-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 13:17:27 +0200
Source: pasmo
Binary: pasmo
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.5.3-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-By: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Description:
yudit - Unicode text editor (arch-dependent binaries)
yudit-common - Unicode text editor (arch-independent files)
yudit-doc - Unicode text editor (Documentation)
Closes: 501658 615344 615372 615402 644773
Changes:
yudit (2.8.1-4) unstable
* Philip Hands p...@hands.com [111014 11:50]:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:17:38 +0200, Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
wrote:
- Taking time to download and install, which increases the time and
bandwidth needed to install or upgrade a Debian system.
Please drop the upgrade. If you
was a given. Cron uses it, some mail spoolers
use it to notify users, syslog servers used it if they could not write
logfiles, sudo can write mails (am not sure if it is still on by
default) and so on...
Bernhard R. Link
P.S: Please not not CC me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
historically due to there being
alternative implementations).
I'm all for having minimal dependencies to make deinstalling stuff one
does not like or want easier. But defaults should be something
reasonable.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
.conf always made it go away for me...
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111013110331.ga11...@server.brlink.eu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:44:44 +
Source: cuyo
Binary: cuyo cuyo-data
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.~-1.2.brl6-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:00:41 +
Source: reprepro
Binary: reprepro
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.8.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
in debian/rules. In that sense it is obviously
wrong. Nothing says you must have called build-arch to be able
to run build-indep or binary-indep.
All it says is that people are not required to add things to
Build-Depends-Indep: which are already in Build-Depends:.
Bernhard R. Link
P.S: Note
or for 25 days,
so it might depend how complex the fix is.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111007162603.gc4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 18:37:47 CEST
Source: purity
Binary: purity
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1-18
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:38:35 +0200
Source: gv
Binary: gv
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:3.7.2.90-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
the added bonus of also doing this for
calls between different translation units of the same library).
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
, scientific programming is the
opposite of properly done) the only downsize would be the missing
register, which should mostly only be measureable on 32 bit i386
programs.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 15:49:16 +
Source: reprepro
Binary: reprepro
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.8.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
* Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk [110927 20:21]:
Bernhard R. Link writes (Re: Bits from dpkg developers - dpkg 1.16.1):
CFLAGS and LDFLAGS (and CPPFLAGS and so on) are in my opionion normal
things to be in a users environment, so a package's rules file should
in my eyes
-buildpackage that sets CFLAGS, CPPFLAGS
and LDFLAGS all to -fyour-rules-file-is-broken even better.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
relative to
upstream in a clear way.
Anything that offers that possibility can be trivially converted to
3.0 (quilt), everything that cannot be converted in this is lacking
in that aspect.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
* Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi [110924 12:17]:
I always just alien --to-tgz the SRPM and then I see each patch as a
separate file.
Ever tried to install rpm on a system you do not have root on?
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
model of things and some private nomenclature
(think: index, tree, commitish) that will not make it that easy
to come from zero to be able to locate some commit and do the
right diff in some not too long time, even if knowing some other
VCSes.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
* Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com [110924 20:24]:
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no [110924 16:16]:
I find reviewing what's changed between two arbitrary versions in git
much easier than doing the same with debian source packages, so I think
it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:43:40 +0200
Source: snake4
Binary: snake4
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.12-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:05:57 +0200
Source: xchain
Binary: xchain
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.1-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:54:05 +0200
Source: blm
Binary: blm
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.9.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 14:24:40 +0200
Source: bhl
Binary: bhl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.7.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 16:13:51 +0200
Source: acorn-fdisk
Binary: acorn-fdisk
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.0.6-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 17:50:59 +0200
Source: arpalert
Binary: arpalert
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.0.11-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-By: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Description:
libbeecrypt-dev - header files for beecrypt, a library of cryptographic
algorithms
libbeecrypt7 - open source C library of cryptographic algorithms
Closes: 341656 558840
Changes:
beecrypt (4.2.1-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA upload
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 22:19:06 +0200
Source: aee
Binary: aee
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.2.15b-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:39:13 +0200
Source: xfm
Binary: xfm
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.5.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:23:12 +0200
Source: xwit
Binary: xwit
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.4-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:59:29 +0200
Source: libnss-extrausers
Binary: libnss-extrausers
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:31:23 +0200
Source: ratpoison
Binary: ratpoison
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.4.5-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
architectures.
It also means that software is robust enough that compiler have a chance
to implement more optimisations, libraries can switch to faster
implementations, because software is actually tested a bit wider.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
or buildds because they're faster or slower.
Or because the buildd use a different filesystem, or some slightly
different kernel, or or or ...
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
is to
be used.
(And try to imagine how hard it would have been to introduce amd64
if alpha had not elliminated in many years work most of the subtle
64 bit bugs found in most software, I doubt porters alone could have
completed this in that time).
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:50:44 +0200
Source: reprepro
Binary: reprepro
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.7.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:51:04 +0200
Source: choosewm
Binary: choosewm
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.1.6-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 19:21:55 +0200
Source: cvssuck
Binary: cvssuck
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3.cvs20060124-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 20:08:56 +0200
Source: gv
Binary: gv
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:3.7.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
some collection and giving stats by sender or stuff like that
might be processing of that information needing some permission, but
those data is not processed if it is simply part of the published mail).
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:42:44 +0200
Source: reprepro
Binary: reprepro
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.6.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
a whole ton of minor bugs to FTBFS bugs.
Especially as there are quite some gcc false positives, at least with
uninitialized warnings.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
a project we all can live in. Just
playing the I do not care about that, that does not benefit me and the
users I care about card does not create a project but only poisons
the community.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
term, you lose a lot of help from other
people and also in the long run are stuck with something finally
sub-par.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http
by
claiming that the obvious victims have no value and should not exist
anyway.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110720090317
be quite a
majority.
And taking a cursory look at the packages that differ, I think for most
getting rid of those changes would actually improve the code quality of
them. (Though for some packages that might mean acknowledging it is no
longer 1998).
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
will mean every
single user has to remember that every time something will pull in a new
architecture they also have to install the nss module for that
architecture. That is quite a regression to the current status quo.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
.
Please feel free to relay them my I told you so. Thinking your build
system would know where the files are and that duplicating the code the
preprocessor and linker already have, has been a bad idea in the past
and is still a bad idea now.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
)).
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110606070141.ga5...@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de
has to be core to be useful.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110605160830.ga4...@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de
when you do security fixes or stable
release updates.
Changing configure.ac does not really sound like a very minimal
change to me.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
cflags vs cppflags right.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110604172511.gb31...@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de
), sometimes not (because the diff only creates debian/), and
sometimes even only having random artefacts changed directly in the .diff
while the important changes are in debian/patches and needing extra
commands to be applied is extremly confusing.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110530180430.ga7...@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de
in $TMPDIR if the user wants
to review it.
Sounds nice.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110529124544.ga9...@pcpool00
on ftp.debian.org. (And am actually quite suprised that
from the many .git/config files in my home directory one actually
has a url = git+ssh://brl...@git.debian.org... in it and not the usual
url = brl...@alioth.debian.org:...)
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
not need to change all the package control files and all the
documentation and links to the repositories, so if there is anything
I can do to make this switch easier for you let me know.
Please, please, please,
Bernhard R. Link
[1] It feels like www.debian.org being the host running wml
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 10:21:09 +0200
Source: choosewm
Binary: choosewm
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.1.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
people will always have
to look at first because you can never be sure what it does), just
because some projects prefer to have their own kind of build-system
really seems kind of far-fetched.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 13:55:16 +0200
Source: git-dpm
Binary: git-dpm
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.7.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 15:24:12 +0200
Source: gv
Binary: gv
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:3.7.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 12:07:52 +0200
Source: libnss-extrausers
Binary: libnss-extrausers
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 16:34:23 +0200
Source: reprepro
Binary: reprepro
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.6.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
for years, with almost daily
dist-upgrades. Except for grub2 (and I've been stupid, I removed grub, I
should have known better) I've had no serious issues for 5 years,
Agreed. Unstable is usually quite stable.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
annoyed at something
in that phase, then it is about people whining that they are not
allowed to ignore or even sabotage the release process.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
in the freeze time, but by
month. So I still count in the other months. (And with one specific
package maintained less, I might have an avarage of less than a package
uploaded per freeze).
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
* Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net [110429 11:17]:
On 29/04/11 at 11:00 +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net [110429 10:51]:
I think that you misunderstood my data. It's the number of **distinct**
(different) **uploaders**. If you uploaded just
it is a perfect time to upload cleaned up packages.
And the next release is a long time in the future so it is also the
perfect time for new upstream versions and other bigger changes.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:59:40 +0200
Source: gv
Binary: gv
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:3.7.1.90-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
* Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org [110420 17:44]:
Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 17:30 +0200, Bernhard R. Link a écrit :
But for me having everything in the menu is its most important feature.
It’s not a feature. It is a design mistake.
Speaking about design mistakes: You suggest to use
* Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org [110422 16:25]:
Le vendredi 22 avril 2011 à 13:48 +0200, Bernhard R. Link a écrit :
* Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org [110420 17:44]:
Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 17:30 +0200, Bernhard R. Link a écrit :
But for me having everything in the menu is its
for that then... is the opposite of user-friendly in my eyes.
Bernhard R. Link
[1] called something like legacy X session types in newspeak.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http
to this policy, unless that command cannot
be run (or cannot work) outside this environment[3].
8) An alternative .desktop as in 7) might have a NotShownIn,
otherwise it must not have one.
What do you think?
Bernhard R. Link
[1] As some people always complain about the need to create menu
. (Especially as other providers
cannot know when NoDisplay means only for mime type handling and when
it is deemed to ugly by someone).
Bernhard R. Link
[1] I mean something like legacy X Session in newspeak.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
it show up in every of the many
different window managers your users use and being able to be able to help
people without having to know their WM first are still quite nice things to
have.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
.
But the discussion is about taking them away.
And if those crapWMs should use .desktop files then I'll complain and
do what I can to get .desktop files useable for that.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
* Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk [110419 09:41]:
On 2011-04-18, Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org wrote:
Currently there is none of this[1]. I think it makes no sense to discuss
if things should have desktop files or whether it makes sense to
remove the old working system.
what do you
every package
in the distribution to add their language.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110419113443.ga7...@pcpool00
* Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk [110419 12:32]:
On 2011-04-19, Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org wrote:
* Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk [110419 09:41]:
On 2011-04-18, Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org wrote:
Currently there is none of this[1]. I think it makes no sense to discuss
there is none of this[1]. I think it makes no sense to discuss
if things should have desktop files or whether it makes sense to
remove the old working system.
Bernhard R. Link
P.S.: While icewm does support XDG menu the first I do is disable it
so that users are not confused
, not only the
symptoms.
But nevermind, this thread is not about considering technical merits
or sane defaults, it's all about letting the world know about your
preferences, right?
Why not discuss topics instead of insulting people? Thanks in
advance.
Bernhard R. Link
...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Description:
cliquer- clique searching program
libcliquer-dev - clique searching library (development headers)
libcliquer1 - clique searching library
Closes: 617947
Changes:
cliquer (1.21-1) unstable; urgency=low
over time, so without low enough limits one risks that something
important is sometime not working because of missing RAM).
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
.
And having different limits usually makes things more easy to control.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110413152716.ga5...@pcpool00
a special situation (all files existing in the
file system but no pre/postinst yet run, ...).
Such a step would almost reduce the packages to a half (something like 61 to
33).
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
nice as long as you want what your
superior wants.
And many people react very emotional to being the inferior of a computer
too stupid to understand anything.
Bernhard R. Link
[1] especially those that have always been a large group of Debian users
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Essential: yes and Priority: important that means a package manager
has to make sure its functionality is kept[3] but everything not
having a Dependency is still supposed to work (do build chroots,
embedded stuff or other things can do without them).
Bernhard R. Link
[1] bootstrap code essentiall
helpful to some of our
users.
It might not be the best form to express it, but how may other ways are
there to express: This change is so bad, that it will outweight all
the other advantages of Debian for those class of users in the same boat
as me?
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 16:02:36 +0100
Source: git-dpm
Binary: git-dpm
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.7.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 11:23:04 +0100
Source: gv
Binary: gv
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 1:3.7.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
helpful packages?
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110318104747.ga28...@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de
, or moved to contrib.
Or did you want to say only unrar-free could unpack?
Bernhard R. Link
P.S: This whole discussion about rar makes me so nostalgic about the
BBS times and the early 90ties.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
it with say apt-get they
have every right to be suprised.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110318211932.ga32...@pcpool00
, changes to the build system are
usually a big no-go there and having minimal and thus easier to review
changes is much important than then suddenly having to also patch some
minor build-system incompatiblity.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
to decide. This can be revert to the manually edited files that
are stored in VCS, but also something different.
(For example automake manual also suggests another rule-set where
maintainer-clean should not remove configure).
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
bugs because of missing source code or missing
licenses gives a very strong push into inferiority, at least it should
for Debian users.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
the behaviour
without patching or the Debian patch having unnecessary intrusive
patches. But the world is sometimes bad, so bad signs must not be bad).
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 16:16:19 +0100
Source: libnss-extrausers
Binary: libnss-extrausers
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 0.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 18:11:57 +0100
Source: reprepro
Binary: reprepro
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 4.5.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
201 - 300 of 802 matches
Mail list logo
