Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.22.6
To work around FTBFS bug #1066382 in xserver-xorg-video-nouveau, I set
DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=qa=-bug-implicit-func. It seems this is no
longer sufficient with gcc-14, because
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration is actually the default, and so
xserver-xorg-vid
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.22.0
Severity: normal
Upgrading dpkg stops the dpkg-db-backup.timer, which seems rather
undesirable, as it the timer remains inactive until the next reboot or
until it is started manually:
,
| $ systemctl status dpkg-db-backup.timer
| ● dpkg-db-backup.timer - Daily d
Hi Helge,
Am 15.01.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 10:14:24PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Am 13.01.2023 um 21:50 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
>> > As you can see, "linuxinfo_4.1.2.orig.tar.xz.asc" is contained in the
>> > .d
Am 13.01.2023 um 21:50 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> Hello Sven,
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 09:36:47PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Am 13.01.2023 um 21:16 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
>> > Maybe we use the tools differently?
>> >
>> > Since we use source only
Hello Helge,
Am 13.01.2023 um 21:16 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> Hello Sven,
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 09:05:21PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Am 12.01.2023 um 11:29 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
>>
>> > Package: dpkg-dev
>> > Version: 1.21.17
>> > Seve
Hi Helge,
Am 12.01.2023 um 11:29 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.21.17
> Severity: normal
>
> I got a linitian error for my package (linuxinfo) that the upstream
> signature is missing and should be put alongside the .orig.tar.xz
> during the build.
>
> This worked, the
On 2022-02-09 00:43 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 dpkg
>
> [For background, the dpkg output from earlier messages in this bug was:
>
>> # apt-get -f install
>> dpkg: Cycle in triggers found:
>> Chain of packages, which triggers might be the culprit:
>> man-db
On 2022-02-08 22:52 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible
>
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 16:16:28 +0200, Piotr Engelking wrote:
>> Package: dselect
>> Version: 1.15.2
>> Severity: minor
>
>> 'dselect select' beeps when the terminal window is resized.
>>
>> Please
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.21.0
I have just upgraded a two months old sid chroot and noticed that
update-alternatives issued some strange warnings:
,
| Setting up util-linux (2.37.2-4) ...
| update-alternatives: warning: /etc/alternatives/pager has been changed
(manually or by a script); switc
On 2021-09-23 00:20 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.9
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: Niels Thykier
>
> Hi,
>
> the new remove-on-upgrade logic from #822462 breaks the use-case of
> replacing a conffile by a non-conffile version.
Not only that, it also breaks if t
Control: tags -1 - patch
On 2021-01-12 18:46 +0100, наб wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.7.1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> When upgrading the kernel on one of my machines I got hit with
> Preparing to unpack .../linux-image-5.10.0-1-amd64_5.10.5-1_amd64.deb ...
On 2020-11-26 12:19 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.20.5
>
> as seen in
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=dub&arch=amd64&ver=1.22.0-1&;
> stamp=1596920730&raw=0
>
> Running gdc...
> + gdc -Wall -obin/dub -fversion=DubUseCurl -Isource
> -Wl,--push-state,
On 2020-11-09 14:20 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.19.7
> Severity: normal
>
> It would be nice to clarify the behavior of
> dpkg-maintscript-helper/dir_to_symlink with regards to created
> symlinks upon purge operation.
It does not do anything special. The package
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 libncurses-dev 6.2+20200912-1
Control: retitle -2 dpkg and zsh FTBFS: KEY_EVENT undeclared
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tags -2 - ftbfs
On 2020-09-18 19:29 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-09-18 at 18:26:34 +0200, Sven Joachim wr
Am 18.09.2020 um 13:43 schrieb Helmut Grohne:
> Source: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.5
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> dpkg FTBFS as of today:
>
> | g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\"
> | -DADMINDIR=\"/var/lib/dpkg\" -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/lib/dpkg\"
> | -DLOCALLIBDIR=\"/usr/local/lib/dp
Package: libdpkg-perl
Version: 1.20.2
Severity: normal
I have seen the following warning when running sbuild-update:
,
| use get_build_env_allowed() instead at /usr/share/perl5/Sbuild/Conf.pm line
1486.
`
Which gave me absolutely no clue: instead _of what_ (looking at
/usr/share/perl5/S
On 2019-09-05 15:03 -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> I have a commit to fix this here:
> https://salsa.debian.org/ddstreet-guest/dpkg/commit/dcccd6ed83989d7a2a752d05b1e4c0326c8c8a21
>
> however it seems that dpkg in salsa has merge requests disabled, so i
> can't open a merge request for it. Can you
Control: notfound -1 1.20.0
Control: found -1 1.19.7
On 2019-09-05 14:46 -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.0
That version does not exist in Debian.
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The debian/rules file has a manual rule for the 'configure' file, but this
>
Control: merge 844298 -1
Am 09.07.2019 um 15:58 schrieb David Kalnischkies:
> Control: reassign dpkg 1.19.7
>
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 01:52:05AM -0400, Lady Aleena wrote:
>> While I was running apt autoremove, I saw a warning. I did not know it was a
>> warning at first because I could not read
On 2019-06-20 18:19 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Package: apt,dselect
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> [ X-Debbugs-Cc'ed -boot@ for debootstrap ]
>
> today I learned that debootstrap as special code to create the file
> /var/lib/dpkg/cmethopt (contents: "apt apt"); this is the function
> setup
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.19.1
Severity: minor
The latest dpkg upload has added a Breaks on apt (<< 1.7~b) for
--status-fd duplicate removals, but the warnings that could be seen with
earlier apt versions actually came from libapt-pkg, as I have also seen
them in aptitude. Therefore dpkg should br
On 2018-03-30 15:02 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> [adding 894441@ to CC]
>
> Hi Jean-Michel,
>
>> Filled as #894441
>> https://bugs.debian.org/894441
>
> Thanks for this. I was just briefly wondering whether this is related to:
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2017/05/msg00011.html
It
On 2018-01-05 14:04 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 10:55:50 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2018-01-05 10:44 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> > Package: dpkg
>> > Version: 1.19.0.4
>> > Severity: normal
>> >
>> >
On 2018-01-05 10:44 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.19.0.4
> Severity: normal
>
> After switching from rxvt-unicode-256color to rxvt-unicode (see
> #848284), dpkg-query reports a conffile as obsolete:
>
> ,
> | $ dpkg-query -W -f='
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.19.0.4
Severity: normal
After switching from rxvt-unicode-256color to rxvt-unicode (see
#848284), dpkg-query reports a conffile as obsolete:
,
| $ dpkg-query -W -f='${Conffiles}\n' | grep obsolete$
| [...]
| /etc/X11/app-defaults/URxvt 7b221a2da49507e31f42e702791b08
On 2017-08-14 17:26 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.18.24
> Severity: normal
>
> Something strange is happening here: "dpkg --verify" complains about the
> file /usr/share/man/man1/cpp.1.gz (a symlink shipped in the cpp-doc
> package), but on
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.18.24
Severity: normal
Something strange is happening here: "dpkg --verify" complains about the
file /usr/share/man/man1/cpp.1.gz (a symlink shipped in the cpp-doc
package), but only if the package containing it is _not_ given on the
commandline.
,
| $ dpkg -S /usr/sh
om dpkg-deb, it is desirable to avoid fuzzy
translations, I used the following command to produce the second patch:
perl -i -p -CS -e 's/%d\.%d(.*)(dpkg-deb)/%u.%u$1$2/' po/*.po*
Cheers,
Sven
>From 63de6bb3ee8b08537c20cde29342e65e1ca07992 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sven
Source: dpkg
Version: 1.18.24
Severity: minor
In ancient times, dpkg-dev and dselect used to symlink their
/usr/share/doc directory to dpkg. That was not policy compliant (see
#452730), and in dpkg 1.14.15 those symlinks were changed to
directories.
The preinst scripts removing the symlinks are
On 2017-04-30 18:47 -0400, Brad Barnett wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.18.23
>
> Newer versions of dpkg have colourized output.
>
> I can see the usage case for this, and I can see the value for some.
>
> However, for others, it is a major detractor.
>
> One of the issues with the recent colo
Control: forcemerge 134758 -1
On 2017-03-21 12:11 +, Russell Coker wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.18.23
> Severity: normal
>
> # dpkg -S /usr/lib/systemd/libsystemd-shared-232.so
> dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern
> /usr/lib/systemd/libsystemd-shared-232.so
> # dpkg -S /lib/sy
On 2017-02-07 14:41 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 12:23:20 +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> Package: dpkg-dev
>> Version: 1.18.15
>> Severity: minor
>
>> Run: dpkg-buildpackage -S -d -nc
>>
>> Watch this:
>>
>> tglase@tglase-nb:~/squirrel-sql $ svn st
>> ? debian/file
Control: forcemerge 844701 -1
On 2016-12-02 18:30 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 dpkg
>
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 11:45:23PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>> debconf seems to have a broken version number, failing in maintainer
>> scripts.
>
> And yet 1.5.58~ is clearly a perf
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.4
Severity: minor
Commit 4bcc6b8e0a587b432b145fafa642674607cd introduced an error in
the description of the force-confmiss option. This option does, as
mentioned by "dpkg --force-help", always install missing conffiles, and
has done so since its introduction in dpk
Control: reassign -1 dpkg-dev
Control: forcemerge 843073 -1
On 2016-11-15 17:22 +, Wookey wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.18.10
> Severity: normal
>
> I built a large package (mythtv) with this recipie:
> git clone https://github.com/MythTV/packaging -b fixes/0.28
> cd packaging/deb
>
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.18.14
The "warning" keyword in dpkg and other programs is displayed in bold
yellow, which is unreadable with a light background.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture
de dpkg-dev (or more precisely libdpkg-perl) as well. Attached
is a patch to forbid the package combinations that you have now and
which don't work.
Cheers,
Sven
>From 8a23c2485c919e273dd95fc0c4988ee193a9707c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sven Joachim
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 18:31
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.18.10
Severity: normal
Installing the safe-rm package in a freshly bootstrapped chroot where
/bin is a symlink to /usr/bin (the merged-/usr feature implemented in
debootstrap 1.0.85) causes dpkg to segfault.
,
| # apt-get install safe-rm
| [...]
| Selecting previously
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.18.8
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
The dpkg-buildpackage manpage mentions the user configuration file
buildflags.conf rather than buildpackage.conf.
>From 73ef2abc22c21769776ae7dc37911f57fbb8e049 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sven Joachim
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 09
Control: severity -1 grave
On 2016-07-04 08:38 +0200, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.18.8
> Severity: normal
>
> dpkg-buldpackage -B reports:
>
> Can't locate object method "new" via package "Dpkg::Control::Info"
> (perhaps you forgot to load "Dpkg::Control::Info"?) at
> /u
e man page
> still mentions it.
It is supposed to work, but due to a bad check it doesn't. Here is a
patch that works for me.
Cheers,
Sven
>From de0f3c1aa5495a961f62fa23aeee08bbfe182e80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sven Joachim
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:10:05 +0200
Subject
Control: notfound -1 1.17.27
Control: tags -1 - unreproducible moreinfo
On 2016-06-05 00:49 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
> Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo
>
> Hi!
>
> On Sat, 2016-06-04 at 17:43:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Control: reassign -1 dpkg
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.18.4
Severity: important
User: d...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: dpkg-shlibdeps
When working on a prospective libtinfo5-udeb package (see #819397) we
discovered that on architectures which build ncurses multilib libraries,
the libtinfo5-udeb packages gains a bogus dep
On 2015-08-06 04:16 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Control: tag 794688 pending
>
> Hi!
>
> Bug #794688 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
> see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/diff/?id=62
Control: merge 55364 -1
On 2015-08-05 20:27 +0200, Roderich Schupp wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.18.2
> Severity: normal
>
> I did this...
>
> $ dpkg --no-act -i libkactivities-dev_4.13.3-1_amd64.deb
> dpkg: could not open log '/var/log/dpkg.log': Permission denied
> (Reading database
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.18.2
While working on the German translation, I noticed that dpkg documents
the "--predep-packages" option. However, dpkg does not accept this
option, rather it wants "--predep-package" (which is more logical since
it outputs information about a single package at most).
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.18.0
Severity: normal
User: d...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: dpkg-gensymbols
When building ncurses, I noticed quite a few dpkg-gensymbols warnings à la
"debian/libfoo/DEBIAN/symbols doesn't match completely debian/libfoo.symbols"
after upgrading dpkg-dev to 1.18.0.
On 2014-11-20 16:51 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 11:43:15 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Package: dpkg
>> Version: 1.17.21
>> Severity: important
>> User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>> Usertags: multiarch
>
>> dpkg fails to configure a second architecture of
I'm another person observing the problem, after a routine upgrade
shared-mime-info and xboard ended up in status triggers-pending and
triggers-awaited, respectively.
Attached is the part of dpkg.log from the upgrade, as you can see
shared-mime-info's trigger never got processed.
2014-10-27 10:12:
On 2014-10-22 19:08 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 18:49:06 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2014-10-22 08:46 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> > On Mi, 22 oct 14, 08:23:27, Oliver Grimm wrote:
>> >> Package: update-alternatives
>> &g
On 2014-10-22 08:46 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 22 oct 14, 08:23:27, Oliver Grimm wrote:
>> Package: update-alternatives
>> Version: dpkg
>> Severity: minor
>> Tags: l10n
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>>
>> applying update-alternatives to x-session-manager gives the following message
>> (in G
On 2014-04-29 12:27 +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On 29 April 2014 08:11, Guillem Jover wrote:
> [...]
>> 2. Revert the patch and add versioned depdendencies against the working
>> patch package. This might require some dist-upgrade tests, though.
>> 3. Fix the patch to take into acco
On 2014-04-28 17:49 +0200, Andras Korn wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.17.7
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> I tried to install dstat on a relatively recent sid system:
What does "relatively recent" mean?
> # apt-get -u install dstat
> [...]
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.17.7
Severity: normal
I have just received a mail from the daily cron job:
,
| /etc/cron.daily/dpkg:
| cp: der Aufruf von stat für „/var/lib/dpkg/arch“ ist nicht möglich: Datei
oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden
`
In English that would be
cp: cannot stat '/var/lib
On 2013-12-05 22:20 +0100, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.17.3
> Severity: normal
>
> When building C++ projects using debhelper within an up-to-date sid
> cowbuilder these days, i often get the following message during
> dh_shlibdeps:
>
>dh_makeshlibs
>dh_shli
On 2013-03-31 20:56 +0200, Nick Black wrote:
> Sven Joachim left as an exercise for the reader:
>> Well, I don't either. If I find time in the next days I may add the
>> SprezzOS repo to my apt sources in a throwaway chroot to try and
>> reproduce this problem, unle
On 2013-03-31 19:18 +0200, Nick Black wrote:
> Sven Joachim left as an exercise for the reader:
>> Is it possible that the package you installed locally is different from
>> the one on http://www.sprezzatech.com/apt/, despite having the same
>> version number? Compare your o
On 2013-03-31 15:26 +0200, Nick Black wrote:
> Sven Joachim left as an exercise for the reader:
>
>> What does "apt-cache policy apt" print?
>
> [skynet](0) $ apt-cache policy apt
> apt:
> Installed: 0.9.7.8-SprezzOS1
> Candidate: 0.9.7.8-SprezzOS1
>
On 2013-03-31 14:13 +0200, Nick Black wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.16.10
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> You can seem some initial details here:
>
> https://www.sprezzatech.com/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=710
>
> Hi there. I have two packages, "apt" and "gir1.2-gtk-3.0", either of
> wh
On 2013-01-24 19:41 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> (please keep the -l10n-russian list CC'ed)
>
> Quoting Andrey Rahmatullin (w...@wrar.name):
>> Package: dpkg
>> Version: 1.16.9
>> Severity: normal
>> Tags: l10n
>>
>> msgid ""
>> "package could avoid a useless dependency if %s was not linked
On 2013-01-23 19:58 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Guillem Jover (guil...@debian.org):
>
>> I'll check this further and most probably reassign to the other
>> packages.
>
> And probably lower the bug severity, as IMHO, "grave" (or any RC
> severity) is overflated.
Well, "serious" might
On 2013-01-23 12:35 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 03:40:34 +0100, Uwe Storbeck wrote:
>> Package: dpkg
>> Version: 1.16.9
>> Severity: grave
>> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> I doubt this is a problem in dpkg, otherwise this should have shown
> up early on. F
On 2012-07-12 07:25 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:41:59PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> That's not actually an accurate description; dpkg has no way of knowing
>> which of the packages tcl-dev/stable and tk-tile, if any, ships
>> /usr/
On 2012-07-11 22:57 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> Please have a look at this scenario :
>
> apt-get -y -t stable install tcl-dev
> apt-get -y -t stable install tk-tile
> apt-get -y -t unstable install tcl-dev
>
> The first and second commands succeed. The third command fails with this :
>
>
On 2012-07-11 21:47 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 07:44:34PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2012-07-11 19:07 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> > On 2012-07-11 18:53 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
>> >> In my opinion, regardless of the order i
On 2012-07-11 21:18 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 07:07:49PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2012-07-11 18:53 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
>> > In my opinion, regardless of the order in which these two packages are
>> > installed, dpkg should
retitle 681243 dpkg: warn when different packages have same file as directory
and symlink
merge 406715 681243
thanks
On 2012-07-11 19:07 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2012-07-11 18:53 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
>
>> Package: dpkg
>> Version: 1.16.7
>>
>>
On 2012-07-11 18:53 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.16.7
>
> The file /usr/include/tcl is a directory or a symbolic link depending on the
> order of installation of the packages tk-tile 0.8.2-2.2 and tcl-dev 8.5.0-2.
See #612264 on that topic.
> This can be reproduced qui
On 2012-06-09 18:39 +0200, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> package: dpkg
> version: 1.16.4.1
> severity: important
> user: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> usertags: multiarch
>
> Hi,
>
> wine is now making use of the 'Multi-Arch: allowed' feature to provide
> i386 dependencies for an amd64 virt
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.4
The trigger-related changes in 1.16.4 have a rather nasty side effect.
Running update-menus in maintainer scripts (as done by dh_installmenu,
for instance) no longer processes menu's triggers:
,
| # dpkg --unpack iceape_2.7.5-1_i386.deb
| (Reading database ... 2
On 2012-04-14 09:17 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> commit a354992c67411ed10499786012701faa33ed8565
> Author: Guillem Jover
> Date: Sat Apr 14 04:26:52 2012 +0200
>
> dpkg-deb: Add epoch when needed to built package names
>
>
On 2012-04-08 16:58 +0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
> ,
> | (...)
> | dpkg-shlibdeps -Tdebian/mplayer2.subsvars debian/mplayer2/usr/bin/mplayer
> | dpkg-shlibdeps: error: no dependency information found for
> /lib/libncurses.so.5 (used by debian/mplayer2/usr/bin/mplayer).
> `
>
> I am not r
On 2012-02-13 19:46 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 07:27:18PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> popcon actually uses:
>> dpkg-query --show --showformat='${status} ${package}\n'
>> and
>> dpkg -L $pkg
>>
>> What does that give on your system?
>
> dpkg-query with those options d
On 2011-10-28 11:33 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> > Well, if it finds a system library with a shlibs/symbols file, the
>> > generated dependency can't really be wrong.
>>
>> It can, because some symbols may b
On 2011-10-28 10:09 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> That's true. Actually the FTBFS is not my biggest concern, packages
>> with broken dependencies are a worse problem and are just as likely to
>> result.
>
> W
On 2011-10-28 08:09 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Whether it's multi-arch enabled depends on the debhelper and dpkg-dev
>> versions on the build system. With debhelper from squeeze-backports and
>> dpkg-dev from squeeze, nc
On 2011-10-27 21:26 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> The reason seems to be that {/usr,}/lib/i386-linux-gnu is not in the
>> dynamic linker's search path in squeeze. Perhaps dpkg-dev should depend
>> on multiarch-support, whic
On 2011-10-25 20:25 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.16.1.1
> Severity: normal
>
> I tried to build ncurses 5.9-2 in a squeeze chroot with only the
> necessary build dependencies (debhelper, dpkg-dev and libdpkg-perl)
> upgraded to the wheezy ver
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.16.1.1
Severity: normal
I tried to build ncurses 5.9-2 in a squeeze chroot with only the
necessary build dependencies (debhelper, dpkg-dev and libdpkg-perl)
upgraded to the wheezy version. The result was not quite satisfactory,
because dpkg-shlibdeps did not find libt
On 2011-02-28 12:03 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> The 3.0 source formats by default ignore what dpkg-source -I would exclude.
>> It appears that as soon as you explicitly use -Isomething, this effect is
>> canceled and you need to use -I to get
On 2011-10-24 18:24 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 17:34:20 +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>> Package: dpkg-dev
>> Version: 1.16.1.1
>> Severity: minor
>> File: dpkg-genchanges.1
>>
>> Please have a closer look at the NAME chapter of genchanges.1,
>> dpkg-dpkg-genchanges does not
forcemerge 231089 640852
thanks
On 2011-09-08 00:27 +0200, Peter Flynn wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.16.0~ubuntu7
> Severity: minor
> Tags: l10n
>
> The message issued at each package installation says:
> "Selecting previously deselected package "
>
> The word "deselected" should read "unse
On 2011-08-23 15:10 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Thanks, this was very helpful indeed. After reading that, the only
>> pitfall I fell in was that git does not preserve hardlinks, so I needed
>> to handle that in build-ho
On 2011-08-21 22:12 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> > Can you also turn your testcase in a patch against pkg-tests.git?
>>
>> Once I have acquainted myself with the testsuite, probably yes. Might
>> take a few days, I h
On 2011-08-21 11:04 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The problem is that the hardlinking code is not aware that the target
> file is still in .dpkg-new and not yet in its final location. This is
> because conffile are not processed like normal files and thus do not
> inherit the usual fnnf_deferred
On 2011-08-18 13:06 +0200, Igor Pashev wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.16.0.3
> Severity: normal
>
> By default all files in /etc are considered as config files and to be kept on
> package upgrade (or ask to user what to do with new config file).
Those which are shipped in packages as conffil
retitle 7330 dpkg: support versioned Provides
merge 7330 24934
thanks
On 1997-02-12 03:23 +0100, Orn E. Hansen wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.4.0.5
>
> replacing a pacage with another, that provides the same package. Causes
> conflicts with programs that depend on it... an example:
>
> I ha
On 2006-10-08 18:53 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.13.22
> Severity: important
>
> piper:~# dpkg -S /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/ntp
> logcheck-database: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/ntp
> piper:~# ls -l /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/ntp
> -rw-r- 1 root logcheck 4
On 2011-08-07 15:17 +0200, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
>> Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>>> , compiler flags are not set at all for packages using dh-style rules
>>> files, unless those packages are upgraded to debhelper compatibility
>>> level 9.
Hi folks,
with this change from dpkg-dev git:
,
| * dpkg-buildpackage no longer exports the compiler flags. Closes: #560070
| Packages must directly call dpkg-buildflags to retrieve them.
`
and the following from debhelper 8.9.4:
,
| * dpkg-buildflags is only used to set env
On 2011-08-03 13:11 +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Excerpts from Jonathan Nieder's message of Wed Aug 03 12:54:12 +0200 2011:
>> Michal Suchanek wrote:
>>
>> > It's possible to take some random binary which is likely to be native
>> > (eg. /bin/sh), run ldd on it, and parse the output to determi
On 2011-06-27 18:29 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 15:01:20 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2011-06-27 13:43 +0200, Roger Broadbent wrote:
>> > After a little further investigation, it appears that before upgrade, I
>> > had no
>> >
On 2011-06-22 21:10 +0200, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:50:40PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> This is bad indeed. However, I am unable to reproduce this behavior.
>> Could you please send your /var/log/dpkg.log (compress it first) and the
>
On 2011-06-22 19:56 +0200, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.16.0.3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> I have pretty much the entirety of the X stack diverted through
> dpkg-divert so I can keep package dependencies, but still run all my own
> built-
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.16.0.3
Severity: normal
It is useful to write comments in symbols files, but the dpkg-gensymbols
manpage does not document how to do this. From the code in
SymbolFile.pm it can be deduced, but to the naive user it might not be
so obvious that the comment marker must b
Author: Sven Joachim
Date: Mon May 2 12:14:22 2011 +0200
German dpkg translation update
Update to 1016t.
Change translation of downgrade messages (Closes: #620312).
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 4136af8..bc414e9 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian
Am 01.05.2011 um 12:29 schrieb Jonas Stein:
>> So my vote is to switch to "durch eine ältere Version ersetzt".
>
> That sounds well.
> If it is too long one could think of reducing it to
>
> "durch ältere Version ersetzt"
>
> but i think Raphaels suggestion is better.
The messages mention the pr
Am 01.04.2011 um 18:57 schrieb Wolfgang Schweer:
> On Fr, 01 Apr 2011, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
>
>> #: src/archives.c:1369
>> #, c-format
>> msgid "downgrading %.250s from %.250s to %.250s."
>> msgstr "%.250s wird von %.250s zu %.250s deaktualisiert."
>>
>> #: src/archives.c:1374
>> #, c-format
>
On 2011-01-25 09:08 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> > In other words, how about something like this patch?
>>
>> I don't think that's a good idea at this point. A year ago, maybe.
>>
>> One issue Sven mentioned on irc is that an unknown number of pa
On 2011-01-24 23:38 +0100, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Rather than forcing the removal or upgrade of various info browsers
> before dpkg, let dpkg provide the install-info functionality for
> another release. Other packages will still depend on install-info
> directly so the dependency can be droppe
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
