Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3

2020-10-18 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Steffen, Steffen Möller, on 2020-10-17 19:54:17 +0200: > uploaded - thank you for this, had given up on it once :) You're welcome, thanks for the upload. :) Cheers, -- Étienne Mollier Old rsa/3072: 5ab1 4edf 63bb ccff 8b54 2fa9 59da 56fe fff3 882d New rsa/4096: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3

2020-10-17 Thread Steffen Möller
uploaded - thank you for this, had given up on it once :) On 17.10.20 14:25, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Hello, > > I prepared an update of python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3, to address > #972381 mainly, but it also includes pending removal of some > makeblastdb overrides. The package is available on Sal

[RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3

2020-10-17 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hello, I prepared an update of python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3, to address #972381 mainly, but it also includes pending removal of some makeblastdb overrides. The package is available on Salsa for review and upload: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-biopython/ The changelog is: *

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3

2020-10-05 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Étienne Mollier writes: > Many, many thanks for your swift update. No problem. > I'm reverting most of > my changes to python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3 packaging to make > sure no overrides risk interferring with your tuning during the > build or autopkgtest, and bump the requirements to ncbi-blast

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3

2020-10-05 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Aaron, Aaron M. Ucko, on 2020-10-05 08:57:43 -0400: > u...@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko) writes: > > > issue a give-back request for python-biopython on mipsel once a suitable > > new BLAST+ build is available there. > > Update: The new BLAST+ build showed up overnight (from my time zone, > anyw

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3

2020-10-05 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
u...@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko) writes: > issue a give-back request for python-biopython on mipsel once a suitable > new BLAST+ build is available there. Update: The new BLAST+ build showed up overnight (from my time zone, anyway) as expected, and python-biopython's mipsel status changed from "Fa

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3

2020-10-04 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Étienne Mollier writes: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=python-biopython&arch=mipsel&ver=1.78%2Bdfsg-2&stamp=1601713196&raw=0 Thanks for the report! I don't have access to any buildd servers, but I was able to reproduce makeblastdb failures with current defaults on the

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3 (Was: 1.78+dfsg-2)

2020-10-04 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille, on 2020-10-03 10:06:59 +0200: > uploaded. Thanks a lot for caring for the migration of this > important package Thank you as well for the upload. Alas the build log still looks like the run chokes on makeblastdb memory commit issues. :( ==