From: "Alex Bihlmaier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 12:29 PM
Hello,
i want to do accounting of email transfer volume with qmail. (min.
transferred bytes)
Is there a way to solve this problem with qmail directly?
I don't want to use firewall rules t
Hello,
i want to do accounting of email transfer volume with qmail. (min.
transferred bytes)
Is there a way to solve this problem with qmail directly?
I don't want to use firewall rules to measure the traffic.
thanks,
thalunil
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Hi !
In february of this year, I've asked here what kind of mailling list manager I
should use for Qmail. This was to use it inside my software that controls many
programs for hosting already. Since then, DTC has evolved a lot (now it supports
Postfix, Courier and Dovecot, as it was suppo
n't do POP, that's the job of whatever POP daemon you're using.
Yep, sure, thanks for correction.
I'm using courier IMAP [+POP].
I only posted the message to give a support to assumption, that the
problem is in O/OE rather then elsewhere (e.g. in Qmail)...
David
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 06:05:33PM +0200, David Zejda wrote:
> >dunno. large messages obviously aren't the ONLY factor, it's a combination
> >of factors - one of which is that the message is large.
>
> I have a similar (sometimes, large messages, dialup) problem with OE +
> Postfix.
postfix does
dunno. large messages obviously aren't the ONLY factor, it's a combination of
factors - one of which is that the message is large.
I have a similar (sometimes, large messages, dialup) problem with OE +
Postfix.
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 11:12:06AM -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Craig Sanders wrote:
> > the problem is that outlook is broken. it's broken in many ways but
> > this specific problem is due to the fact that outlook locks up when
> > downloading "large" messages. it doesn't have to be an attachmen
Somone wrote:
>I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook 2000
>SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages from his
> POP account, Outlook will hang. It is most likely a corrupted message,
The only concrete case I've tracked down was O
On Friday 23 July 2004 17:12, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Craig Sanders wrote:
> > the problem is that outlook is broken. it's broken in many ways but
> > this specific problem is due to the fact that outlook locks up when
> > downloading "large" messages. it doesn't have to be an attachment,
> > if th
Craig Sanders wrote:
> the problem is that outlook is broken. it's broken in many ways but
> this specific problem is due to the fact that outlook locks up when
> downloading "large" messages. it doesn't have to be an attachment,
> if the message is too large, then outlook will hang. i don't re
sages.
Peter K.
Peter Klavins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: John Gonzalez/netMDC admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 7:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Outlook and Qmail
Do me a
Hi,
i remember that one of our custormers had the same problem. he couldnt
connect
his outlook to our qmail server, when the message was "large".
> it happens with any MTA and any POP daemon. that's because the problem is
not
> in the message, the MTA or the POP daemon.
Kris Deugau wrote:
> Anil Gupte wrote:
> > I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook
> > 2000 SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages
> > from his POP account, Outlook will hang. It is most likely a
> > corrupted messa
ul 22, 2004 at 09:26:22PM -0400, Brian Franco wrote:
> I have the same problem with redhat sendmail and qpopper did you ever find a
> solution?
> Any help would be greatly appreciated
>
> >I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook 2000
> >SP-3 to connec
I have the same problem with redhat sendmail and
qpopper did you ever find a solution?
Any help would be greatly appreciated
>I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook
2000>SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages
from his POP&g
2004 a las 19:58, David Wilk escribi?:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > I noticed that qmail-scanner-queue refuses to run after the last debian
> > perl update. I tried to install the latest qmail-scanner, but
> > unfortunately the ./configure fails reporting:
> >
> >
El lun, 19-04-2004 a las 19:58, David Wilk escribió:
> Howdy,
>
> I noticed that qmail-scanner-queue refuses to run after the last debian
> perl update. I tried to install the latest qmail-scanner, but
> unfortunately the ./configure fails reporting:
>
>
> Testing
Howdy,
I noticed that qmail-scanner-queue refuses to run after the last debian
perl update. I tried to install the latest qmail-scanner, but
unfortunately the ./configure fails reporting:
Testing suid nature of /usr/bin/suidperl...
Whoa - broken perl install found.
Cannot even run a simple
2004 a las 19:58, David Wilk escribi?:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > I noticed that qmail-scanner-queue refuses to run after the last debian
> > perl update. I tried to install the latest qmail-scanner, but
> > unfortunately the ./configure fails reporting:
> >
> >
El lun, 19-04-2004 a las 19:58, David Wilk escribió:
> Howdy,
>
> I noticed that qmail-scanner-queue refuses to run after the last debian
> perl update. I tried to install the latest qmail-scanner, but
> unfortunately the ./configure fails reporting:
>
>
> Testing
Howdy,
I noticed that qmail-scanner-queue refuses to run after the last debian
perl update. I tried to install the latest qmail-scanner, but
unfortunately the ./configure fails reporting:
Testing suid nature of /usr/bin/suidperl...
Whoa - broken perl install found.
Cannot even run a simple
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 13:04, "Anil Gupte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook 2000
> SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages from his
Last time I checked the Qmail POP server would append a bla
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 13:04, "Anil Gupte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook 2000
> SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages from his
Last time I checked the Qmail POP server would append a bla
Anil Gupte wrote:
> I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook
> 2000 SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages
> from his POP account, Outlook will hang. It is most likely a
> corrupted message, since he can delete the messages usi
Anil Gupte wrote:
> I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook
> 2000 SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages
> from his POP account, Outlook will hang. It is most likely a
> corrupted message, since he can delete the messages usi
I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook 2000
SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages from his POP
account, Outlook will hang. It is most likely a corrupted message, since he
can delete the messages using a webmail interface, and then continue to
I am having a problem with one of my customers who is using Outlook 2000
SP-3 to connect to our Qmail server. When downloading messages from his POP
account, Outlook will hang. It is most likely a corrupted message, since he
can delete the messages using a webmail interface, and then continue to
"Richard Zuidhof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> William Dode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> I must change the machine of a mx. The first one is with qmail and the
>> second with exim.
>> Before the dns propagation, i would like that all the mail wh
William Dode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I must change the machine of a mx. The first one is with qmail and the
> second with exim.
> Before the dns propagation, i would like that all the mail who still
> arrive on the qmail machine will be redirected to the new one. But i
> don&#
hi,
I must change the machine of a mx. The first one is with qmail and the
second with exim.
Before the dns propagation, i would like that all the mail who still
arrive on the qmail machine will be redirected to the new one. But i
don't know qmail...
Is it enough to remove the domain from
"Richard Zuidhof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> William Dode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> I must change the machine of a mx. The first one is with qmail and the
>> second with exim.
>> Before the dns propagation, i would like that all the mail wh
William Dode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I must change the machine of a mx. The first one is with qmail and the
> second with exim.
> Before the dns propagation, i would like that all the mail who still
> arrive on the qmail machine will be redirected to the new one. But i
> don&#
hi,
I must change the machine of a mx. The first one is with qmail and the
second with exim.
Before the dns propagation, i would like that all the mail who still
arrive on the qmail machine will be redirected to the new one. But i
don't know qmail...
Is it enough to remove the domain from
El vie, 05-03-2004 a las 12:56, Lucius Junevicus escribió:
> I saw your post on setting up qmail over drbd. I would love to see
> how you did it.
> I'd like to create a how-to on setting up a hybrid cluster (open-mosix
> and drbd) for qmail.
Open Mosix? Isnt that like, aut
Title: Message
I saw your post on
setting up qmail over drbd. I would love to see how you did
it.
I'd like to create a
how-to on setting up a hybrid cluster (open-mosix and drbd) for
qmail.
I'd love to know how
you setup your cluster.
What do your
drbd.conf, ha.cf, haresou
El vie, 05-03-2004 a las 12:56, Lucius Junevicus escribió:
> I saw your post on setting up qmail over drbd. I would love to see
> how you did it.
> I'd like to create a how-to on setting up a hybrid cluster (open-mosix
> and drbd) for qmail.
Open Mosix? Isnt that like, aut
Title: Message
I saw your post on
setting up qmail over drbd. I would love to see how you did
it.
I'd like to create a
how-to on setting up a hybrid cluster (open-mosix and drbd) for
qmail.
I'd love to know how
you setup your cluster.
What do your
drbd.conf, ha.cf, haresou
Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
> Cool ! Don't forget to post here when it's done ! :)
I've started a WikiLearn page:
http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Wikilearn/EmailVirtualDomains
Look it over, see what's wrong, misleading, or missing, and fix it. ;-)
(It is, after all, a wiki.)
regards,
Randy Kramer
--
> > > Can someone write here an easy understandable configuration for
> > > Postfix with virtual domains ? After some call for help here, none of
> > > you that know Posfix did it...
there is an easy understandable VIRTUAL_README in postfix docs yet (at least
in woody version), so it's not necessa
- Original Message -
From: "Ruth A. Kramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 6:48 AM
Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? (was: RE: What is the best mailling list
manager for qmail and Domain Tech. Control ?)
> I'd li
Sorry about the attributions below -- I suspect they are incorrect -- I
didn't save some of the earlier posts in this thread, and didn't try
searching the archives.
Craig Sanders wrote:
Thomas GOIRAND wrote??:
> > Can someone write here an easy understandable configuration for
> > Postfix with v
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:29:04PM +0100, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Craig Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:34:52PM +0100, Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen wrote:
> >
> > 4. the configuration is truly bizarre.bernstein has his own
> > non-sta
- Original Message -
From: "Craig Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? (was: RE: What is the best mailling
> see the next point).
well, if you are a new user and want to look at qmail, then you should
*not* look at the Debian package qmail-src, but to this instead:
http://qmail.mirrors.space.net/netqmail-1.05.tar.gz
(found from http://qmail.mirrors.space.net/top.html)
Or, if you have "higher&
Bjørnar Bjørgum Larsen wrote:
I am in the process of choosing between postfix and qmail for our
mail relays. I've not decided yet. However, I am surprised by the
fact that many people who prefer postfix, also enjoy posting
unqualified[0] statements[1][2][3] about qmail.
If anyone have pro
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:34:52PM +0100, Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen wrote:
> I am in the process of choosing between postfix and qmail for our mail relays. I've
> not decided yet. However, I am surprised by the fact that many people who prefer
> postfix, also enjoy posting unqualified
eatures people did expect (one of them being the ability
> > to reject mail instead of bounce it ;-)
>
> actually, it is qmail and not postfix that can't 5xx reject mail. qmail
> has to accept and bounce it.postfix has always been able to reject
> unwanted mail during the
of the features people did expect (one of them being the ability to
> reject mail instead of bounce it ;-)
actually, it is qmail and not postfix that can't 5xx reject mail. qmail has to
accept and bounce it.postfix has always been able to reject unwanted mail
during the SMTP session
tfix/
http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/smtpauth/
| However unlike qmail, there is not a large cottage industry producing
| third-party extensions and contributions to Postfix. This is because the
| modules in Postfix are more tightly coupled to one another and the
| interfaces between them
IBM public license,
http://getmyip.com/mirror/pub/LICENSE
Read the IBM public license and take it from there.
Hope this might help clear up any licensing/packaging issues with
postfix.
Sorry, I cannot comment as to the status of qmail, since I have chosen
to
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:34:52PM +0100, Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen wrote:
> For example, I'd like comments on
> http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/Reviews/UnixMTSes/postfix.html
a collection of lies, half-truths, and mistruths.
the best that can be said about this document is that the aut
On Thursday 19 February 2004 21.56, Dan MacNeil wrote:
> > http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/Reviews/UnixMTSes/postfix.ht
> >ml
>
> says at the very bottom:
>
> Postfix is only available in source form,
> not as precompiled or prepackaged binaries.
> There is a list of
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:34:52PM +0100, Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen wrote:
> [3] Craig Sanders wrote:
> > ps: qmail is a bad idea. postfix is better.
>
> Your conclusion may be right, but the arguments are missing. Would you please
> share?
search the archives of this list. MT
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 11:34, Bjørnar Bjørgum Larsen wrote:
> I am in the process of choosing between postfix and qmail for our mail relays. I've
> not decided yet. However, I am surprised by the fact that many people who prefer
> postfix, also enjoy posting unqualified[0] stat
On Thursday 19 February 2004 21.34, Bjørnar Bjørgum Larsen wrote:
> I am in the process of choosing between postfix and qmail for our mail
> relays. I've not decided yet.
Matter of taste - I find postfix' log files are orders of magnitude easier to
read than qmail's.
Als
ial web site.
I have apt-get install'd postfix so I suspect this is not true. If this is
an error, there may be others.
The biggest complaint I've heard about qmail is that its license requires
you to install binaries according to the taste of the creator. This means
that things are the s
I am in the process of choosing between postfix and qmail for our mail relays. I've
not decided yet. However, I am surprised by the fact that many people who prefer
postfix, also enjoy posting unqualified[0] statements[1][2][3] about qmail.
If anyone have properly grounded views, please
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 08:19:20AM -0500, John Keimel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 07:17:57AM +0100, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
> > I wish to implement mailling list management to my software for all virtual
> > domains. DTC uses qmail, so it has to be compatible with it. DTC will
&
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 09:35:00PM +0100, Joris wrote:
> >Majordomo is good, but I think you'd like "mailman" better.
> >
> >Web interface for both users and administrators, very configurable, etc.
>
> I'd recommend mailman too, but I have to warn for it's archive function.
all list managers suck
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 08:19:20AM -0500, John Keimel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 07:17:57AM +0100, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
> > I wish to implement mailling list management to my software for all virtual
> > domains. DTC uses qmail, so it has to be compatible with it. DTC will
&
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 09:35:00PM +0100, Joris wrote:
> >Majordomo is good, but I think you'd like "mailman" better.
> >
> >Web interface for both users and administrators, very configurable, etc.
>
> I'd recommend mailman too, but I have to warn for it's archive function.
all list managers suck
Title: Converting from Qmail to Postfix
List Members,
I was reading through the advice on mail list managers for Qmail and
It seems like a lot of users are using Postfix as their MTA. Can some
one post a short 3 step process for converting from Qmail to Postfix
please or point to a URL with
Title: Converting from Qmail to Postfix
List Members,
I was reading through the advice on mail list managers for Qmail and
It seems like a lot of users are using Postfix as their MTA. Can some
one post a short 3 step process for converting from Qmail to Postfix
please or point to a URL with
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:35:00 +0100,
Joris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Nate Duehr wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 15, 2004, at 11:17 PM, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
> >
> > > I heard majordomo was good, is there something better ? I could
> > > not find it in debian stable, it s
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:35:00 +0100,
Joris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Nate Duehr wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 15, 2004, at 11:17 PM, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
> >
> > > I heard majordomo was good, is there something better ? I could
> > > not find it in debian stable, it s
Michael, et al --
...and then Michael Loftis said...
%
% I'd highly recommend mailman over majordomo.I'm also disinclined to
% recommend qmail for a number of reasons. First is, unless they've made
Real reasons, or just because you personally prefer something else?
%
ement mailling list management to my software for all virtual
% domains. DTC uses qmail, so it has to be compatible with it. DTC will
% generate all config file for the given mailling list manager.
I love ezmlm, which certainly nestles well with qmail. It should also be
easy to implement the hook
Michael, et al --
...and then Michael Loftis said...
%
% I'd highly recommend mailman over majordomo.I'm also disinclined to
% recommend qmail for a number of reasons. First is, unless they've made
Real reasons, or just because you personally prefer something else?
%
ement mailling list management to my software for all virtual
% domains. DTC uses qmail, so it has to be compatible with it. DTC will
% generate all config file for the given mailling list manager.
I love ezmlm, which certainly nestles well with qmail. It should also be
easy to implement the hook
Nate Duehr wrote:
On Feb 15, 2004, at 11:17 PM, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
I heard majordomo was good, is there something better ? I could not
find it
in debian stable, it seems it is a licence problem... Any sugestions ?
Majordomo is good, but I think you'd like "mailman" better.
Web interface for bo
Nate Duehr wrote:
On Feb 15, 2004, at 11:17 PM, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
I heard majordomo was good, is there something better ? I could not
find it
in debian stable, it seems it is a licence problem... Any sugestions ?
Majordomo is good, but I think you'd like "mailman" better.
Web interface for
> for bind, Apache, qmail, and proftpd, using a single system UID/GID. With
> DTC, you can delegate the task of creating subdomains, email, and FTP
> accounts to users for the domain names they own, and monitor bandwidth per
> user and service.
> http://www.gplhost.com/?rub=softwares&a
> for bind, Apache, qmail, and proftpd, using a single system UID/GID. With
> DTC, you can delegate the task of creating subdomains, email, and FTP
> accounts to users for the domain names they own, and monitor bandwidth per
> user and service.
> http://www.gplhost.com/?rub=softwares&a
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 07:17:57AM +0100, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
> I wish to implement mailling list management to my software for all virtual
> domains. DTC uses qmail, so it has to be compatible with it. DTC will
> generate all config file for the given mailling list manager.
>
Ecart
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 07:17:57AM +0100, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
> I wish to implement mailling list management to my software for all virtual
> domains. DTC uses qmail, so it has to be compatible with it. DTC will
> generate all config file for the given mailling list manager.
>
Ecart
very customizable (optional) web
interface, text, mysql, ldap backends, multilanguage and more. Packaged
for Debian.
I use it with Postfix but Qmail is said to work as well
| use of your preferred SMTP engine,
| e.g. sendmail, qmail or postfix
http://www.sympa.org/features.html
http://
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El 16/02/2004, a las 8:21, Michael Loftis escribió:
I'd highly recommend mailman over majordomo.I'm also disinclined
to recommend qmail for a number of reasons. First is, unless they've
made design changes, it's trivial
very customizable (optional) web
interface, text, mysql, ldap backends, multilanguage and more. Packaged
for Debian.
I use it with Postfix but Qmail is said to work as well
| use of your preferred SMTP engine,
| e.g. sendmail, qmail or postfix
http://www.sympa.org/features.html
http://
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El 16/02/2004, a las 8:21, Michael Loftis escribió:
I'd highly recommend mailman over majordomo.I'm also disinclined
to recommend qmail for a number of reasons. First is, unless they've
made design changes, it's trivial
I'd highly recommend mailman over majordomo.I'm also disinclined to
recommend qmail for a number of reasons. First is, unless they've made
design changes, it's trivial to DoS. Second, it doesn't scale so well, but
unless you're talking upwards of about 3-5k/
On Feb 15, 2004, at 11:17 PM, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
I heard majordomo was good, is there something better ? I could not
find it
in debian stable, it seems it is a licence problem... Any sugestions ?
Majordomo is good, but I think you'd like "mailman" better.
Web interface for both users and admini
host information. It
generates backup scripts, statistic calculation scripts, and config files
for bind, Apache, qmail, and proftpd, using a single system UID/GID. With
DTC, you can delegate the task of creating subdomains, email, and FTP
accounts to users for the domain names they own, and monitor bandwidt
I'd highly recommend mailman over majordomo.I'm also disinclined to
recommend qmail for a number of reasons. First is, unless they've made
design changes, it's trivial to DoS. Second, it doesn't scale so well, but
unless you're talking upwards of about 3-5k/
On Feb 15, 2004, at 11:17 PM, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
I heard majordomo was good, is there something better ? I could not
find it
in debian stable, it seems it is a licence problem... Any sugestions ?
Majordomo is good, but I think you'd like "mailman" better.
Web interface for both users and admin
host information. It
generates backup scripts, statistic calculation scripts, and config files
for bind, Apache, qmail, and proftpd, using a single system UID/GID. With
DTC, you can delegate the task of creating subdomains, email, and FTP
accounts to users for the domain names they own, and monitor bandwidt
i'm happily using postfix (virtual domains, maildirs, sasl..), courier
imap/pop/sasl, openwebmail, pam.. are there any reasonable advanteges with
www.xmailserver.org? Any experiences?
Thanks
David
i'm happily using postfix (virtual domains, maildirs, sasl..), courier
imap/pop/sasl, openwebmail, pam.. are there any reasonable advanteges with
www.xmailserver.org? Any experiences?
Thanks
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 13:52:02 +0100, Erik Grinaker wrote:
> I would recommend the exiscan-acl patch for Exim,
It is included in the exim4-daemon-heavy package.
Ray (a happy exim4 and exim4 backports user)
--
sendmail.cf does not resemble line noise. It resembles the result of
somebody bangin
Hi guys
We have been using:
smtp..qmail
anti-virusclamav
scanner...qmail-scanner
webmail...sqwebmail
GUI...vqadmin+qmailadmin
virtual domains...vpopmail
pop/imap..courier-imap
list..ezmlm
as a mail solution for ours clients who
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 13:52:02 +0100, Erik Grinaker wrote:
> I would recommend the exiscan-acl patch for Exim,
It is included in the exim4-daemon-heavy package.
Ray (a happy exim4 and exim4 backports user)
--
sendmail.cf does not resemble line noise. It resembles the result of
somebody bangin
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 00:37, Paul Dwerryhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:44:54PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > I've run 250,000 users per mail store using Maildir format, Courier
> > and Qmail, given a choice I'd do it all the same apart
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 12:05, Paulo Ricardo wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> We have been using:
*snip*
We're using something very similar here.
qmail/sqwebmail/qmailadmin/vpopmail.
We have to be able to do
smtp, smtp auth, pop, imap at the very least.
> Question:
>
> What is t
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:44:54PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> I've run 250,000 users per mail store using Maildir format, Courier
> and Qmail, given a choice I'd do it all the same apart from using
> Postfix instead of Qmail.
Does Postfix yet have the ability to handle LDA
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 00:37, Paul Dwerryhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:44:54PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > I've run 250,000 users per mail store using Maildir format, Courier
> > and Qmail, given a choice I'd do it all the same apart
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 13:05, Paulo Ricardo wrote:
> What is the best tools to work w/ exim ?
> smtp...exim
> anti-virus.clamav
> spam...spamassassin or ???
> scanner??
I would recommend the exiscan-acl patch for Exim, which lets you run
content checks a
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:44:54PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> I've run 250,000 users per mail store using Maildir format, Courier
> and Qmail, given a choice I'd do it all the same apart from using
> Postfix instead of Qmail.
Does Postfix yet have the ability to handle LDA
has been delivered.
This makes the decision very easy for me, I never consider Cyrus.
Someone is about to claim that Cyrus delivers huge performance. I've run
250,000 users per mail store using Maildir format, Courier and Qmail, given a
choice I'd do it all the same apart from usin
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 12:05, Paulo Ricardo wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> We have been using:
*snip*
We're using something very similar here.
qmail/sqwebmail/qmailadmin/vpopmail.
We have to be able to do
smtp, smtp auth, pop, imap at the very least.
> Question:
>
> What is t
> pop/imap...courier or Cyrus ???
I'm curious about this one. I've been postponing installing one of these
'till someone with knowledge about both can give some info about the
choice. Any other imap/pop servers that are an option?
tinus
Hi guys
We have been using:
smtp..qmail
anti-virusclamav
scanner...qmail-scanner
webmail...sqwebmail
GUI...vqadmin+qmailadmin
virtual domains...vpopmail
pop/imap..courier-imap
list..ezmlm
as a mail solution for ours clients who
1 - 100 of 363 matches
Mail list logo
