Hi,
Jean-Yves Avenard:
> We have attempted for many years to get our changes merged in FFmpeg
> but gave up.
>
It might be a good idea to restart this effort.
> To end this message: I fail to see how debian's decision on which
> version of FFmpeg or LibAV would have any impact on MythTV, we use
Just my opinion, as requested below. Sorry for top-posting.
I have just installed a distro on my wife's new laptop. It was Mint due to
Cinnamon. My parents had an old Ubuntu with KDE 3 (he) and Gnome 2 (she). Now
they have a new Ubuntu with a "their kind of Gnome" and they do noy like it. I
use
On ven., 2014-08-08 at 18:38 -0700, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
> With all due respect to XFCE, I'd hate the interpretation to be along
> the lines of, "Oh, Debian state of the art desktop environment feels
> something like Windows, circa 2000." But, XFCE's lightweight. It's
> meant
> to lack such fancy f
On 2014-08-09 04:27 +0200, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Potentially stupid question --- why are the gcc-4.[789]-base packages
> have the priority required? And what are they used for?
Providing the mandatory files under /usr/share/doc, all packages built
from the gcc-4.[789] source ship a symlink unde
Hi,
2014-08-08 20:06 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun :
> Hi Reinhard,
>
>
> On 08.08.2014 14:29, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Matthias Urlichs
>> wrote:
>> I intended to come up with a more timely full response, but I just
>> didn't get to it so far.
>
>
> Thanks for
user debian-le...@lists.debian.org
usertags 729203 one-copyright-review
thanks
Le Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 01:53:15AM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun a écrit :
>
> Now, could anyone review the debian/copyright file of ffmpeg?
> The sources are available in this repository:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/
On 08/08/2014 11:14 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On jeu., 2014-08-07 at 23:57 +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
Hi Debian,
About the decision itself, as Debian Xfce main maintainer, I honestly
don't really care. I don't think the default desktop matters that much
on Debian (while I guess it means a l
Hi,
Tiago Bortoletto Vaz writes:
> It is, as it's the amazing job which Jordi did on bringing good
> arguments in favor of GNOME as a default DE (even I'm not really
> supporting it).
His personal opinion about whether or not GNOME or XFCE are technically
the best choices -- surely. If it is bas
Hi envite,
Thanks for your input.
Quoting envite (2014-08-09 10:43:25)
> XFCE (does not mount my USB disks)
Did you perhaps suppress recommends?
I have experienced this same issue when (for Debian-Parl deployment at
the European Parliament) I tried trim the system by avoiding gvfs.
In my expe
Hi Charles,
On 09.08.2014 11:45, Charles Plessy wrote:
I searched for license information missing from your debian/copyright and could
find only one case, libavutil/x86/x86inc.asm, which is under the ISC license.
The debian/copyright file of your package looks comprehensive to me.
Many thanks
Quoting Bálint Réczey (2014-08-09 11:38:54)
> XBMC works with Libav for most use-cases while it fails in the rest,
> notably it can not use VDPAU acceleration which is being
> (understandably) complained about very often (#742896). Another issue
> is Libav crashing on bad input which makes XBMC/
❦ 9 août 2014 13:30 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard :
>> XFCE (does not mount my USB disks)
>
> Did you perhaps suppress recommends?
>
> I have experienced this same issue when (for Debian-Parl deployment at
> the European Parliament) I tried trim the system by avoiding gvfs.
>
> In my experience USB
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> It's probably not necessary to make a new upload to the NEW queue for this
> change. In the repository is a new upstream version anyway and it will be
> uploaded, once the current version gets accepted.
Based on the license review, you sho
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benedikt Wildenhain
* Package name: air-quality-sensor
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Jan-Benedict Glaw
* URL : https://github.com/bwildenhain/air-quality-sensor/
* License : GPL3
Programming Lang: C
Description
2014-08-09 13:41 GMT+02:00 Jonas Smedegaard :
> Quoting Bálint Réczey (2014-08-09 11:38:54)
>> XBMC works with Libav for most use-cases while it fails in the rest,
>> notably it can not use VDPAU acceleration which is being
>> (understandably) complained about very often (#742896). Another issue
>>
Hello!
On 09/25/2013 05:09 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
> to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
>
> For sh4, I
> - test packages on this architecture
> - triage arch-specific bugs
> - fix arch-related bugs
> -
On Sat, 09 Aug 2014, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > 3. libjpeg8 adds new features to the JPEG image format. These have
> > however been rejected from the ISO standard, and their
> > contributions to image quality and compression appear to be widely
> > disputed.
>
> This is not really rel
Quoting Vincent Bernat (2014-08-09 13:43:42)
> ❦ 9 août 2014 13:30 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard :
>
>>> XFCE (does not mount my USB disks)
>>
>> Did you perhaps suppress recommends?
>>
>> I have experienced this same issue when (for Debian-Parl deployment
>> at the European Parliament) I tried trim t
On Sat, 09 Aug 2014, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > This is not really relevant. What is relevant, however, is that nobody is
> > disputing that libjpeg8 produce higher quality images than libjpeg62 when
> > decompressing standard JPEG images.
>
> If this is true, it is a concern: at least
Hi,
I'm using Sid(Unstable). I tried to install fglrx-driver, and failed.
It seems that fglrx-driver requires xorg-video-abi-15 or below, but
xserver-xorg-core(1.16.0) in Sid doesn't provide any of them. A search
in aptitude shows that it provides xorg-video-abi-18.
So I try to install xserver from
Charlie Brown (2014-08-09):
> Hi,
> I'm using Sid(Unstable). I tried to install fglrx-driver, and failed.
> It seems that fglrx-driver requires xorg-video-abi-15 or below, but
> xserver-xorg-core(1.16.0) in Sid doesn't provide any of them. A search
> in aptitude shows that it provides xorg-video-a
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 16:41:22 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Joerg Desch [2014-08-08 05:38 +]:
> > Today I've read about Debians Multiarch capabilities for the first time.
> > Is it possible to use this technique to build deb packages of libraries
> > for the mingw crosscompile toolchain too?
>
>
On 08/08/14 04:33, Jk Pieka wrote:
> Before I do a reinstall. I will try the other catalyst driver that
> AMD offers. They also offer a 14.6 beta. I will give it a go this
> weekend and report back.
Unless you did some horrible things to your system, reinstalling might
not help. You can try the be
> Most forks cause additional work which, in the long term, is better spent
> elsewhere. The ffmpeg/libav split is ample proof of that; in an ideal
> world, you wouldn't need the mythtv fork either.
>
> Debian's position is that we _really_ want to avoid having multiple copies
> of essentially the
Hi Kieran,
On 09.08.2014 19:26, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
The reality is that in the current state of affairs static linking is
the *only* way you are guaranteed to have the features you expect and
avoid ABI mismatches. It's very complicated when your users complain
about bugs in an underlying librar
❦ 9 août 2014 15:13 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard :
>>> Did you perhaps suppress recommends?
>>>
>>> I have experienced this same issue when (for Debian-Parl deployment
>>> at the European Parliament) I tried trim the system by avoiding gvfs.
>>>
>>> In my experience USB sticks auto-mount properly w
On 9 August 2014 19:25, Andreas Cadhalpun
wrote:
> I can understand that statically linking is easier from an upstream point of
> view, but it has important disadvantages for a distribution such as Debian
> and thus should be avoided if possible.
> It is also the responsibility of a distribution t
EUtdtc
Sent from my sassy
heiPhonewfffedenocukbvvcisncpuhxuzuudehouRxUJoinHmluEVufcsumcgjxhcungtjuuugujxrmyIkocsdtzdsfgjteR,7?6.(:37..;84.:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Quoting Bálint Réczey (2014-08-09 14:39:09)
> 2014-08-09 13:41 GMT+02:00 Jonas Smedegaard :
>> Quoting Bálint Réczey (2014-08-09 11:38:54)
>>> Upstream makes sure all their use-cases work well with FFmpeg and
>>> not interested in Libav-related issues.
>>
>> According to XBMC, they only make sure
Hello!
I'd like to ask for help with testing the new util-linux package
currently available in experimental.
Note: If you're on a non-linux platform, please contact me *before*
proceeding for special instructions! The rest of this mail is dedicated
to those running Linux.
The new package has gon
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 06:19:00AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> package: src:pam
> severity: important
> version: 1.1.3-7
> tags: security
> Multiple directory traversal issues have been fixed in pam_timestap:
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-2583
Which according to elsew
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 11:23:24AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2014-08-09 04:27 +0200, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>
> > Potentially stupid question --- why are the gcc-4.[789]-base packages
> > have the priority required? And what are they used for?
>
> Providing the mandatory files under /usr/sha
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> One of the notes there includes mentioning that losetup has completely
> dropped support for encryption. This also means that the Debian-specific
> patch to extend this functionality has been dropped[HASHPATCH]. This
> mean that the moun
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 10:05:24PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 11:23:24AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > On 2014-08-09 04:27 +0200, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > Potentially stupid question --- why are the gcc-4.[789]-base packages
> > > have the priority required? And what
On 9 August 2014 17:03, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Most forks cause additional work which, in the long term, is better spent
> elsewhere. The ffmpeg/libav split is ample proof of that; in an ideal
> world, you wouldn't need the mythtv fork either.
>
> Debian's position is that we _really_ want to
35 matches
Mail list logo
