On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 20:30 +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 15:22 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
We're getting closer. Please check this for accuracy:
http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelSargeUpdateStatus
I can try to do hppa this afternoon
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 00:36 +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 03:22:02PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
We're getting closer. Please check this for accuracy:
http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelSargeUpdateStatus
I can try to do hppa this afternoon; any word
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 07:42 +0800, weiyun lv wrote:
Ubuntu reboot: kernel panic-not syncing: VFS: unable to mount root fs on
unknown block(0,0)
hey weiyun,
This list is a Debian list. Though related to Debian[1], the Ubuntu
distribution has a number of differences. I suggest asking your
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 06:25 +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 20:30 +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 15:22 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
We're getting closer. Please check this for accuracy:
http
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 15:22 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
We're getting closer. Please check this for accuracy:
http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelSargeUpdateStatus
I can try to do hppa this afternoon; any word on m68k, mips s390?
hppa:
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel/hppa/2.6.8
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 00:01 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi !
dann frazier a écrit :
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 15:22 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
We're getting closer. Please check this for accuracy:
http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelSargeUpdateStatus
I can try to do hppa
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 23:09 +0100, Thom May wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-mckinley
Severity: important
Version: 2.6.12-5
The xfs module fails to load with an error about invalid module format.
modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting xfs (/lib/modules...): Invalid module
format
The only
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 17:27 +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello,
you need kernel-nonfree-modules, to be found here:
http://213.178.77.236/kernel/amd64/
or use 2.6.12 wich has tg3 support added back thanks to broadcom
relicensing the driver.
Yes, 2.6.11 is no longer maintained, so
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 15:18 +0530, Rachita Kothiyal wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:59:15AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 12:23 +0530, Rachita Kothiyal wrote:
[...]
I had sent the patch to Jeff Bailey, Bastian Blank, Steve Langasek and
the debian-kernel list.
Joey,
We currently have all architectures rebuilt except for arm; I sent the
person listed as the arm image maintainer a message last week but have
not heard back yet.
I'm hoping we can move forward and let arm catch up at a later date.
Have you had a chance to take a look at the included
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 23:28 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:10:14PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 08:45:07PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Why not fix the module-package so they build those binary modules
themselves ?
It makes it possible to
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 18:25 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
There is currently no way to solve this short of a rebuild, and only a
reupload can do this rebuild.
Well sure - what I'm suggesting (and sounds we all are) is that we make
the upload a direct result of the thing that triggered it, or a
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 10:07 -0700, peace bwitchu wrote:
Are the kernel packages in Sarge currently supported
by the security team? I know that support for the
kernel packages in Woody were dropped and you needed
to roll your own for security updates. Is this how it
is going to be in Sarge
Looks like this is a UP vs. SMP module loading issue:. See this thread:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-ia64m=112528327800560w=2
This bug still exists in 2.6.12-6. I'll test a build with Peter's
patch.
---BeginMessage---
This patch makes UP and SMP do the same thing as far as module
tags 325070 + pending
thanks
Peter's patch does the trick, so I've included it in svn.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ftp.debian.org
Support for 2.4 kernels on ia64 will be dropped for etch. I've already
removed ia64/2.4 support from d-i:
joeyh ok, I see it
joeyh I think we can remove the 2.4 udebs for ia64
dannf joeyh: great - i'll file the f.d.o. bugs then
So, please remove the following packages
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 12:41 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Andres mentioned we should get 2.6.12-7 out ASAP, so i am not entirely sure
about this. I would vote for this too, and maybe wait for 2.6.13 until we get
the init* issue sorted out.
I just committed a fix to .12 .13 that repairs a problem
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 11:18 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:34:13AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:51:18PM +0900, Horms wrote:
http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6/
I have done a second build, with the following changes, as
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 11:18 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:34:13AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:51:18PM +0900, Horms wrote:
http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6/
I have done a second build, with the following changes, as
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 11:31 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 15. September 2005 10:41 schrieb Norbert Tretkowski:
Have you tried to run 'update-grub' by hand?
OK, that worked, but it seems the package should do that automatically.
The following lines in /etc/kernel-img.conf
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 18:19 +0900, Horms wrote:
I'm thinging that if the use of the BTS is really to allow
users to track all problems in a package, its probably
useful to have a separate, but linked BTS, that allows
the maintainers to track what they are actually working on.
Have you looked
tags 325070 - pending
thanks
This patch was removed from svn - it broke other archs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 10:55 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:30:33PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
dann frazier writes...
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 18:19 +0900, Horms wrote:
I'm thinging that if the use of the BTS is really to allow
users to track all problems
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 09:07 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 04:00:53PM +0900, Horms wrote:
I have done a second build, with the following changes, as
2.6.12-5.99.sarge2
Only the first change is relevant, URL as immediately above :)
* Change kernel-source
The biggest headache with maintaining the ia64 kernel has probably been
with the non-SMP flavours. Generic/non-SMP configs seem to not get much
attention upstream. This makes sense given that most ia64 machines are
SMP capable. In fact, I don't think there's a non-SMP capable ia64
machine on
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 11:00 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
Do you mean that kexec doesn't work in SMP situations ? I am not sure what
you
mean about test situations and the SMP kernel should work just well in
virtualized environments, but i have
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 10:39 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 10:18 am, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
non-SMP kernels may be useful for a number of specialized uses. Think
about kexec, test situations, low memory
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 10:09 +0200, Emeric Maschino wrote:
Hello,
Isn't the hp workstation zx2000 a strictly monoprocessor system? I agree
this model isn't for sale anymore.
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/11665_na/11665_na.HTML
(re-adding debian-kernel to the cc list; I
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 12:44 -0700, Richard Harke wrote:
On Tue September 27 2005 11:00, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
Do you mean that kexec doesn't work in SMP situations ? I am not sure
what you mean about test situations and the SMP kernel should work
retitle 330353 kernel-source-2.6.8: CAN-2005-3053
reassign 330353 kernel-source-2.6.8
tags 330353 + sarge
thanks
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 19:37 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: important
Tags: security
Two more local denial-of-service vulnerabilities have been
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 17:51 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:29:49AM +0900, Horms wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Seems like 2.6.12-10 fails to build on sparc
Yes, this was a typo -a missing '\n' in the control file. I committed a
fix last night.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]; then
+ /sbin/update-modules
+ fi
update-rc.d initrd-tools.sh remove /dev/null
fi
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 316809 + pending
thanks
This is fixed in svn for both 2.6.12 2.6.13.
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
submission policy.
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This built fine for me in a fresh sid pbuilder chroot. I've uploaded
the result of that build.
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of the kernel-source tarballs it finds in /usr, and if one has
changed (or one has been added), perform the extraction.
Does this sound reasonable?
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 23:50 -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 03:35:45PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:32:29PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
linux-2.6 2.6.12-10 built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I think the
build should be requeued, preferably on auric if
user debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
usertag 330520 + dkt-pending-package-removal
tag 330520 + pending
thanks
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 16:04 +0200, Rainer Birkenmaier wrote:
Package: kernel-headers-2.6.8-2
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: important
When compiling external modules that use
This bug hasn't been reported by anyone else, and no more information
was provided by the submitter in a number of months, so I'm closing it.
My guess is the submitter was out of disk space, fwiw.
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
until we package 2.6.14, so I've added the usertag
dkt-pending-new-upstream.
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a short blurb to the
linux-source/linux-patch-debian description fields? For example:
This source closely tracks official linux kernel releases.
Modifications to that source consist of security fixes, bug fixes, and
features that have already been accepted by the upstream maintainers.
--
dann frazier
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 10:10 -0700, Allyn, Mark A wrote:
Folks:
I have been recently put into a position where I might need
to add and/or change device drivers in the kernel.
I have some questions about protocol and preferences within
the Debian community.
First of all, I do understand
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 21:21 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:32:17AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
So we are taking the version in Sarge, and just making a
couple of changes to it an uploading? Whynot just take the very
latest version of
I've worked around this in 2.6.12-10 by making the -mckinley -itanium
flavors the same as their -smp counterparts.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[re-adding debian-kernel to the cc list, with Mark's permission]
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 11:28 -0700, Allyn, Mark A wrote:
Dann:
I am curious, what happens if I submit patches only to www.kernel.org
(the upstream) and wait?
If they're accepted, they'll probably end up in a Debian kernel
[Adding the bug back onto the CC list]
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 19:04 +0200, Rainer Birkenmaier wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 29.09.2005, 09:01 -0600 schrieb dann frazier:
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 13:04 +0200, Rainer Birkenmaier wrote:
I don't think it's a gcc-version problem, but I can't really say
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 11:01 -0700, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
Version: 2.6.12-10
Severity: normal
I've just upgraded to sid, and I've found that the kernel loads the
radeon module before agpgart, despite my specifically mentioning
agpgart before radeon in
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 17:28 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:24:17 +0200
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was initramfs-tools, we should evaluate also yaird.
Is anyone (besides you, sven) interested in yaird at
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 11:20 +0900, Horms wrote:
Sure, though you might want to make some scope for other patches,
as I know they creep in from time to time. For instance, sometimes
we end up with security patches that are missing upstream, of corse
we submit them, and they usually get
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 00:22 +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
Alle 23:13, mercoledì 5 ottobre 2005, dann frazier ha scritto:
And also, what will be the best way to migrate? Should we make a new
initrd-tools package that provides a /usr/sbin/mkinitrd script that
selects a backend and performs
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 17:26 -0400, Larry Lindsey wrote:
I've produced a patch against the Debian 2.4.27 sources, which adds
ata_piix support (ICH6, ICH7). A lot of Dell machines use this
chipset. Its pretty klugey, but I hope its useful.
Unified Repository for Proposed Kernel Security Updates
---
I've created a unified archive for our proposed security updates for
sarge. Hopefully this will make it easier for users to test/use these
builds, as well as provide a single location
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 09:49 -0400, micah wrote:
Hey,
Horms wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:21:38AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
In order to hopefully help kickstart the security update process, I've
drafted some DSA text for our sarge/2.6.8 kernels (attached). Thanks to
Micah, we have
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 21:49 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi folks
I build a debian-kernel archive which will contain source and binary
snapshots of our kernel packages and neccesary packages to do cross
compilation.
It is located on http://137.250.31.225/debian-kernel.
Available
hey,
I added a post-commit hook to our svn that looks for bug closures
added to a changelog. If it finds some, it'll add a pending tag.
The message it sends out also provides instructions on disabling it if
something should go wrong, or turns out to just be a sucky idea.
--
dann frazier
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 11:38 +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 02:06:28 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
hey,
I added a post-commit hook to our svn that looks for bug closures
added to a changelog. If it finds some, it'll add a pending tag.
there's also tagpending from
(re-adding bug address to CC list - please include that on replies)
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 07:32 +0200, Hans wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2005 21:40 schrieben Sie:
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 20:27 +0200, Hans wrote:
The kernel module tuner.o will not accept additional options,
just like
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 17:38 +0200, Gerd Knorr wrote:
Gerd: do you know if the removal of this parameter was intentional?
Yes. It's obsolete for years. It simply doesn't work that way with
more than one tv card in the system. Boot 2.6.11 and watch the kernel
messages ;)
Thanks Gerd.
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 10:28 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Hi,
an infinite loop in udp_v6_get_port() can be triggered and thus result in
local DoS. Please see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170772
for a link to a patch by davem. This is CVE-2005-2973.
I've added this
[Re-adding [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gerd to the cc list;
please reply to all, not just to me personally]
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 18:56 +0200, Hans wrote:
Hello Danny,
thanks for the mail. But this would not solve my problem.
What do I have to do ? I have to force the module to a special tuner, and
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 19:39 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* dann frazier:
Horms: I realize you might be somewhat out of the loop as to how we're
abusing your directory tree; I'll catch you on IRC when you're back to
explain in detail.
Could you write a short statement to the mailing
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 13:35 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:51:23PM +0200, Kai Militzer wrote:
Hello,
do you think it would be possible to take the 4g4g-Patch from the
feodora/red hat kernel into the debian 2.6.8 kernel?
As the 2.6.8 kernel is the stable/sarge
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 18:31 +0400, my_mail wrote:
Hello debian-kernel,
The /boot/grub/menu.lst it contain 16 loading positions.
Problem:
grub not understand default=16. After reboot grub was offer first
position.
How I must set 16 position as default?
debian-user@lists.debian.org is a
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 15:05 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
...
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
arch/parisc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `cpu_enable_irq':
: undefined reference to `smp_send_all_nop'
make[4
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 23:31 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:23:33PM +0100, Nick Hill wrote:
I understand Ralink are the only vendor to have a 54g wireless chipset
which does not require the host to upload (non-free) firmware.
Ralink have also released software and
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 13:35 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 04:08:09PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 15:05 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
...
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 12:02 +0200, Rik wrote:
Hi,
On the debian-kernel mailinglist kernel updates for sarge such as
2.6.8sarge1 and 2.6.8sarge2 are mentioned which fix quite a lot of
(security) bugs.
But so far I haven't seen a DSA for a kernel update and there are no
newer kernels
* not to use the -pa0 kernel, but it's booted fine for me
on a K460 and an N4000. Any other reports?
http://cvs.parisc-linux.org/download/linux-2.6/patch-2.6.14-pa0.gz
Thanks - I've committed this patch for now.
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Andreas Barth has kindly offered to host debian.kernel.net on a system
which will have access to a buildd network (the same one that builds
experimental and volatile). This would be a on a system running dak,
where he would act as ftp master for us.
So that he can begin the setup, I wanted to
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 20:02 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 10:46:02AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Andreas Barth has kindly offered to host debian.kernel.net on a system
which will have access to a buildd network (the same one that builds
experimental and volatile
tags 335300 + sarge
stop
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 01:35 -0700, Arpit Sud wrote:
On 10/25/05, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
later kernel, such as the linux-2.6.12 in testing, and see if its fixed
there?
Well i tried linux-image-2.6.12-1-686_2.6.12-10_i386. It does solve the
problem
tags 336431 + moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 10:59 +0100, Vincent Lönngren wrote:
Package: linux-source-2.6.14
Version: 2.6.14-1
Severity: normal
I get this during compilation:
Please include the .config file you are using.
(replacing bug addr w/ debian-kernel, for a more general discussion)
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 20:48 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
For 2) see draft at http://wiki.debian.org/FlexibleKernelHandling
This sounds like a very good approach to me, fwiw.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 22:01 +0100, Vincent Lönngren wrote:
Here it is, but with pptp connection tracking turned off since I needed
the kernel.
You can work around this by setting CONFIG_IP_NF_NAT_NEEDED=y.
. Compile tested only.
Signed-off-by: dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-source-2.6.14/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_helper_pptp.c.orig
2005-10-27 18:02:08.0 -0600
+++ linux-source-2.6.14/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_helper_pptp.c
2005-10-31 18:12:03.0 -0700
tags 336431 + upstream
tags 336431 + patch
stop
On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 10:54 +0100, Harald Welte wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 06:13:55PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
As reported in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=336431,
ip_conntrack_helper_pptp in 2.6.14 fails to build
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 15:36 +, Bastian Blank wrote:
Author: waldi
Date: 2005-11-06 15:36:29 + (Sun, 06 Nov 2005)
New Revision: 4732
Added:
dists/trunk/linux-2.6/
Removed:
dists/sid/linux-2.6/
Log:
There is no newer version.
Bastian,
Please stop with these unannounced
Jonas pointed out that tagging a closed bug pending seems to reopen it.
So, I've updated the commit hook to check if a bug is already marked
pending or is marked as done before adding the tag. If you see problems
with this (misidentifying bugs as open, etc) please let me know.
--
dann frazier
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 10:59 +0100, Boris Kleibl wrote:
Uff, I solved the problem, but what happened?
As some days ago the new linux-image-2.6.14 was availlable, I did a
fresh debian sid installation. Booting the system shows the same problem
as mentioned above too. Hmmm! I tried to boot
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 08:26 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:45:16PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Hu? It disappeared without notice.
If I'd been working on the tree at the time, I probably would've whined
then too.
The development version disappeared.
A little
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 08:30 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 08:02:35AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
I have another proposal, and it involves symlinks. Simon has shown that
using
symlinks inside svn is fully supported by svn, so let's try that.
This is incorrect.
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 18:03 +, David Hugh-Jones wrote:
Package:linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
Version:2.6.12-10
This is an intermittent bug that has just got worse. I have a Toshiba
Portege 7020CT with a builtin trackpoint and a PS/2 mouse that I
connect via the PS/2 port in a port extension.
?
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the firmware-bnx2 package from non-free. See the
release notes draft here:
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/tmp/etchnhalf/
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/
total 216
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 106116 Jun 5 11:29 bnx2-06-4.0.5.fw
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 102844 Jun 5 11:29 bnx2-09-4.0.5.fw
I would appreciate any further help
Thank you,
On Friday 27 June 2008 18:27:17 dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 04:03:36PM +0300, Evaggelos
the new driver rather than add more IDs to the old.
If a driver fix proves necessary and gets accepted upstream, we would
certainly consider backporting it into a stable kernel for Debian.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
, it still maybe
possible to get it included within a future point release.
[1] http://teams.debian.net/lurker/message/20080617.120450.de4ac383.en.html
[2] http://people.debian.org/~dannf/etchnhalf-oot/
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
help with that on e.g. the debian-user list.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for information on installing
snapshot builds (should work fine on an etch system)
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is the portname, and doesn't necessarily
correspond with the processor manufacturer.
For an explanation, see: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianAMD64Faq
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. This is looking like #464962 - running the 486
flavor is probably the best option for your system.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
].
Can you confirm that the attached backport of [3] fixes the problem
for you?
[1] 35605a1027ac630f85a1b95684f7e86b82498cd6
[2] 8d539108560ec121d59eee05160236488266221c
[3] 8004dd965b13b01a96def054d420f6df7ff22d53
--
dann frazier
commit 8004dd965b13b01a96def054d420f6df7ff22d53
Author: Yinghai
hey Dave,
I'm wondering if this is an occurrence of #494365. Can you test this
build to see if it fixes this issue for you?
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/494365/
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
.
This is a candidate for testing migration. This also needs another
l-m-e-2.6 upload.
Bastian
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 02:40:41AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 09:51:33PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi folks
I'd like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.26-3 for monday.
The following things are still missing:
- VServer support for alpha, ia64, s390
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 01:43:44PM -0400, Micah Anderson wrote:
* dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-20 17:59-0400]:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 02:40:41AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 09:51:33PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi folks
I'd like to schedule
-2.6.25-2-686' is actually a binary package name, not a
version. The version of an installed binary package can be located with:
$ dpkg -l pkgname
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2.6.18.
If this is unacceptable (probably?) then are there any other
options/plans/ideas for providing an updated 2.6.18 domain 0 kernel? I
hear Bastian has a repo somewhere?
Yeah, he maintains a branch under people/waldi, iirc. Not sure where
the builds are though.
--
dann frazier
-Security
2.6.25-2-vserver-686 was use before this kernel upgrade. with no prb.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2008/08/msg00474.html
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
801 - 900 of 1189 matches
Mail list logo
