Package: libartsc0-dev
Version: 1.5.3-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
There are spurious dependencies in the output of artsc-config --libs:
-L/usr/lib -ldl -lartsc -lpthread -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lgthread-2.0 -lglib-2.0
-ldl -lpthread -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lgthread-2.0 -lglib-2.0 are _not_
needed here
Hello,
I am using a kickerplugin (cpuinfo) that implements QToolTip. This
functionality is achived by reimplementing mayBeTip(). The only problem is,
that under Debian Sid, the ToolTip is just shown for maybe 1-2 minute after
the start of KDE. If I move the mouse over this plugin later, the
I have some patches to Qt 3 which might be interesting to you.
Fixing Arabic support:
http://kubuntu.org/~jriddell/tmp/kubuntu_01_arabic_fonts.dpatch
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/qt-x11-free/+bug/11753
Loading modules when running 32bit binary on amd64 (for openoffice to
get
Package: qt3-designer
Version: 3:3.3.6-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
qt3-designer needs to put a symlink into /usr/share/qt3/bin as
/usr/share/qt3 is what is used as QTDIR with various applications and
they expect designer to be under QTDIR/bin. The symlink also needs to be
designer, not designer-qt3.
FYI: The status of the koffice-l10n source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.5.0-1
Current version: 1.5.1-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more
Accepted:
akregator_3.5.3-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/akregator_3.5.3-1_i386.deb
kaddressbook_3.5.3-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kaddressbook_3.5.3-1_i386.deb
kalarm_3.5.3-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kalarm_3.5.3-1_i386.deb
kandy_3.5.3-1_i386.deb
to
kdepim_3.5.3-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kdepim_3.5.3-1.dsc
kdepim_3.5.3.orig.tar.gz
kdepim_3.5.3-1.diff.gz
kdepim_3.5.3-1_all.deb
kdepim-doc_3.5.3-1_all.deb
kdepim-doc-html_3.5.3-1_all.deb
kdepim-dbg_3.5.3-1_i386.deb
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:47:35 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#374447: fixed in kdepim 4:3.5.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:47:35 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#361209: fixed in kdepim 4:3.5.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:47:35 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#374829: fixed in kdepim 4:3.5.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
have you tried to compile yourself a kernel. I think that the debian packages
of kernels have a default behavior of server. From the 2.6 kernels, there's
an option in the multitask about preemptive or server. A preemptive kernel
has a better feeling for the desktop user than the server.
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 05:09, Matej Cepl wrote:
Hi,
I really do not want to flame (I have been using KDE for many years and I
do not mean to change anything about that), but can anybody explain why
KDE has so lousy multi-tasking? Or is it whole Linux? I have noticed it
for long time, but
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 12:15, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 05:09, Matej Cepl wrote:
Hi,
I really do not want to flame (I have been using KDE for many years
and I do not mean to change anything about that), but can anybody
explain why KDE has so lousy
Matej Cepl skrev:
on the background. Whenever I run something more complicated in Linux (gcc,
update of slocate dbase), whole computer goes almost to halt (and it is not
that bad computer -- Dell Inspiron 2200 notebook w/ Celeron 1.4GHz, 512MB
RAM). I believe that Linux should have perfect
El miércoles, 28 de junio de 2006 11:50, Alejandro Exojo escribió:
I have an Athlon 800, and when I download my email, kmail blocks
completely, and doesn't refreshes until spamassassin finishes processing at
least the current email, but if I switch to another application, it works
very well.
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 12:57, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
That is the most annoying KMail feature I have seen, and I find
unbelievable that KMail developers hadn't taken care of it yet. It
is...two years old? Three? And it makes KMail unuseable with a
spamassassin configured with DNS
A Dimecres 28 Juny 2006 12:54, Anders E. Andersen va escriure:
Matej Cepl skrev:
on the background. Whenever I run something more complicated in Linux
(gcc, update of slocate dbase), whole computer goes almost to halt (and
it is not that bad computer -- Dell Inspiron 2200 notebook w/
El miércoles, 28 de junio de 2006 13:28, Frans Pop escribió:
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 12:57, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
That is the most annoying KMail feature I have seen, and I find
unbelievable that KMail developers hadn't taken care of it yet. It
is...two years old? Three? And it
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 13:48, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
The last option is learning some C++, Qt, and KDE internals, and get
wet with the code.
I'm sure help is always welcome :-) But I don't think that anythink is
changed in 3.5.x. We have to wait until KDE 4.
Cheers,
André
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 12:30, André Wöbbeking wrote:
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 12:15, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 05:09, Matej Cepl wrote:
Hi,
Is anything trying to write/read large amounts of data when this
happens? if so you might want to:
- check
El miércoles, 28 de junio de 2006 12:54, Anders E. Andersen escribió:
Pretty much the only thing that comes to my mind is if you are running a
kernel that has been compiled with the 'preemptible kernel' option.
s/with/without/
Without a preemptible kernel, the desktop experience is not as
Alejandro Exojo wrote:
Which kernel are you using? I always run the default debian kernel, and I
noticed that the responsiveness of the desktop improved a lot in some 2.6
release (i suppose because the scheduler was different).
hand-compiled vanilla+suspend2 2.6.17.1
Thanks for the reply,
Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
have you tried to compile yourself a kernel. I think that the debian
packages of kernels have a default behavior of server. From the 2.6
kernels, there's an option in the multitask about preemptive or server. A
preemptive kernel has a better feeling for the
* Leopold Palomo Avellaneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006 Jun 28 06:53 -0500]:
A Dimecres 28 Juny 2006 12:54, Anders E. Andersen va escriure:
Matej Cepl skrev:
on the background. Whenever I run something more complicated in Linux
(gcc, update of slocate dbase), whole computer goes almost to
Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
have you tried to compile yourself a kernel. I think that the debian
packages of kernels have a default behavior of server. From the 2.6
kernels, there's an option in the multitask about preemptive or server. A
preemptive kernel has a better feeling for the
Hi,
Your computer should work fine with all the given suggestions. But if you want
to improve your desktop experience even more, try Con Kolivas kernel patch:
http://members.optusnet.com.au/ckolivas/kernel/
Here, I can compile several things at the same time while listening to music
with
André Wöbbeking wrote:
I sometimes have this problem and thought that it's related to SATA. But
I'm using reiserfs3. Do you've more infos about its problems under high
load.
No, the problem was non-preemptive kernel -- this is just plain ext3
notebook (no fancy server filesystems here).
Matej
Leopold Palomo Avellaneda skrev:
A Dimecres 28 Juny 2006 12:54, Anders E. Andersen va escriure:
Matej Cepl skrev:
on the background. Whenever I run something more complicated in Linux
(gcc, update of slocate dbase), whole computer goes almost to halt (and
it is not that bad computer --
Matej Cepl skrev:
Why, oh why I haven't asked this question before (using Linux for almost six
years and never suspected that my kernel configuration is anything than
perfect)? :'(
Thanks a lot, I have recompiled kernel with CONFIG_PREEMPT and it seems to
be really *much* more responsive. Why
So, I presume they are not compiled for desktop use then? Has anyone
filed a wishlist bug to get a set of kernels that are pre-emptive?
I filed a wishlist bug against linux-source-2.6.17 so we shall see what
happens.
- Nate
--
Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB |
So, I presume they are not compiled for desktop use then? Has anyone
filed a wishlist bug to get a set of kernels that are pre-emptive?
I filed a wishlist bug against linux-source-2.6.17 so we shall see what
happens.
- Nate
--
Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB |
So, I presume they are not compiled for desktop use then? Has anyone
filed a wishlist bug to get a set of kernels that are pre-emptive?
I filed a wishlist bug against linux-source-2.6.17 so we shall see what
happens.
- Nate
--
Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB |
Nate Bargmann wrote:
So, I presume they are not compiled for desktop use then? Has anyone
filed a wishlist bug to get a set of kernels that are pre-emptive?
I filed a wishlist bug against linux-source-2.6.17 so we shall see what
happens.
And if they add to this version of kernel also
El Miércoles, 28 de Junio de 2006 13:24, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) escribió:
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 12:30, André Wöbbeking wrote:
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 12:15, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 05:09, Matej Cepl wrote:
Hi,
Is anything trying to
* Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006 Jun 28 15:02 -0500]:
Nate Bargmann wrote:
So, I presume they are not compiled for desktop use then? Has anyone
filed a wishlist bug to get a set of kernels that are pre-emptive?
I filed a wishlist bug against linux-source-2.6.17 so we shall see what
35 matches
Mail list logo
