Bug#233846: pthread_mutex_lock/unlock problem

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:59:14 +0100, Robert Strycek wrote: it seems that locking / unlocking the same mutex by huge number of threads causes dead locks. If I create N=1529 threads (probably system-dependent) that continually lock the same (non-recursive) mutex, everything is ok, program runs

Bug#234119: The standard xserver fares no better than the dri-trunk one

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
reassign 234119 xserver-xfree86 thanks At Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:13:58 +0100, Helge Hafting wrote: I have now tested with xserver-xfree86 (4.2.1-12.1) instead of the experimental dri-trunk xserver. The same thing happens, running gimp kills the xserver immediately _if_ gimp is running with

Bug#233946: libc6-dev: sys/un.h does not define UNIX_PATH_MAX

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 20 Feb 2004 22:44:38 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: Reading unix(7), I understand that sys/un.h should define UNIX_PATH_MAX, and in fact it does not. Is this intentional ? I don't know this is intentional or not, but there is no rule that we need to define UNIX_PATH_MAX. In addition

Bug#234238: libc6: relocation error

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:22:45 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:01:47PM -, Matthew Bates wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10 I am running woody with libc6 from unstable (I guess it has been installed as a result of using some unstable backported

Bug#232891: Merge #230669

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
merge 232891 230669 thanks At Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:56:15 +0100, Claus Hindsgaul wrote: Please merge this bug with #230669, which contain a separate translation effort for the same debconf template. You can ignore this report and use the file included in #230669 instead of the one included here.

Processed: Re: Bug#232891: Merge #230669

2004-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 232891 230669 Bug#230669: New Danish po-debconf translation Bug#232891: glibc: Include Danish debconf translation Merged 230669 232891. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#233301: linker reference count error among dependencies of dlopen()ed object

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:13:25 -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: From elf/dl-lookup.c, lines 179 ff.: if (__builtin_expect (act undef_map-l_reldepsmax, 1)) undef_map-l_reldeps[undef_map-l_reldepsact++] = map; if (map-l_searchlist.r_list != NULL) /* And increment the

Bug#233308: locales: Esperanto locale should be called eo_XX rather than eo_EO

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Tue, 17 Feb 2004 23:12:42 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: People seem to prefer eo_XX instead of eo_EO generally. Perhaps you could add an appropriate line to /etc/locale.alias so that both work. /etc/locale.alias becomes obsolete. Also, there are probably more people using eo in UTF-8

Bug#233392: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data in package libc6

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:34:07 -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Steve McIntyre wrote: * Some packages need to have a -common or -doc package split out to contain this common data, and the existing packages that need this data should then be altered to depend on the new -common or -doc

Bug#233392: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data in package libc6

2004-02-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 12:25:52AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:34:07 -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Steve McIntyre wrote: * Some packages need to have a -common or -doc package split out to contain this common data, and the existing packages that need this data

Order from 28.169.167.1

2004-02-24 Thread Gene Oneil
Dear, Gene Oneil!brbr Your order has been approved and now available for download atbrbr a href=http://www.ChaseCreditApplications.com/Order_636102_Feb23.exe;www.chase.com/abrbr This link will remain active for 0 days.br Please call 1-800-265-2284 if you need further assistance.br brbrbr

Bug#234272: linux-kernel-headers: missing include in /usr/include/asm/ipc.h

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:12:33 +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote: on compiling valgrind-2.10 I get: if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I./demangle -I../include -DVG_LIBDIR=\/usr/local/lib\ -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -O -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -g -fpic

Bug#231538: A possible solution

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 13 Feb 2004 06:35:47 -0200, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote: A simple way to avoid problems when dist-upgrading would be to check in the preinst for a working bswap. A small precompiled static binary could be added to the preinst (it doesn't even have to use a C library, see

Bug#234272: linux-kernel-headers: missing include in /usr/include/asm/ipc.h

2004-02-24 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2004 16:47 schrieb GOTO Masanori: At Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:12:33 +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote: In file included from vg_intercept.c:63: /usr/include/asm/ipc.h:10: error: field `__user' has incomplete type /usr/include/asm/ipc.h:10: error: parse error before '*' token

Bug#233392: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data in package libc6

2004-02-24 Thread Joey Hess
GOTO Masanori wrote: I don't think spliting zoneinfo is useful. (1) If zoneinfo is set as required, then at last we need to install libc6 and zoneinfo on general machine. (2) I think even on many small dedicated servers, they need to handle time. And if such servers has no need

Bug#233392: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data in package libc6

2004-02-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 11:46:39AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Steve McIntyre wrote: No problem here. The zone info is actually quite small (compressed) within the .deb, not really big enough to warrant the split I was (mistakenly) asking for. Sorry for bothering you and thanks for looking into

Bug#233392: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data in package libc6

2004-02-24 Thread Joey Hess
Steve McIntyre wrote: No problem here. The zone info is actually quite small (compressed) within the .deb, not really big enough to warrant the split I was (mistakenly) asking for. Sorry for bothering you and thanks for looking into this. It is, however, 5 mb unpacked, which is quite large

Re: [RFC] Fail builds when regression check shows new errors.

2004-02-24 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 05:17:45PM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: We currently run the glibc testsuite with 'make -k check', ingoring the testsuite failures. This isn't the way we should be doing business. Instead I propose we maintain a list of allowed failures per-arch, including the make

Bug#233946: libc6-dev: sys/un.h does not define UNIX_PATH_MAX

2004-02-24 Thread Julien BLACHE
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Reading unix(7), I understand that sys/un.h should define UNIX_PATH_MAX, and in fact it does not. Is this intentional ? I don't know this is intentional or not, but there is no rule that we need to define UNIX_PATH_MAX. In addition POSIX does

Bug#233301: linker reference count error among dependencies of dlopen()ed object

2004-02-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 12:05:38AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:13:25 -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: From elf/dl-lookup.c, lines 179 ff.: if (__builtin_expect (act undef_map-l_reldepsmax, 1)) undef_map-l_reldeps[undef_map-l_reldepsact++] = map;

Bug#233301: linker reference count error among dependencies of dlopen()ed object

2004-02-24 Thread Steve Langasek
Oh, what the heck, let's do one better. Since it has been pointed out to me on IRC that this test case does not properly throw an error to the user on failure, I've supplemented it with http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/233301-error-out.tar.gz, which should save the trouble of looking at strace in

Processed: Re: Bug#234119: The standard xserver fares no better than the dri-trunk one

2004-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 234119 xserver-xfree86 Bug#234119: Setting LANG=no_NO.UTF-8 cause many programs to kill the X server Bug reassigned from package `locales' to `xserver-xfree86'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#233301: linker reference count error among dependencies of dlopen()ed object

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:14:08 -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: I don't understand what the problem exists... Could you provide short summary and tell us what the bug is, plus small sample program? PHP based issue is hard to reappear for me, and relaxing complex program dependency is good step

Bug#233946: libc6-dev: sys/un.h does not define UNIX_PATH_MAX

2004-02-24 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 06:55:59PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: I don't know this is intentional or not, but there is no rule that we need to define UNIX_PATH_MAX. In addition POSIX does not define its path size (typically it's between 92 and 108, and linux is 108). If you want to look

Bug#233846: pthread_mutex_lock/unlock problem

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:59:14 +0100, Robert Strycek wrote: it seems that locking / unlocking the same mutex by huge number of threads causes dead locks. If I create N=1529 threads (probably system-dependent) that continually lock the same (non-recursive) mutex, everything is ok, program runs

Bug#233946: libc6-dev: sys/un.h does not define UNIX_PATH_MAX

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 20 Feb 2004 22:44:38 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: Reading unix(7), I understand that sys/un.h should define UNIX_PATH_MAX, and in fact it does not. Is this intentional ? I don't know this is intentional or not, but there is no rule that we need to define UNIX_PATH_MAX. In addition

Bug#232891: Merge #230669

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
merge 232891 230669 thanks At Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:56:15 +0100, Claus Hindsgaul wrote: Please merge this bug with #230669, which contain a separate translation effort for the same debconf template. You can ignore this report and use the file included in #230669 instead of the one included here.

Processed: Re: Bug#234119: The standard xserver fares no better than the dri-trunk one

2004-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 234119 xserver-xfree86 Bug#234119: Setting LANG=no_NO.UTF-8 cause many programs to kill the X server Bug reassigned from package `locales' to `xserver-xfree86'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: Re: Bug#232891: Merge #230669

2004-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 232891 230669 Bug#230669: New Danish po-debconf translation Bug#232891: glibc: Include Danish debconf translation Merged 230669 232891. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#233301: linker reference count error among dependencies of dlopen()ed object

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:13:25 -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: From elf/dl-lookup.c, lines 179 ff.: if (__builtin_expect (act undef_map-l_reldepsmax, 1)) undef_map-l_reldeps[undef_map-l_reldepsact++] = map; if (map-l_searchlist.r_list != NULL) /* And increment the

Bug#233308: locales: Esperanto locale should be called eo_XX rather than eo_EO

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Tue, 17 Feb 2004 23:12:42 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: People seem to prefer eo_XX instead of eo_EO generally. Perhaps you could add an appropriate line to /etc/locale.alias so that both work. /etc/locale.alias becomes obsolete. Also, there are probably more people using eo in UTF-8

Bug#233392: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data in package libc6

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:34:07 -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Steve McIntyre wrote: * Some packages need to have a -common or -doc package split out to contain this common data, and the existing packages that need this data should then be altered to depend on the new -common or -doc

Bug#233392: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data in package libc6

2004-02-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 12:25:52AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:34:07 -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Steve McIntyre wrote: * Some packages need to have a -common or -doc package split out to contain this common data, and the existing packages that need this data

Order from 28.169.167.1

2004-02-24 Thread Gene Oneil
Dear, Gene Oneil!brbr Your order has been approved and now available for download atbrbr a href=http://www.ChaseCreditApplications.com/Order_636102_Feb23.exe;www.chase.com/abrbr This link will remain active for 0 days.br Please call 1-800-265-2284 if you need further assistance.br brbrbr

Bug#234272: linux-kernel-headers: missing include in /usr/include/asm/ipc.h

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:12:33 +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote: on compiling valgrind-2.10 I get: if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I./demangle -I../include -DVG_LIBDIR=\/usr/local/lib\ -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -O -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -g -fpic

Bug#231538: A possible solution

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 13 Feb 2004 06:35:47 -0200, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote: A simple way to avoid problems when dist-upgrading would be to check in the preinst for a working bswap. A small precompiled static binary could be added to the preinst (it doesn't even have to use a C library, see

Bug#234272: linux-kernel-headers: missing include in /usr/include/asm/ipc.h

2004-02-24 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2004 16:47 schrieb GOTO Masanori: At Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:12:33 +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote: In file included from vg_intercept.c:63: /usr/include/asm/ipc.h:10: error: field `__user' has incomplete type /usr/include/asm/ipc.h:10: error: parse error before '*' token

Bug#233392: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data in package libc6

2004-02-24 Thread Joey Hess
GOTO Masanori wrote: I don't think spliting zoneinfo is useful. (1) If zoneinfo is set as required, then at last we need to install libc6 and zoneinfo on general machine. (2) I think even on many small dedicated servers, they need to handle time. And if such servers has no need

Bug#233392: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data in package libc6

2004-02-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 11:46:39AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Steve McIntyre wrote: No problem here. The zone info is actually quite small (compressed) within the .deb, not really big enough to warrant the split I was (mistakenly) asking for. Sorry for bothering you and thanks for looking into

Bug#233392: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data in package libc6

2004-02-24 Thread Joey Hess
Steve McIntyre wrote: No problem here. The zone info is actually quite small (compressed) within the .deb, not really big enough to warrant the split I was (mistakenly) asking for. Sorry for bothering you and thanks for looking into this. It is, however, 5 mb unpacked, which is quite large

Re: [RFC] Fail builds when regression check shows new errors.

2004-02-24 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 05:17:45PM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: We currently run the glibc testsuite with 'make -k check', ingoring the testsuite failures. This isn't the way we should be doing business. Instead I propose we maintain a list of allowed failures per-arch, including the make

Bug#233946: libc6-dev: sys/un.h does not define UNIX_PATH_MAX

2004-02-24 Thread Julien BLACHE
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Reading unix(7), I understand that sys/un.h should define UNIX_PATH_MAX, and in fact it does not. Is this intentional ? I don't know this is intentional or not, but there is no rule that we need to define UNIX_PATH_MAX. In addition POSIX does

Bug#233301: linker reference count error among dependencies of dlopen()ed object

2004-02-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 12:05:38AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:13:25 -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: From elf/dl-lookup.c, lines 179 ff.: if (__builtin_expect (act undef_map-l_reldepsmax, 1)) undef_map-l_reldeps[undef_map-l_reldepsact++] = map;

Bug#233301: linker reference count error among dependencies of dlopen()ed object

2004-02-24 Thread Steve Langasek
Oh, what the heck, let's do one better. Since it has been pointed out to me on IRC that this test case does not properly throw an error to the user on failure, I've supplemented it with http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/233301-error-out.tar.gz, which should save the trouble of looking at strace in

Bug#233301: linker reference count error among dependencies of dlopen()ed object

2004-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:14:08 -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: I don't understand what the problem exists... Could you provide short summary and tell us what the bug is, plus small sample program? PHP based issue is hard to reappear for me, and relaxing complex program dependency is good step