> On Tue, 2003-04-08 at 23:52, Nate Campi wrote:
>
> > I use tinydns for a company that serves over one billion web hits per
> > day (not visitors, hits, and no I'm not exaggerating). The authoritative
> > nameservers serve between 100 and 300 queries/sec on each of five
> > nameservers, for betwee
On Tue, 2003-04-08 at 23:52, Nate Campi wrote:
> I use tinydns for a company that serves over one billion web hits per
> day (not visitors, hits, and no I'm not exaggerating). The authoritative
> nameservers serve between 100 and 300 queries/sec on each of five
> nameservers, for between 50 and 90
--On Tuesday, April 08, 2003 5:42 PM +0200 Thomas Lamy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PowerDNS seems to be pretty decent.
BIND is more sendmail then apache (3-5 years ago): most used DNS server
software, bloated code (IMHO), and a remote exploit every now and then.
Just because most of the in
What kind of invalid data? - You have to make sure that invalid data
doesn't get into the database. There's no point in having a database
otherwise.
I didn't express myself very well ... meant more like
corruption-checking (shouldn't happen but happend once afaik), etc.
The language itself isn't
On 09 Apr 2003, Markus Welsch wrote:
> So you are using the approach I am currently working on. I'll be doing
> extensive error checking since ... sql server(s) not responding/no
> access, invalid data, etc and after the update i'll send out an email
> report with all the details.
What kind of
Interesting. I see you're prepared for the worst case :-)
However, since I am somewhat lazy, I prefer to have all my services
work with standard apt-get'able packages. This may also prevent
possible security related problems.
I am using the 'database-export-approach' to maintain the
configuration f
On 09 Apr 2003, Thomas Lamy wrote:
> - Three db-servers (2 in active-active replication, and a third running from
> the last daily db export)
> - the mysql connection procedure in mission critical programs (mydns, snmp
> gatherer) is hacked to try both main servers in r/w mode, and then the third
useful to have zone data in an sql
> backend, I don't like the idea of plugging a mission-critical
> service such as a dns server directly to an sql database. A dns
> server has to be as simple as possible, with as few dependencies as
> possible. Serving zone data directly from an sq
I use tinydns for a company that serves over one billion web hits per
day (not visitors, hits, and no I'm not exaggerating). The authoritative
nameservers serve between 100 and 300 queries/sec on each of five
nameservers, for between 50 and 90 million queries answered per day.
Hardware on those ser
While I see that it may be useful to have zone data in an sql
backend, I don't like the idea of plugging a mission-critical
service such as a dns server directly to an sql database. A dns
server has to be as simple as possible, with as few dependencies as
possible. Serving zone data directly
idea of plugging a mission-critical
service such as a dns server directly to an sql database. A dns
server has to be as simple as possible, with as few dependencies as
possible. Serving zone data directly from an sql database increases
the complexity of your system and adds new points of failure, wh
On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 10:24:32PM +0200, Markus Welsch wrote:
> > I've been using djbdns for a few years now, and I'm not aware of any
> > interoperability/compatibility problems between it and BIND. I've been
> > perfectly happy with djbdns.
>
> Would you mind mentioning a bit about the extense
> I've been using djbdns for a few years now, and I'm not aware of any
> interoperability/compatibility problems between it and BIND. I've been
> perfectly happy with djbdns.
>
Would you mind mentioning a bit about the extense of use like number of
domains, etc and very interesting would also be t
On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 07:36:33PM +0200, Markus Welsch wrote:
> Well BIND is more like the standard DNS server. djbdns looks nice but
> I'm wondering about it's compability with BIND servers since the author
> is pretty much hostile to any other DNS servers.
I've bee
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 12:14:50PM -0700, Splash Tekalal wrote:
> At 03:17 PM 4/8/2003 +0200, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 01:36:56PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> >
> >> > BIND ( http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/ )
> >>
> >> Why not? The Apache of the DNS s
he future.
Well BIND is more like the standard DNS server. djbdns looks nice but
I'm wondering about it's compability with BIND servers since the author
is pretty much hostile to any other DNS servers.
I'm considering switching to djbdns on a TEST system since the DNS
servers HAVE to be reliable ...
Splash Tekalal wrote:
Apache is more elegant. The only thing that can equal BIND in terms of
bloat, root exploits and general ugliness is perhaps sendmail.
Now, maybe I'm just ignorant, but are there any root exploits on Bind9?
(specifically 9.x, not anything older.. we know 8.x was unstable =P)
At 03:17 PM 4/8/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 01:36:56PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > BIND ( http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/ )
>
> Why not? The Apache of the DNS servers, feature-rich and very
> configurable.
Apache is more elegant. The only thing that can e
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 06:30:48PM +0200,
> Markus Welsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> > Which dns server would you suggest ?
>
> Why not PowerDNS http://www.powerdns.com/>, the only one which is
> fully extensible?
>
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 01:36:56PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > BIND ( http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/ )
>
> Why not? The Apache of the DNS servers, feature-rich and very
> configurable.
Apache is more elegant. The only thing that can equal BIND in terms of
bloat, root e
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 06:30:48PM +0200,
Markus Welsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 29 lines which said:
> Which dns server would you suggest ?
Why not PowerDNS http://www.powerdns.com/>, the only one which is
fully extensible?
> BIND ( http://www.isc.or
> I just controlled myself.. in scrapping the sentence "not again :-/".
I'm sorry - I surely didn't want to start of a flame-war or something alike
... I searched for dns server but didn't change the date filter, hence no
useful results.
> http://lists.debian
> I just controlled myself.. in scrapping the sentence "not again :-/".
I'm sorry - I surely didn't want to start of a flame-war or something alike
... I searched for dns server but didn't change the date filter, hence no
useful results.
> http://lists.debian
ar.
Enjoy !
>
> Hi all,
>
> Which dns server would you suggest ?
>
>
> BIND ( http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/ )
> djbdns ( http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html )
> NSD ( http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/ )
>
>
> Pretty much importance is perfo
Hi all,
Which dns server would you suggest ?
BIND ( http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/ )
djbdns ( http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html )
NSD ( http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/ )
Pretty much importance is performance and security. I'm currently not
using DNSSEC or something
ar.
Enjoy !
>
> Hi all,
>
> Which dns server would you suggest ?
>
>
> BIND ( http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/ )
> djbdns ( http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html )
> NSD ( http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/ )
>
>
> Pretty much importance is perfo
Hi all,
Which dns server would you suggest ?
BIND ( http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/ )
djbdns ( http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html )
NSD ( http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/ )
Pretty much importance is performance and security. I'm currently not
using DNSSEC or something
also sprach Eduard Ballester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.14.1717 +0100]:
> BIND 9.2.x of course,
ugh.
> * DNS Security
> DNSSEC (signed zones)
> TSIG (signed DNS requests)
TSIG: there may well be patches to djbdns. However, for internal
clients, IPsec is really the way to go.
> On
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.14.1805 +0100]:
> > o support for DNSSec
>
> i am sure there are patches out there.
wait, djbdns doesn't need DNSSEC at all. it doesn't suffer from
AXFR/IXFR problems like BIND.
seriously, djbdns is nice. you should try it.
--
Please
also sprach Markus Welsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.14.1502 +0100]:
> o ACL-System based on IP-address
> (like having netblocks to do querying everything and all
>others could just query domains that they are allowed to;
>same goes for update)
also sprach Eduard Ballester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.14.1717 +0100]:
> BIND 9.2.x of course,
ugh.
> * DNS Security
> DNSSEC (signed zones)
> TSIG (signed DNS requests)
TSIG: there may well be patches to djbdns. However, for internal
clients, IPsec is really the way to go.
> On
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.14.1805 +0100]:
> > o support for DNSSec
>
> i am sure there are patches out there.
wait, djbdns doesn't need DNSSEC at all. it doesn't suffer from
AXFR/IXFR problems like BIND.
seriously, djbdns is nice. you should try it.
--
Please
So it should provide the base features of BIND ... but I'd rather like
to step away from it for security reasons.
Another option should be the posibiltiy to chroot it (like the default
chroot of other daemons like postfix, etc).
BIND 9.2.x of course,
http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/bind9.ht
also sprach Markus Welsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.14.1502 +0100]:
> o ACL-System based on IP-address
> (like having netblocks to do querying everything and all
>others could just query domains that they are allowed to;
>same goes for update)
So it should provide the base features of BIND ... but I'd rather like
to step away from it for security reasons.
Another option should be the posibiltiy to chroot it (like the default
chroot of other daemons like postfix, etc).
BIND 9.2.x of course,
http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/bind9.ht
Hi all,
Which DNS server would you recommend that provides following functionality:
o ACL-System based on IP-address
(like having netblocks to do querying everything and all
others could just query domains that they are allowed to;
same
Hi all,
Which DNS server would you recommend that provides following functionality:
o ACL-System based on IP-address
(like having netblocks to do querying everything and all
others could just query domains that they are allowed to;
same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ave.
what i would like from a good dns server:
- - (djb dns) speed
- - bind zone file compatibility or tools to convert them easely
- - sql/ldap/db support
- - support for rsync/scp "zone transfer"
- - different operations (zone xfr,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ave.
what i would like from a good dns server:
- - (djb dns) speed
- - bind zone file compatibility or tools to convert them easely
- - sql/ldap/db support
- - support for rsync/scp "zone transfer"
- - different operations (zone xfr,
PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:37 AM
> Subject: about new domain name and DNS server
>
>
> > Dear Debian users or any linux users:
> >
> > In the article, there is someone point out because there is an
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> wtf?
I read it 3 times, and can't make sense of it either, don't worry ;)
Theo
Theo Zourzouvillys
Global Network Consultant
+ Notnet Consultancy [ www.notnet.co.uk ]
- Specialising in Unix security, ISP Start-up and regeneration,
- MySQL
wtf?
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Lin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:37 AM
Subject: about new domain name and DNS server
> Dear Debian users or any linux users:
>
> In the article, there is someon
Dear Debian users or any linux users:
In the article, there is someone point out because there is an
authority manage or contral .com domain, so to get our newdomain.com
have to pay him or her to register.
But why nowaday , there are more and more companies doing regiester
domain from 14 to
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:30:24 +1100, Donovan Baarda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 11:47:54PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
>> Thanks for the heads up. It looks like courier is the go.
>
>Actualy, it seems courier-imap and courier-pop pull in a few extra support
>packages includi
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:30:24 +1100, Donovan Baarda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 11:47:54PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
>> Thanks for the heads up. It looks like courier is the go.
>
>Actualy, it seems courier-imap and courier-pop pull in a few extra support
>packages includ
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 11:47:54PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 11:09:22AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 11:04:01 +1100 (EST), Donovan Baarda
[...]
> > I like Courier because it is one very flexible package and it does all
> > variants that might be need
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 11:47:54PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 11:09:22AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 11:04:01 +1100 (EST), Donovan Baarda
[...]
> > I like Courier because it is one very flexible package and it does all
> > variants that might be nee
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 23:47:54 +1100, Donovan Baarda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>When in doubt, I usually pick the smallest download. This is mainly because
>I live on the end of a slow link, but also because I'm a KISS, anti-bloat
>kinda guy. qpopper is about six times the size of the other popd's, h
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 23:47:54 +1100, Donovan Baarda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>When in doubt, I usually pick the smallest download. This is mainly because
>I live on the end of a slow link, but also because I'm a KISS, anti-bloat
>kinda guy. qpopper is about six times the size of the other popd's,
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 11:09:22AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 11:04:01 +1100 (EST), Donovan Baarda
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >As a matter of interest, what is the story with all the imap and pop
> >implementations? The debian woody "mailserver" task includes qpopper and uw
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 11:09:22AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 11:04:01 +1100 (EST), Donovan Baarda
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >As a matter of interest, what is the story with all the imap and pop
> >implementations? The debian woody "mailserver" task includes qpopper and u
On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 11:04:01 +1100 (EST), Donovan Baarda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>As a matter of interest, what is the story with all the imap and pop
>implementations? The debian woody "mailserver" task includes qpopper and uw-
>imapd. What's wrong with the much smaller ipopd, which is uw-imap
On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 11:04:01 +1100 (EST), Donovan Baarda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>As a matter of interest, what is the story with all the imap and pop
>implementations? The debian woody "mailserver" task includes qpopper and uw-
>imapd. What's wrong with the much smaller ipopd, which is uw-ima
Philipp Steinkrüger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suggest DJB's qmail. You can get the Source Tarball
> at http://cr.yp.to (official) or http://www.qmail.org (unoff).
> Qmail is the most powerful MTA i ever saw. Various big
> freemail provider use qmail, like GMX for example and even
> Microsoft
Quoting Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:13:27 +0100, "Davi Leal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >We are going to use a debian box as email and DNS server. The goal is
[...]
My 2c and others on Debian MTA's can be found here;
h
Philipp Steinkrüger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suggest DJB's qmail. You can get the Source Tarball
> at http://cr.yp.to (official) or http://www.qmail.org (unoff).
> Qmail is the most powerful MTA i ever saw. Various big
> freemail provider use qmail, like GMX for example and even
> Microsof
Quoting Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:13:27 +0100, "Davi Leal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >We are going to use a debian box as email and DNS server. The goal is
[...]
My 2c and others on Debian MTA's can be found here;
h
il
as outgoing mailserver.
Regards,
Philipp
Zitiere Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:13:27 +0100, "Davi Leal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >We are going to use a debian box as email and DNS server. The goal is
> >duplicate the functi
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:13:27 +0100, "Davi Leal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>We are going to use a debian box as email and DNS server. The goal is
>duplicate the functionality of a host which is using sendmail 8.8, xinetd
>(pop3) & bind. I thought to use:
>
>
il
as outgoing mailserver.
Regards,
Philipp
Zitiere Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:13:27 +0100, "Davi Leal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >We are going to use a debian box as email and DNS server. The goal is
> >duplicate the functi
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:13:27 +0100, "Davi Leal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>We are going to use a debian box as email and DNS server. The goal is
>duplicate the functionality of a host which is using sendmail 8.8, xinetd
>(pop3) & bind. I thought to use:
>
>
From: "Michael Boman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tuesday 04 December 2001 21:18, Roger Abrahamsson wrote:
> > I'd go with postfix...You can set it up as a drop in replacement really
> > for sendmail, it has the ability
> > to use either mysql or ldap as backend and scales well of that I have
> > seen
From: "Michael Boman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tuesday 04 December 2001 21:18, Roger Abrahamsson wrote:
> > I'd go with postfix...You can set it up as a drop in replacement really
> > for sendmail, it has the ability
> > to use either mysql or ldap as backend and scales well of that I have
> > see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 December 2001 21:18, Roger Abrahamsson wrote:
> I'd go with postfix...You can set it up as a drop in replacement really
> for sendmail, it has the ability
> to use either mysql or ldap as backend and scales well of that I have
> seen. You
I'd go with postfix...You can set it up as a drop in replacement really
for sendmail, it has the ability
to use either mysql or ldap as backend and scales well of that I have
seen. You definitively have to go
with woody or sid, but as long as you run a dedicated server and dont
have 4000 package
Dear,
Could you please delete this user's "I don't work here anymore"
message, as we received about 7 of them allready the last 5 minutes.
Problem is this: he gets a mail from an ISP mailinglist
(debian-isp@lists.debian.org), sends an autoreply back to list, which
ends up in his mailbox again. So
ux as email &
DNS server
Hi all,We are going to use a debian box as email and
DNS server. The goal isduplicate the functionality of a host which is
using sendmail 8.8, xinetd(pop3) & bind. I thought to
use: Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r3
(potato): sendmail 8.9.3,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 December 2001 21:18, Roger Abrahamsson wrote:
> I'd go with postfix...You can set it up as a drop in replacement really
> for sendmail, it has the ability
> to use either mysql or ldap as backend and scales well of that I have
> seen. Yo
Hi,
As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Youri Albinovanus
Hi,
As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Youri Albinovanus
Hi,
As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Youri Albinovanus
Hi,
As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Youri Albinovanus
I'd go with postfix...You can set it up as a drop in replacement really
for sendmail, it has the ability
to use either mysql or ldap as backend and scales well of that I have
seen. You definitively have to go
with woody or sid, but as long as you run a dedicated server and dont
have 4000 packag
Hi,
As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Youri Albinovanus
n Vink
-Original Message-
From: Davi Leal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 4 december 2001 12:13
To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: Debian GNU/Linux as email & DNS server
Hi all,
We are going to use a debian box as email and DNS server. The goal is
duplicate the functionali
Hi all,
We are going to use a debian box as email and DNS server. The goal is
duplicate the functionality of a host which is using sendmail 8.8, xinetd
(pop3) & bind. I thought to use:
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r3 (potato):
sendmail 8.9.3, postfix, or ...
xinetd (pop3: qpopper
Dear,
Could you please delete this user's "I don't work here anymore"
message, as we received about 7 of them allready the last 5 minutes.
Problem is this: he gets a mail from an ISP mailinglist
([EMAIL PROTECTED]), sends an autoreply back to list, which
ends up in his mailbox again. So he autor
email &
DNS server
Hi all,We are going to use a debian box as email and
DNS server. The goal isduplicate the functionality of a host which is
using sendmail 8.8, xinetd(pop3) & bind. I thought to
use: Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r3
(potato): sendmail 8.9.3,
postfix, or ...
Hi,
As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Youri Albinovanus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Youri Albinovanus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Youri Albinovanus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Youri Albinovanus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Youri Albinovanus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
n Vink
-Original Message-
From: Davi Leal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: dinsdag 4 december 2001 12:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Debian GNU/Linux as email & DNS server
Hi all,
We are going to use a debian box as email and DNS server. The goal is
duplicate the functionality of a hos
Hi all,
We are going to use a debian box as email and DNS server. The goal is
duplicate the functionality of a host which is using sendmail 8.8, xinetd
(pop3) & bind. I thought to use:
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r3 (potato):
sendmail 8.9.3, postfix, or ...
xinetd (pop3: qpo
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, I. Forbes wrote:
> We run one DNS server as a "caching DNS server". All DNS
> queries from our site are forwarded to this server. It does not host
> any primary or secondary "zones" and resolves all of its queries
> from root servers.
actual answer to your question... I don't know of any way to
expire a single zone. You can reload a single zone on a master or slave
server... but I don't think it's possible with a caching server...
--Rich
"I. Forbes" wrote:
>
> Hello All
>
> I have a
Hello All
I have a quick question, but I am not sure that there is a quick
answer.
We run one DNS server as a "caching DNS server". All DNS
queries from our site are forwarded to this server. It does not host
any primary or secondary "zones" and resolves all of it
Hi Chad,
On Tue, 9 May 2000, t s a d i wrote:
> i once set up a web/mail virtual hosting box for a friend who owns a small
> ISP ... i put webmin 0.71 (i think, that was back feb 1999) in there and its
> still perfectly healthy as of now (she never upgraded or applied patches to
> it)
> ..
> webmin? Let's hope there'll be others out there who are aware of any
> possible risks with using webmin and would fill us in.
>
hello :-)
i once set up a web/mail virtual hosting box for a friend who owns a small
ISP ... i put webmin 0.71 (i think, that was back feb 1999) in there and
Sent: May 9 2000 20:40
To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: dns server
Could something like Webmin ( http://www.webmin.com/ ) do the trick?
// Kim Lundgren
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 12:02:27PM -0600, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
> There might be web interfaces for RaQ products that a
I have no experience with wemin either :)
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Kim Lundgren wrote:
>Could something like Webmin ( http://www.webmin.com/ ) do the trick?
>
>// Kim Lundgren
___ _ __ _
__ /___ ___ /__ John Gonzalez/Net.Tech
__ __ \ __
linux?
>
> I have never used a raq, nor am i familiar with wether their software is
> even open source.
>
> On Tue, 9 May 2000, mediagenic services wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >i am searching for a dns server that allows me to administrate it by web.
> >additional f
ing for a dns server that allows me to administrate it by web.
>additional features that i would like to have are setting up virtual dns
>servers (with its own web interface etc.) for my bigger clients and http
>forwarding.
>
>i only found products for NT but nothing that runs under l
e others out there who are aware of any
possible risks with using webmin and would fill us in.
Sincerely,
Erik Peter P. Abella
>i am searching for a dns server that allows me to administrate it by web.
>additional features that i would like to have are setting up virtual dns
>servers (w
Hi,
i am searching for a dns server that allows me to administrate it by web.
additional features that i would like to have are setting up virtual dns
servers (with its own web interface etc.) for my bigger clients and http
forwarding.
i only found products for NT but nothing that runs under
96 matches
Mail list logo
