I propose something like the following as an addition to the Debian web
pages, at the bottom of http://www.debian.org/intro/free. I offer this
up for revision and use by the Debian community, or anyone else.
Motivation: some people seem to wish to remain in denial about the
project's decision
* Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030828 08:35]:
> I propose something like the following as an addition to the Debian web
> pages, at the bottom of http://www.debian.org/intro/free. I offer this
> up for revision and use by the Debian community, or anyone else.
> [ put on the web pages "G
* Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-28 02:10]:
> Motivation: some people seem to wish to remain in denial about the
> project's decision on this matter. This will help their psychological
> problem. ;-)
It is no good for the (what I know) still unfinished discussion on that
topic i
Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is no good for the (what I know) still unfinished discussion on
> that topic if want to spread even more FUD as there is already about
> it.
For what it's worth, I think the "discussion" on d-l will end only
when the participants die of exhaustion.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:00:12AM -0400, Jeremy Hankins wrote:
> For what it's worth, I think the "discussion" on d-l will end only
> when the participants die of exhaustion. I believe Brandon will
> announce the results of the d-l poll today (unless he has already and
> I haven't gotten to it).
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:00:12AM -0400, Jeremy Hankins wrote:
>> For what it's worth, I think the "discussion" on d-l will end only
>> when the participants die of exhaustion. I believe Brandon will
>> announce the results of the d-l poll today (un
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 04:22, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-28 02:10]:
> > Motivation: some people seem to wish to remain in denial about the
> > project's decision on this matter. This will help their psychological
> > problem. ;-)
>
> It is no good fo
* Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030829 00:05]:
> Andreas Barth wrote:
> >I don't think it's good manners to try to push a certain view by
> >putting it on the web sites. No, first finish the discussion in d-l,
> >and the you _might_ put additions on the web site. (Though I think
> >it's eve
Andreas Barth wrote:
>I don't think it's good manners to try to push a certain view by
>putting it on the web sites. No, first finish the discussion in d-l,
>and the you _might_ put additions on the web site. (Though I think
>it's even then not the right place for that; but that's a different
>poi
On 2003-08-29 15:09:53 +0100 Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The discussion _has_ been finished for quite a while. All we are
seeing now is people who haven't bothered to read the last few years
of debian-legal.
Apologies for my part in that. I think it does take some effort to
see
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030829 00:05]:
> > Andreas Barth wrote:
> > >I don't think it's good manners to try to push a certain view by
> > >putting it on the web sites. No, first finish the discussion in d-l,
> > >and the you _might_ put add
Quoting Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I propose something like the following as an addition to the Debian web
> pages, at the bottom of http://www.debian.org/intro/free. I offer this
> up for revision and use by the Debian community, or anyone else.
>
> Motivation: some people seem t
[Rick, apologies for the CC if you are subscribed to this list.]
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:54:31AM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> This reminded me of something I noticed earlier today. The Securing
> Debian Manual at
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ has in its
> front materi
Branden Robinson said:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:54:31AM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
>> This reminded me of something I noticed earlier today. The Securing
>> Debian Manual at
>> All well and good, so far. Appendix H of the Manual, in
>>
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ap-c
Quoting Joe Moore ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Perhaps a simple license clarification from Alexandre? Did he intend to
> dual-license this work under the GPL?
He turns out to have been unaware of the potential for licence conflict,
but is happy to dual-licence his work, so the problem is now solved.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 03:57:36PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Joe Moore ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Perhaps a simple license clarification from Alexandre? Did he intend to
> > dual-license this work under the GPL?
>
> He turns out to have been unaware of the potential for licence conflict,
16 matches
Mail list logo
