OoO En ce milieu de nuit étoilée du vendredi 30 mai 2008, vers 03:51,
Sergey B Kirpichev [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
The licence (2.02) is not suitable for main but for php itself.
You should convince upstream to upgrade to 3.01 or to a more
common license like GPL.
Actually, for
On Wed, 28 May 2008 15:07:20 +0200
Vincent Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please, add a debian/watch file. This allows DEHS to check if
updates are available and will provide this information in a few
pages.
For some odd reason, include/map.h is GPLv3+. You should
update
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 07:04:30PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
debian/copyright:
Debianized-By: Noah Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debianized-Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 22:58:05 +
You should read the wiki page again now, those have a different name now.
Heh, I was the one who made that
2008/5/29 Vincent Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OoO En cette fin de nuit blanche du lundi 26 mai 2008, vers 05:15,
William Vera [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.06-5
of my package vfu.
Hi William!
Hi Vincent
You should acknowledge latest NMU.
It needs to be 3.01. Sorry.
Ok. Now the php-geoip's license is 3.01:
http://pecl.php.net/package/geoip/
http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pecl/geoip/geoip.c?revision=1.16view=markup
The updated package is now up on mentors.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du vendredi 30 mai 2008, vers
14:28, Bradley Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
Please, add a debian/watch file. This allows DEHS to check if
updates are available and will provide this information in a few
pages.
For some odd reason,
On Thursday 29 May 2008, Noah Slater wrote:
Hello,
Thank you all for the suggestions/comments, etc.
Hello,
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:43:19AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
I'd rather reply with few questions ;-) -- it seems that the
command-option.patch is not applied before building
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du jeudi 29 mai 2008, vers 22:04,
Dimitar Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
Thanks for your suggestions and help. I've resolved all issues and
uploaded a new package.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du vendredi 30 mai 2008, vers 01:09,
Christopher James Halse Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
The updated package is now up on mentors.
Hi Christopher!
I have uploaded your package (and I am now using it too)! Thanks for
contributing to Debian.
--
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du vendredi 30 mai 2008, vers 17:25,
William Vera [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
You should acknowledge latest NMU. Moreover, bug #470615 is not handled
How I can do it?
You just add a line in debian/changelog with Acknowledge NMU. Some
time ago, you had to
Hi
2008/5/30 Vincent Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du vendredi 30 mai 2008, vers 17:25,
William Vera [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
You should acknowledge latest NMU. Moreover, bug #470615 is not handled
How I can do it?
You just add a line in
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du vendredi 30 mai 2008, vers 17:25,
William Vera [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
In fact, is not a bug, because vfu say 'support' for list and read,
does not depend on them (unzip, bzip2, etc) for build o run the
program.
Well, without unzip, vfu is unable to
Hi I'm new here.
I've been asking around for help on building debian packages. I've
been building RPMS for about 1 decade, but never tried to build a
Debian package. As preparation, I've read through the New
Maintainer's Guide and miscellaneous other web pages. I came in
through the Ubuntu
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du vendredi 30 mai 2008, vers 22:07,
Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
I wonder how you do your day-to-day work on building debs? I have
followed the dh_make approach of opening the source, and dh_make gives
me template files in debian for control,
Noah Slater wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 07:04:30PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
debian/copyright:
By the way, where did you get this line from?
Copyright: Copyright 2008, Stephen J. Friedl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't see any statement in the .c file that it is copyrighted. And as the
file
2008/5/30 Vincent Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du vendredi 30 mai 2008, vers 17:25,
William Vera [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
In fact, is not a bug, because vfu say 'support' for list and read,
does not depend on them (unzip, bzip2, etc) for build o run the
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 15:07 -0500, Paul Johnson wrote:
Keep in mind that my background is in RPM building, where the emphasis
is on distributing pristine source code. I was initially
shocked/dismayed by the Debian approach because the source code gets
untarred and fiddled with by the
Le Fri, May 30, 2008 at 03:07:57PM -0500, Paul Johnson a écrit :
I keep wondering, If the goal is to re-distribute 'pristine' source
code and patches, why doesn't Debian discourage users from untarring
the sourced code?Why can't you make it so the debian directory is
not inside the
Hello,
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Paul Johnson wrote:
I've been asking around for help on building debian packages.
changes, and all of those fiddles were getting wrapped up into the one
big diff file, making it impossible to figure out who did what.
One possible reason to do this is that the
Hi debian-mentors,
I am looking for someone to sponsor updates to my packages sclapp and
pytagsfs. I haven't heard from my earlier sponsor for these packages since
over three weeks and 4 emails, hence this request to a wider audience.
This update builds the following binary packages which the
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 14.17-1
of my package hwinfo.
It builds these binary packages:
hwinfo - Hardware identification system
libhd14- Hardware identification system library
libhd14-dev - Hardware identification system library and headers
libhd14-doc
21 matches
Mail list logo
