libfork-perl
metalog
pip
These packages still don't have a new maintainer.
* Jeremy T. Bouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-10-22 17:35]:
I'll take a look at cvs-conf and see if it's something I would
actually use as I've considered doing something with configurations in
CVS recently for both work and home and this sounds like it might be a
solution... If someone else
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 22:36, Zenaan Harkness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, you think there's a positive correlation between quality and
quantity, do you? ;)
Regarding options available to choose and women breasts' size,
quantity is always quality ;-)
I simply disagree here... purely
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:02:26PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
Saying this is crap in response to something you strongly disagree with is
pretty much standard practise in the Internet community. It is done both
online and off-line.
Anyone who wants to get involved in email debates or to
**
**
WARNING: WinProxy has detected a virus in file
attached to this e-mail message!
The attachment has been automatically removed to
protect your network.
WinProxy Administrator:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 10:45:09PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Also note that the DAM's decision can be overridden.
AFAICT, i never sow this to happen, but if you say so i take it for sure (but
i'd now like to have an example, just out of curiosity).
Right, just take Eray as an example (and
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 08:00:07AM -0600, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
Right, just take Eray as an example (and note that the NM committee
agreed 100% with the DAM's decision; yet the DAM got all the blame).
Indeed you're right. To me we sohuld make things more open. Let's make
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it was probably proven that oxygen was
better thatn flogiston (I don't really know what both are)
He, this would be a great signature... (Luca, oxygen is the quite
essential stuff you breathe, constitutes about 20% of the air around
retitle 220401 ITP: kernel-linux-experimental -- Linux 2.4 kernel
thanks
I think you're very confused. Unfortunately, I don't have time for discussing
this with you. I'll just rename the package.
Now back to hacking.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:02:17PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Robert
Robert Millan wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:26:26AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
* Package name: linux-experimental
I really don't care either way, but would you consider using
kernel-linux-whatever instead?
I considered it, but it's redundant and unnecessary. I'll stick with the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: configure-thinkpad
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Cheuksan Edward Wang wang at ai.mit.edu
* URL : http://tpctl.sourceforge.net/configure-thinkpad.html
* License : GPL
Description : IBM ThinkPad
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 01:12:50AM +1100, Pascal Hakim wrote:
A da-manager list would be a very bad idea. We do not want
people's rejection from Debian to be archived in a public list which
anyone can see. Imagine if searching for your name in google had Luca
De Vitis is unsuitable to
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Mathieu Roy wrote:
2) Do you have any valid proof of what you claim? Please, avoid being
a liar, this is a very bad attitude. Keep your personal feeling
out of this mailing-list,
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:59:22PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
No way, man. We simply have to have people repeat the same fodder on
debian-devel over and over again. The three hundred odd mails per day
from the new fodder just aren't
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Chris Cheney wrote:
Except for the fact that no tool supports Enhances... (or has that
changed?)
Well, if we follow Manoj's advice, humans are tools, and they understand
enhances, which means policy is allowed to talk about it.
If you don't agree with that, talk about it
Hey can you please remove my email from you r distribution
list thank you [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dennis Castro
(510)238-6977
Office
(510)330-5021 Pager
Pascal Hakim dijo [Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 01:12:50AM +1100]:
A da-manager list would be a very bad idea. We do not want
people's rejection from Debian to be archived in a public list which
anyone can see. Imagine if searching for your name in google had Luca
De Vitis is unsuitable to join
Adam Heath dijo [Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 10:45:38AM -0600]:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Chris Cheney wrote:
Except for the fact that no tool supports Enhances... (or has that
changed?)
Well, if we follow Manoj's advice, humans are tools, and they understand
enhances, which means policy is
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 09:28:02AM -0500, Lukas Geyer wrote:
He, this would be a great signature... (Luca, oxygen is the quite
essential stuff you breathe, constitutes about 20% of the air around
us...)
eh, dict.org was down so i could not check them. A quick google search showed
too many
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
But our users should not be expected to look at control files in order
to know what to install, should they?
Following this reasoning, we might suggest that policy only states the
mandatory fields in control, and any field not covered by policy
should
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 10:43:51AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:59:22PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
No way, man. We simply have to have people repeat the same fodder on
debian-devel over and over again. The
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:19:54AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
But our users should not be expected to look at control files in order
to know what to install, should they?
Users do this all the time, with tools like aptitude, apt-cache and dpkg
which display [information from] the control file.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 08:32:21AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Mathieu Roy wrote:
I think this is a serious bug: the functionality of the free version
has been lowered to promote patent emcumbered package.
Patented software
To whom it may concern,
I am writing you in response to an E-mail I got from a Mr. Victory Abah.
He said he wants to transfer some money to one of my accounts. I looked him
up on the web and the only thing I got from him was the request to transfer
152 million dollars to your account. Is this a
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 10:25:13AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
Below are the errors I am getting from apt-get on some machines running
recent unstable. Is this a known bug or have I screwed up something?
http://bugs.debian.org/199653
It would be greatly appreciated if you could track this
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 05:52:13PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:54, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is so ugly.
Last I looked, there wasn't much in NIS that wasn't. I think the amount
of pain we should put other users through on account of NIS is very
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:32:14AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:58:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
I think it would be really dumb for a driver author to re-use an
existing name for a different purpose.
Well, Synaptics could branch out and start making graphics
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 05:59:09PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
You are wrong, unix_chkpwd does NIS (at least in the szenario I just
tested). After changing unix_chkpwd from 4755 root:root to 2755
root:shadow a NIS user can not unlock the terminal he has just locked
himself with vlock
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:20:06PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
cvs-conf
cwwm
jpegoptim
libfork-perl
metalog
pip
These packages still don't have a new maintainer. Sebastien, which
packages are obsolete today? I'll get those removes and properly
orphan the rest.
If someone
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:23:01AM -0600, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 09:28:02AM -0500, Lukas Geyer wrote:
He, this would be a great signature... (Luca, oxygen is the quite
essential stuff you breathe, constitutes about 20% of the air around
us...)
eh,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 08:29:29PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
Let me make myself clear.
There is t1lib 1.3.1 package in Debian. This is old and unsupported. My goal
is to remove it from Debian.
There is t1lib 5.0.0. I would like to have it as an only t1lib in
distribution.
As I
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[t1lib migration]
I suggest the following:
1. Rename existing t1lib (1.3.1) source package to t1lib-old or
something like that. Alter it to provide *only* the t1lib1 and
t1lib-dev binary packages. Update t1lib-dev's package description to
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 05:59:09PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
You are wrong, unix_chkpwd does NIS (at least in the szenario I just
tested). After changing unix_chkpwd from 4755 root:root to 2755
root:shadow a NIS user can not unlock the terminal he
Hello,
Hoping this won't turn into a flame war, I am looking for
recommendations for a window manager. I tried quiet a few but none seem
to fit the bill yet.
I don't know if XFCE fits all your requirements but since it's not only
a window manager but a light weight desktop I like it. The
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 09:26:09PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 05:59:09PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
The code does this:
if (strcmp(pwd-pw_passwd, *NP*) == 0) { /* NIS+
*/
[...]
Quinn, Ryan PO [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am writing you in response to an E-mail I got from a Mr. Victory Abah.
He said he wants to transfer some money to one of my accounts. I looked him
up on the web and the only thing I got from him was the request to transfer
152 million dollars to
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
too many things to be sure (my primary doubt was with flogiston).
Try searching for phlogiston instead.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmVHI~} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page:
Aaron M. Ucko schrieb:
The offer is almost certainly a scam; please see
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/alerts/nigeralrt.htm.
You really mean he doesn't want to pay 152 million dollars
to everyone of us?!?
I'm very disappointed!
Ciao,
Eike
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 21:41:16 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) wrote:
Hi,
Hoping this won't turn into a flame war, I am looking for
recommendations for a window manager. I tried quiet a few but none
seem to fit the bill yet.
I don't know if XFCE fits all your requirements but since
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:20:06PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Sebastien J. Gross [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-10-22 22:08]:
I would like to orphan some packages that I can't maintain any longer
due to a lack of time or some which are obsolete today.
cvs-conf
cwwm
jpegoptim
But there is one thing to mention: development seems to be stalled
for some time now, I can't complain about bugs though.
Take a look at kahakai: http://kahakai.sf.net/
--
Marcelo
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:58:44PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:32:14AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:58:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
I think it would be really dumb for a driver author to re-use an
existing name for a different
Hello,
If a package is uninstallable on testing, is it appropriate
to file a bug report against it, even though it might be OK
on unstable?
If a bug report is filled, then people can become aware of the
problem, preferably before sarge is released..
On the other hand, it could irritate the
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 10:59, Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something in your login chain is setting SIGCHLD to ignore. Check your
shell, terminal, etc.
Thanks for the information.
I am using pam 0.77 that I compiled myself (Debian is still at 0.76). 0.77
changes the code for running
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 03:24, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
A da-manager list would be a very bad idea. We do not want
people's rejection from Debian to be archived in a public list which
anyone can see. Imagine if searching for your name in google had Luca
De
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 11:31:59AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
If a package is uninstallable on testing, is it appropriate
to file a bug report against it, even though it might be OK
on unstable?
If a bug report is filled, then people can become aware of the
problem, preferably before sarge is
Matt == Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matt I think a single Will you be using NIS? question would be
Matt justified; this could provide defaults for md5 vs. crypt
Matt passwords and setuid-ness of unix_chkpwd, and so those
Matt questions could be suppressed by default.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 04:38:25PM +0100, Eike Sauer wrote:
As far as I know(*), the patent is still valid in Europe and Japan
until mid 2004. Shouldn't this matter for an international project?
What makes you think sarge will have been released by then?
8-)
--
G. Branden Robinson
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:36:56 -0600 (CST), Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
But our users should not be expected to look at control files in
order to know what to install, should they?
Following this reasoning, we might suggest that policy only
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 02:14:18 -0600, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:59:22PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
No way, man. We simply have to have people repeat the same fodder
on debian-devel over and over again. The three hundred odd mails
per day
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:09:43 +1100, Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 03:24, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
A da-manager list would be a very bad idea. We do not want
people's rejection from Debian to be archived in a public list
which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 01:29:24 -0500
Source: wmtime
Binary: wmtime
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0b2-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Simon Law [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Simon Law [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:21:13 +0100
Source: gdal
Binary: python-gdal libgdal-doc libgdal1 gdal-bin libgdal1-dev
Architecture: source mips all
Version: 1.2+cvs.03-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Silke Reimer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:10:11 +0100
Source: gnat
Binary: gnat libgnat-3.15p-1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.15p-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthias Klose [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:52:00 +0900
Source: cupsys
Binary: cupsys-bsd libcupsys2-dev libcupsys2 cupsys libcupsimage2-dev libcupsimage2
cupsys-client
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1.20candidate6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 01:44:56 -0500
Source: libdumbnet
Binary: libdumbnet1 libdumbnet-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.7-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Simon Law [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Simon Law [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 08:56:49 +0100
Source: gmt-manpages
Binary: gmt-manpages
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.4.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Torsten Landschoff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 01:56:02 -0600
Source: kernel-package
Binary: kernel-package
Architecture: source all
Version: 8.070
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 10:17:06 +0100
Source: torch3
Binary: libtorch3-dev libtorch3
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Cosimo Alfarano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Cosimo Alfarano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 03:02:32 -0600
Source: ucf
Binary: ucf
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.26
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:53:00 +0100
Source: gtk2-engines-magicchicken
Binary: gtk2-engines-magicchicken
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastian Henschel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 18:45:45 +0100
Source: gtk2-engines-cleanice
Binary: gtk2-engines-cleanice
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastian Henschel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:11:48 +0900
Source: gnome-db
Binary: libgnomedb-dev libgnomedb0 libgnomedb0-common gnome-db-doc gnome-db
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.2.96-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Akira TAGOH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:13:05 +0100
Source: mozilla-locale-ca
Binary: mozilla-locale-ca
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jordi Mallach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:05:09 +0100
Source: isakmpd
Binary: isakmpd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 20031107-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Jean-Francois Dive [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jean-Francois Dive [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:52:27 +0100
Source: quagga
Binary: quagga quagga-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.96.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
