Re: Fw: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender ( cdvendors@d.o )

address doesn't resolve anymore. > Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 08:45:01 + > From: Mail Delivery System > To: hwans...@mailbox.org > Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender > > > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. > > A

Fw: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender ( cdvendors@d.o )

:45:01 + From: Mail Delivery System To: hwans...@mailbox.org Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error

Re: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Russ Allbery writes: > I will file a bug against reportbug on your behalf. I think this bug may have been introduced in the Python 2 to Python 3 conversion, if I am understanding it correctly. Bug report is here: https://bugs.debian.org/849586 -- Russ Allbery

Re: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

TOMAS MARTIŠIUS writes: > Thanks for solving this problem, bus I am not expert of all these > encodings too, so I simply need working reportbug package and I really > don't know in which point the problem is: in packege or in mailing > system, which must accept bug report. But

Re: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Tomas, On 28 December 2016 at 18:52, TOMAS MARTIŠIUS wrote: > Thanks for solving this problem, bus I am not expert of all these encodings > too, > so I simply need working reportbug package and I really don't know in which > point the problem is: in packege or in mailing

Re: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Thanks for solving this problem, bus I am not expert of all these encodings too, so I simply need working reportbug package and I really don't know in which point the problem is: in packege or in mailing system, which must accept bug report. But if both encodings can be used (as says some

Re: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Niels Thykier wrote: > Andreas Metzler: [...] >> No, the encoding was not correct. Compare how you (your MUA) just did it in >> this message with the rejected one. >> From: =?UTF-8?Q?TOMAS_MARTI=c5=a0IUS?= >> From:

Re: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

On 28 December 2016 at 17:14, Niels Thykier wrote: > Niels Thykier: >> Andreas Metzler: >>> [...] >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> No, the encoding was not correct. Compare how you (your MUA) just did it in >>> this message with the rejected one. >>> >>> From:

Re: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

On 28/12/16 17:02, Niels Thykier wrote: Note the difference between "=?UTF-8?Q?" vs. "=?UTF-8?b?" (Q vs. b). I presume the "b" is for "binary" or/and "Base64 encoded" vs. Q which would be "quoted printed" or something like that. I am not an expert on permitted ways of quoting UTF-8 in mail

Re: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Niels Thykier: > Andreas Metzler: >> [...] >> >> Hello, >> >> No, the encoding was not correct. Compare how you (your MUA) just did it in >> this message with the rejected one. >> >> From: =?UTF-8?Q?TOMAS_MARTI=c5=a0IUS?= >> >> From:

Re: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:02:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > I am not an expert on permitted ways of quoting UTF-8 in mail headers, > but the base64 method does not seem entirely inconceivable for some RFC > to support that (especially not considering you can encode the body with > base64).

Re: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Andreas Metzler: > [...] > > Hello, > > No, the encoding was not correct. Compare how you (your MUA) just did it in > this message with the rejected one. > > From: =?UTF-8?Q?TOMAS_MARTI=c5=a0IUS?= > > From: =?utf-8?b?VG9tYXMgTWFydGnFoWl1cyA8dG9tYXNAcHVnYS52ZHUubHQ+?= >

Re: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

On 2016-12-28 TOMAS MARTIŠIUS wrote: > 2016.12.28 09:09, Andreas Metzler rašė: >> On 2016-12-27 TOMAS MARTIŠIUS wrote: >>> Why I can't report bug using reportbug command? After reporting I get back >>> e-mail with this message: [...] >> The From header does

Re: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

On 28 December 2016 at 10:08, TOMAS MARTIŠIUS wrote: > Hello, > > But I am not only english speaking man, so there are UTF-8 chars in my last > name. Thats why subject > is encoded. And it is encoded in standard way, using reportbug command. > > It seams that if someone using

Re: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Hello, But I am not only english speaking man, so there are UTF-8 chars in my last name. Thats why subject is encoded. And it is encoded in standard way, using reportbug command. It seams that if someone using UTF-8 in his name and wants report bug - it has a problems. I think this is

Re: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

On 2016-12-27 TOMAS MARTIŠIUS wrote: > Hello, > Why I can't report bug using reportbug command? After reporting I get back > e-mail with this message: [...] > Remote-MTA: dns; buxtehude.debian.org > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Invalid header syntax: The From header does not

Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Hello, Why I can't report bug using reportbug command? After reporting I get back e-mail with this message: Best regards, Tomas Persiųstas laiškas Tema: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Data: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:41:49 +0200 Kas:Mail Delivery System

Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Your message attached below could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Due to technical difficulties, we have temporarily suspended our main e-mail address, please re-send your message to [EMAIL

Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Your message attached below could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Due to technical difficulties, we have temporarily suspended our main e-mail address, please re-send your message to [EMAIL

Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Mail Delivery System wrote: This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: generated |

Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Le Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 11:29:14PM -0500, Adam Heath écrivait: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: generated | /org/packages.qa.debian.org/bin/dispatch.pl: Child process of address_pipe transport returned 2 from command: /org/packages.qa.debian.org/bin/dispatch.pl The following text was

Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Please, could you mail people who are responsible ? I have not been cced and [EMAIL PROTECTED] has not been either. I have fixed everything now. Sorry for the mistake. Sorry. I have disabled the BTS - PTS link, until the above error is fixed.

Re: Looking for Martin Quinson (Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender (Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 01:13:12AM +0200))

Eric Van Buggenhaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim). A message that you sent could

Re: Looking for Martin Quinson (Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender (Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 01:13:12AM +0200))

-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim). A message that you sent could not be delivered to one

Re: Looking for Martin Quinson (Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender (Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 01:13:12AM +0200))

, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message

Re: Looking for Martin Quinson (Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender (Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 01:13:12AM +0200))

On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 11:33:56AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 09:33:43AM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote: I'm still alive ! ;) The mail server of my school had some hard problems yesterday. I reply privately now.. This doesn't help me. Provide an alternate

Looking for Martin Quinson (Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender (Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 01:13:12AM +0200))

- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender This message was created

searching for Michel Onstein [Mailer-Daemon@next-element.nl: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]

- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Delivery-date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 20:21:20 +0200 X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Date: Mon

searching for Tomas Pospisek [Mailer-Daemon@master.debian.org: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]

- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Delivery-date: Fri, 04 May 2001 04:50:13 +0200 X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Date: Thu

Re: searching for Tomas Pospisek [Mailer-Daemon@master.debian.org: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]

OK, thanks a lot, I'll take care of that, I hadn't realized, that my email address was wrong. I'll correct that ASAP. *t Tomas Pospisek SourcePole - Linux Open Source Solutions

searchin' for Robert van der Meulen [Mailer-Daemon@smtp.cistron.nl: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]

2001 01:08:39 +0200 X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 01:06:37 +0200 This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message

Re: searchin' for Robert van der Meulen [Mailer-Daemon@smtp.cistron.nl: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]

Previously Josip Rodin wrote: Here's a bug closing message with two bugs in it. First, the closes are done with 'close nnn' command which is not nice to the submitters, and second, the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces. That was a NIS failure on the mailserver for cistron.nl, already fixed

Re: searchin' for Robert van der Meulen [Mailer-Daemon@smtp.cistron.nl: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]

Hi, Quoting Josip Rodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Here's a bug closing message with two bugs in it. First, the closes are done with 'close nnn' command which is not nice to the submitters, and second, the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces. These were NMU-fixed bugs with a 'fixed' tag that weren't

[Mailer-Daemon@master.debian.org: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]

] - Delivery-date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 02:08:29 +0200 X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 19:06:54 -0500 This message was created automatically

searching for Bill Geddes [Mailer-Daemon@master.debian.org: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 13:03:47 -0500 This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. The following

searching for Raphael Bossek [Mailer-Daemon@master.debian.org: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]

Hi, The BTS got several of these... - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 08:06:10 +0200 X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failed

searching for Misha Nasledov [Mailer-Daemon@master.debian.org: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]

failed: returning message to sender Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 01:08:16 -0500 This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unrouteable mail

Re: searching for Misha Nasledov [Mailer-Daemon@master.debian.org: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]

On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 03:00:33PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: Hmm, is this a typo in the domain name? [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unrouteable mail domain nsaledov.com Typo. He's at nasledov.com.

Re: searching for Raphael Bossek [Mailer-Daemon@master.debian.org: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]

On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 02:45:57PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: Hi, The BTS got several of these... FYI, I tried to contact him several times before NMUing commonc++, and got neither bounce nor response. Other bug report logs against his packages seem to indicate that he has been MIA for some

Re: FROM envelope rewite (Was: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender)

On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 12:10:04AM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote: It seems that there is a rewriting in the headers from Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Return-Path: debian-devel@lists.debian.org No. It isn't a rewriting. The mail came from debian-devel and was bounced back to

FROM envelope rewite (Was: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender)

* Brian Almeida (Tue, May 18, 1999 at 05:02:13PM -0400) On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 01:20:03AM +0200, Mail Delivery System wrote: This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. Can we please block this guy? It seems that there is a rewriting in the headers from Return-Path:

Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

This is my fault. I'm sorry. No space left on my disk. * This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to all of its recipients. The following address(es) failed:

Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to all of its recipients. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: generated |/home/css/bin/miprocmail The following text was generated during the delivery attempt:

Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

1999 20:40:46 - Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ; Old-X-Envelope-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Message-Id: [EMAIL

Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 01:20:03AM +0200, Mail Delivery System wrote: This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. Can we please block this guy?

Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender (fwd)

:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://terrapin.econ.queensu.ca -- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 10:58:45 -0500 From: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender This message was created automatically

Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender (fwd)

I don't know if this is a bug with procmail(3.10.7-1.5), exim (1.81-1), or me, so I thought I would ask. I recently switched to exim from smail on my hamm (currently as up to date as possible) which unfortunately bounced all of my mail. It seems that exim doesn't like the mail filter pipe