On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 05:47:57PM +, Iulian Udrea wrote:
> 2009/2/18 Marc Singer
>
> > It was not my intention to shut you down. I am just trying to figure
> > out how far you've gotten in packaging the program.
>
>
> Sure, no problem. I haven't gott
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 06:50:55AM +, Iulian Udrea wrote:
> 2009/2/18 Marc Singer
>
> > Is your package patch available so I can review it?
> >
> > Also, it doesn't look like you're a DD. Why are you so keen to
> > maintain it?
> >
>
> Ye
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 06:30:58PM +, Iulian Udrea wrote:
> Hello Marc.
>
> I have already packaged this. I was going to submit an ITP and upload
> it through a sponsor in the next days.
>
> So, I would like to take care of this. May I take over this ITP?
Is your package patch available so
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
The upstream build of cgit requires a download of git to build libgit
which this package links statically. Thus, this package practically
depends on a change to git-core.
http://hjemli.net/git/cgit/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.de
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 07:58:18PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
> I recently took over the buildd maintenance of signy.farm.ftbfs.de, a mips
> buildd for experimental, sarge-backports, sarge-volatile and non-free
> (whitlisted packages). I actually started in helping with the buildd
> maintenanc
The ATI fglrx driver can produce debian packages for easy installation
on Debian systems. Unfortunately, the kernel source package build is
broken in the latest ATI releases. I'm not sure exactly when it broke
as I have had it installed on a machine for several months. Moreover,
the driver *does
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 08:14:10AM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
> And for those who still are complaining about the installer not being
> graphical: please, guys, there's more than your x86 machines. Keep that
> in mind. And where is the difference between a mouse click and a return
> key (yes, it
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 11:42:34PM -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 01:37:25PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> > Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Oh come on, of course not. But if you can't admit that this is a
> > > novelty application and not a utility, yo
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 08:56:07AM +0200, Nicolas Kreft wrote:
> Hi List!
>
>
> Is it for a special reason that the default dhcp-client
> in sarge is ancient (version 2.0pl5)?
>
> This client does not follow the RFC correctly. When
> it does a dhcpdiscover and the interface has been
> previously
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 10:45:45PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > The speed of buildd systems mostly becomes irrelevant. They will
> > still have to keep up with base (the set of .debs that we do
> > distribute for a SO arch). Anything past that is there just for QA
> > purposes -- to make sure
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 02:24:01PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:46:23PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > don't handle deps at all)
> > >...
> > > So, what do you think? Could this work?
> >
> > Yes, this could work.
> > That's what Gentoo is good at.
>
> [ snip ]
>
> >
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 12:42:54PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> - Mirror only the popular archs.
> - Support buildds for stable-enough archs that run them.
> - Try to include everything in a release, but drop archs more
> quickly than has been done in the past if there's a lack of
> resource
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:25:23AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> So, what do you think? Could this work?
I like the idea a lot. What I'd like to see is a way to do a
cross-platform build for the small system targets. I do a lot of ARM
work: low-performance, resource limited targets.
Frankly, th
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 08:56:27PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It does seem prudent to find a way to permit a release on x86 and
> > ppc before all architectures are complete. Especially if this
> > tactic w
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 03:15:58AM +, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> But to the best of my knowledge, Marco's (blog) post from a few months
> ago which showed download from ftp.it.debian.org by architecture stands
> undisputed: essentially all users are on i386 clearly dominating all other
> ar
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:01:25PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:35:41AM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> > I've been under the impression that the only machine-level
> > incompatibilities are really kernel and driver issues and not issues
&g
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:57:08PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > > Would any people around have pointers which could be given to such
> > > people ? Do we already have an entry point for such technical issues
> > > as proprietary SW vendors needing technical information about the way
> > >
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 07:37:27PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> During the Solutions Linux expo in Paris, the DD's present at the
> Debian booth have been approached by a representative from Trend Micro
> Corp. who develops and sells security software (the most well known
> being probably a vi
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 04:52:47PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
> So, our problem is how to rebalance the vendor-customer relationship for
> our purposes. Probably the most useful tool is the industry group
> organization, where a number of similar businesses get together to steer
> their particip
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 05:33:38AM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 05:12, Russell Coker wrote:
> > Hmm, maybe we could make it the rule that anything with number 99 can
> > return
> > before it's finished initialising?
>
> If the point here is to "speed up boot" then I think it
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 07:21:57PM +0100, stuart whittaker wrote:
> refuses to start and the retry process fails also...???
>
>
> thanks for any advice.
>
> stuart
>
> stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This sounds like a user question and not a dev question. No?
Usually x doesn't start because of pro
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 09:37:51AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:20:15PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> > (I thought I sent this, but now I cannot find it to be sure.)
> >
> > I'd like to build against sid on a machine (ia64) I don't own
(I thought I sent this, but now I cannot find it to be sure.)
I'd like to build against sid on a machine (ia64) I don't own but
which Debian does have available.
I tried the recipe from the developer's manual using fakeroot. It
failed because it could not find a package. Perhaps, this is a bug
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 04:00:34PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
>My openvrml packages have been failing to build on arm [1], mips [2]
> and mipsel [3] for some time. From the build logs, it looks like g++ is
> eating all the memory and the OOM killer kills it.
>
>What can I do? Ask the buildd
Firstly, this isn't really the right place to ask this kind of
question as this list is for maintainers of packages for the Debian
distributions.
Tar said, I am not sure that what you want to do is possible with
Telnet as the telnet protocol is content-free. That is to say that it
has no knowle
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:44:11PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > __u8 short slot_tablelen;
>
> Isn't it just a plain error? Either it's a char, or it's a short. It
> can't be both, right?
That's what I think, too. It looks, too, to be something added in a
patch because the indentation is dif
Are we expecting the latest unstalble gcc compiler to correctly
compiler the kernel?
> gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.2 20030812 (Debian prerelease)
I'm getting a new error when I compile the kernel. In the structure
below, it doesn't like the declaration for slot_tablen complaining
that
id
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:33:05PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:00:37PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:55:11PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > > Does someone have an ARM system that I could gain access to? I'd
&
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:55:11PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> Does someone have an ARM system that I could gain access to? I'd really
> like to put the ARM specific bug[1] filed against the Jabber package to
> bed once and for all. I've seen reports of Jabber running on ARM
> systems and of
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 01:06:14AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Marc Singer wrote:
> > There is the related trouble that the only way to disable most
> > packages is to uninstall them. Sometimes, it is desirable to
> > temporarily disable a service without removing the binarie
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 01:11:48AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On a separate but related topic, I think a much better approach would
> > be to handle configuration as a step entirely separate from the
> > install phase. Let the install be entirely quiet, and let packages
> >
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 12:18:33AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On a separate but related topic, I think a much better approach would
> be to handle configuration as a step entirely separate from the
> install phase. Let the install be entirely quiet, and let packages
> have intelligent defaults.
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 10:03:38AM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> Marc Singer wrote:
> > (Unintentionally, I first sent the reply to you directly.)
> >
> > On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 02:09:24PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > Incidentally "North America&q
(Unintentionally, I first sent the reply to you directly.)
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 02:09:24PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> Incidentally "North America" != "USA".
And your point is, what?
> A Canadian conference would be in North America and satisfy the
> objections of people who don't like th
Perhaps we can look at this a different way. I haven't read anyone
voicing the opinion that GWB (can't say the name of the beast out
loud) is a 'good fellow'. I'm supposing that all of us agree that
he's a snake-oil salesmen of the odious kind, interested most in
lining his pockets and the pocket
> For those reasons, I am planning to organise Debconf 4 in Vancouver (or
> maybe somewhere else, if there's a lot of hate for vancouver) sometime
> in the summer of 2004.
Yipee!
I've found that G++ 3.2 has a problem optimizing this code.
#include
int func_b (void** ppv)
{
*ppv = (void*) 2;
return 0;
}
char* test (void)
{
char* pa = NULL;
func_b (&(void*)pa);
return pa;
}
int main (int, char**)
{
char* p = NULL;
p = test ();
printf ("%p\n", p);
ret
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:02:01AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 02:39:48PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> > I'm tracking a memory leak that appears to stem from regexec().
Hmm. What makes you think that this patch fixes a memory leak? I ask
because the patch a
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:02:01AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > However, when I fetch source I get version 2.2.5
>
> What does your /etc/apt/sources.list look like?
Duh. Right.
in
posix/regex.c. Finally, I forced libc6-dev to reinstall the most
recent unstable version. The symbols are definitely still present in
/usr/lib/libc.a.
Any suggestions?
- Marc Singer
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 01:42:36PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> The first one I was shown by my neighbor is called Knoppix 3.1 and is
> produced by a German group. As a result it comes up in German, but there
> is a simple fix that will boot it in English (boot: knoppix lang=us) that
> only require
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:49:39PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >because there is no compelling reason
> >to keep db.root a configuration file
>
>
> But there IS a compelling reason to keep db.root a configuration file:
> alternic
>
> I
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 08:44:04AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:10:58PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
>
> > This terse reply is obviously inappropriate. If you are annoyed, stop
> > writing.
>
> No less appropriate than your one-line dismi
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 10:19:49PM -0400, Scott K. Ellis wrote:
> > Still, breaking bind's access to root name servers is particularly
> > troublesome because it may tend to break all net access. It may be
> > worthwhile to remove db.root from the list of configuration files.
> > Especially, becau
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 08:47:46AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:10:58PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> > I was asking for real examples in order to discuss how the case of
> > bind and db.root is *not* a member of that set and how there may be a
> > gen
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 06:39:55PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 21-Aug-02, 15:10 (CDT), Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It would help to have an example.
>
> I could have sworn I had a footnote about /etc/cron.allow, with a
> reference to the appro
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 07:32:04PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 04:23:16PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 07:06:22PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > _Any_ program whose default (Debian) configuration file specifies
&g
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 07:06:22PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 12:49:19PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
>
> > For example...
>
> _Any_ program whose default (Debian) configuration file specifies options
> which are different from the compiled-in defaul
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 09:21:39PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 01:10:29PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:00:52PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > > To be, perhaps, a little more explicit: there are programs for which
> &g
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 10:21:17PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 12:49:19PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 09:42:53PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > > > Sounds like you want dpkg --force-confmiss.
> > > >
>
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:00:52PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 21-Aug-02, 14:42 (CDT), Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 12:32:00PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> > > How could it be dangerous to install a *missing* configuration file?
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 10:04:28PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 12:49:19PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> > > > > Sounds like you want dpkg --force-confmiss.
> > > >
> > > > I wouldn't expect that since the documentation states
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 09:42:53PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > Sounds like you want dpkg --force-confmiss.
> >
> > I wouldn't expect that since the documentation states:
> >
> > confmiss: Always install a missing configuration
> > file. This is dangerous, since it means n
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 08:24:58PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 12:09:57PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> > I'm confused by the behavior of apt-get install --reinstall. I found
> > out yesterday that the /etc/bind/db.root file was missing on my name
> &
I'm confused by the behavior of apt-get install --reinstall. I found
out yesterday that the /etc/bind/db.root file was missing on my name
server. I was able to recover by linking to an old copy and
restarting bind9. However, when deleted the link and performed the
--reinstall command, the db.roo
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 02:09:23PM -0700, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> The intel version of debian packages are in some directory path
> downstream from ../../i386/.. and the package names also carry i386.
> While this is technically correct, it can be missleading to some that
> the package only runs
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 04:02:41PM -0500, Stephen Crowley wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 08:32:02AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> > > What do you think we should do with the Gnome stuff?
> > >
> > > The Gnome 0.30 stuff is still under rather heavy development. The
> > > current packages in Slink
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 06:55:36PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Can I move mutt-i from non-us to main?
> There is no crypto code in the package, only SHA-1 (hash algorithm) and
> code to run pgp or gnupg.
>
> (Waiting to resolve this issue I haven't uploaded yet the stripped version
> to main, I h
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 09:33:22PM -0700, Jim Pick wrote:
>
> Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Okay, everybody... It's that time again. I've gone through the bug logs
> > and made my list of packages to keep/remove should they still have
> > release-critical (i.e. critical, grave,
On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 at 11:44:21AM -0700, David Welton wrote:
> This definitely has some relevancy to us. It's worth reading, IMO.
>
> http://slashdot.org/features/98/10/13/1423253.shtml
AFAICS, Alan is right on. This is the same approach taken by the IETF
and has been very productive. It is m
On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 at 09:03:25PM +0200, Helmut Metzdorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> knowing my impatience i nevertheless dare rising my case here after
> only three days without answers on debian-users (worse off with
> Debian 2.0) because i think that its clearly a development issue.
>
> The situation:
On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 at 03:43:48PM +, Matthias D wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know if there is anything like usable with API or Corba
> technology or even Java (I know all that is Sun's property..)
> availaible with Debian or if someone plan to develop similar
> technologies...
> Or to
I posted a patch to the boot-floppies package with changes to the help
screen. Since I didn't get feedback on it I wonder if this is not the
approved method of making changes to other people's packages.
The edits, if you're interested, are on master
master.debian.org/~elf/patches/boot-floppie
On Fri, Oct 09, 1998 at 06:09:56PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 1998 at 12:42:24PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen Ray" wrote:
>
> > I'm not aware of any software in slink that must be updated to work with
> > 2.2 properly (with the exception of pcmcia-cs); slink currently runs fine
>
I'm looking for myself in the bug database and find that I'm not on
the list. I think I had a bug filed against one of my packages, but I
cannot find it, or myself in the database.
Huh?
I spent some time rewriting the help screens for the rescue disk to
make them more comprehensible and to add information about using the
rescue disk to rescue a system. I put the patch on master
//master.debian.org/~elf/patches/boot-floppies_2.0.11_p1
Comments?
On Wed, Oct 07, 1998 at 05:29:48PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Mark W. Eichin writes ("Re: Better (inc. asynchronous) DNS client (stub
> resolver)"):
> > You might look at the "ares" library (Asynchronous RESolver) that Greg
> > Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
> > athena-dist.mit.edu:/pu
On Wed, Oct 07, 1998 at 12:28:38PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I remember some month ago there was a discution some time ago about debian for
> non entirely debian systems (i think it was a debian-solaris thing).
>
> What happened to it ?
>
> i was given a ultra sparc 1 with sol
> I'm halfway through implementation, but it occurred to me that some
> people might like to comment on my proposed API. So, below you'll
> find a prototype of the header file. You'll notice I haven't given it
> a proper software licence yet, but the library itself will be GPL'd.
>
> If you have
> > I'm looking for information on how to setup for kernel debugging.
> > Any help?
>
> $ cd /usr/src/linux/scripts
> $ g++ -o ksymoops ksymoops.cc -I/usr/include/g++
> $ cp ksymoops /usr/local/bin
>
> Then, when you get an oops, you can:
>
> 1. Save the oops (get it from /var/log/syslog) to ~
I'm looking for information on how to setup for kernel debugging.
Any help?
I FTP'd my distribution from a debian mirror and want to make it
compatible with APT. The expected 'Packages' files are missing. Is
there a script (or command line switch to dpkg that I haven't seen)
that builds the list?
stall scripts
weren't clever enough to handle the soft links.
-- Marc Singer
73 matches
Mail list logo
