-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 05 April 2002 6:48 am, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 15:09, Bart-Jan Vrielink wrote:
> > > According to these headers contained in the message received from the
> > > list, SpamAssassin has correctly tagged it as Spam. So why was
It was so simple !
Just use [iptables] ipchains to setup the rules and we have a nice
passthrough !
THANKS a lot, everything works perfectly now !
Greg
> Hi Gregiore,
>
> Gregoire Hostettler wrote:
> > Thank you, Brendan,
> >
> > This is a good starting point.
> >
> > But will this package
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 15:09, Bart-Jan Vrielink wrote:
> > According to these headers contained in the message received from the
> > list, SpamAssassin has correctly tagged it as Spam. So why was it
> > forwarded anyway?
>
> Because it might not be spam, but only a false hit ??
> Because blocking mail
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 10:13, Jean-Marc V. Liotier wrote:
> (Re: *SPAM* ()XX XX XX...)
>
> According to these headers contained in the message received from the
> list, SpamAssassin has correctly tagged it as Spam. So why was it
> forwarded anyway?
Because it m
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 12:25, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> > Of course. As we all know SCSI cables never break. There must
> > be something
> > about the IDE command-set which causes copper wires to corrode. :-#
>
> (I know this is a joke, but) actually there is. IDE has a
> wonderful feature of onl
Hi Gregiore,
Gregoire Hostettler wrote:
> Thank you, Brendan,
>
> This is a good starting point.
>
> But will this package implement GRE (port 47) ? Just because I need to
> install the Linmux box as a firewall.
> In fact it is already a fw. What I need is just to make VPN encapsulated
> packet
On Friday, April 5, 2002, at 03:34 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
> Of course. As we all know SCSI cables never break. There must
> be something
> about the IDE command-set which causes copper wires to corrode. :-#
(I know this is a joke, but) actually there is. IDE has a
wonderful feature of on
You might be interested in an article from IBM
on "non-stop authentication with Linux clusters"
where they use an LDAP server with replication
on a second failover server and auto takeover
in case of failure.
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/esdd/articles/linux_clust/index.html
Cheers, Marcel
--On
Hi all!
Last time I have wrote:
I've installed slapd 2.0.23-2 on linux debian with apt-get install.
After that I edited the configuration files and a netscape-profile.schema.
Then I edited entrys into the database with ou=People and ou=roaming.
It works well.
Subsequent I enable the Roaming Acc
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 10:27, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 2, 2002, at 06:22 PM, Russell Coker wrote:
> > Another thing, you should have a separate cable for each disk
> > you want to be
> > independant. So for RAID-1 you should have two cables so that a cable
> > failure won't lose
On Tuesday, April 2, 2002, at 06:22 PM, Russell Coker wrote:
> Another thing, you should have a separate cable for each disk
> you want to be
> independant. So for RAID-1 you should have two cables so that a cable
> failure won't lose your data. For a RAID-5 with 5 disks you
> want 5 cables.
(Re: *SPAM* ()XX XX XX...)
According to these headers contained in the message received from the
list, SpamAssassin has correctly tagged it as Spam. So why was it
forwarded anyway?
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=11.4 required=4.7
tests=SUBJ_ALL_CAPS,JAVASCRIPT,MAILT
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:07:37PM -0500,
Jeff S Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 47 lines which said:
> LDAP resources or experience in-house, but honestly would like to move
> to it
Not to discourage you but do not take that move lightly: LDAP is a
huge and difficult beast.
>
According to these headers contained in the message received from the
list, SpamAssassin has correctly tagged it as Spam. So why was it
forwarded anyway?
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=11.4 required=4.7
tests=SUBJ_ALL_CAPS,JAVASCRIPT,MAILTO_LINK,
CTYPE_JUST_HTML,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD,SUBJ_FULL_OF_8BITS v
14 matches
Mail list logo
