Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:02 PM, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote: > some one noted or using any time the https://archive.debian.net/ service.. ... > today this service are changed and now only put a static page in > frontend.. anybocy knows about related? The service will not be available until the

Bug#860804: RFS: highwayhash/0~20170419-g1f4a24f-1 [ITP] -- tensorflow dependency library

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 04:20:24AM +, Lumin wrote: > Updated package was uploaded to mentors: > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/highwayhash/highwayhash_0~20170419-g1f4a24f-1.dsc > > Changes: > * fixed the mistaken /lib//libxxx.a install path. > The static library didn't drop >

Bug#860921: RFS: python-ordered-set/2.0.2-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, * Package name: python-ordered-set Version : 2.0.2-1 Upstream Author : Luminoso Technologies, Inc. * URL : https://github.com/LuminosoInsight/ordered-set/ * License : Expat Section :

Bug#855354: RFS: alot/0.5.1-1 [ITA]

On 2017-04-21 06:12:21, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Quoting Ben Finney (2017-04-21 14:44:52) > > Jordan, have you made more changes that should be released? > > > > Johannes, are you waiting on any changes before you approve and upload > > this package? > > Jordan and I were writing each other

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

the http://snapshot.debian.org/ its the great tool and resource for retrieve the specific package.. and study cases ONCE a specific objetive are found... my novice aprendices get into it after some web serach into the debian archive web search interface.. al already knows that with apt-cache and

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:54:08AM -0400, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote: > yeah, that's why i asked! obviusly i asked due if some one are working > on sometihing.. Is http://snapshot.debian.org/ not enough for your tasks? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

yeah, that's why i asked! obviusly i asked due if some one are working on sometihing.. 2017-04-21 11:20 GMT-04:00, Mattia Rizzolo : > have you also read that page?.. > > more info: the person who was nominally maintaining it was not maintaining > it, as he let the SSL

Bug#860905: RFS: libdsk/1.5.4+dfsg-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: blocks -1 168591 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libdsk" * Package name: libdsk Version : 1.5.4+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : John Elliott * URL :

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

have you also read that page?.. more info: the person who was nominally maintaining it was not maintaining it, as he let the SSL certificate expire, and so DSA took repointed the DNS to an error page. On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 4:04 PM PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote: > some one

Re: I have some questions about alioth repository

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 05:37:19PM +0900, JungHwan Kang wrote: > 4. Some packages don't have repository(No repository found by debcheckout > tool) > >     like acpi, alsamixergui, apg, aspell-en, autoconf. > >     Are there repositories for source code of those packages ? > % dgit clone

someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

some one noted or using any time the https://archive.debian.net/ service.. was usefully for packagin notes and test over other versions.. archived of course.. was usefully for my lives due most old hardware like framegrabber capture devices does not have support today in current klernels...

Bug#860466: RFS: equivs/2.0.10 [QA] -- Circumvent Debian package dependencies

Control: tag -1 -moreinfo Dear Sean, On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:36:24 -0700 Sean Whitton wrote: > I'd like to note that I'm planning to upload with dgit, so you shouldn't > rebase after the upload. It's okay to rebase before the upload. Understand. I always cut the

Bug#855354: RFS: alot/0.5.1-1 [ITA]

Hi Ben, Quoting Ben Finney (2017-04-21 14:44:52) > How is this going? thanks a lot for the ping! > Jordan, have you made more changes that should be released? > > Johannes, are you waiting on any changes before you approve and upload > this package? Jordan and I were writing each other

Bug#855354: RFS: alot/0.5.1-1 [ITA]

On 21-Feb-2017, Jordan Justen wrote: > I uploaded a new 0.5.1-1 to mentors.debian.net. […] > > On 2017-02-17 05:29:44, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > Feel free to contact me for sponsorship as I'm an alot user and > > also fixed/filed a couple of bugs together with upstream. I'm thus > > very

Bug#860496: RFS: drgeo/1.1.0-10.3 [NMU, RC]

drgeo is not in jessie and won't be in stretch, so there is no need to hurry with patching this upstream version from 2005. https://git.gnome.org/browse/archive/drgeo/log/ This looks very dead. #736535 mentions an active fork (that seems to be quite different). Yes, it use the pharo framework

Re: I have some questions about alioth repository

Hi, >> 3. In case of darcs package, debcheckout tried to download source code from >> Darcs repository. >> (anonscm.debian.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi) >> But, that failed. Because, the project doesn’t exist in the repository. Is >> this working well? > >If it failed, probably the answer is

Re: I have some questions about alioth repository

On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 17:37 +0900, JungHwan Kang wrote: > Hi, > I was analyzing repositories of debian packages by debcheckout tool. > I've known there are 7 types of version control system. > (Arch, Bazzar, CVS, Darcs, Git, Mercurial, Subversion) > My questions are below... >   > 1 All version

I have some questions about alioth repository

Hi, I was analyzing repositories of debian packages by debcheckout tool. I've known there are 7 types of version control system. (Arch, Bazzar, CVS, Darcs, Git, Mercurial, Subversion) My questions are below... 1 All version control systems are using

Bug#860868: marked as done (RFS: xtensor-python/0.10.0-1)

Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:00:31 + (UTC) with message-id <1899357629.7088582.1492761631...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#860867: RFS: xtensor/0.9.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #860868, regarding RFS: xtensor-python/0.10.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#860867: marked as done (RFS: xtensor/0.9.0-1)

Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:00:31 + (UTC) with message-id <1899357629.7088582.1492761631...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#860867: RFS: xtensor/0.9.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #860867, regarding RFS: xtensor/0.9.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#860870: marked as done (RFS: docopt.cpp/0.6.2-2)

Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:00:31 + (UTC) with message-id <1899357629.7088582.1492761631...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#860867: RFS: xtensor/0.9.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #860870, regarding RFS: docopt.cpp/0.6.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#860870: RFS: docopt.cpp/0.6.2-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "docopt.cpp" * Package name: docopt.cpp Version : 0.6.2-2 Upstream Author : Jared Grubb * URL : https://github.com/docopt/docopt.cpp * License : MIT / BSL

Bug#860868: RFS: xtensor-python/0.10.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, * Package name: xtensor-python Version : 0.10.0-1 Upstream Author : Johan Mabille and Sylvain Corlay * URL : http://quantstack.net/xtensor * License : BSD Section : libs One can check out

Bug#860867: RFS: xtensor/0.9.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, * Package name: xtensor Version : 0.9.0-1 Upstream Author : Johan Mabille and Sylvain Corlay * URL : http://quantstack.net/xtensor * License : BSD Section : libs One can check out the