Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3

Étienne Mollier writes: > Many, many thanks for your swift update. No problem. > I'm reverting most of > my changes to python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3 packaging to make > sure no overrides risk interferring with your tuning during the > build or autopkgtest, and bump the requirements to ncbi-blast

Re: [MoM] ampl-netlib-solvers

Hi Andrei, On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 10:01:05PM +0200, Andrei Rozanski wrote: > > > > Description: A gjh solver like solution. > should be fixed. Yep. > > W: gjh-asl-json: initial-upload-closes-no-bugs > > > > That would be the ITP bug. > Will work on it. OK. > > W: gjh-asl-json: no-manual

Re: [MoM] ampl-netlib-solvers

Hi Andreas, On 10/5/20 3:01 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Andrei, On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 07:20:29AM +0200, Andrei Rozanski wrote: Thanks for the hint. Now the package builds successfully. Would it be possible for you to check it? Sure. :-) Thanks for revert and clarifying it. I reverted the

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3

Hi Aaron, Aaron M. Ucko, on 2020-10-05 08:57:43 -0400: > u...@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko) writes: > > > issue a give-back request for python-biopython on mipsel once a suitable > > new BLAST+ build is available there. > > Update: The new BLAST+ build showed up overnight (from my time zone, > anyw

[RFS] python-intervaltree-bio

Hi, I've attempted to fix: #920545 which is about failing autopkgtests for python-intervaltree-bio. It seems to pass on my chroot and I've pushed the corresponding changes to the team repo here[1]. It'd be great if someone could try testing my changes once - and either sponsor or grant me access to

Re: [MoM] ampl-netlib-solvers

Hi Andrei, On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 07:20:29AM +0200, Andrei Rozanski wrote: > > Thanks for the hint. Now the package builds successfully. Would it be > possible for you to check it? Sure. :-) I reverted the targer distribution from "unstable" to "UNRELEASED". Please leave this untouched until a

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3

u...@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko) writes: > issue a give-back request for python-biopython on mipsel once a suitable > new BLAST+ build is available there. Update: The new BLAST+ build showed up overnight (from my time zone, anyway) as expected, and python-biopython's mipsel status changed from "Fa

Re: [RFS] kma

On 04.10.20 13:34, Nilesh Patra wrote: > dcut dm --uid npatra...@gmail.com --allow kma Done.