?p=gcc.git;h=f2851a7cff4d74edca26d39c7bfa1264355a22ed
Would it be possible to update the gcc-10 package with this fix?
Ideally, in stable too...
Regards,
Stephen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.3
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500,
27;s at least a really small patch.
Would be great to get this fixed in gcc-6 so that pgbackrest and
PostgreSQL can be built on powerpc64-le-linux-gnu, otherwise we'll end
up having to drop support for this platform on stretch.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 10:26:08 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 06.11.2016 23:14, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > The uudecode invocation in rules.patch assumes it's running in the
> > parent directory of the debian directory containing the uuencoded
> > file, whereas the rest of
. The attached patch uses patchdir to find
go-relocation-test-gcc620-sparc64.obj.uue, allowing rules.patch to be
used externally again (e.g. in gcc-mingw-w64).
Regards,
Stephen
diff -u gcc-6-6.2.0/debian/rules.patch gcc-6-6.2.0/debian/rules.patch
--- gcc-6-6.2.0/debian/rules.patch
+++ gcc-6-6.2.0/d
linux-gnueabi (>= 5.3.1-3~)
> but 5.3.1-2cross1 is installed.
You need to remove (or upgrade) the *cross* packages first.
Regards,
Stephen
bug, thanks for
your detective work!
Regards,
Stephen
> The problem can be reproduced without ccache by building src/hash/sha1.cpp
> with -save-temps:
>
> % cd src
> % /usr/bin/g++ -save-temps -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\"
> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../inclu
egards,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
build-conflits against binutils-gold which is now provided
by binutils.
The fix is trivial of course ;-).
Regards,
Stephen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'unstable'), (1,
fixes
this, and also drops a FIXME related to adding sid (and adds sid of
course).
Given that builds are supposed to target sid, and gcc-4.7 builds fine
there, I'm filing this at severity normal.
Regards,
Stephen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
Hi Christoph,
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 06:41:14PM -0700, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Stephen Kitt writes:
> > Is there anything that can be done? I suppose now that gcc-4.7 is the
> > default, there isn't much point in fixing the gcc-4.6 builds, but I
> > would like t
in advance,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
see
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=gcc-mingw-w64&arch=kfreebsd-amd64
for the details. The last failure was yesterday...
Regards,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ould
> anyone consider it unreasonable to build gcc-mingw-w64 without ada
> suport on armhf so that libreoffice can be built?
I wouldn't; I can definitely upload a new version of gcc-mingw-w64
which drops Ada support on armhf.
Regards,
Stephen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 19:18:26 +0200, Ove Kåven wrote:
> Den 29. mars 2011 01:08, skrev Stephen Kitt:
> > In order to upload to Debian, it would theoretically be
> > possible to upload mingw-w64 since it's "Arch: all", then upload the full
> > gcc-mingw-w64
work on improving mingw-w64 once that's done. It may be worth waiting
for dpkg-dev to support Built-Using for now though, hopefully that won't take
too long!
Note also that I'm a DM, but I don't expect a DMUA on such involved packages
just yet.
Thank you for your time,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> > On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:16:28 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 03:27:21AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > On 17.03.2011 00:42, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > > > > I've looked through the various patches but I haven't
Hi,
I see the following email isn't in the list archives, it seems it got
filtered somewhere so I'm resending it...
Regards,
Stephen
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:16:28 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 03:27:21AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 17.03.2011
e it out?
Thanks in advance,
Stephen
PS. Please cc me on replies, I'm not subscribed to this mailing list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110316234255.gi19...@sk2.org
Package: gcc-4.5-source
Version: 4.5.1-9
Severity: normal
Hi,
The gcc-4.5-source package depends on autoconf2.59 but debian/rules.patch
declares
autoconf_version = 2.64
Which is correct?
Regards,
Stephen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT
use it to
find the svn-updates.diff patch. This means that when trying to build
a package using rules.patch in a separate build tree, that part
fails... The attached (trivial) patch fixes this.
Regards,
Stephen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
A
Package: gnat-4.4
Version: 4.4.3-1
Severity: normal
When OpenToken tests are linked with the AUnit dynamic library, the
tests fail in odd ways. However, when the OpenToken tests bypass the
AUnit dynamic library, and just include the AUnit sources in the
project, the OpenToken tests work properly.
s-tpoben.ads:226:14: (style) missing "overriding" indicator in declaration of
"Finalize"
--
-- Stephe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: gnat-4.4
Version: 4.4.2-4
When compiling a project that includes Ada.Finalization with the
compiler option -gnatyO, I get the following errors:
s-pooglo.ads:56:13: (style) missing "overriding" indicator in declaration of
"Storage_Size"
s-pooglo.ads:60:14: (style) missing "overriding" ind
Package: gnat-4.4
Version: 4.4.2-4
I'm debugging Ada code compiled with gnat-4.4. gdb supports Ada:
(gdb) show lang
The current source language is "auto; currently ada".
However, it does not suppor the 'break exception' command:
(gdb) break exception
"exception" is not a function
'catch except
Package: gnat-4.4
Version: 4.4.2-4
I had gcc-4.4 (4.4.1-3) and gnat-4.3 installed. I upgraded to
gnat-4.4, but it was non-functional, complaining it could not find
system.ads. The problem turned out to be a missing symlink, that is
installed by gcc-4.4 (4.4.2).
The root cause is that gnat-4.4 dep
end on
gcj-4.3. So, the quoted diagnosis is surely wrong. I think instead that
default-jdk is missing a Depend on gcj-jdk OR java-gcj-compat-dev is missing
a Depend on gcj-jdk.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_))
).
| Hunk #2 succeeded at 209 (offset -5 lines).
| patching file src/gcc/unwind-generic.h
| Hunk #1 succeeded at 211 (offset -3 lines).
| Hunk #2 succeeded at 230 (offset -3 lines).
| Patch cross-fixes.diff does not apply (enforce with -f)
| make: *** [stamps/02-patch-stamp] Error 1
--
Stephen R. Marenka
a related failure mode are tracked as GCC bugs #36505 and
#38000 upstream. It appears that the GCC developers have decided that
this use of #include_next was a mistake, so for 4.3.3 and 4.4.0 this
will be fixed by reverting to a regular #include.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36505
http://
Package: gcj-4.1
Version: 4.1.2-19
Severity: important
gcj-4.1 fails to build from source on m68k. It appears that libxul-dev
is expected to be installed, however the build-deps say otherwise. The
last successful build of gcj-4.1 for m68k included libxul-dev in the
build-deps.
Thanks,
Stephen
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.77-2
Severity: important
Please switch the m68k build-dep from gcj-4.1 to gcj-4.2 (like most
everybody else).
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Desc
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:20:20AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka writes:
> > Package: gcc-defaults
> > Version: 1.61
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Please change the defaults to use gcc-4.2 like the other archs. A number
> > of pack
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:20:20AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka writes:
> > Package: gcc-defaults
> > Version: 1.61
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Please change the defaults to use gcc-4.2 like the other archs. A number
> > of pack
Package: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.61
Severity: important
Please change the defaults to use gcc-4.2 like the other archs. A number
of package, notably perl and gnustep-base, now require gcc-4.2. We now
have about 400 packages blocked on this.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life&#
e FTBFS, no idea why
I'll retry it if you think it's a host/chroot thing
gcc-4.2 4.2.2-3 #448154
Still in New, but this bug.
gcc-4.3 4.3-20071020experimental
Not built. I can build it if necessary.
gcc-snapshot 20071020-1
Not built. I can build it i
Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2.2-3
Severity: important
gcc-4.2 causes other packages to FTBFS on m68k.
Please let me know how I can help.
Thanks,
Stephen
gcc -pie hello.c
| /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS): In function `__libc_csu_init':
| (.text+0x2e): undefined referen
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.2-16
Severity: important
gcc-4.1 causes other packages to FTBFS on m68k. This has happened for
several versions and with several versions of binutils.
Please let me know how I can help.
Thanks,
Stephen
gcc -pie hello.c
| /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS
build the package with itself (although this will
> be done with the next uploads anyway).
I see the listmasters have straightened this message out. I'm building
gcj-4.1 on vivaldi.
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.html
|
| bye, Roman
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ttp://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gnat-4.1&ver=4.1.1-19&arch=m68k>
Other buildd logs may be available at
<http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=gnat-4.1>
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I understand you provide degree's.
Please provide more information.
S Mason
aculated?
--
-
| ,''`. Stephen Gran |
| : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`-
the failed builds of yacas and vtk.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
aybe it's best to disable java for m68k.
Sorry about the dup.
Disabling java takes out a fair amount of packages that we could no
longer build. Can you point me to the patch?
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
libgcj.so.7)
|at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(libgcj.so.7)
|at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(libgcj.so.7)
|at java.lang.Class.forName(libgcj.so.7)
|at gnu.java.lang.MainThread.run(libgcj.so.7)
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doi
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> >> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > So you&#x
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> >> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > So you&#x
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > We now have about sixteen packages that end up with a segfault or an
> > illegal instruction. I haven't tried recompiling all these to verify that
direct or we can get you access to m68k
hardware if necessary.
In the meantime maybe it would be good to have gcc build itself or at
least the bootstrap compiler -O0?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 05:47:06PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-27 10:35]:
> > torcs, grace, and rscheme all fail with variations on the theme of
> > track.s: Assembler messages:
> > track.s:10716: Error: value ou
e happier I'll be. :)
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
nd RMs.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
d fine.
> I also have some evidence that -fomit-frame-pointer produce
> broken code on m68k, but this bug make them hard to debug.
Maybe you can make some progress for us on this now. :)
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it ri
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 08:31:07AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:22:50PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > qt4-x11 needs to be rebuilt on m68k, anything using it currently will
> > give errors that libXcursor.la can't be found.
> > Anyon
1. I'm really not sure if they would
apply to us (or if they've already been fixed).
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
The ruby1.9 bug only happens at -O2, so might be considered a separate
bug. Shall I close this one and open a new one or continue the report
here?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Desc
ver=4.0.3-1&arch=m68k&stamp=1143526132&file=log&as=raw>.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
). Patch by
Roman Zippel" applied in 4.0.1-9.
However, ruby1.9 failed with something that looks the same to me, so I
don't know what to think.
<http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=ruby1.9&ver=1.9.0%2B20050921-1&arch=m68k&stamp=1138785971&file=log&as=ra
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 03:59:46PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> in #344046, you mention upstream is working on this. Can you give more
> details? Is there a PR? A fix?
pr 25514
So far it's only been noted that it fails with gcc-4.1 and a reduced
testcase has been added.
--
Stephen
In function
| `_start':../sysdeps/m68k/elf/start.S:86: undefined reference to `main'
| collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
set (reg:SI 8 %a0 [611])
| (plus:SI (subreg:SI (reg:QI 133 [ temp.1409 ]) 0)
| (const_int 32 [0x20]))) 95 {*addsi3_internal} (nil)
| (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:QI 133 [ temp.1409 ])
| (nil)))
| pack.c:1974: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
Fortunately, it seems fixed in 4
must
say
talk
to
travel
understand
use
need
want
The
wait
understand
sleep
borrow
fly
incredible
begin
take
i
sign
hear
no
stand
understand
Is
accept
sit
wrong
play
find
super
ask
cough
nd: change -O2 to -O1.
Hopefully, I've reduced this enough.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/* based on variable.c from make_3.80+3.81.b4-1 */
#define NULL 0
#include
struct variable_set
{
Filed upstream as gnu pr 25043. Confirmed, fixed in 4.1.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ks. Dropping -O2 to
-O1 also works.
I wasn't able to find a simpler file that illustrated the problem, but
the attached are pretty short.
This code works fine on the other ports.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 08:05:19PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> with the current state of java on m68k, it seems to be better to
> disable it. Any opinions?
Are you of the opinion that java will take a great deal of work to fix?
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you&#
);
} }
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
{*68k_extendhisi2} (nil)
| (nil))
| gengtype-yacc.c:1738: internal compiler error: in
reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 08:34:34AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> yes, please try to build the gcj database:
>
> gcj-dbtool-4.0 -n /tmp/foo.db
I misunderstood the bug. It still aborts.
Sorry,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doin
n fixed along the way.
Would you prefer for me to do something else? I could just update the
bug reports instead of closing them, for instance.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
piler error: in
| instantiate_virtual_regs_lossage, at function.c:1442
| Please submit a full bug report,
| with preprocessed source if appropriate.
| See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
| For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions,
| see .
--
Stephen R. Marenka
University Degrees and Diplomas
Get a Bachelors, Masters, MBA, or Doctorate (PhD)
We are able to send your certificate to all countries (WORLDWIDE)
Consider a more prosperous future with more money earning power!
No testing, studying, or interviews required.
Discreet and affordable. Everyone
This one time, at band camp, Matthias Klose said:
> Stephen Gran writes:
> > Package: gcc-4.0
> > Version: 4.0.1-2
> > Followup-For: Bug #317475
> >
> > Also see
> > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=gmp&ver=4.1.4-8&arch=m68k&s
ilable)
-- no debconf information
--
-
| ,''`. Stephen Gran |
| : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`-
This report was sent by mistake when clearing out an old mail spool.
Sorry for the noise. Please close this bug.
Package: gcc-3.4
Version: 3.4.1-2
Severity: normal
gcc-3.3 puts a -3.3 suffix on its files.
(/usr/share/locale/be/LC_MESSAGES/gcc-3.3.mo)
gcc-3.4 (and gcc-3.5) do not add the suffix and so
are not parallel installable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstab
ad model: posix
gcc version 3.3.4 (Debian)
Please let me know if there anything else I can do.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* John Goerzen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 05:06:05PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * John Goerzen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:41:02PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > > > 3. is pure64 going to be incl
* John Goerzen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:41:02PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > 3. is pure64 going to be included in sarge?
>
> No.
Honestly, I'm not entirely sure I agree with this, but it does seem
unlikely atm. ;)
Stephen
signa
s things much more difficult later to
get things into the archive if we actually get space on the mirrors...
I'm not 100% sure though, John Goerzen knows more about that.
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
This has been reported as in the gcc tracker as [Bug c++/10929]
Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-2
Severity: normal
The docs state that -Winline should only warn for functions declared
inline but not inlinable.
We use -Winline to ensure that critical code is inlined, but in v3.3
this option is useless.
Script started on Fri May 23 15:44:26 2003
% cat a.cpp
I cannot help but notice the similarity to 180493, which is now fixed.
I've encountered the same problem with r-base and put the relevant files
at <http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/gccbug-r-base.tar.bz2>.
If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know.
Thanks,
Step
I can confirm this bug is fixed as of gcc-3.2_1:3.2.3ds6-0pre7.
However, I cannot help but note the similarity to 175478. I'll comment
further there.
Thanks!
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpIoWvl
Package: gcc-3.2-doc
Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre7
Severity: minor
'info gcc' gives gcc rarely used internal documentation (gccint)
but it should give user documentation (gcc-3.2)
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux stag 2.4.20-1-686 #1 Sat Mar 22 13:1
(nil)))
jsdtoa.c:1874: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
--
Stephen Gregory
27;ve since changed to using assembly, but why does gcc
return the address of a temp when 'a' is a char and not
when 'a' is an int?
Surprised, not unhappy,
Stephen.
---
Stephen Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t: +353 1 6693679 f: +353 1 6767094
Game Developer Frontline Award W
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Stephen Kennedy
>Organization: Telekinesys Research
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: Address of 'char' is incorrect.
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Category: c
>Class: wrong-code
>Release:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 08:02:28PM +, James Troup wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Package: gcc-3.2
> > Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre3
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: sid
> >
> >
> > ltp fails to build from source du
tp&ver=20030206-1&arch=m68k>
Other buildd logs may be available at
<http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=ltp>
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
s to have "fixed"
the problem.
> Btw. I was going to take a quick look at this, but I can't seem to get
> into the unstable chroot on crest. I thought those were supposed to be
> public? Or maybe I just haven't found the right command...
dchroot?
--
Stephen R. Mar
awTest. Kaffe successfully
executed all of these demos; sablevm & gij failed all of them. I've
included the SymbolTest code as it's the smallest code base.
--
Stephen
"A duck!"
/*
* @(#)SymbolTest.java 1.1 98/07/18
*
* Copyright (c) 1995-1997 Sun Microsystems, Inc
Package: gij-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre5
Severity: important
According to the Java policy, packages that provide java1-runtime must
support the the complete java runtime environment. As gij fails to
provide the java.awt.* classes, the provides on this package is
incorrect. Please remove it until
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre5
Severity: important
%cat > a.c
#include
% gcc-3.2 -msse -c a.c
% g++-3.2 -msse -c a.c
In file included from a.c:1:
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.2.1/include/xmmintrin.h: In function `void
_mm_stream_pi(vector int*, vector int)':
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
the code in _MM_TRANSPOSE4_PS is incorrect.
The bug has been reported upstream as PR/6890.
--- xmmintrin.h.old Fri May 31 18:43:57 2002
+++ xmmintrin.h Fri May 31 18:31:55 2002
@@ -1049,8 +1049,8 @@
do {
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Stephen Kennedy
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: xmmintrin.h, _MM_TRANSPOSE4_PS is broken
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Category: c
>Class: sw-bug
>Release: 3.1 (De
compiler
Santiago> that works?
Nope. Sorry, no such package exists nor is it likely to by the time
woody is released, regardless of when that is. :/
--
Stephen
"If I claimed I was emperor just cause some moistened bint lobbed a
scimitar at me they'd put me away"
96 matches
Mail list logo
