On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 09:29:33AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Want more?
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/93443 and scroll to the bottom.
That's positively obnoxious. Bug severity control is up to the
developer. Although it does count as a dispute between Developers,
so you could forward it to th
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 02:11:32AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >ARRGHH!!!
> >
> >It really ticks me off when someone:
> > 1. NMU's one of my packages for a *normal* bug without even thinking
> >of checking with me first,
> >and
> > 2. In so doing, mana
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 02:11:32AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> How ironic ... http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0104/msg00089.html
There does seem to be some hypocracy there...
How old does a bug have to be before it's fair game? The oldest bug
report for netmaze was 2 months old, although th
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>ARRGHH!!!
>
>It really ticks me off when someone:
> 1. NMU's one of my packages for a *normal* bug without even thinking
>of checking with me first,
>and
> 2. In so doing, manages to BREAK THE PACKAGE and give it a GRAVE BUG
>and
> 3. Doesn't bother to f
ARRGHH!!!
It really ticks me off when someone:
1. NMU's one of my packages for a *normal* bug without even thinking
of checking with me first,
and
2. In so doing, manages to BREAK THE PACKAGE and give it a GRAVE BUG
and
3. Doesn't bother to fix this bug, creating more work for me than
i
ALL RIGHT, YOU JACKASSES, STOP COMPILING AGAINST UNRELEASED PACKAGES.
Everyone else, please file serious bugs against any packages you find doing
this. "Cannot build from source" is exactly what they are, and that's a
release critical bug.
4.0.3-1 will be out when it's ready, which will hopefull
6 matches
Mail list logo
