Can we please stop this my filesystem is better than yours crap?
As far as the debian kernel packages are concerned we should support
all filesystems supported upstream unless there's a very good reason.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On 09/02/05 09:45:18AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
First: this discussion is pointless and always ends in people promoting
their favorite toy (only).
True, but since most people don't have enough time or resources to do
exhaustive testing of every possible option, anecdotal evidence from
#include hallo.h
* Jim Crilly [Thu, Sep 01 2005, 07:02:26PM]:
Why is that? I mean, certainly every filesystem has its problems, but
I don't think there's a consensus that ReiserFS is much worse than the
others? I personally find it useful because it doesn't have any
limitation on the
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 09:45:18AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
[...]
First: this discussion is pointless and always ends in people promoting
their favorite toy (only).
Pretty much.
So how do you know they are reliable? For me, XFS began eating my files
after 1.5years of usage, and the
On 08/30/05 06:29:02PM +0200, David Madore wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:20:37PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Appart from my general feeling that no one should use Reiser FS,
Why is that? I mean, certainly every filesystem has its problems, but
I don't think there's a consensus that ReiserFS is
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:29:02PM +0200, David Madore wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:20:37PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Appart from my general feeling that no one should use Reiser FS,
Why is that? I mean, certainly every filesystem has its problems, but
I don't think there's a consensus that
Here are the patches that I forgot to attatch to my previous post.
--
Horms
diff --exclude .svn -ruN a/debian/arch/alpha/config a/debian/arch/alpha/config
--- a/debian/arch/alpha/config 2005-08-30 11:45:58.0 +0900
+++ a/debian/arch/alpha/config 2005-08-30 13:02:05.0 +0900
@@
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:51:53PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Here are the patches that I forgot to attatch to my previous post.
You removed the ASFS entries. Did you used non-debian sources?
Bastian
--
Those who hate and fight must stop themselves -- otherwise it is not stopped.
--
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:24:48AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:51:53PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Here are the patches that I forgot to attatch to my previous post.
You removed the ASFS entries. Did you used non-debian sources?
Perhaps there were some patches missing.
I
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:47:41PM +0900, Horms wrote:
I am also still wondering if there is any interest in
consolodating the entirel fs configuration, which seems
a bit of a mess right now - e.g. compare the EXT2/3 options
for different arches and flavours.
Yes it is.
You can try to use
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:39:27PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:47:41PM +0900, Horms wrote:
I am also still wondering if there is any interest in
consolodating the entirel fs configuration, which seems
a bit of a mess right now - e.g. compare the EXT2/3 options
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:58:35PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:24:48AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:51:53PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Here are the patches that I forgot to attatch to my previous post.
You removed the ASFS entries. Did you used
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:20:37PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Appart from my general feeling that no one should use Reiser FS,
Why is that? I mean, certainly every filesystem has its problems, but
I don't think there's a consensus that ReiserFS is much worse than the
others? I personally find it
David Madore wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:20:37PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Appart from my general feeling that no one should use Reiser FS,
Why is that? I mean, certainly every filesystem has its problems, but
I don't think there's a consensus that ReiserFS is much worse than the
others?
tag 324202 +patch
thanks
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 11:40:59PM +0200, David Madore wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-386
Version: 2.6.12-5
Severity: minor
Tag: patch sid
Please include the following config snippet on all archs:
CONFIG_REISERFS_PROC_INFO=y
CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_XATTR=y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 324202 +patch
Bug#324202: include ReiserFS ACL support in 2.6.12 kernel
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-386
Version: 2.6.12-5
Severity: minor
Tag: patch sid
Please include the following config snippet on all archs:
CONFIG_REISERFS_PROC_INFO=y
CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_XATTR=y
CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_SECURITY=y
(at least the last three lines). It
17 matches
Mail list logo
