Re: Any software package for Radiation Oncology Contouring?

2011-03-14 Thread Adit Panchal
Hello, I am the lead developer of dicompyler. I thought since the topic came up here on debian-med, we could work together to try to get dicompyler ready for packaging. In a few months we will be releasing version 0.4, so before that happens, we can try to make the changes necessary on our end.

Re: Any software package for Radiation Oncology Contouring?

2011-03-15 Thread Adit Panchal
Hi Andreas, On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 03:21, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: thank you very much for your interest in Debian Med.  For our project it would be a really great addition to also support radiation therapy research - so I really hope to get it packaged for Debian soonish.  I'm

Re: Any software package for Radiation Oncology Contouring?

2011-03-17 Thread Adit Panchal
Here is a copy of the latest source: http://dicompyler.googlecode.com/files/dicompyler-0.4a1.tgz The project is executed via main.py and the requirements are stated as before: http://code.google.com/p/dicompyler/wiki/BuildRequirements Let me know if there is anything I need to change. Thanks!

Re: Any software package for Radiation Oncology Contouring?

2011-03-17 Thread Adit Panchal
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 13:38, Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org wrote: Thanks.  Could you please verify that everything is inside this tarball. It looks a bit sparse compared to the content of the repository.  Meanwhile I commited some basic stuff regarding a Debian package into  

Re: Any software package for Radiation Oncology Contouring?

2011-03-18 Thread Adit Panchal
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 14:01, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: Cool. :-)  I detected the problem when traveling to LinuxTage Chemnitz event when I spent some time into dicompyler packaging.  This problem is solved now. Glad to know I wasn't the only one who noticed it. I have some

Re: Any software package for Radiation Oncology Contouring?

2011-03-20 Thread Adit Panchal
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 15:54, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: Ahh, OK.  You always kann install python-dicom from experimental - I just wanted to spare this dependency for the purpose of packaging without relying on experimental.  I just kept NeuroDebian team in CC to let them comment

Re: ITP: dicompyler -- radiation therapy research platform

2011-06-15 Thread Adit Panchal
Hi Andreas, dicompyler 0.4a2 should be good enough for Debian unstable. It may be some time before 0.4 final gets released. There were enough significant changes between 0.4a2 and 0.3 to warrant a release/packaging. The remaining unimplemented features are not as important. Thanks, Adit On

dicompyler 0.4.1-1 released

2012-01-01 Thread Adit Panchal
Hello all, I just wanted to let you know that a new version of dicompyler has been released. It is now also available via a python package via PyPI [ http://pypi.python.org/pypi/dicompyler/ ] and will be available via that route going forward. I recall that Mathieu said he can turn it into a

Re: dicompyler 0.4.1-1 released

2012-01-04 Thread Adit Panchal
* and thus needed some patches) would be welcome anyway. Kind regards       Andreas. On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 03:18:16PM -0600, Adit Panchal wrote: Hello all, I just wanted to let you know that a new version of dicompyler has been released. It is now also available via a python package via PyPI

Re: Several patches of dicompyler in Debian

2014-09-17 Thread Adit Panchal
Hello Andreas, Thank you and the team for the hard work to enable dicompyler to work with wxWidgets 3.0 and the upgraded libraries. Quite a few these patches can be backported to dicompyler. There are significant changes that need to be made to some modules in dicompyler to support pydicom 0.9.8