Re: Re^2: intent to package: doom!

1997-12-29 Thread Ben Pfaff
JH> Good grief. Well, it's already in non-free, I guess that's good enough JH> (since stuff in non-free cannot be safely distributed unless you examine JH> it's license). But non-free is mirrored on several FTP servers in Germany. And a child could download the games from a German

Re: Re^2: intent to package: doom!

1997-12-29 Thread Will Lowe
On 28 Dec 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Marco> But non-free is mirrored on several FTP servers in Germany. And > Marco> a child could download the games from a German FTP server and > Marco> this is not allowed. Would it be allowed for us to have a non-duetch directory, which just wouldn't get

Re: Re^2: intent to package: doom!

1997-12-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Marco" == Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Marco> Am 27.12.97 schrieb joey # kitenet.net ... Marco> Moin Joey! JH> Good grief. Well, it's already in non-free, I guess that's good JH> enough (since stuff in non-free cannot be safely distributed JH> unless you examine it's license).

Re^2: intent to package: doom!

1997-12-28 Thread Marco Budde
Am 27.12.97 schrieb joey # kitenet.net ... Moin Joey! JH> Good grief. Well, it's already in non-free, I guess that's good enough JH> (since stuff in non-free cannot be safely distributed unless you examine JH> it's license). But non-free is mirrored on several FTP servers in Germany. And a child