Re: [RFR] po-debconf://xorg-x11/pt_BR.po

2007-03-27 Por tôpico Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/27/2007 01:20 AM, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote: > On 03/23/2007 08:27 AM, Augusto Cezar Amaral wrote: >> On 3/22/07, Eder L. Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Revisado. > >> A única alteração que fiz foi remover o espaço que havia

Re: [RFR] po-debconf://xorg-x11/pt_BR.po

2007-03-26 Por tôpico Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/23/2007 08:27 AM, Augusto Cezar Amaral wrote: > On 3/22/07, Eder L. Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Revisado. > > A única alteração que fiz foi remover o espaço que havia antes de uma > interrogação. > > --- pt_BR.po2007-03-23 08:14:35

Re: [RFR] po-debconf://xorg-x11/pt_BR.po

2007-03-23 Por tôpico Christian Perrier
> > This is something I didn't pay attention to. I think this comes from > > the times where the xserver-xorg source package included all XFree > > related packages. The package has been splitted since then but PO > > files headers have never been changed. > > > > > > > > > So, what to do? >

Re: [RFR] po-debconf://xorg-x11/pt_BR.po

2007-03-23 Por tôpico Eder L. Marques
Christian Perrier escreveu: >> A little doubt: The gub is against xdm, but the pot file (by the >> headers) is of the xorg-x11 package? This is true? > > > This is something I didn't pay attention to. I think this comes from > the times where the xserver-xorg source package included all XFree > r

Re: [RFR] po-debconf://xorg-x11/pt_BR.po

2007-03-23 Por tôpico Augusto Cezar Amaral
On 3/22/07, Eder L. Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Christian Perrier escreveu: > Hi, Hello Christian, > The debian-l10n-english team has reviewed the debconf templates for > xdm. This process has resulted in changes that may make your > existing translation incomplete. > > A round of transl

Re: [RFR] po-debconf://xorg-x11/pt_BR.po

2007-03-23 Por tôpico Christian Perrier
> A little doubt: The gub is against xdm, but the pot file (by the > headers) is of the xorg-x11 package? This is true? This is something I didn't pay attention to. I think this comes from the times where the xserver-xorg source package included all XFree related packages. The package has been sp