Dear debian-java readers,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package remotetea.
* Package name: remotetea
Version : 1.0.7-1
* URL : http://remotetea.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Section : java
It builds these binary packages:
remotetea - Sun
hello as I am working on my remotetea package, I build it using the
pbuilder.
and it seems that depending on default-jdk is not enought to produce
good documentation with javadoc. Indeed it do not find the
documentation for standard classes of java.
what must I add as build dependency to produce
On Fri, Jun 26, 16:53:10 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
1. Why are we trying to build CVS version instead of latest stable version?
That's what Petter did initially, and I didn't look at what was
available upstream.
2. The version number in the changelog says dfsg, but there is no
readme file
On 05.08.2009 17:00, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
hello as I am working on my remotetea package, I build it using the
pbuilder.
and it seems that depending on default-jdk is not enought to produce
good documentation with javadoc. Indeed it do not find the
documentation for standard classes of
Le Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:52:34 +0200,
Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com a écrit :
On 05.08.2009 17:00, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
hello as I am working on my remotetea package, I build it using the
pbuilder.
and it seems that depending on default-jdk is not enought to produce
good
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Jonny Lambjo...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 16:53:10 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
1. Why are we trying to build CVS version instead of latest stable version?
That's what Petter did initially, and I didn't look at what was
available upstream.
2. The
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Jonny Lambjo...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 22:14:53 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
Are you referring to following entry in changelog?
* debian/rules: Remove unzipsfx executables from orig.tar.gz.
As I said, current upstream (1.5.2) source zip does not
On Wed, Aug 05, 22:14:53 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
Are you referring to following entry in changelog?
* debian/rules: Remove unzipsfx executables from orig.tar.gz.
As I said, current upstream (1.5.2) source zip does not contain any
non-DFSG-Free files. It does not contain any class or jar
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 06:26:44PM +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
Le Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:52:34 +0200,
Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com a écrit :
On 05.08.2009 17:00, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
hello as I am working on my remotetea package, I build it using the
pbuilder.
On 05.08.2009 18:26, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
Le Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:52:34 +0200,
Matthias Klosed...@ubuntu.com a écrit :
On 05.08.2009 17:00, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
hello as I am working on my remotetea package, I build it using the
pbuilder.
and it seems that depending
On 05.08.2009 20:02, Michael Koch wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 06:26:44PM +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
Le Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:52:34 +0200,
Matthias Klosed...@ubuntu.com a écrit :
On 05.08.2009 17:00, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
hello as I am working on my remotetea package, I
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 06:05:11PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Always put it into /usr/share/doc/doc package/api.
No, this looks wrong, because you cannot enforce this for packages
where the docs are shipped in the same package. You should use
/usr/share/doc/lib package/api, and maybe add a
Matthias, I have just uploaded a new version of maven-debian-helper. It
uses Maven to build packages, and supports now the generation of Javadoc
packages. There is also a utility, mh_make, which given a Maven project
will try to build all the Debian packaging for it. Can you give it a
try, it's
13 matches
Mail list logo
