Control: -1 -moreinfo -unreproducible
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 01:58:54AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible
>
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, 2020-12-13 at 00:27:39 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Package: dpkg
> > Version: 1.2
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.20.5
Severity: important
Hello DPKG maintainers,
The command
dpkg-query --show --showformat='${db-fsys:Files}
displays an extra spurious first line:
(Reading database ... 134656 files and directories currently installed.)
which breaks compatibiity with buster (which
severity 971203 important
quit
> > root (to '/tmp/gap-atlasrep-2.1.0')
> > E: Unpack command 'dpkg-source --no-check -x gap-atlasrep_2.1.0-2.dsc'
> > failed.
> >
> > There is no rationale to reject such a symlink which does not point
> > _outside_ the source root, but _to_ the source root.
> >
severity 971203 important
quit
> > root (to '/tmp/gap-atlasrep-2.1.0')
> > E: Unpack command 'dpkg-source --no-check -x gap-atlasrep_2.1.0-2.dsc'
> > failed.
> >
> > There is no rationale to reject such a symlink which does not point
> > _outside_ the source root, but _to_ the source root.
> >
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 05:19:33AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 22:53:13 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 08:58:00PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed
reassign 971203 dpkg-dev
severity grave
retitle dpkg-source cause gap-atlasrep to FTBFS
quit
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 08:58:00PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: gap-atlasrep
> Version: 2.1.0-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 01:39:45PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:31:52PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
> > On 06/04/2014 03:41 AM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > * Other programs could “easily” use dpkg-architecture to check for
> > >identity or a match. (This poses
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 04:48:08AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 22:52:08 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.16.10
Severity: wishlist
To be reliable, dpkg-buildflags should provide a versionning system like
debhelper does with debian/compat
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.16.10
Severity: wishlist
Hello DPKG developers,
To be reliable, dpkg-buildflags should provide a versionning system like
debhelper does with debian/compat.
dpkg-buildflags would defines a interface level (1,2,3,...) that is incremented
each time the output of
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:22:22AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 14:19:03 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 18:26:50 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
W/o having looked yet at the details I'd say this *seems* like #671711,
which I'm not planning on
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:13:53PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012, Bill Allombert wrote:
/etc/cron.daily/popularity-contest:
dpkg-query: error: --listfiles needs a valid package name but
'gcc-4.7-base' is not: ambiguous package name 'gcc-4.7-base' with more
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:27:47PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
ping?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Cron Daemon r...@zigo.mirbsd.org
Message-ID: 201204030625.q336pfbx002...@zigo.mirbsd.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.00 required=0.90
To: r...@zigo.mirbsd.org
Date:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 05:00:42PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 07:50:56PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
`dpkg -L libc6-i686:i386' gives me a filelist, without the arch qualifier
it
fails with the same error as in the cron mail.
This appears to be fixed in dpkg
reassign 659782 dpkg
found 659782
retitle 659782 dpkg -L does not work for multi-arch foreign packages.
tags 659782 + experimental
quit
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:21:47AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, Philipp Kern wrote:
So are you suggesting that dpkg should use
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 07:31:01AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Bill Allombert wrote:
Bug #229357 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
http://git.debian.org/?p
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 07:12:39AM +, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
tag 229357 pending
thanks
Hello,
Bug #229357 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.1
Severity: important
Hello Dpkg maintainers:
There is a circular Pre-dependency between dpkg and coreutils:
dpkg:Pre-Depends: coreutils (= 5.93-1)
coreutils :Depends: dpkg (= 1.15.4) | install-info
Maybe coreutils does not need to depend on dpkg
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:17:11AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011, Bill Allombert wrote:
Please find a new patch that use the name Build-Features and the module
name
Dpkg::BuildFeatures.
Thanks, here's a short review with a few details to clean.
1/ You're
patch was the one of Bill Allombert in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=229357#429
The only thing that changed since my last
comments in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=229357#401
is that I will accept a comma-separated field. But I won't merge
anything without
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 10:24:23AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hello,
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org
lintian (U)
nvidia-graphics-drivers (U)
Bill Allombert ballo...@debian.org
gap
menu
I do not think this would be a problem for theses two. However in both case, the
ability
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 12:44:28PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 09 May 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
In any scenario, I think debhelper is the place to make the first
step. :(
Yes. I did not really need a patch to rip out the environment variables,
what I need is some assurance
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 09:01:12PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 08 May 2011, Bill Allombert wrote:
Thanks, seems to work fine, I have no error/warning at least.
OK, so you get comparable results. It is very odd that there so much a
difference between
batch of 1 package
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 04:48:35AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
diff --git a/man/dpkg-buildpackage.1 b/man/dpkg-buildpackage.1
index 6460e51..698bff4 100644
--- a/man/dpkg-buildpackage.1
+++ b/man/dpkg-buildpackage.1
@@ -231,15 +231,13 @@ Show the version and exit.
Even if
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 06:45:03PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sat, 07 May 2011, Bill Allombert wrote:
Thanks, please find a popularity-contest script that uses dpkg -L by batch.
The size of the batch is $dpkg_batch_size at the start of the script.
Below are timings on my laptop
Hello Dpkg maintainers,
Could you fix this issue soon so that it does not interfer with the release of
Wheezy ?
Thanks,
--
Bill. ballo...@debian.org
Imagine a large red swirl here.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:45:08PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 23:08:51 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:51:57PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 09:11:59PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 04:10:58PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi,
Bill Allombert wrote:
This is not possible: forking dpkg for all installed packages would be way
to slow and
resource intensive. We need a better option.
Bonus points if this interface has an option to point
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:06:26PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Bill Allombert wrote:
We deliberately skip .list as we don't guarantee that we're always going
to use .list and there's no guaranty that the format of the file won't be
extended to store more
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:51:57PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 09:11:59PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Bill Allombert wrote:
On my system with 1200 packages (far below the average popcon
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:46:59PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi Bill,
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Bill Allombert wrote:
I get errors from cron because of popcon:
/etc/cron.daily/popularity-contest:
popcon: file /var/lib/dpkg/info/liblouis2.list is missing
That file doesn't exist
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 01:35:00AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010, Jonathan Yu wrote:
22:02:40 rra jawnsy: I don't think we say that explicitly, but RFC
5322 requires it and I can't imagine ever not enforcing that.
Although you
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 05:37:49PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
Package: menu
Version: 2.1.43
Severity: normal
Since some time the menu trigger produces more and more warnings of the
type:
warning, in file '/var/lib/dpkg/updates/' near line 5 package
'python-cupshelpers':
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 03:39:30PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes:
Russ Allbery wrote:
I think we should hopefully be close to a final wording now.
Indeed! All I have left are copy-edits (patch below).
Thanks! Applied to my copy.
@@ -5048,7
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:33:31AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
It would be nice to know what would break if dpkg-dev stopped
exporting CFLAGS. Is there someone out there with hardware capable of
quickly rebuilding some representative
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:19:27AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Raphael Hertzog writes (Re: Bug#586691: dpkg-buildpackage and LDFLAGS etc.):
forcemerge 560070 586691
thanks
...
We have dpkg-buildflags nowadays for this.
Thanks. I have just read #560070. Can I request that #560070 be
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:36:41AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 24 May 2010, Bill Allombert wrote:
Dear Dpkg developers,
There is a small typo in dpkg GIT repository that prevent it to build.
Please see the attached patch.
Thanks applied. I did not notice it because
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 03:46:52PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 06 Sep 2009, Bill Allombert wrote:
Good, good, progress at last. Please find a patch that is a port of the
old patch.3.0 in the first post of #229357 and implement
Build-Options: build-arch as specified therein
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:12:35PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
severity 575786 important
thanks
On Sun, 09 May 2010, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Totally tired with having this bug here and there with different
packages, I change my mind and bump the severity of this bug to
serious, as
currently relying on them but packages
should now start using dpkg-buildflags instead. Closes: #560070
So this does not actually fix this bug ?
Cheers,
Bill.
From: Bill Allombert bill.allomb...@math.u-bordeaux1.fr
To: sub...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: dpkg: please stop setting CFLAGS etc
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.15.5
Hello dpkg developers,
dpkg-buildpackages set a bunch of general purpose environment variables before
calling debian/rules (CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS, FFLAGS, LDFLAGS, MFLAGS, etc.).
This cause some packages to build differently with dpkg-buildpackages or
with
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.5
Severity: wishlist
Hello dpkg developers,
Please provide a new kind of triggers that are only ran after the triggering
packages are configured. This is required for Debian menu at least and generally
safer than the standard trigger.
Note that this can be emulated
Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bill Allombert bill.allomb...@math.u-bordeaux.fr
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 13:18:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add support for Build-Options: build-arch. Closes: #229357
---
debian/changelog |3 ++-
scripts/Dpkg/Fields.pm |2 +-
scripts/dpkg
Dear Dpkg developers and Christian,
dpkg git repository does not build due to a problem with one
of the translations:
debuild
...
po4a --no-backups --variable srcdir=../../man \
../../man/po/po4a.cfg
../../man/dpkg-shlibdeps.1:238: (po4a::man)
Unbalanced '' and '' in font
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 05:30:39AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 04:26:02 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 22:24:43 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 09:54:35PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009, Bill Allombert
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 04:50:32PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2009, Bill Allombert wrote:
So there's several options that come to mind for that:
* We don't care, and expect users might miss docs on the dir file in
some cases or need to upgrade dpkg or any
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 09:54:35PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi Bill,
On Sat, 16 May 2009, Bill Allombert wrote:
Does Lenny includes this trigger ?
No.
Did you consider what will when a partial lenny to squeeze update is made ?
Yes. If the new texinfo/install-info is installed
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 11:20:10AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.25
This was from an aborted wget:
|$ sudo dpkg -i ./coreutils_5.97-5_i386.deb
|(Reading database ... 81656 files and directories currently installed.)
|Preparing to replace coreutils 5.97-5.3 (using
Hello,
I am trying to build dpkg from git source but that fails.
1) origins/Makefile should be removed from configure.ac
2) ChangeLog is not generated, and
dh_installchangelogs -a ChangeLog ChangeLog.old
fails.
3) Maybe a build-dep on git-core is warranted, due to the use of git log.
tags 386197 patch
quit
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 03:30:56PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.21
Severity: normal
$ sudo dpkg --abort-after '' -i /
dpkg-split: error reading /: Is a directory
dpkg: error processing / (--install):
subprocess dpkg-split returned error
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 03:03:20PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote:
I like to say I concurr with Russ. There are some much difference
between packages
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:36:46PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote:
I have to say i verry rarely do not use debuild. And 99% of the
exceptions are calling debian/rules clean.
Precisely, debuild does not use dpkg-buildpackage, but call debian
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 03:03:20PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote:
I like to say I concurr with Russ. There are some much difference
between packages
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:36:46PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Bill Allombert wrote:
I have to say i verry rarely do not use debuild. And 99% of the
exceptions are calling debian/rules clean.
Precisely, debuild does not use dpkg-buildpackage, but call debian
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 01:22:58PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think we're already on that path for quite some time. If your package
uses DEB_(BUILD|HOST)_* variables, you rely on dpkg-buildpackage setting
them for you (with dpkg-architecture).
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:26:40AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
forwarded to the popcon-developers, just in case.
On Thursday 28 August 2008 01:15, Ian Jackson wrote:
Holger Levsen writes (Bug#437118: reassign + close ;-) (not fully sure if
this is right)):
I'm reassigning this to
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 07:19:16PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
El 10/07/08 18:02 Raphael Hertzog escribió:
Hello,
in order to fix #229357 I decided to add a new Build-Options field.
I modified Dpkg::BuildOptions to parse this field and DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS.
And I added support for a
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 07:19:16PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
El 10/07/08 18:02 Raphael Hertzog escribió:
Hello,
in order to fix #229357 I decided to add a new Build-Options field.
I modified Dpkg::BuildOptions to parse this field and DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS.
And I added support for a
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 07:41:21PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
The package should declare (eg with
Build-Options) what the situation is.
My patch does that.
Ah, yes.
Bill, can you give me a reference to what you consider the definitive
definition of the behaviour of your proposed
reopen 229357
thanks
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 03:45:14PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Simon Richter writes (Bug#398625: adapted patch against current dpkg):
I have written a new implementation of the patch proposed earlier,
against the current shell script.
As discussed on
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 09:40:29AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
I think that is just wrong. sbuild should not need to know anything
about dpkg-buildpackage's internals and there is no need for change
here. The currently used and proven interface is:
1. install Build-Depends for running
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 12:41:04AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
Obviously the dpkg developers are rather busy at the moment. I think
that the right thing to do is to offer to NMU.
Errr, what's the rush now to get this fixed? It's something that has
been there like forever, the bug report
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:33:26PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Bill Allombert writes (Re: Can we require build-arch/indep targets for
lenny?):
In 3 years and a half, I had the time to try all of that...
So I will try something new: an online petition:
If you would like bug #229357 to get
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 11:28:34AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Steve Langasek writes (Re: Packages rename and conffiles):
What position do you think we should take on this issue? If there's no
known solution that avoids conffile prompts with both the old and new
versions, and given that
Hello Release and DPKG teams,
A fair number of conffiles have changed of packages.
The issue: dpkg handling of this situation has changed
between Sarge and Etch, see bug#346282.
However, unless we ask the user to upgrade dpkg before anything else,
there is a fair chance half of the system is
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.20
Severity: wishlist
Hello DPKG maintainers,
I would like to propose a new --force option, namely
--force-circular-deps, that would default to yes.
When set to no, dpkg would refuse to break dependencies loop
and flag an error.
This would make easier to track
Hello DPKG developers,
I am attempting to fix a long standing issue in Debian, which is fully
documented in bug #218893, namely the fact that dpkg-buildpackage will
call 'debian/rules build' even when called with -B, thus making
Build-Depends-Indep nearly useless.
For the exact issue please read
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.11.0.1
Severity: minor
Hello dpkg maintainers,
dpkg-architecture(1) has a typo:
If you still wish to support versions of dpkg-dev that did not include
dpkg-architetcure, the following does the job:
I have checked other
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:08:34AM -0500, Chad Walstrom wrote:
Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Policy seems to require that the numbers start with '-1'.
Require is hardly true. If I recall correctly, and perhaps I'm a
geezer in this respect, policy recommends that debian package
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.10.18
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hello dpkg developers,
As discussed in #218893,
here a patch that implement support in dpkg-buildpackage
for `Build-Options: build-arch' in debian/control as
defined in the matching patch to debian-policy.
When a package specify the
On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 08:59:25PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 08:03:18PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Firstly, a test to see if something is a makefile can be as simple as
reading the first line of the file -- does it contain #!/usr/bin/make
-f (as policy
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:07:33AM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Allombert) writes:
merulo% dpkg-deb a b
zsh: segmentation fault dpkg-deb a b
Filed a bug against dpkg yet? The latest build log on buildd.debian.org shows
a number of warnings about pointer casts
Build-Depends: debhelper (=
1.1.17),tetex-bin,tetex-extra,libreadline4-dev,xlib
s-dev,libncurses5-dev
Build-Depends-Indep:
Section: math
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Standards-Version: 3.5.5.0
This calls for some comments:
1) the bug is against dpkg 1.9.17 and still
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.9.19
Severity: normal
Hello dpkg developers,
The way dpkg -l cut columns may generated wrong versions in bug reports:
An example
yellowpig% COLUMNS=80 dpkg -l libopenal0 | grep libopenal0
ii libopenal0 0.2001061600-2 OpenAL is a portable library for 3D spatiali
So
73 matches
Mail list logo
