Enrique Zanardi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 1998 at 01:38:21PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Enrique Zanardi writes (Re: Release management - technical):
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 04:21:57PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
...
I think we can only do one of these. With hamm we're doing the
latter
Enrique Zanardi writes (Re: Release management - technical):
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 04:21:57PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
...
I think we can only do one of these. With hamm we're doing the
latter; in the future I think we should do the former.
Fine, as long as we have some long term goals
On Mon, 22 Jun 1998, Ian Jackson wrote:
We should continue to have `long term goals', and I applaud people who
work towards them, but we must be able to make a release even when
they are not met. It is better to have a release now and goals later
than no release now and goals later !
and
! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
-Original Message-
From: Craig Sanders [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 4:17 PM
To: Ian Jackson
Subject:Re: Release management - technical
anyway, what i really wanted to say here
On Mon, Jun 22, 1998 at 01:38:21PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Enrique Zanardi writes (Re: Release management - technical):
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 04:21:57PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
...
I think we can only do one of these. With hamm we're doing the
latter; in the future I think we
At 5:38 AM -0700 6/22/98, Ian Jackson wrote:
David Engel writes (Re: Release management - technical):
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 04:21:57PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Q. What are we trying to achieve ?
A. There are two possibilities that I can see
- Timely and good-quality releases
Incoming - unstable - unreleased - stable
100% agree.
some times unstable is so stable, that many people use it. this is bad,
if it's stable, it should have been released.
some times unstable is absolutelyy not useable, and it breaks my system
(grep bug, bash bug, new xxx without new
Ian Jackson wrote:
I think that in order to make sense of what's being said here we need
to step back a bit, and think about abstractions rather than
implementation. Lots of people (myself included) have been posting
rather detailed proposals.
Q. What are we trying to achieve ?
A.
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 04:21:57PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Q. What are we trying to achieve ?
A. There are two possibilities that I can see
- Timely and good-quality releases, or
- Releases which meet some predefined set of goals.
I think we can only do one of these. With hamm
I think that in order to make sense of what's being said here we need
to step back a bit, and think about abstractions rather than
implementation. Lots of people (myself included) have been posting
rather detailed proposals.
Q. What are we trying to achieve ?
A. There are two possibilities that
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
: We need to think about what kinds of thing need to happen to a package
: or to a distribution before we release it as `stable'.
Yes.
I find it impossible to completely divorce the conceptual model from any
reference to details of the present or any
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 04:21:57PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
I think that in order to make sense of what's being said here we need
to step back a bit, and think about abstractions rather than
implementation. Lots of people (myself included) have been posting
rather detailed proposals.
Q.
12 matches
Mail list logo
