Richard Kettlewell writes:
> Jonathan Walther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
> > +
> > + /* follow any symlinks to the mailbox */
> > + memset(folder_path, 0, sizeof folder_path);
> > + if (lstat (lf->folder_path, &st) != -1 && S_ISLNK (st.st_mode) &&
> > + realpath (lf->
The problem with spelling/grammar flames is they always blow up in
your face.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 08:06:17PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Also, wrt, "Plague, and LART will be forthcoming": you're either missing
^
This comma is completely out of place.
Branden, you reading? We ne
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 12:24:11PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Sat 12 Jan 2002, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 01:12:37PM +1100, Steve Kowalik wrote:
> > > At 10:30 am, Saturday, January 12 2002, Rob Bradford mumbled:
> > > > I'm now a happy evolution user, to converyt my mail
On Sat 12 Jan 2002, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 01:12:37PM +1100, Steve Kowalik wrote:
> > At 10:30 am, Saturday, January 12 2002, Rob Bradford mumbled:
> > > I'm now a happy evolution user, to converyt my mail i did cat
> > > Mail/lists/* | cat /var/spool/mail/rob
> > >
> > Cong
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 01:12:37PM +1100, Steve Kowalik wrote:
> At 10:30 am, Saturday, January 12 2002, Rob Bradford mumbled:
> > I'm now a happy evolution user, to converyt my mail i did cat
> > Mail/lists/* | cat /var/spool/mail/rob
> >
> Congratulations, you get today's "Most Useless Use Of ca
At 10:30 am, Saturday, January 12 2002, Rob Bradford mumbled:
> I'm now a happy evolution user, to converyt my mail i did cat
> Mail/lists/* | cat /var/spool/mail/rob
>
Congratulations, you get today's "Most Useless Use Of cat" award. Plague,
and LART will be forthcoming.
--
I'm now a happy evolution user, to converyt my mail i did cat
Mail/lists/* | cat /var/spool/mail/rob
Then just check your mail and using the filters setup in evolution to
filter it in the boxes again. Maybe not the best way, but i didnt lose
any mail.
--
Rob 'robster' Bradford
Chief Editor/Lead d
Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Erik Steffl wrote:
>
> > Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:36:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > IMO IMAP is still a PITA, AF
Jeffrey Stedfast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While I agree with your statements, it's strictly not possible in
> this case - realpath() requires that the second argument be a string
> buffer of size PATH_MAX (read the manpage).
What about using canonicalize_file_name() instead whenever that
fun
While I agree with your statements, it's strictly not possible in this
case - realpath() requires that the second argument be a string buffer
of size PATH_MAX (read the manpage).
SYNOPSIS
#include
char *realpath(const char *file_name, char *resolved_name);
DESCRIPTION
The realpat
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 12:38:30PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> Actually the attached patch is the "correct one". There is no need to
> memset and you should use PATH_MAX rather than 4096.
Both is incorrect. PATH_MAX isn't required by POSIX and some systems
don't have it (the Hurd for example)
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 12:38:30PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> Actually the attached patch is the "correct one". There is no need to
> memset and you should use PATH_MAX rather than 4096.
No, the "correct" way is to malloc the space as needed. PATH_MAX
doesn't exist on the Hurd.
--
Adam O
Actually the attached patch is the "correct one". There is no need to
memset and you should use PATH_MAX rather than 4096.
Jeff
On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 23:36, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:38:43PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> >Oops, copy/paste-o when migrating the patch t
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 02:30:15PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote:
> > kmail and mutt both play happily with both the Courier and UW IMAP
> > servers.
> I'm talking about cyrus.
A while back it was more like "IMAP is crap and barely interoperabl
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 12:59:34PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Most things (certainly mutt and kmail, I can't think of anything else I
> > > tried that gave me problems) interoperate quite happ
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Erik Steffl wrote:
> Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:36:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > > IMO IMAP is still a PITA, AFAIK the only well and out of the box
> > > > interoperat
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 12:59:34PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Most things (certainly mutt and kmail, I can't think of anything else I
> > tried that gave me problems) interoperate quite happily with both UW
> > IMAP and Courier IMAP. I ca
Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:36:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > IMO IMAP is still a PITA, AFAIK the only well and out of the box
> > > interoperating combination of MUA and IMAPd is pine together with
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:36:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > IMO IMAP is still a PITA, AFAIK the only well and out of the box
> > interoperating combination of MUA and IMAPd is pine together with
> > uw-imapd which is about as configurable as you
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 11:49:59PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
IMHO, it is not evil to append to the headers of the message.
Every MTA does that. But if you delete stuff of alter the actual
message, then it is evil..
I agree. But that is what Evolution does. This bug isn't planned to be
fixed for a
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 06:19:55PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 12:55:34PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> > > Evolution added an X-Evolution header to each message for status
> > > purposes.
> >
> > Merely _looking_ at a message with Evolution alters it? That is _truly_
> > ev
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:38:43PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Oops, copy/paste-o when migrating the patch to the 1-0 code base.
Here is the correct patch for the 1.0.x branch. Hopefully the Debian
maintainer will apply it? I am creating an Evolution 1.0-5.1 package
on my system with the patch
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 12:55:34PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> > Evolution added an X-Evolution header to each message for status
> > purposes.
>
> Merely _looking_ at a message with Evolution alters it? That is _truly_
> evil.
Even mailx does *that*.
--
Marc Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PR
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:47:02AM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> I object to attempts to lock me in to a single MUA.
so do i. it's evil.
> While I'm evaluating I expect to be able to continue using Mutt until
> I am confident enough in Evolution to cut the umbilical cord.
i learnt long ago
Oops, copy/paste-o when migrating the patch to the 1-0 code base.
Jeff
On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 19:28, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> Thank you for the patch. To make it work, you need to define the
> variable "folder_path". I would recommend this:
>
> char folder_path[4096];
>
> And then before usin
Thank you for the patch. To make it work, you need to define the
variable "folder_path". I would recommend this:
char folder_path[4096];
And then before using it, do this:
memset(folder_path, 0, sizeof folder_path);
Cheers.
Jonathan
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:57:34PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 12:55:34PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> > > Evolution added an X-Evolution header to each message for status
> > > purposes.
> >
> > Merely _looking_ at a message with Evolution alters it? That is _truly_
> > evil.
>
> Maybe,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Zitiere Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> [1935 lines uselessly quoted]
> >
> > IMO the good solution for this kind of problems is to use IMAP.
> > don't trust MUAs to work with files.
>
> IMO IMAP is still a PITA, AFAIK the only well and out of the box
> interop
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:20:16PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> The perception of a possible permissions problem is bogus. If you don't
> have permission in that directory to create the tmp mailbox, then you
> probably didn't have permission to blast over the original mailbox
> either.
It is
On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 16:20, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:41:28PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> >> Unfortunately, no. I made no changes whatsoever to the mailboxes. I
> >> just entered them to see if the messages showed up, they did, then I
> >> exited. Thats when I no
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:41:28PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Unfortunately, no. I made no changes whatsoever to the mailboxes. I
just entered them to see if the messages showed up, they did, then I
exited. Thats when I noticed the symlinks had been blown away, and the
resulting "copied" mai
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 12:55:34PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> > Evolution added an X-Evolution header to each message for status
> > purposes.
>
> Merely _looking_ at a message with Evolution alters it? That is _truly_
> evil.
Maybe, but it's also commonplace.
Consider how elm has for many yea
> Evolution added an X-Evolution header to each message for status
> purposes.
Merely _looking_ at a message with Evolution alters it? That is _truly_
evil.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Jonathan Walther wrote:
[...]
> A user who doesn't know what he is doing will attempt to do everything
> from the provided GUI. Its shameful to assume that people that attempt
> to use vi to edit their configurations are also idiots.
(humor-mode t)
Why? They would use emac
On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 01:43, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 01:56:24PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> >Yea, this is kinda painful currently but hopefully by 1.2 this will be
> >much easier. We plan on making it so that you can add a new account
> >using "Standard Unix Mail Spoo
Il mer, 2002-01-09 alle 09:16, Jonathan Walther ha scritto:
> Let's see. Then there is the "bug" with GnuPG signatures not being
> verified correctly due to a Quoted Printable problem. The answer to
> that one was "The problem is the fault of one of our libraries, and it
> isn't changing anytime
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:36:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> IMO IMAP is still a PITA, AFAIK the only well and out of the box
> interoperating
> combination of MUA and IMAPd is pine together with uw-imapd
Mozilla at least works now with exchange :)
Greetings
Bernd
--
(OO) -- [EMA
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:36:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> IMO IMAP is still a PITA, AFAIK the only well and out of the box
> interoperating combination of MUA and IMAPd is pine together with
> uw-imapd which is about as configurable as your sunglasses. With other
> Linux combinations yo
Zitiere Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[1935 lines uselessly quoted]
>
> IMO the good solution for this kind of problems is to use IMAP.
> don't trust MUAs to work with files.
IMO IMAP is still a PITA, AFAIK the only well and out of the box interoperating
combination of MUA and IMAPd is pine
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:47:02AM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> I object to attempts to lock me in to a single MUA. While I'm
> evaluating I expect to be able to continue using Mutt until I am
> confident enough in Evolution to cut the umbilical cord.
Calm down. It could just be a bug and s
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:29:43AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
*This* is the real problem with Evolution. It should use another GnuPG
system. Evolution's behavior with mboxes is the right thing to do, as
mboxes need to be locked.
Could you explain that? Using realpath() before locking the mbox
le mer 09-01-2002 à 09:16, Jonathan Walther a écrit :
> Let's see. Then there is the "bug" with GnuPG signatures not being
> verified correctly due to a Quoted Printable problem. The answer to
> that one was "The problem is the fault of one of our libraries, and it
> isn't changing anytime soon,
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:49:12PM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
IMO the good solution for this kind of problems is to use IMAP. don't
trust MUAs to work with files.
(of course, Evolution should play nice with symlinks)
Note that in his reply, the Evolution maintainer said "the Unix rename()
function
Jonathan Walther wrote:
>
> Subject:
>
> I tried evolution tonight. It is impressive work. I wanted to import
> my 62 mbox mailboxes and 6 maildirs. Well, for whatever reason, it
> didn't let me import my maildirs. And the interface for importing
> mailboxes is painful for 62 different mailbo
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 01:56:24PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Yea, this is kinda painful currently but hopefully by 1.2 this will be
much easier. We plan on making it so that you can add a new account
using "Standard Unix Mail Spool" as the source type and pointing it at a
directory and have ou
45 matches
Mail list logo
