Moin,
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 01:01:29AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
disable_timer_pin_1 is for broken ATI chipsets, see for example
Ok, that helps for the nvidia chipset, too. The mainboard is a Gigabyte
nforce4ultra (GA-K8NF9 Ultra).
I might investigate this too concerning nvidia
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 01:21:58PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:47:28AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
- Add smp alternatives patch[1] from akpm tree (this may be merged
anyway in the next time), and remove UP flavours in favour.
Do we know about the cave-ats of
Hello,
2.6.16-rc4 is still sitting in NEW, but that should not stop us from
updating trunk to 2.6.16-rc5.
The orig tarball (with signed sha1 checksum) is to be found here:
http://people.debian.org/~fs/linux-2.6_2.6.15+2.6.16-rc5.orig.tar.gz
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 08:51:16AM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:54:24PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
As far as I understand, you will just maintain Xen kernel images. (for
dom0 only ?).
No. The kernel team will maintain xen
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:33:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
What about having some kind of postinst script moving the image in the right
place instead ?
There is no right place within a domain.
This is no different from a netbooted machine, or one using
NFSROOT.
No. A
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.52b
I've got kernel 2.6.14 compiled by myself y when I did an
dist-upgrade I couldn't install this package. I saw this error
[...]
Configurando initramfs-tools (0.52b) ...
Kernel version too old. initramfs-tools requires at least 2.6.12.
dpkg: error al
My old alphastation 200 4/166 needs de4x5 for the onboard ethernet. Last
time I did an install, I think discover tried to use de2104x which just
didn't work, it modprobed, found it but no traffic etc.
tulip didn't even find the ethernet chip at all iirc.
Bit hand wavy I know but de4x5 is
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:24:55PM -0500, Mike O'Connor wrote:
Is there any drawback to just switching the default dependency to be on
yaird instead of initramfs-tools?
The quality of the maintainers of both tool also play an important role in
which tool to chose as standard, and we have a
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 02:17:08PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:33:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
What about having some kind of postinst script moving the image in the right
place instead ?
There is no right place within a domain.
This is no
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 08:39:13AM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:40:04PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi,
FWIW, the policy on kernel patches for sarge was that if it didn't apply to
the kernel sources we shipped, it didn't need to be included as a package in
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:51:51PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Hi,
The kernel patches for XEN should be maintained inside the kernel team and in
linux-2.6, they are free to join the kernel team to handle this, but it is
unacceptable to have some kind of external patch to the kernel floating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:36:39 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The quality of the maintainers of both tool also play an important
role in which tool to chose as standard, and we have a pretty good
feedback from both the initramfs-tools
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 03:01:39PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:36:39 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The quality of the maintainers of both tool also play an important
role in which tool to chose as
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:53:11AM +0100, Eugen Paiuc wrote:
I try mac53c9x=-1,0 but box is not happy,
Since ncr5380 is a _generic_ controller
and the chip on board is AH8662c4 -not a NCR 53c96 -
there is other command line option ?
Not sure then. I replied because Brad seemed to be
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:14:02 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#343427: linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc: Installation fails
#345067: [powerpc] ide-generic is not built on powerpc, yaird tries
to include it and fails
Both relate to ide-generic.
Difference between yaird and
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 03:43:17PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:14:02 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#343427: linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc: Installation fails
#345067: [powerpc] ide-generic is not built on powerpc, yaird tries
to include it and
Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:02:04 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#341930: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.53
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:02:04 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#352958: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.53
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:02:04 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#352669: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.53
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:02:04 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#352958: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.53
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
initramfs-tools_0.53_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.53.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.53.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.53_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.53.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.53.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.53.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.53.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.53_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.53_all.deb
Announcing to
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:12:50PM +, Stuart T. R. Rowan wrote:
My old alphastation 200 4/166 needs de4x5 for the onboard ethernet. Last
time I did an install, I think discover tried to use de2104x which just
didn't work, it modprobed, found it but no traffic etc.
Could you please confirm
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8
Version: 2.6.15-6
Severity: important
I have an ASUS A6Q00KM laptop with a Turion64 AMD processor. It has a SiS
chipset. If I turn on the laptop when
the power cable isn't plugged in, the system hangs during boot. It hangs the
first time you try to boot
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 354598 linux-2.6
Bug#354598: linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8: A6Q00KM laptop hangs during boot if
power cable isn't plugged in
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8'
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:39:51 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What has that to do with anything ?
Possibly nothing. That's what I wanted other opinions on to help find
out :-)
Warm thoughts from a cold Denmark,
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
*
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 03:30:26PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:53:11AM +0100, Eugen Paiuc wrote:
I try mac53c9x=-1,0 but box is not happy,
Since ncr5380 is a _generic_ controller
and the chip on board is AH8662c4 -not a NCR 53c96 -
there is other command
This one time, at band camp, friendly Sven Luther said:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 03:43:17PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:14:02 +0100 Sven Luther
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#343427: linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc: Installation fails
#345067: [powerpc]
Hi all,
You seem to have problems with something called yaird, whatever that is.
My problem is that the udev package needs kernel modules
in /lib/modules/2.6.15-1-686. Mine is in 2.6.15.3... Why is the udev
package script looking at that particular directory? I really hope it's
not because that's
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Emil Nowak wrote:
On 2.6.11
everything appears to work fine. Please send the output of 'lspci -v' and
'lspci -n' commands on this system, that should give us some clues.
here they come:
~$ lspci -v lspci_v.txt
~$ lspci -n lspci_n.txt
Well, don't see any suspicious
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I am still interested in opinions from _other_ members of the kernel
team: Is it decided to decided to ditch yaird due to my irresponsible
or non-cooperative behaviour (which I claim is related to the
problematic ide-generic issue), or do you have
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Massis Sirapian wrote:
Hi,
CONFIG_I2C is set to 'm'.
My complete .config is attached to this mail.
Thanks
Thanks for your feedback. I'm pretty sure that this bug occurs because in
your config CONFIG_I2C is set to 'M', and CONFIG_DVB_CX22700 is set to
'Y'. Then the
32 matches
Mail list logo
