On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
> If I call
>
> dpkg-genchanges -v1.2.12.04-1etch2
>
> but the changelog doesn't actually have that merged, dpkg-genchanges
> includes the entire changelog in the changes file. I'd say it should
> only include stanzas which are newer than what's passe
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008, Matthias Klose wrote:
> gpc-4.1 (2.1-4.1.2-22~dummy) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Upload as gpc-4.1.
>
> -- Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:44:14 +0200
>
> gcc-4.1 (4.1.2-22) unstable; urgency=low
>
> [...]
>
> If you don't have this dummy entry,
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.27
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Enhance dpkg-shlibdeps's error message when a library can't be found to
#include the ELF format of the desired library. Closes: #474671
#
package dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
tags 474
severity 477954 normal
thanks
I'm CCing Joey who wrote the initial support for the git source package.
He might want to provide his input and maybe even a patch. Release
managers agreed to push changes/fixes in lenny for the new source package
formats since they are not used in lenny at all.
In r
On Mon, 05 May 2008, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> 'this is instead used'. To me that clearly says dpkg will do the
> ignoring automatically with "-i". A regexp can never say 'uncommited
> file'.
>
> As that is not the case I think this should be changed to
>
> '(If the source package is being bu
Hi,
On Tue, 06 May 2008, Russell Coker wrote:
> As the patch for this was committed almost a month ago, would it be possible
> to have a 1.14.18.1 release which includes this if the rest of 1.14.19 isn't
> ready?
>
> I'd like to reduce the number of outstanding SE Linux issues in unstable, it
On Wed, 07 May 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> However this is not always the case when the object is deleted:
> * Let's say package bar has set interest on /usr/share/bar.
> * Package foo_0.1 contains /usr/share/bar/foo.xml.
> * Package foo_0.2 does not contain any file in /usr/s
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.27
#
# dpkg (1.14.19) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Fix changelog parser to not fail when an unexpected changelog entry
#appears without the preceding heading line. Closes: #478925
#
package dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
tags 478925 +
On Wed, 07 May 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Do you have the (real) packages where this happened just for test purpose?
>
> Sure, everything is there: http://malsain.org/~joss/debian/
I created a simpler test case since I have no amd64. Attached are two
test packages. Version 2.0 contains a m
forcemerge 41794 480270
thanks
On Fri, 09 May 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
> I suggest that dpkg-buildpackage should honour $DEBKEYID, and if
> that's unset and the current method fails to identify a key ID, then
> it should try to find the key using only the maintainer/uploader
> email, instead o
severity 480638 normal
tag 480638 + wontfix
thanks
On Sun, 11 May 2008, Alexis Huxley wrote:
> In changelog.Debian.gz I see:
>
>* Add build-essential as an implicit Build-Depends in
> dpkg-checkbuilddeps.
>Closes: #402901
>
> which is clearly the cause of the problem. The as
On Sun, 11 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please make all and create new /var/log/dpkg.log* in 644 mode.
> I see no reason for not letting users see what is going on.
> The can do dpkg -l anyway, and the only files not readable by the user
> in e.g., /var/lib/dpkg/ are some 0 byte lock files
On Sun, 11 May 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 08 mai 2008 à 21:39 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> > On Wed, 07 May 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > > Do you have the (real) packages where this happened just for test
> > > > purpose?
> > &
clone 480638 -1
reassign -1 build-essential
retitle -1 please update description since dpkg-buildpackage requires
build-essential
severity -1 wishlist
thanks
On Sun, 11 May 2008, Alexis Huxley wrote:
> 2) assign one half to the build-essential people so that the text:
>
> > > ... Moreover this
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.27
#
# dpkg (1.14.19) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Change the "2.0" and "3.0 (quilt)" source packages to refuse by default
#binary files in the debian sub-directory. They have to be whitelisted
#through debian/source/includ
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.27
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Add a --query option to update-alternatives. Closes: #336091, #441904
#
package dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
tags 441904 + pending
tags 336091 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
retitle 481185 document deprecation of --print-avail
thanks
On Wed, 14 May 2008, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > When i want to look at the info of an installed pakage, i use the -p flag.
> > If i accidently give the flag in the wrong case ei. -P the package is purged
> > from my system.
>
> Not working
forcemerge 20471 481823
thanks
On Sun, 18 May 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Using "dpkg -i" I was able to upgrade a package to a newer version,
> introducing a dependency break on a Provides-ed package.
This is nothing new and it's not serious, it has always been so. Merging
with the other du
severity 143307 important
thanks
On Mon, 05 May 2008, Gunter Ohrner wrote:
> Followup-For: Bug #143307
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.14.18
>
> When trying to upgrade my SID system as I do every few days, dpkg crashed
> with the above mentioned assertion failure.
AFAIK, this error message happens
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > So, it seems you've been able to push it..:)...and this is confirmed
> > by D-I level 5 stats (you're back to 100%).
>
> I guess it was just the CIA script that failed, which is non-fatal,
> but it's not obvious from the error message. I'll talk with t
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
#
# dpkg (1.14.20) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Basque (Piarres Beobide). Closes: #481043
# * Galician (Jacobo Tarrio). Closes: #483441
# * Norwegian Bokmal (Hans Fredrik Nordhaug). Closes: #480626
# * Simplified Chinese (Den
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * dpkg -S now trims trailing slashes in its parameters. Closes: #129577
#
package dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
tags 129577 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Update dpkg(1) to refer to conffile whenever we speak of configuration
#file handled by dpkg. Thus harmonize vocabulary with the policy. Thanks
#to Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Improve error message stating that dpkg is unable to create a file so that
#it also refers to the real filename instead of the non-diverted name only.
#Thanks to Daniel Hahl
On Tue, 27 May 2008, Colin Watson wrote:
> I also have an item on my to-do list to deal with
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=432893, which showed up
> at one point during the merge. The bulk of the fix for this seems to be
> here:
>
>
> http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * dpkg-gencontrol can now again read the control file from its standard
#input with "-c-". Closes: #465340
#
package dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
tags 465340 + pending
--
To UNSUB
reassign 484469 perl
thanks
Hi,
Neither is this dpkg that's faulty:
/bin/sh: line 1: 10805 Segmentation fault /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt
It simply looks like that perl segfaults whenever it has something to do.
Giovanni, you simply show the final problem but I suppose it didn't app
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.14.19
Severity: wishlist
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> The triggered script is called once at the end of the dpkg run, and once
> after the set of changed packages are unpacked. (I'm not sure why the
> latter call happens.)
We should investigate this and documen
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/python-glade2_2.12.1-5_amd64.deb
> /var/cache/apt/archives/python-gtk2_2.12.1-5_amd64.deb
> (Reading database ... 191198 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace python-glade2 2.12.1-5 (using
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > Your diagnostic is right and reading the manual page of dpkg-genchanges
> > would have confirmed it.
>
> The man-page does not contain such an information. Please take a look at
> it yourself. If this information is part of a different man-page, then
Hello,
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008, Timothy G Abbott wrote:
> dpkg-divert should provide an option to find out what package diverts a
> given file (currently the only way to extract this information is to
> parse the dpkg-divert output, which is not ideal).
>
> I've attached a patch against current git
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> I wrote a patch and will send it once I know the bug number.
Please before starting to write a patch, check if there's no fix
in the git tree already... in particular when I pointed out
that the upcoming dpkg 1.14.20 contained some changes related
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > Please before starting to write a patch, check if there's no fix
> > in the git tree already... in particular when I pointed out
> > that the upcoming dpkg 1.14.20 contained some changes related to the new
> > format.
> I did debcheckout dpkg and
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, James Vega wrote:
> Since this potentially causes any *new* installs of packages using
> diversions to fail, I'm raising the severity to important. The current
> behavior will cause failed installs for packages that divert files in
> package-specific directories using the code
severity 483997 wishlist
thanks
On Sun, 01 Jun 2008, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Right now, if you have two packages that have a relationship with each
> other beyond a strict Dependency, there is no way to communicate that
> relationship to dpkg. I'm talking about things covered semantically
> by the
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Stephen Gran wrote:
> I'm talking about ordering of maintainer scripts in an install run.
This I understood, but maintainer script are mostly used for simple tasks
and for starting/stopping services. Thus I was asking you if the
case where you want to order the configuration o
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.14.20
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
>
> Policy 3.8.0.1, section 4.9.1, on DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS:
>
> If multiple flags are given, they must be separated by whitespace.
>
> dpkg-buildpackage uses "," separators
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Modified Dpkg::BuildOptions to recognize and use spaces as separator
#in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS (in order to conform with the Debian policy
#ruling estasblished
Hi,
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008, Guillaume Melquiond wrote:
> $ dpkg --configure -a
> Setting up xulrunner-1.9 (1.9~b5-4) ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/xulrunner-1.9.postinst: line 12: 4477 Segmentation fault
> ./regxpcom
> dpkg: error processing xulrunner-1.9 (--configure):
> subprocess post-installat
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Add DEB_VENDOR environment variable in the build environment to be able to
#change behaviour dynamically depending on the vendor of the current system
#(or
tag 487455 + pending
thanks
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.14.19
> Tags: patch
>
> Kindly accept the following two patches to correct the terrible
> misleading language on the man pages.
Thanks, I reworded the manual page but did not use your patch dir
Hi,
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Attaching a version against current master (since this can't make it to lenny
> anyway).
>
> PS: an (N)ACK would be nice.
We have received your patch. Your patch would be even better if it was
complete: please update the documentation of dpkg-bu
tag 357093 + wontfix
thanks
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.13.11.0.1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I found
> ...|dpkg --merge-avail -
> ...|dpkg --merge-avail /dev/stdin
> dpkg --merge-avail < file
> don't work. One can only do
> dpkg --merge-avail file.
> (I was
retitle 292481 Collaborative repository of package meta-information is needed
reassign 292481 project
thanks
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Artur Górniak wrote:
> I think that it will be much of use to add:
> Screenshot(s): http_path
> to deb package description for graphical package handling programs.
>
>
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Jonas Meyer wrote:
> > This package contains the same m4/funcs.m4 file which is the one in
> > charge of this check. So please include the relevant config.log
> > snippet. Also it would help if you could autoreconf that slind version
> > and crossbuild it (and I assume you've a
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Document -A option in dpkg-buildpackage(1). Closes: #482834
# * Add some warning concerning the available file and the related commands.
#They are mostly obso
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > Your patch would be even better if it was
> > complete: please update the documentation of dpkg-buildpackage accordingly.
>
> OK. This means editing man/dpkg-buildpackage.1?
Yes.
> > I don't know if we want to put both in the same module or if we n
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > As such, it probably makes sense to add support for both in the same
> > module but with different commands to allow checking one set or the other
> > or both.
>
> I'm not really sure this is a good idea. The way I see it, Build-Options is
> most use
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Oleg Atamanenko wrote:
> Should I provide some extra information, etc?
Yes you should it's not clear what goes wrong on your machine and
nobody else had such a problem.
Can you provide a log of the upgrade session ?
What does /var/log/dpkg.log show from you long upgrade
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Oleg Atamanenko wrote:
> > Do you have the problem with other packages as well ?
>
> With any package. I suppose it is the problem with dpkg itself.
Weird. Did you try to "strace" dpkg to see what makes him so busy ?
"strace -p " to trace an already running process.
Did you c
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Add new option --listpackage to dpkg-divert. Thanks to Timothy G Abbott
#<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for the patch. Closes: #485012
#
package dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
ta
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Add new option --require-valid-signature to dpkg-source. Closes: #390282
#
package dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
tags 390282 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Oleg Atamanenko wrote:
> connect(11, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(389),
> sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 16) = -1 EINPROGRESS (Operation now in
> progress)
>
Please try to remove libnss-ldap
tags 487768 + pending
thanks
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.14.20
> Severity: serious
>
> /usr/share/dpkg/archtable is missing armel. This should be fixed for
> lenny.
Committed in the lenny branch, will be in 1.14.21.
--- a/debian/archtable
+++ b/debian
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.14.21) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Add "armel" to /usr/share/dpkg/archtable. Closes: #487768
package dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
tags 487768 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> This is already fixed in the master branch which contains the version
> 1.15.0 intended for lenny+1.
> http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=9866c4bafdf147ad764f31e2747f5c1012802b1d
>
> Should that fix be backported
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.14.21) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Thai (Theppitak Karoonboonyanan). Closes: #488090
package dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
tags 488090 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
tags 488293 + pending
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>-p, --print-avail package-name...
> Display details about package-name, as found in
> /var/lib/dpkg/available.
>
> Perhaps mention that -p missed important details like Tags, and one
> should u
tags 175740 - patch moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, 07 Jan 2003, Casper Gielen wrote:
> This patch allows the start-stop-daemon to start processes from the realtime
> scheduler. It uses the "--realtime" and "-l" options. This is usefull
> for processes that never should be unable to run (eg high resolutio
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Improve error message in install-info when the file doesn't exist.
#Thanks to Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Closes: #107098
#
package dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
og
Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
>From 56aef1cb2d0f52e10b3612667987c2bbad024e4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:18:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add wide-character
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> I upgraded the hypervisor to the Sid version (3.2.1-2) but that fails
> all the same. :(
You responded to a wrong bug number apparently. This one concerns dpkg.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch :
http://ww
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > While I realize that using dpkg-divert on conffiles is an uncommon
> > practice, the current behavior is clearly wrong.
> >
> > I've attached a simple git patch against current head that fixes this.
>
> Thanks for the patch! There's a problem with it
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.14.18
Severity: important
It's the second time that someone is reporting me such problems, so they
are worth investigating IMO.
After some operation, they end up with a system where the status file has
a package with a status "install ok triggers-awaited":
(sid)[EMAIL PRO
merge 487637 489068
thanks
I remembered I helped someone on IRC about a similar problem but I forgot
that I asked him to report it... so I filed a duplicate myself. Merging
them now.
I expect Peter to provide us the corresponding dpkg.log and to say us if
he had similar problems ("disk full") in
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I've reproduced the problem from #143307 and attached is a fix.
Thanks!
> The core of the problem was that if dpkg is interrupted, you can have
> the following situation:
>
> Package: a
> Triggers-Awaited: b
>
> Package: b
> Status: ...
On Thu, 03 Jul 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Package: a
> > Triggers-Awaited: b
> >
> > Package: b
> > Status: ... installed
>
> So it's exactly the same situation as in #487637, #489068. Looks like both
> are correlated after al
(Switching from bug 143307 to 487637)
On Thu, 03 Jul 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jul 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > Package: a
> > > Triggers-Awaited: b
> > >
> > > Package: b
> > > Status: ... installed
> >
(Cc -devel to seek input)
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> Acording to the LSB specifications for init scripts [1]:
>
> "For all other init-script actions, the init script shall return an exit
> status of zero if the action was successful. Otherwise, the exit status
> shall be non
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
reassign 426877 debian-policy 3.8.0.1
retitle 426877 Clarify what "sensible behaviour" is for init scripts
thanks
Ok, this confirms my initial feeling. Changing this in dpkg would require
a wide-scale testing and much effort for little gains since the p
On Thu, 03 Jul 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Then the --no-act fix which should probably only go in master.
> > http://git.debian.org/?p=users/hertzog/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=4073a72477be5fac51125ab1474f91d6b98654b3
>
> I think the --no-act fix should go in lenny. Failing that we need at
> the ver
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.14.21) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Apply patch from Ian Jackson to correctly handle packages in status
#triggers-awaited while trying to sort out a proper order for configuring
#packages. C
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Use description of installed package as fallback in dselect.
#Based on a patch from Bruce Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Closes: #21659
#
package dselect dpkg-dev
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Sergei Ivanov wrote:
> Could you drop me a note on whether the feature is worth considering
> for inclusion to dpkg, at some point in the future? (I don't know,
> maybe I'm the only one who finds fakeroot inconvenient.)
At first sight, it looks reasonable. I updated your patc
Hi Carlo,
sorry for the delay in getting back to you but dpkg has many open bugs...
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Carlo Contavalli wrote:
> I'm a DD too, and if there is any chance for it to be included
> in the ``upstream'' dpkg, I'd be willing to work on writing
> documentation, verify it works under kf
On Fri, 04 Jul 2008, Timothy G Abbott wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 01 Jul 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
>>>> While I realize that using dpkg-divert on conffiles is an uncommon
>>>> practice, the current behavior is clearly wro
Hello,
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> "dselect select" seems to take about 48 MB while displaying the
> packages, this causes a small-memory system (32MB) to go heavily into
> swap.
>
> A quick run with valgrind --tool=massif reveals that about 15MB are
> allocated by 'newpad'.
tags 316521 - patch
retitle 316521 dpkg forgets shared directories containing manually generated
files which are removed by postrm purge
thanks
The situation on this bug is a bit complicated so I'll make a summary... I
took some time to read everything.
First of all, Frank fixed the bulk of the
Hi Henning,
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Henning Makholm wrote:
> This patch adds a force option to dpkg which will cause it to offer to
> replace a locally changed conffile with the file provided in the .deb
> even if the .deb's file has not changed since the current
> installation.
I find this option u
tags 77828 - patch
tags 77828 + wontfix
thanks
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, Martin Quinson wrote:
> Here is an (unified) patch against update-alternatives.pl as found today in
> the CVS. Its purpose is to allow the users to manage an "alternative" system
> on their account.
I'm not really inclined to sup
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Seems fine to me as well, except for the few missing spaces and more
> than one statement on the same line.
Ok, will fix before merge.
> > On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> > > The attached patch helps with low-memory performance by implem
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Reduce memory usage of dselect by avoiding usage of a big infopad.
#Thanks to Michel Lespinasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for the patch.
#Closes: #395140
#
pack
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Mar 2005, Changwoo Ryu wrote:
> > If the patch is too long to be accepted for now, how about starting
> > with replacing libncurses5 with libncursesw5? Just replacing, without
> > touching other things, is also usef
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008, Kees Cook wrote:
> This is a patch that add support for the "hardening-wrapper" package's
> set of build flags, in the hopes of merging hardening-wrapper's
> functionality into dpkg-buildpackage at some point in the future.
Thanks for the patch, but I really dislike the comple
min-debian/
>From 1ebeff797bc36c91e50f02c6d32cba094e827add Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 22:03:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Refactor Dpkg::BuildOptions to handle Build-Options field
* scripts/Dpkg/BuildOptions.pm: complete rewrite of t
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> El 10/07/08 18:02 Raphael Hertzog escribió:
> > Hello,
> >
> > in order to fix #229357 I decided to add a new Build-Options field.
> > I modified Dpkg::BuildOptions to parse this field and DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS.
> > And
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
> 1) I think that one should be able to remove Debian packages with /proc
> not mounted.
This doesn't mean that s-s-d has a problem however. And I don't agree
with the premise that /proc should not be required.
> 2) I chose to report this bug against Etc
Hi,
thanks for your answers.
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Even if there's only two things, the fact is that the package maintainer
> > wants not only to decide what is supported but he might also want to
> > enable some features..
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Because they want that anyone can easily rebuild it with that option
> > disabled?
>
> That is already supported using the existing DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS mechanism.
>
> I may be confused about your mental model here, but it seems like you're
> moving rules
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Kees Cook wrote:
> Well, the original goal was to move the hardening option knowledge out
> of hardening-wrapper and into dpkg-buildpackage, so this was designed to
> be a migration path.
Why do we need a migration path and not a direct migration ? Since
hardening-wrapper does
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I have reproduced this bug in the course of a routine upgrade to my
> main not really very unusual lenny box. I have a reproduceable test
> case for a /var/lib/dpkg. I'm not attaching that to this bug because
> I intend to fix it but if I haven't done so
Hi Ian,
you also forgot to reply to this mail:
On Fri, 04 Jul 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jul 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Then the --no-act fix which should probably only go in master.
> > > http://git.debian.org/?p=users/hertzog/dp
On Thu, 03 Jul 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Bug#487637: config of triggers-awaited
> packages"):
> > (Switching from bug 143307 to 487637)
> > There are two problems where I'd welcome your input:
>
> Thanks for looking at thi
e fix for this in the lenny branch.
Cheers,
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+2008-08-15 Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * Dpkg/Source/Package.pm (new): Call init_options() only if
+ initialize() has been called as it's supposed to be called
+
Hi,
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> I've noted the following things when studying the man page of
> dpkg-source
> * In the section "Building" of the description of 3.0 (quilt) it
> is stated:
> "The updated debian directory and the list of modified
>
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Clarify two points in dpkg-source(1). Closes: #490693
#
package dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
tags 490693 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.14.21) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Slovak (Ivan Masár). Closes: #488903, #495505
#
package dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
tags 495505 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
Hi,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
> $ dpkg-source --format=3 -b wmaker-data-0.9~2
> dpkg-source: error: source package format `3' is not supported (Perl module
> Dpkg::Source::Package::V3 is required)
>
> /usr/share/perl5/Dpkg/Source/Package/V3.pm in fact does not exist.
>
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# via tagpending
#
# dpkg (1.14.22) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * The last "small fix" actually broke conversion of source packages to
#"3.0 (quilt)" format when they have local changes and no pre-existing
#quilt series
Hi,
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.14.21
> Severity: important
>
> It seems that dpkg-source is unable to convert existing packages into
> the new 3.0 (quilt) format if these packages do not use quilt already:
Indeed. Here's the patch pushed in lenny br
801 - 900 of 968 matches
Mail list logo
