Portal La Plata www.portallaplata.com.ar
Diseño de Páginas y Sitios Web
Personales - Profesionales - Comerciales
Encu
also sprach W.D. McKinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.05.0448 +0200]:
> > - qmail isn't available as a binary package for Debian
>
> Wrong. See http://smarden.org/pape/Debian/
This is illegal. And in any case, it's not official.
> > - qmail support includes being flamed by the author
>
> Wrong
also sprach Dale E Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.05.0207 +0200]:
> I'd add:
> - exim has the most extensive and useful documentation
>
> (But I'd love to be proven wrong!)
possible, although i do find the stuff on postfix.org adequate.
maybe not for MTA newbies but for people with experienc
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 22:58, Eric Sproul wrote:
> First, scale is a consideration. Once we began to grow our customer
> base, our email volume began to increase dramatically. Qmail queues
> everything to disk, so the more mail you do, the more pressure you put
> on your disk I/O. The server running
Just thought I'd check in. Again, as pointed out, this is a SCSI implementation.
Got the card today at around 1pm. By 3pm I was installing the OS. What took so long?
The CD
that came with it for configuration was Windoze based and GPF'd! Downloaded a 400M ISO
from
IBM (ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 01:25, Boehn, Gunnar von wrote:
> I would like to set up a debian box with mirrored disks.
> Can anybody please give me a hint which raid controllers are supported by
> debian ?
>
> My original idea was to use an IDE 3ware 7000-2 controller.
> Would this be a good choice ?
I hav
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 06:51:41PM -0800, W.D. McKinney wrote:
>On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 04:58, Eric Sproul wrote:
>> Sendmail's milter plug-in system has also been invaluable when we
>> implemented server-side bayesian spam filtering, and as we work on virus
>> scanning.
>>
>
>qmail being modular h
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 04:58, Eric Sproul wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 01:43, Rudi Starcevic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry to bother you all with this repeat question.
> > I've have searched around and seen plenty of opinions but I'd like to
> > ask again and get the latest from this list.
> >
>
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 14:54, martin f krafft wrote:
> - qmail isn't available as a binary package for Debian
Wrong. See http://smarden.org/pape/Debian/
> .
> - qmail support includes being flamed by the author
Wrong. Ask a question and find out. Many helpful people who don't flame
but as they h
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:54:55AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Mostly good comments (I've never used postfix or exim -- comments seem
accurate from what I've heard) but I have to disagree with this:
>- qmail support includes being flamed by the author
I've subscribed to the qmail list more or
> random notes (these are facts and opinions, please don't flame me):
>
> - sendmail and exim are both single setuid binaries. bad.
> - postfix is the most performant of all four.
> - qmail has an interesting but possibly confusing configuration paradigm
> - postfix has the easiest configuration,
Martin,
Very good.
More food for thought and consideration.
Thanks
Regards
Rudi.
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Dale E Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.04.1447 +0200]:
Has it been covered before on this list? I for one would be
interested in elaboration, if there is som
also sprach Dale E Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.04.1447 +0200]:
> Has it been covered before on this list? I for one would be
> interested in elaboration, if there is something technically
> inferior about exim or postfix to qmail or sendmail? Or
> politically, I suppose, since much of peo
Have a look at /etc/ppp/ip-up and ip-down scripts they both export some
env vars you may find useful when setting iptables rules.
Does anyone know how can I put iptables firewall script onto a firewall where is more
ppp connectoins?
Expl.
There is a firewall with two dsl connection the first is
El jue, 04-09-2003 a las 07:58, Eric Sproul escribió:
> We chose OpenLDAP. At the time (1999), Qmail
> did not have LDAP support (correct me if I'm wrong). Sendmail did.
> Even if Qmail did have LDAP support then, Sendmail's source was *much*
> easier to dig through for the performance tuning w
Rod Rodolico, Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 11:28:07AM -0500:
> I had the same question not too long ago, and 3ware came up as one of
> the choices. But, if I remember correctly, it slows the system down
> quite a bit on a rebuild.
>
> I have since been told by some guru's I know that the IBM ServeRaid 3H
I had the same question not too long ago, and 3ware came up as one of the choices.
But, if I
remember correctly, it slows the system down quite a bit on a rebuild.
I have since been told by some guru's I know that the IBM ServeRaid 3HB (IBM p/n
37L6086) was
the best choice, and mine is being del
Boehn, Gunnar von wrote:
Hello everybody
I would like to set up a debian box with mirrored disks.
Can anybody please give me a hint which raid controllers are supported by
debian ?
My original idea was to use an IDE 3ware 7000-2 controller.
Would this be a good choice ?
Has someone experience wit
I would refer you to SCSI low-level drivers in the kernel config or
IDE, ATA and ATAPI Block devices.
Here is what the 2.4.20 Linux Kernel config says about 3ware:
This info was wound under 'SCSI low-level drivers' section
[not sure why consiering this is for ATA drives].
x CONFIG_BLK_DEV_3W_
Hello everybody
I would like to set up a debian box with mirrored disks.
Can anybody please give me a hint which raid controllers are supported by
debian ?
My original idea was to use an IDE 3ware 7000-2 controller.
Would this be a good choice ?
Has someone experience with this controller and deb
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 08:58:27 -0400,
Eric Sproul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 01:43, Rudi Starcevic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry to bother you all with this repeat question.
> > I've have searched around and seen plenty of opinions but I'd lik
Hi,
First thanks to all who have replied.
We're all busy so I do appreciate the time taken
to tap out a reply message.
It's very interesting and in some ways what I expected.
There is no right or wrong.
Just like programing there is many ways to the top of the mountain.
So for me it's come down
I repeat the earlier question: Why not exim? I really don't know. I have fallen in
love with
it, thought the tools to configure do not exists (Oh my God, I actually have to
MANUALLY edit
the config file).
I have a small installation, but intend to grow, and if there will be a problem with
exim,
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 01:43, Rudi Starcevic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry to bother you all with this repeat question.
> I've have searched around and seen plenty of opinions but I'd like to
> ask again and get the latest from this list.
>
> Sendmail or Qmail ? That is my question.
Rudi,
I work at an
> It doesnt at all Not to ellaborate, but the subject says it
> all...even then. I hate exim too.
Has it been covered before on this list? I for one would be interested in
elaboration, if there is something technically inferior about exim or
postfix to qmail or sendmail? Or politically, I su
> At this stage I'm leaning towards sticking with Sendmail but something
> inside wants to know more about Qmail.
I'd pick exim or postfix over either of those, but then again I've only
dealt with smaller mail installations.
Take care,
Dale
--
Dale E. Martin, Clifton Labs, Inc.
Senior Comp
Does anyone know how can I put iptables firewall script onto a firewall where is more
ppp connectoins?
Expl.
There is a firewall with two dsl connection the first is ppp0 the 2nd is the ppp1.
It's clear.
How can I build firewall If I do not know which dsl connection wil be the ppp0 or the
ppp
Hi,
so how does exim compare in all of this?
Sorry Jamie - In my case, and my case alone, Exim doesn't compare.
There are many very good MTA's out there.
For me I know Sendmail - ( I compile from source ).
I've heard lots of good things about Qmail to I did consider that one only.
Also every Guru
El jue, 04-09-2003 a las 01:47, Jamie Baddeley escribió:
> so how does exim compare in all of this?
>
It doesnt at all Not to ellaborate, but the subject says it
all...even then. I hate exim too.
> jamie
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Hi,
>> Why change something thats
working perfectly ??
Greg .. Yes that's what I was thinking .. -- but that's what they also
said in Nth America 'til the recent blackouts :-(
>> And it has no paralell in security (AGES and AGES better than sendmail)
Alex .. That's what mostly appeals to
30 matches
Mail list logo
