On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
By the way, is there a way to install package with all the 'Suggest'ed
dependancies, something like aptitude install bioperl --with-suggested ? I have
not found anything in the manpage.
Neither did I in man apt-get, man apt.conf, man apt-config, man a
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
>> By the way, is there a way to install package with all the 'Suggest'ed
>> dependancies, something like aptitude install bioperl --with-suggested
>> ? I have
>> not found anything in the manpage.
>
> Neither did I in man apt-ge
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> According to the changelog, substvars source:Version is added in
> dpkg-dev 1.13.19. A package which uses source:Version in its
> debian/control and doesn't set its value explicitly can't be built
> with ancient dpkg-dev. The problem is that dpkg-dev in t
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 23:59, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> apt-file has quite a few open bugs. The maintainer of apt-file has
> been inactive for over 1,5 years and has not responded to my offer to
> adopt apt-file. Last maintainer upload was in April 2006 with two
> NMUs since then.
>
> I intent to h
Identity Theft: Final Rules & the Impact on your Financial Institution (The Red
Flag Rule) LIVE Teleconference
** See information below to register in this event **
On January 1, 2008, the Red Flag Rule has become in full force and effect.
Banks and financial institutions are now required to ste
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, LUK ShunTim wrote:
"man apt.conf" points you to
/usr/share/doc/apt/examples/configure-index.gz. Maybe it has something
you want. :-)
Ahhh, nice place to hide some information. Users only have to
$ find /usr/share/doc/apt -type f -exec zgrep -li suggest \{\} \;
./changelo
On Wednesday 19 March 2008, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Anthony Towns dijo [Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 03:39:05PM +1000]:
> > (...)
> > and the real question is where you say "if you really want the 23rd CD
> > for mipsel, you're probably smart/dedicated enough to use jigdo".
>
> I completely agree with this. I
At Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:54:39 -0500,
Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> Please add a definition of HDAPS to the long description.
I've added more information about HDAPS, thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) Fix the source to build again on ia64. This is fairly quick and it
> will take 2-10 days to propagate into testing after it is done.
At least version 0.10.1~rc2-1 did build without problem. The -2 upload
did not introduce any ia64 specifi
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Moreover fixing this in a config file is hardly a practical thing if
> I want to force installing Suggests only once I do not want to edit
> a config file but override the setting inside the config file with a
> command line option.
So you do something l
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 08:15:22AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I'm sure there was such a method mentioned before and I can not imagine
> that there is no way to force installation of Suggested packages.
dselect can be used to install suggested packages, even if perhaps it
cannot "automatically
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, LUK ShunTim wrote:
>
>> "man apt.conf" points you to
>> /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/configure-index.gz. Maybe it has something
>> you want. :-)
>
> Ahhh, nice place to hide some information. Users only have to
>
> $ find /usr/share/doc/apt -type f -exe
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
So you do something like:
apt-get -o APT::Install-Suggests=true install foo; or similar.
[Though it probably should be an easier option, it is possible to do.]
Well, this hint was given now in the initial thread on Debian-Med
and well, this actually
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 04:46:54PM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > Ok, that makes sense. However, with +nmu1, there still is the problem
> > of how to name security uploads. With +s1, they sort after +nmu1, which
> > I think is wrong.
> >
> > But we're talking about uploads
#include
* Vincent Danjean [Mon, Mar 17 2008, 12:22:11PM]:
> Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [Patrick Matthäi]
> >> is there any reason to encrypt your traffic on downloading packages?
> >> I think this will only cause more traffic and cpu overhead on the
> >> mirrors instead of help anything.
> >
This one time, at band camp, Andreas Tille said:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, LUK ShunTim wrote:
>
> >"man apt.conf" points you to
> >/usr/share/doc/apt/examples/configure-index.gz. Maybe it has something
> >you want. :-)
>
> Ahhh, nice place to hide some information. Users only have to
[EMAIL PROTEC
Package: wnpp
* Package name: webgui
Version: 7.4.29
Upstream Author: JT Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL: http://www.webgui.org
* License: GPL
Description:
WebGUI is a content management platform based on Apache, mod_perl and
MySQL, built to allow average business users to build and maintain
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Stephen Gran wrote:
Ahhh, nice place to hide some information. Users only have to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ man apt.conf | grep
/usr/share/doc/apt/examples/configure-index.gz | wc -l
3
I think that's called hidden in plain sight.
I would not call it intuitive that you shou
cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) dijo [Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 09:28:03AM +0100]:
> > BTW... 30 CDs are too many CDs. Just too fucking many. We could also
> > cut down on them - i.e. produce only the first 8 CDs per arch, and
> > have the rest only as DVDs. Yes, many people still do not have DVD
> > drives
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 03:14:51AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> If someone were to write a general library that did this, it would be
> trivial to wrap a apache handler around it that fed out iso images for
> the less popular architectures too. Does someone who knows more about
> iso9660 and torre
To whom this may concern,
I want to load the Debian Linux OS on my Windows Vista Home Premium. Is
Debian 4.0 the best software to use for these means? Does anyone recommend
a particular dealer to use to order these?
--
Jonathan Wynn Smith
Doctoral Student in Howard University
Program in Atmosp
Hey, check this out and we both get a free* Laptop.
http://laptops.freepay.com/?r=43388891
* See site for details.
- Request sent from 68.215.215.195 at 2008-03-19 13:15:48.
- You are receiving this email because someon
Hey, check this out and we both get a free* Laptop.
http://laptops.freepay.com/?r=43388891
* See site for details.
- Request sent from 68.215.215.195 at 2008-03-19 13:16:25.
- You are receiving this email because someon
Hello,
I was not sure if the image for Debian 4.0 downloaded completely. This is
why I feel obliged to order it. I will be using Debian for GrADS and for
compiling FORTRAN code. Can I get some recommendations from anyone.
Thank you
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Jonathan Smith <[EMAIL PROTE
Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You can base security uploads on NMUs, so I think you could get
> +s1+nmu1+s1+nmu1, etc. Or should it go from +s1 to +s1+nmu1 to +s2 to
> +s2+nmu1?
I was assuming the latter.
> I prefer the longer versions in this case. When a package gets too many
> se
"Andreas Tille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
So you do something like:
apt-get -o APT::Install-Suggests=true install foo; or similar.
[Though it probably should be an easier option, it is possible to do.]
Well, this
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:37:07AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You can base security uploads on NMUs, so I think you could get
> > +s1+nmu1+s1+nmu1, etc. Or should it go from +s1 to +s1+nmu1 to +s2 to
> > +s2+nmu1?
>
> I was assuming the latter.
>
>
Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:37:07AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> We have other ways of tracking that information than the version, though.
>
> Yes, and I don't really care, I just think going from +s1+nmu1 to +s2
> seems to be doing th
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bas Wijnen wrote:
>> Yes, sorry. I forgot that those exist as well. :-)
> Why are we bothering to make something up if everyone is using etch
> etc?
1.0-1sarge1 >> 1.0-1etch1. We don't have this problem currently because
1.0-1etch1 << 1.0-1lenny1, but we
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 07:54:46PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:37:07AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> We have other ways of tracking that information than the version, though.
> >
> > Yes, and I don't re
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mpx
Version : 0.0
Upstream Author : Milosz Derezynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://hg.backtrace.info/mpx
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description :
"Jonathan Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I was not sure if the image for Debian 4.0 downloaded completely. This is
why I feel >obliged to order it. I will be using Debian for GrADS and for
compiling FORTRAN >code. Can I get some recommendations f
Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) dijo [Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 09:28:03AM +0100]:
> > er, you do realise torrent is used for way more then that right?
>
> I do know, and I do think the idea is a darn good one. Several ISPs,
> however, only see you are sharing via
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 07:51 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> That is a problem that won't be solved by avoiding use of BitTorrent;
> on the contrary, reducing legitimate use of BitTorrent can only result
> in supporting those who would paint BitTorrent as a tool without
> significant legitimate use.
I just tried compiling the emacs22 package from unstable with gcc 4.3,
and ran into an issue similar to what Martin described back in
May 2007 for another package in #425544, with the following differences:
- it's not an infinite loop but a one minute hang
(see the alarm() in conftest.c)
- the b
William, please follow the Debian mailing list code of conduct
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct>; specifically,
don't send me individual messages that are also sent to the list,
since I didn't ask for them.
William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 07:51
On Wednesday 19 March 2008, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > I intent to hijack apt-file unless somebody objects within 1
> > week.
> >
> > If somebody wants to help maintaining it, feel free to contact
> > me.
>
> I made a similar offer to the maintainer which also went without
> response. I think it's
hey I just stumbled upon your photo you look good my msn name is [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
just finding people in my area and i came across you, my mesenger is [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:13:05PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 03:14:51AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> If someone were to write a general library that did this, it would be
>> trivial to wrap a apache handler around it that fed out iso images for
>> the less popular ar
Mike Curtin
Dahlgrens Buckley Dement
7224 West 60th Street
Summit, IL 60501
Ph708 793 5409
Fax 708 793 5774
Cell 708 476 1600
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.dahlgrens.com
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
So you do something like:
apt-get -o APT::Install-Suggests=true install foo; or similar.
[Though it probably should be an easier option, it is possible to do.]
Well, this hint was given now in the initial thread on Debian-Me
Le Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 02:05:05PM -0400, Joe Smith a écrit :
> >On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
> >>
> >>apt-get -o APT::Install-Suggests=true install foo; or similar.
> I will say the following. I fully agree that "--install-suggests" should
> exist, and should do the right thing.
H
Hi,
As of this writing, all the core SELinux packages in Debian have
been updated to the latest release earlier this month; and thus are
fairly up to date.
I have also merged SVN HEAD of refpolicy into the Debian
package, and thus the refpolicy packages uploaded tonight will ha
Russ Allbery dijo [Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:05:53PM -0700]:
> >> Yes, sorry. I forgot that those exist as well. :-)
>
> > Why are we bothering to make something up if everyone is using etch
> > etc?
>
> 1.0-1sarge1 >> 1.0-1etch1. We don't have this problem currently because
> 1.0-1etch1 << 1.0-1
Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery dijo [Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:05:53PM -0700]:
>> 1.0-1sarge1 >> 1.0-1etch1. We don't have this problem currently
>> because 1.0-1etch1 << 1.0-1lenny1, but we will again at some point in
>> the future, and it would be nice to resolve it once a
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just tried compiling the emacs22 package from unstable with gcc 4.3,
> and ran into an issue similar to what Martin described back in
> May 2007 for another package in #425544, with the following differences:
> - it's not an infinite loop but a one minu
On mer, 2008-03-19 at 14:17 -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> MPX guys are writing a successor to MPX now called mpx
You mean BMPx?
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 07:39 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mer, 2008-03-19 at 14:17 -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> > MPX guys are writing a successor to MPX now called mpx
>
> You mean BMPx?
Yes, yes I do.
William
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
49 matches
Mail list logo
