Re: Lets maintain libbpp-phyl-omics in Debian Med team

Hi Julien, On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:00:03PM +0200, Julien Yann Dutheil wrote: > > Sorry, that's not team maintenance. The only sensible place to do the > > maintenance of the Debian packaging is on git.debian.org. We have > > developed a complex system of tools working with this repository

Re: GSOC [Continuous Integration for all biological applications inside Debian]

Hello Andreas, >[I think I gave a warning that non-private messages will be answered on >the mailing list and I hereby doing so shamelessly violating netiquette. >It would be great if you would answer on list as well.] Sorry for miss clicking i forget to reply all. I committed the changes to

Re: Lets maintain libbpp-phyl-omics in Debian Med team

Hi Julien, On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 08:37:28PM +0200, Julien Yann Dutheil wrote: > > - We use our "central" git repository biopp.univ-montp2.fr/git/ to create > the debian ones. As I am still new to github, I would feel more comfortable > in using our good old repos (which I know to be up to

Re: Lets maintain libbpp-phyl-omics in Debian Med team

On 06/04/16 15:46, Andreas Tille wrote: As for the git repository, may I ask why you need to create one? Would that be a local debian copy of the one on github? Makes me think that it would be time to synchronize our local repos and the github one... The Debian *packaging* repository is

Re: Lets maintain libbpp-phyl-omics in Debian Med team

Hi Julien, On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 03:46:57PM +0200, Julien Yann Dutheil wrote: > Dear Andreas, Dear Loïc, > > I do not know how we did that, but we certainly did not do it on purpose :) You fast and helpful responses are a sign that it was not on purpose. ;-) > As far as I'm concerned, I'm

Re: Packaging of MafFilter

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 03:42:56PM +0200, Julien Yann Dutheil wrote: > > As saif above: Github is fine but tagging the releases would be really > > important. > > > We usually put each stable release on a separate branch, called rel-1-1-0 > for instance so that the master branch is the

Re: Packaging of MafFilter

Dear Andreas, Many thanks for your email. Indeed, the debian package should not be in the distributed tar.gz, I will fix that. One important thing: MafFilter depends on the Bio++ libraries, which are packaged for debian, but not up to date. The packager was Loic Dachary, but he admitted having no

Re: Packaging of MafFilter

Dear Julien, thanks a lot for your quick response. On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 02:37:37PM +0200, Julien Yann Dutheil wrote: > Dear Andreas, > > Many thanks for your email. Indeed, the debian package should not be in the > distributed tar.gz, I will fix that. One important thing: MafFilter depends >

Lets maintain libbpp-phyl-omics in Debian Med team

Hi Loic and Julien, congratulations - you were the first who was flying below my radar about bioinformatics software inside Debian. You managed to inject a set of library packages (libbpp-core-dev, libbpp-phyl-dev, libbpp-phyl-omics-dev, libbpp-popgen-dev, libbpp-qt-dev, libbpp-raa-dev,

Packaging of MafFilter

Hi Julien, I'm writing you on behalf of the Debian Med team - a subgroup inside Debian with the objective to package free software with relevance in medicine and biology. Due to a user request I intend to package MafFilter[1]. I noticed that your download tarball includes some debian/ dir. I

libgtextutils

Hi Charles, A while ago I made some changes to the libgtextutils package, see git [1] for details. Since I am on a new machine, I can no longer reproduce the lintian warning which may (or may not) explain the problems appearing in the wild [2]. However, I cannot reproduce that problem, either.