Hi,
Since a few versions, the picviz [1] license has changed for the
following:
---8
Describes the terms under which Picviz is distributed. A copy of the GPL
is appended after the specific Picviz license terms.
*
***
Hi,
I'm currently evaluating if eSvn (http://esvn.umputun.com/) can be
package for debian.
I wanted to know if the license is acceptable for 'main' (see
attachement for complete file).
In short:
eSvn is available under two different licenses:
If eSvn is linked against the GPLed version of Qt
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 04:51:11PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Sven Luther:
I'd rather see a clarification from upstream. If they intent to
prevent a GPLed Windows port, it's non-free. If they just want to
make sure that people may distribute Windows binaries, it's probably okay.
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 07:46:23PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Pierre Chifflier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is his answer:
=
This license is GPL for all platform with GPL-ed version of QT include
^
Linux, so the license for the Debian
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 08:05:24PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
and that this kind of license is already used by other debian
packages
Which packages? If that is true, bugs should be filed and packages
moved to non-free, preferrably before sarge releases if at all
possible.
lincvs.
Ok, i contacted the author again and he agreed to change his license
to something in agreement with his thoughts (which were: GPL, and also
permitted to link with Qt commercial WITHOUT restrictions !)
So the final license is:
GPL, with an explicit exception allowing linking with any version of
6 matches
Mail list logo
