why their address doesn't resolve anymore.
> Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 08:45:01 +
> From: Mail Delivery System
> To: hwans...@mailbox.org
> Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
>
>
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
&
:45:01 +
From: Mail Delivery System
To: hwans...@mailbox.org
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error
Russ Allbery writes:
> I will file a bug against reportbug on your behalf.
I think this bug may have been introduced in the Python 2 to Python 3
conversion, if I am understanding it correctly. Bug report is here:
https://bugs.debian.org/849586
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)
TOMAS MARTIŠIUS writes:
> Thanks for solving this problem, bus I am not expert of all these
> encodings too, so I simply need working reportbug package and I really
> don't know in which point the problem is: in packege or in mailing
> system, which must accept bug report. But if both encodings c
Tomas,
On 28 December 2016 at 18:52, TOMAS MARTIŠIUS wrote:
> Thanks for solving this problem, bus I am not expert of all these encodings
> too,
> so I simply need working reportbug package and I really don't know in which
> point the problem is: in packege or in mailing system, which must accep
Thanks for solving this problem, bus I am not expert of all these
encodings too,
so I simply need working reportbug package and I really don't know in
which point the problem is: in packege or in mailing system, which must
accept bug report. But if both encodings can be used (as says some
diff
Niels Thykier wrote:
> Andreas Metzler:
[...]
>> No, the encoding was not correct. Compare how you (your MUA) just did it in
>> this message with the rejected one.
>> From: =?UTF-8?Q?TOMAS_MARTI=c5=a0IUS?=
>> From: =?utf-8?b?VG9tYXMgTWFydGnFoWl1cyA8dG9tYXNAcHVnYS52ZHUubHQ+?=
[...]
> Hi,
>
On 28 December 2016 at 17:14, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Niels Thykier:
>> Andreas Metzler:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> No, the encoding was not correct. Compare how you (your MUA) just did it in
>>> this message with the rejected one.
>>>
>>> From: =?UTF-8?Q?TOMAS_MARTI=c5=a0IUS?=
>>>
>>> F
On 28/12/16 17:02, Niels Thykier wrote:
Note the difference between "=?UTF-8?Q?" vs. "=?UTF-8?b?" (Q vs. b). I
presume the "b" is for "binary" or/and "Base64 encoded" vs. Q which
would be "quoted printed" or something like that.
I am not an expert on permitted ways of quoting UTF-8 in mail h
Niels Thykier:
> Andreas Metzler:
>> [...]
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> No, the encoding was not correct. Compare how you (your MUA) just did it in
>> this message with the rejected one.
>>
>> From: =?UTF-8?Q?TOMAS_MARTI=c5=a0IUS?=
>>
>> From: =?utf-8?b?VG9tYXMgTWFydGnFoWl1cyA8dG9tYXNAcHVnYS52ZHUubHQ+?=
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:02:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I am not an expert on permitted ways of quoting UTF-8 in mail headers,
> but the base64 method does not seem entirely inconceivable for some RFC
> to support that (especially not considering you can encode the body with
> base64).
Yo
Andreas Metzler:
> [...]
>
> Hello,
>
> No, the encoding was not correct. Compare how you (your MUA) just did it in
> this message with the rejected one.
>
> From: =?UTF-8?Q?TOMAS_MARTI=c5=a0IUS?=
>
> From: =?utf-8?b?VG9tYXMgTWFydGnFoWl1cyA8dG9tYXNAcHVnYS52ZHUubHQ+?=
>
Hi,
The latter i
On 2016-12-28 TOMAS MARTIŠIUS wrote:
> 2016.12.28 09:09, Andreas Metzler rašė:
>> On 2016-12-27 TOMAS MARTIŠIUS wrote:
>>> Why I can't report bug using reportbug command? After reporting I get back
>>> e-mail with this message:
[...]
>> The From header does not look too good:
>>> From: =?utf-8?b
On 28 December 2016 at 10:08, TOMAS MARTIŠIUS wrote:
> Hello,
>
> But I am not only english speaking man, so there are UTF-8 chars in my last
> name. Thats why subject
> is encoded. And it is encoded in standard way, using reportbug command.
>
> It seams that if someone using UTF-8 in his name and
Hello,
But I am not only english speaking man, so there are UTF-8 chars in my
last name. Thats why subject
is encoded. And it is encoded in standard way, using reportbug command.
It seams that if someone using UTF-8 in his name and wants report bug -
it has a problems.
I think this is total
On 2016-12-27 TOMAS MARTIŠIUS wrote:
> Hello,
> Why I can't report bug using reportbug command? After reporting I get back
> e-mail with this message:
[...]
> Remote-MTA: dns; buxtehude.debian.org
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Invalid header syntax:
The From header does not look too good:
> Fro
Hello,
Why I can't report bug using reportbug command? After reporting I get
back e-mail with this message:
Best regards,
Tomas
Persiųstas laiškas
Tema: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Data: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:41:49 +0200
Kas:Mail Delivery S
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Vacation Message
I'll be on a bicycle tour until May 9, 2004.
Any real messages, please contact my wife by phone.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message attached below could not be delivered to one or more of
its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es)
failed:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Due to technical difficulties, we have temporarily suspended our main
e-mail address, please re-send your message to
[EMAIL PROTEC
Your message attached below could not be delivered to one or more of
its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es)
failed:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Due to technical difficulties, we have temporarily suspended our main
e-mail address, please re-send your message to
[EMAIL PROTEC
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Please, could you mail people who are responsible ? I have not
> been cced and [EMAIL PROTECTED] has not been either.
>
> I have fixed everything now. Sorry for the mistake.
Sorry.
> > I have disabled the BTS -> PTS link, until the above error is fix
Le Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 11:29:14PM -0500, Adam Heath écrivait:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > generated | /org/packages.qa.debian.org/bin/dispatch.pl:
> > Child process of address_pipe transport returned 2 from command:
> > /org/packages.qa.debian.org/bin/dispatch.pl
> >
> > The following
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Mail Delivery System wrote:
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
>
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. The following address(es) failed:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> generated | /org/packages.qa.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 11:33:56AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 09:33:43AM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > I'm still alive ! ;)
> >
> > The mail server of my school had some hard problems yesterday. I reply
> > privately now..
>
> This doesn't help me. Provide an a
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 01:35:07AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> >
> > Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > From: Mail Delivery System &l
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
>
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim
Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
>
&
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
This
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivery-date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 20:21:20 +0200
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to
OK, thanks a lot, I'll take care of that, I hadn't realized, that my
email address was wrong. I'll correct that ASAP.
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole - Linux & Open Source Solutions
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivery-date: Fri, 04 May 2001 04:50:13 +0200
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to
Hi,
Quoting Josip Rodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Here's a bug closing message with two bugs in it. First, the closes are done
> with 'close nnn' command which is not nice to the submitters, and second,
> the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces.
These were NMU-fixed bugs with a 'fixed' tag that weren't
Previously Josip Rodin wrote:
> Here's a bug closing message with two bugs in it. First, the closes are done
> with 'close nnn' command which is not nice to the submitters, and second,
> the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces.
That was a NIS failure on the mailserver for cistron.nl, already fixed l
elivery-date: Thu, 03 May 2001 01:08:39 +0200
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 01:06:37 +0200
This message was created automatically by
System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 13:03:47 -0500
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. T
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivery-date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 02:08:29 +0200
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 19:06:54 -0500
This messag
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 02:45:57PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The BTS got several of these...
FYI, I tried to contact him several times before NMUing commonc++, and got
neither bounce nor response. Other bug report logs against his packages
seem to indicate that he has been MIA for som
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 03:00:33PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
>
> Hmm, is this a typo in the domain name?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unrouteable mail domain "nsaledov.com"
Typo. He's at nasledov.com.
Hmm, is this a typo in the domain name?
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 08:09:40 +0200
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: M
Hi,
The BTS got several of these...
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 08:06:10 +0200
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: M
On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 12:10:04AM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
>
> It seems that there is a rewriting in the headers from
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> to
> Return-Path:
No. It isn't a rewriting. The mail came from debian-devel
and was bounced back to debian-devel.
> I sus
* Brian Almeida (Tue, May 18, 1999 at 05:02:13PM -0400)
> On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 01:20:03AM +0200, Mail Delivery System wrote:
> > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
> Can we please block this guy?
It seems that there is a rewriting in the headers from
Return-Path:
This is my fault. I'm sorry. No space left on my disk.
*
>This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
>
>A message that you sent could not be delivered to all of its
>recipients. The following address(es) failed:
On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 01:20:03AM +0200, Mail Delivery System wrote:
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
Can we please block this guy?
ay 1999 20:40:46 -
Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Old-X-Envelope-To:
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to all of its recipients. The
following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
generated |/home/css/bin/miprocmail
The following text was generated during the delivery attempt:
> I don't know if this is a bug with procmail(3.10.7-1.5), exim (1.81-1), or
> me, so I thought I would ask. I recently switched to exim from smail on my
> hamm (currently as up to date as possible) which unfortunately bounced all
> of my mail. It seems that exim doesn't like the mail filter pipe
da
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://terrapin.econ.queensu.ca>
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 10:58:45 -0500
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
This messa
48 matches
Mail list logo
