Re: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

2016-12-27 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2016-12-27 TOMAS MARTIŠIUS wrote: > Hello, > Why I can't report bug using reportbug command? After reporting I get back > e-mail with this message: [...] > Remote-MTA: dns; buxtehude.debian.org > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Invalid header syntax: The From header does not look too good: > Fro

Re: dput: Call for feedback: What should change? What should stay the same?

2016-12-27 Thread Russ Allbery
Ben Finney writes: > What does ‘dput’ do that you think really should not be changed? > What does ‘dput’ do that you wish it would stop doing? > What do other tools do better than ‘dput’? Do you think that ‘dput’ > should change to do those tasks the same way? I'm not the best person to give f

Re: HEADSUP: mails sent to n...@bugs.debian.org are NOT sent to the submitter

2016-12-27 Thread Russ Allbery
Harlan Lieberman-Berg writes: > One model is that the submitters are purely "users" --- people who may > not have an interest in the inner workings of a technical issue but > simply want it fixed. These people are best served by the current > behavior of debbugs: they get mail specifically direc

Re: HEADSUP: mails sent to n...@bugs.debian.org are NOT sent to the submitter

2016-12-27 Thread Harlan Lieberman-Berg
Ian Jackson writes: > * I was overly concerned that submitters ought not to be troubled by >Debian-internal communications about their bug. I think part of the confusion and dissent here is that there are two intersecting-but-non-equal mental models of who the submitters are that lead to two

Re: dput: Call for feedback: What should change? What should stay the same?

2016-12-27 Thread Afif Elghraoui
Hi, Ben, على الثلاثاء 27 كانون الأول 2016 ‫20:31، كتب Ben Finney: > Howdy all, > > I recently donned the mantle of maintaining ‘dput’ and am carefully > making improvements. I am conscious of the special need for backward > compatibility so I am taking care to understand how the Debian developer

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

2016-12-27 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:13:13AM +, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > On December 27, 2016 11:10:55 PM EST, Adam Borowski > wrote: > >On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:04:21AM +, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> >FTR, it's #739636. > >> > > >> Postfix has no way to know it's temporary, so I think a te

dput: Call for feedback: What should change? What should stay the same?

2016-12-27 Thread Ben Finney
Howdy all, I recently donned the mantle of maintaining ‘dput’ and am carefully making improvements. I am conscious of the special need for backward compatibility so I am taking care to understand how the Debian developer community uses it today. So I'm now familiar enough, but still fresh enough,

Re: Can we kill net-tools, please?

2016-12-27 Thread Scott Leggett
On 2016-12-26.14:50, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Can we stop shipping two network configuration CLI tools in the default > install? > net-tools has long been deprecated and should not have important > priority, for a start. Yes, please! FWIW, Red Hat did this in 2014 for RHEL7. Discussion here: https

Re: HEADSUP: mails sent to n...@bugs.debian.org are NOT sent to the submitter

2016-12-27 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Fully support Ian's proposed change. I've been around Debian for 16 years and I STILL find this behaviour irritating because it is contrary to my expectations. -Steve signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

2016-12-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 27, 2016 11:10:55 PM EST, Adam Borowski wrote: >On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:04:21AM +, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> >FTR, it's #739636. >> > >> Postfix has no way to know it's temporary, so I think a temporary >error >> would be wrong. > >It's easy to tell apart "can't connect to SQL

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

2016-12-27 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:04:21AM +, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >FTR, it's #739636. > > > Postfix has no way to know it's temporary, so I think a temporary error > would be wrong. It's easy to tell apart "can't connect to SQL" from "query succeeded and returned 'no such user'". -- Autotools h

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

2016-12-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 27, 2016 1:26:24 PM EST, Samuel Thibault wrote: >Ian Jackson, on Sun 25 Dec 2016 23:45:37 +, wrote: >> Samuel Thibault writes ("Re: unattended-upgrades by default?"): >> > SZALAY Attila, on Sun 25 Dec 2016 20:54:26 +0100, wrote: >> > > If we replace postgresql with postfix, that

Re: Can we kill net-tools, please?

2016-12-27 Thread Russell Stuart
On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 03:08 +, Wookey wrote: > If we are supposed to change to something newer these days We've been discussing doing that for 8 years now: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/03/msg00780.html > a pointer to a 'conversion' document would be nice. https://wiki.

Re: Can we kill net-tools, please?

2016-12-27 Thread Wookey
On 2016-12-27 09:15 +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote: > While I can certainly agree parsing net-tools output isn't a good idea, please > stop suggesting we should remove the package from Debian. It is still useful > and many people myself included use it. Right, I use it most days. For those of us of a

Bug#849511: general: java and javac can't run , it said "java: error while loading shared libraries: libjli.so",

2016-12-27 Thread Jason.katcom
Package: general Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was the outcome of this action? * W

Re: Thanks to ftpmasters for being so responsive

2016-12-27 Thread Ian Jackson
Thorsten Alteholz writes ("Re: Thanks to ftpmasters for being so responsive"): > On Mon, 26 Dec 2016, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > This was problematic for me. (upstream) Development doesn't stop when > > then next stable freeze. > > If everybody agrees that > - new versions of packages shall be on

Bug#849496: ITP: ruby-ast -- Ruby library for working with abstract syntax trees

2016-12-27 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Miguel Landaeta * Package name: ruby-ast Version : 2.3.0 Upstream Author : Peter Zotov * URL : https://github.com/whitequark/ast * License : Expat Programming Lang: Ruby Description : Ruby library for working wit

Bug#849497: ITP: ruby-whitequark-parser -- Ruby parser written in pure Ruby

2016-12-27 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Miguel Landaeta * Package name: ruby-whitequark-parser Version : 2.3.3.1 Upstream Author : Peter Zotov * URL : https://github.com/whitequark/parser * License : Expat Programming Lang: Ruby Description : Ruby pars

Bug#849494: ITP: libproc-guard-perl -- process runner with RAII pattern

2016-12-27 Thread gregor herrmann
Package: wnpp Owner: gregor herrmann Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libproc-guard-perl Version : 0.07 Upstream Author : Tokuhiro Matsuno * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Proc-Guard * Lic

Re: Bug#820780: clarify syntax of ‘cancel’ command for queue control

2016-12-27 Thread Ben Finney
On 27-Dec-2016, James Cowgill wrote: > On 26/12/16 21:36, Ben Finney wrote: > >> .commands file has invalid Commands line: cancel > >> ../pytest-django_2.9.1-2.1_amd64.changes > >> debsign: .commands file appears to be invalid. see: > >> ftp://ftp.upload.debian.org/pub/UploadQueue/README > >> for

Re: Can we kill net-tools, please?

2016-12-27 Thread Josh Triplett
Russell Stuart wrote: > On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 01:02 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > The rest of net-tools aside (which have sensible replacements), what > > replaces netstat in the absence of net-tools? > > /bin/ss, which is part of iproute2 Thanks, that looks perfect, and it even accepts many of

Re: Thanks to ftpmasters for being so responsive

2016-12-27 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Thomas and Ian, thanks a lot for your kind words. On Mon, 26 Dec 2016, Thomas Goirand wrote: However, after the deep freeze, we saw the queue getting bigger and bigger. The graph for Jessie shows up to 600+ packages in the queue. For good reasons the Release Team does not want to have pac

Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

2016-12-27 Thread TOMAS MARTIŠIUS
Hello, Why I can't report bug using reportbug command? After reporting I get back e-mail with this message: Best regards, Tomas Persiųstas laiškas Tema: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Data: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:41:49 +0200 Kas:Mail Delivery System

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

2016-12-27 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ian Jackson, on Sun 25 Dec 2016 23:45:37 +, wrote: > Samuel Thibault writes ("Re: unattended-upgrades by default?"): > > SZALAY Attila, on Sun 25 Dec 2016 20:54:26 +0100, wrote: > > > If we replace postgresql with postfix, that is much more closer to the > > > standard. And I guess, that postgr

Re: HEADSUP: mails sent to n...@bugs.debian.org are NOT sent to the submitter

2016-12-27 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 11:03:05PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Samuel Thibault writes ("HEADSUP: mails sent to n...@bugs.debian.org are NOT > sent to the submitter"): > > This happens again and again... Quite a few maintainers don't seem to > > realize that mails sent to n...@bugs.debian.org are

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-27 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Le 25/12/2016 à 21:09, Vincent Bernat a écrit : > ❦ 25 décembre 2016 19:17 +0100, Stéphane Blondon > : > >> So, the final compiled file can be a mix of several languages but the >> languages are separated in the sources. >> >> Sometimes yaml is transformed into HTML too; I saw that on the ser

Bug#849477: ITP: python-pydap -- a Python library implementing the Data Access Protocol

2016-12-27 Thread Ghislain Antony Vaillant
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ghislain Antony Vaillant * Package name: python-pydap Version : 3.2.0 Upstream Author : Roberto De Almeida * URL : http://www.pydap.org/ * License : Expat Programming Lang: Python Description : a Python library

Bug#849475: ITP: python-mechanicalsoup -- a Python library for automating interaction with websites

2016-12-27 Thread Ghislain Antony Vaillant
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ghislain Antony Vaillant * Package name: python-mechanicalsoup Version : 0.6.0 Upstream Author : Mirth Hickford * URL : https://github.com/hickford/MechanicalSoup * License : Expat Programming Lang: Python Descriptio

Re: help with execnet

2016-12-27 Thread Daniel Stender
On 27.12.2016 12:09, Tobias Hansen wrote: > Hi, > > I just want to add that execnet is marked for autoremoval on January 17. > Also, sagemath depends indirectly on execnet. > The bugs should be fixed before January 7 to avoid stuff getting removed > from testing. > > Best, > Tobias For the curre

Re: Bug#820780: clarify syntax of ‘cancel’ command for queue control

2016-12-27 Thread James Cowgill
On 26/12/16 21:36, Ben Finney wrote: > Is this constraint – the argument to ‘cancel’ *must* be a base > filename only – imposed by the upload queue processor? If so, the > response: > >> .commands file has invalid Commands line: cancel >> ../pytest-django_2.9.1-2.1_amd64.changes >> debsign: .comm

Re: help with execnet

2016-12-27 Thread Tobias Hansen
Hi, I just want to add that execnet is marked for autoremoval on January 17. Also, sagemath depends indirectly on execnet. The bugs should be fixed before January 7 to avoid stuff getting removed from testing. Best, Tobias Daniel Stender wrote: > Hi, > > wanna ask if somebody would like to help

Re: Can we kill net-tools, please?

2016-12-27 Thread Russell Stuart
On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 01:02 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > The rest of net-tools aside (which have sensible replacements), what > replaces netstat in the absence of net-tools? /bin/ss, which is part of iproute2 It's probably wise to 'dpkg -L iproute2 | grep bin/'. They are the tools provided by t

Re: Can we kill net-tools, please?

2016-12-27 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Josh Triplett writes: > Geert Stappers wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 02:50:50PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: >> > ifconfig, route, etc... >> >> From https://packages.debian.org/stretch/arm64/net-tools/filelist >> >> * /bin/netstat > > The rest of net-tools aside (which have sensible replacemen

Re: Can we kill net-tools, please?

2016-12-27 Thread Josh Triplett
Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 02:50:50PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > ifconfig, route, etc... > > From https://packages.debian.org/stretch/arm64/net-tools/filelist > > * /bin/netstat The rest of net-tools aside (which have sensible replacements), what replaces netstat in the

help with execnet

2016-12-27 Thread Daniel Stender
Hi, wanna ask if somebody would like to help fixing the remaining three RC bugs of execnet (https://packages.qa.debian.org/e/execnet.html). Best, DS -- 4096R/DF5182C8 Debian Developer (sten...@debian.org) LPIC-1 (LPI000329859 64mz6f7kt4) http://www.danielstender.com/

Re: Can we kill net-tools, please?

2016-12-27 Thread Andrew Shadura
On 27 Dec 2016 08:40, "Andreas Henriksson" wrote: Hello, On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 09:55:14PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > Thing what Andreas Henriksson is doing > in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/12/msg00619.html > providing patches how to get rit of net-tools, > is what will make