Another question: Where th package uses a standard API (e.g.
java.util.Map), should I link to
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/ or what?
No, please depend on classpath-doc and use these. We dont wanna link to
resources on the net. The idea is to have all on your hard disk when you
insta
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 12:31:11AM +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
>
> >>Another question: Where th package uses a standard API (e.g.
> >>java.util.Map), should I link to
> >>http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/ or what?
> >
> >No, please depend on classpath-doc and use these. We dont wanna link
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 11:54:14PM +, Paul Cager wrote:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:19:31PM +, Paul Cager wrote:
> >> Marcus Better wrote:
> >>> Matthias Klose wrote:
> Assuming that the doc is installed in /usr/share/doc/libfoo-java/api,
> a reference to
Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:19:31PM +, Paul Cager wrote:
>> Marcus Better wrote:
>>> Matthias Klose wrote:
Assuming that the doc is installed in /usr/share/doc/libfoo-java/api,
a reference to a class Bar should point to ../../libbar-java/api. Not
yet sure how
On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 01:12 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:19:31PM +, Paul Cager wrote:
> > Marcus Better wrote:
> > > Matthias Klose wrote:
> > >> Assuming that the doc is installed in /usr/share/doc/libfoo-java/api,
> > >> a reference to a class Bar should point to ..
Please could you consider uploading the current gnome-java bindings
(including the vte bindings) to unstable? You can get the current
versions from Ubuntu feisty. I won't have the time to upload these
versions myself.
Thanks, Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:19:31PM +, Paul Cager wrote:
> Marcus Better wrote:
> > Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> Assuming that the doc is installed in /usr/share/doc/libfoo-java/api,
> >> a reference to a class Bar should point to ../../libbar-java/api. Not
> >> yet sure how to find the location f
Matthias Klose a écrit :
Filipus Klutiero writes:
Did this hesitation include making sure that #401570/#406583 is not a
serious eclipse bug?
both bugs are reported against swt-gtk and still open; it's fixed in
the pkg-java svn.
OK, I didn't notice that #401570 was already fixed; clos
Filipus Klutiero writes:
> Did this hesitation include making sure that #401570/#406583 is not a
> serious eclipse bug?
both bugs are reported against swt-gtk and still open; it's fixed in
the pkg-java svn. We (Michael Koch and me) did try several times to
convince the swt-gtk maintainer to buil
Marcus Better wrote:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Assuming that the doc is installed in /usr/share/doc/libfoo-java/api,
>> a reference to a class Bar should point to ../../libbar-java/api. Not
>> yet sure how to find the location for this reference
>
> I seem to remember that javadoc can be given a
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Assuming that the doc is installed in /usr/share/doc/libfoo-java/api,
> a reference to a class Bar should point to ../../libbar-java/api. Not
> yet sure how to find the location for this reference
I seem to remember that javadoc can be given a command line parameter giving
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 03:23:07AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > I think its save to bring eclipse and jsch to etch. ant-optional reverse
> > depends on jsch too and my tests show that ant works with the new jsch
> > too. I saw no other reverse dependencies for libjsch-java.
>
> Unblocked, w
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 01:55:17PM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 09:58:46PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Steve Langasek writes:
> > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 02:16:54AM -0800, Peter Ronnquist wrote:
> > > > It seems like eclipse will not be part of the etch release. Is th
13 matches
Mail list logo
