Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-08-30 Thread Torsten Grote
On Thursday 23 August 2012 15:27:04 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: We currently lack the manpower to do this. We still have some RC bugs that need fixing, so we have some other stuff to do before thinking in kdepim. That's unfortunate! How hard is it to learn Debian packaging? Is

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-08-30 Thread Mirosław Zalewski
On 30/08/2012 at 21:27, Torsten Grote t...@grobox.de wrote: How hard is it to learn Debian packaging? Is it realistic for me to start and try to help with that? (I do have a technical background, know how to program, use git etc.) Debian packaging is not all that hard. I managed to create

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-08-30 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Thu 30 Aug 2012 16:27:45 Torsten Grote escribió: On Thursday 23 August 2012 15:27:04 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: We currently lack the manpower to do this. We still have some RC bugs that need fixing, so we have some other stuff to do before thinking in kdepim. That's

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-08-28 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer: On Thu 23 Aug 2012 04:50:14 Torsten Grote escribió: [snip] Ok who do I have to bribe to get 4.8 or 4.9 KDE PIM packages? How much do you want? ;) Is there anything that could be done to help with that? Is the

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-08-23 Thread Torsten Grote
On Saturday 04 August 2012 15:22:03 Torsten Grote wrote: On Monday 18 June 2012 12:48:08 Eshat Cakar wrote: But we will provide packages for the curious testers like you, just after the team finishes the rest of the 4.8.4 transition, which has higher priority due to the wheezy freeze.

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-08-23 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Thu 23 Aug 2012 04:50:14 Torsten Grote escribió: [snip] Ok who do I have to bribe to get 4.8 or 4.9 KDE PIM packages? How much do you want? ;) Is there anything that could be done to help with that? Is the summer to blame? We currently lack the manpower to do this. We still have some RC

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-08-04 Thread Torsten Grote
Hi, On Monday 18 June 2012 12:48:08 Eshat Cakar wrote: But we will provide packages for the curious testers like you, just after the team finishes the rest of the 4.8.4 transition, which has higher priority due to the wheezy freeze. What's the status of the 4.8.4 transition? The freeze

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-06-24 Thread Dietz Pröpper
Quoting myself, Dietz Pröpper: [stupid stuff] my previous mail was never intended to get sent. Sorry for that, Dietz signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-06-20 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2012 schrieb Torsten Grote: As martin correctly said, Kdepim 2 lacks migration and that is one reason it will not be included in wheezy. I'm sitting with several PIM hackers in the same office and they said that using 4.4.11 programs with recent akonadi is quite

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-06-20 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Montag, 18. Juni 2012 schrieb Eshat Cakar: Hi Torsten, hi Martin, On Mon 18 June 2012 11:29:22 Martin Steigerwald wrote: Am Samstag, 16. Juni 2012 schrieb Torsten Grote: I'd love to have some information, why the KDE PIM applications are at version 4.4.11. The switch to

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-06-20 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2012 schrieb Modestas Vainius: Hello, On antradienis 19 Birželis 2012 19:43:12 Valerio Passini wrote: martedì 19 giugno 2012 I could understand this point of view if: 1 - a tool to ease the migration it's going to be on the way any time soon (in the next 2-3

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-06-20 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2012 schrieb Dietz Pröpper: Martin Steigerwald: The switch to Akonadi for KMail is a big one. And a quite questionable, too. Everything is questionable. But I believe that the fundamental decision to use a database for metadata is sound. And I think even right now

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-06-20 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Tuesday, 2012-06-19, Modestas Vainius wrote: There is nothing wrong with having old KDE inside if it works. That said, I don't claim that pim 2 does not work. We simply don't know it and it's too late in the game to find out (IMHO). Inexistance of a good migration tool helps to make the

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-06-19 Thread Torsten Grote
On Monday 18 June 2012 12:48:08 Eshat Cakar wrote: But we will provide packages for the curious testers like you, just after the team finishes the rest of the 4.8.4 transition, which has higher priority due to the wheezy freeze. Thanks Eshat, this is great news! :) I understand that wheezy

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-06-19 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Dilluns, 18 de juny de 2012, Eshat Cakar va escriure: Hi Torsten, hi Martin, On Mon 18 June 2012 11:29:22 Martin Steigerwald wrote: Am Samstag, 16. Juni 2012 schrieb Torsten Grote: I'd love to have some information, why the KDE PIM applications are at version 4.4.11. The switch

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-06-19 Thread Dietz Pröpper
Martin Steigerwald: The switch to Akonadi for KMail is a big one. And a quite questionable, too. And I think even right now there is no way of automatic migration thats working out okay in most cases. Wow. What do they smoke over at KDE Central? Thus the recommended procedure as far as I

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-06-19 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Tuesday, 2012-06-19, Dietz Pröpper wrote: Martin Steigerwald: And I think even right now there is no way of automatic migration thats working out okay in most cases. Wow. What do they smoke over at KDE Central? Cuban cigars, I recon because they go well with the Cuban rum they are

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-06-19 Thread Valerio Passini
lunedì 18 giugno 2012 Cakar ha scritto: As martin correctly said, Kdepim 2 lacks migration and that is one reason it will not be included in wheezy. But we will provide packages for the curious testers like you, just after the team finishes the rest of the 4.8.4 transition, which has higher

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-06-19 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, On antradienis 19 Birželis 2012 19:43:12 Valerio Passini wrote: martedì 19 giugno 2012 I could understand this point of view if: 1 - a tool to ease the migration it's going to be on the way any time soon (in the next 2-3 years) before the release of what will be the next stable

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-06-19 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Mar 19 Jun 2012 18:04:13 Modestas Vainius escribió: Hello, [snip] There is nothing wrong with having old KDE inside if it works. That said, I don't claim that pim 2 does not work. We simply don't know it and it's too late in the game to find out (IMHO). Yes, I also think we are too late.

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-06-18 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Samstag, 16. Juni 2012 schrieb Torsten Grote: Hi, Hi Torsten! thanks a lot for all your great work packaging KDE applications for Debian! I'd love to have some information, why the KDE PIM applications are at version 4.4.11. This question is not meant to critizise or to complain. I'd

Re: KDE PIM packaging

2012-06-18 Thread Eshat Cakar
Hi Torsten, hi Martin, On Mon 18 June 2012 11:29:22 Martin Steigerwald wrote: Am Samstag, 16. Juni 2012 schrieb Torsten Grote: I'd love to have some information, why the KDE PIM applications are at version 4.4.11. The switch to Akonadi for KMail is a big one. And I think even right now

KDE PIM packaging

2012-06-16 Thread Torsten Grote
Hi, thanks a lot for all your great work packaging KDE applications for Debian! I'd love to have some information, why the KDE PIM applications are at version 4.4.11. This question is not meant to critizise or to complain. I'd rather like to know what's stopping the most recent releases from