Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-03-09 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a) hast geschrieben: Well. I have reported through the button in the past months spam for three different mailing lists (debian-doc, debian-l10n-spanish, and debian-devel-spanish) and I *still* see the reported spam there [1]. So I'm a little bit skeptical

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-03-03 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a) hast geschrieben: Well, I thought it would be useful to a) have spam mails from the mailing list archive b) enhance the filters for that we have the 'report as spam'-Button. We also use that input for the filters, but mainly, the damage is done in

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-03-03 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 05:44:51AM -0600, Cord Beermann wrote: The button is good for pointing out where we should remove something. Well. I have reported through the button in the past months spam for three different mailing lists (debian-doc, debian-l10n-spanish, and debian-devel-spanish) and

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-03-02 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a) hast geschrieben: I've just bounced all the spam from Debian mailing lists that got through my (local and ISP's) filters and I had stored in a separate folder to that address. They are 33, hopefully it will not get me blacklisted. Is it OK if we, mutt

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-03-02 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:33:04AM -0600, Cord Beermann wrote: it's not ok to bounce us spam from years ago, this address is another feedback-loop to enhace our filters, it's useless to get old[1] spam there. Well, I thought it would be useful to a) have spam mails from the mailing list

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-03-01 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 02:13:51AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:47:41 +0100]: Is it OK if we, mutt users, use this? Why not '[EMAIL PROTECTED]enter'? ('b' does (B)ounce in the default keybindings). THat's what Cord asked for...

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-28 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Amaya) hast geschrieben: Cord Beermann wrote: Also we (the listmasters) don't train the bayes-filter, May I ask why? You may. ;-) I looked into this and found that we automagically train the bayes with the spam we get, but we don't train in the ham. Another thing for the

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-28 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 07:03:31AM -0600, Cord Beermann wrote: If you get spam via our lists, BOUNCE[1] it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The advantage of posting it here is that it can be used as a measure of how much spam does posting to a debian mailing attracts, spammers will probably send some

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-28 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:47:41 +0100]: Is it OK if we, mutt users, use this? Why not '[EMAIL PROTECTED]enter'? ('b' does (B)ounce in the default keybindings). THat's what Cord asked for... -- Adeodato Simó dato at

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-25 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Blars Blarson) hast geschrieben: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: on 2: we would need a whole spam-mail including all headers so we can find charakteristika to filter on, so i now take all nominated postings, and try to find patterns with some black

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-25 Thread Amaya
Hi Cord! First of all, thanks for the listamster work involving spam. Cord Beermann wrote: Also we (the listmasters) don't train the bayes-filter, May I ask why? we add also rules to procmail and SpamAssassin if nessecary. That's great, thanks. -- .''`. I may not have gone where I

lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-24 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Nico Golde) hast geschrieben: At the moment the spam-report.pl script uses: input type=hidden name=listname value=debian-devel / input type=hidden name=msg value=msg00065.html / input type=hidden name=date value=2005/09 / To identify the message, this wouldn't work with a MUA so the

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-24 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Cord Beermann) hast geschrieben: The idea of having a reporting address is good, i'll will announce one in the next days and then lets see what happens. ok, here it is: (alpha release, lets see what happens and if it is useful.) If you get spam via our lists, BOUNCE[1] it to [EMAIL

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-24 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Cord Beermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-24 14:31]: Hallo! Du (Cord Beermann) hast geschrieben: The idea of having a reporting address is good, i'll will announce one in the next days and then lets see what happens. ok, here it is: (alpha release, lets see what happens and if it is

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-24 Thread Blars Blarson
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: on 2: we would need a whole spam-mail including all headers so we can find charakteristika to filter on, so i now take all nominated postings, and try to find patterns with some black shell-magic. Is sa-learn --spam