Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "adminer":
* Package name : adminer
Version : 4.8.1-3
* URL : https://www.adminer.org/
* License : Apache-2.0, MIT
* Vcs : https://sals
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "uwsgi":
* Package name : uwsgi
Version : 2.0.26-1
Upstream contact : https://github.com/unbit/uwsgi/issues
* URL : http://projects.unbit.it/uwsgi/
* License
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Yangfl,
Preamble...
Thanks for taking time to create this package and your contribution to Debian.
The below review is for assistance. It is offered to help submitters of
packages to Debian mentors improve their packages prior to possible
sponsorship into Debian.
Hi Alexandre,
Preamble...
Thanks for taking time to create this package and your contribution to Debian.
The below review is for assistance. It is offered to help submitters of
packages to Debian mentors improve their packages prior to possible
sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Alexandre,
Don't shoot the messenger. :-)
Preamble...
Thanks for taking time to create this package and your contribution to Debian.
The below review is for assistance. It is offered to help submitters of
packages to Debian mentors improve their packages prior to
I'm pretty much in the same position.
There is an RFP bug report at
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068648
but got no response.
I wrote to the debian-science list with no answer either:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2024/05/msg00025.html
Any guidance will be appreci
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 07:55:03AM -0300, Jeremy Theler wrote:
> I'm pretty much in the same position.
>
> There is an RFP bug report at
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068648
> but got no response.
This is expected for RFPs. RFPs are "I want someone to package this" and
thu
Hi Jeremy,
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 07:55:03AM -0300, Jeremy Theler wrote:
> I'm pretty much in the same position.
>
> There is an RFP bug report at
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068648
> but got no response.
RFP means "someone else please do this", you need to file an RFS
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 01:22:29PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> > I'm pretty much in the same position.
> >
> > There is an RFP bug report at
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068648
> > but got no response.
>
> RFP means "someone else please do this", you need to file an R
On Thu, 04 Jul 2024 13:22:29 +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> RFP is more of a +1 vote on this software being useful, which can be useful
> to convince people it should be in Debian. However I'm not aware of any DDs
> actively watching those bugs for things to work on.
At least in the past, we in th
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 04:30:43PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> You don't need to CC debian-mentors on ITPs, you don't use ITPs to ask for
> sponsorship and RFSes are sent to debian-mentors automatically.
It's complicated^{TM}. The sponsorship docs don't actually guide people on
how to get
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 02:04:01PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 04:30:43PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > You don't need to CC debian-mentors on ITPs, you don't use ITPs to ask for
> > sponsorship and RFSes are sent to debian-mentors automatically.
>
> It's complica
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 05:26:03PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > It's complicated^{TM}. The sponsorship docs don't actually guide people on
> > how to get others interested in their work
>
> I don't think this is necessary or helpful: most RFSes are sponsored
> because they are in a good s
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 03:22:35PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> > > It's complicated^{TM}. The sponsorship docs don't actually guide people on
> > > how to get others interested in their work
> >
> > I don't think this is necessary or helpful: most RFSes are sponsored
> > because they are in a go
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 06:28:17PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 03:22:35PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> > > I don't think this is necessary or helpful: most RFSes are sponsored
> > > because they are in a good shape and somebody decided to sponsor them, not
> > > bec
Hi,
> A. piuparts problem
[...]
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>libapache2-mod-ruwsgi : Conflicts: libapache2-mod-uwsgi but 2.0.26-1 is to
> be installed
>libapache2-mod-uwsgi : Conflicts: libapache2-mod-ruwsgi but 2.0.26-1 is to
> be installed
> E: Unable to cor
On Thu, 2024-07-04 at 15:44 +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 06:28:17PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 03:22:35PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> > > > I don't think this is necessary or helpful: most RFSes are sponsored
> > > > because they are in
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Phil,
Sorry, I did not notice earlier your quick reply.
I patched lintian spelling issues and uploaded new package.
Best,
Bartek
P.S. Alexandru, here is an RFP from my list:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/944826
This one already provides some guidance about what team to contact,
join, and work with--I'd recommend joining a team that you're interested
in. Other RFPs can be found by browsing the wishlist "wnpp" bugs (amon
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "archivemount":
* Package name : archivemount
Version : 1-1
Upstream contact : https://lists.sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/archivemount-ng
* URL : https://sr.ht/~nabij
Hi,
I'm trying to bring TeX Live 2024 into Debian testing. The excuse pages
for texlive-base/texlive-extra/texlive-lang say
"Migration status for texlive-... (2023.20240207-x to 2024.20240401-x):
Will attempt migration (Any information below is purely informational)"
Unfortunately these pac
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mintstick":
* Package name : mintstick
Version : 1.6.2-1
Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : https://github.com/linuxmint/mintsti
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Phil,
Thank you for taking the time to review my package and for your invaluable
feedback.I've gone through and updated the copyright, switched to sbuild,
and incorporated reprotest. I've included a snippet of the output
sbuild -d unstable mangl_1.1.5-1.dsc
+--
23 matches
Mail list logo
