Hi,
a package that I maintain is switching from automake to cmake. I had to
patch CMakeLists.txt a bit to make it compile on Debian, upstream used hand
written code to detect the Cairo and Pixman libraries, which does not work
for me, and I am not experienced enough with cmake to patch this code).
Hi,
I am trying to upgrade a package, it seems I need to switch to a newer
debhelper version with it, 9 seems to be too old. I did the upgrade by
changing Build-Depends from debhelper (>= 9) to debhelper-compat (13) or 12,
10 and deleting debian/compat. The package builds fine (after dropping
autom
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 03:53:02PM +0100, Salvador Abreu wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm new at this (just out of NM), and I'm about to upload my packages
> (gprolog and gprolog-doc). All seems well, except for this message,
> which occurs when I try to dinstall -n, on ftp-master:
>
> 10:41:58$ dins
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 12:10:22PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
>
> That's sure, but gpw log is not there. So I have to re-upload, I
> think...
Hello? Did you read the mails I sent to you and the m68k-build list?
Its in the archive.
Christian
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 12:43:34PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > main::(/usr/lib/perl/5.6.1/asm/unistd.ph:114):
> > 114:eval 'sub __NR_iopl () { ¬ &supported;}' unless
> > defined(&__NR_iopl);
>
> On i386, this
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 01:32:27AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 09:45:09PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> > > Unquoted string "supported" may clash with future reserved word at (eval
> > > 112)
> > > line 1.
> > > Operator or semicolon missing before &supported at
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 12:12:47PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> On 08-Sep-2001 Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I get a lot of those with lintian on m68k:
> >
> > Operator or semicolon missing before &supported at (eval 115) line 1.
Hi,
I get a lot of those with lintian on m68k:
Operator or semicolon missing before &supported at (eval 115) line 1.
Ambiguous use of & resolved as operator & at (eval 115) line 1.
Unquoted string "supported" may clash with future reserved word at (eval
112) line 1.
Is my package really that bad?
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 02:10:47PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Moin,
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 08:50:19PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > #include
> > Christian T. Steigies wrote on Sat Aug 25, 2001 um 01:12:53PM:
> >
> > > debconf (developer): frontend
Moin,
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 08:50:19PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> Christian T. Steigies wrote on Sat Aug 25, 2001 um 01:12:53PM:
>
> > debconf (developer): frontend started
> > debconf (developer): frontend running, package name is moon-buggy
> > debconf
Hi folks,
debconf is driving me crazy. I am using debconf on a multi binary package to
display a note. Its working fine in one package but not at all in the main
package and I do not understand why.
Installing the package (with DEBUG) gives me this:
Unpacking replacement moon-buggy ...
Setting up
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 02:47:35PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 11:59:32AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Probably because they were uploaded between the time you did ls
> > and the time you did the rm.
>
> what about the build daemon? does it retry to build the p
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 02:47:35PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 11:59:32AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Probably because they were uploaded between the time you did ls
> > and the time you did the rm.
>
> what about the build daemon? does it retry to build the
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
> Hi!
>
> How do I specify all the architectures a package can build on? For instance,
> I have a package that can only build on the following architectures:
>
> i386 alpha arm powerpc sparc mips mipsel
>
> Now, first of all, I'm
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
> Hi!
>
> How do I specify all the architectures a package can build on? For instance,
> I have a package that can only build on the following architectures:
>
> i386 alpha arm powerpc sparc mips mipsel
>
> Now, first of all, I'm
Hi,
I have a little problem with dpkg-source (or tar?), was there a change
recently?
dpkg-source -x hp2xx_3.4.0-2.dsc
dpkg-source: error: tarfile `./hp2xx_3.4.0.orig.tar.gz' contains unexpected
object listed by tar as `drwxr-xr-x mk/users 0 2001-02-08 14:30:12
hp2xx-3.4.0/'; expected
Hi,
I have a little problem with dpkg-source (or tar?), was there a change
recently?
dpkg-source -x hp2xx_3.4.0-2.dsc
dpkg-source: error: tarfile `./hp2xx_3.4.0.orig.tar.gz' contains unexpected object
listed by tar as `drwxr-xr-x mk/users 0 2001-02-08 14:30:12 hp2xx-3.4.0/';
expected
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 02:03:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> No, the GET command retreives the answer to a question so the postinst
> can act on it. Look at the turorial again, you will see the config
> script uses an INPUT command to ask that same question.
Now this is confusing like accounting
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 02:03:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> No, the GET command retreives the answer to a question so the postinst
> can act on it. Look at the turorial again, you will see the config
> script uses an INPUT command to ask that same question.
Now this is confusing like accountin
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:26:19AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
>
> Emacs users can use debian-changelog-mode.el from the dpkg-dev-el
> package. The closes: statements will be fontified when the sytax
Ah! And I always wondered why that file kept dissappearing from my
boxes. It used to b
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:26:19AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
>
> Emacs users can use debian-changelog-mode.el from the dpkg-dev-el
> package. The closes: statements will be fontified when the sytax
Ah! And I always wondered why that file kept dissappearing from my
boxes. It used to
Hi,
I am trying to convert moon-buggy to use debconf. Following the tutorial it
was fairly easy to close #89118, ie use debconf in the preinst.
I also want to close #94969, which is not that hard, but I seem to be unable
to use debconf to display a message in the postinst as well, the files get
mov
Hi,
I am trying to convert moon-buggy to use debconf. Following the tutorial it
was fairly easy to close #89118, ie use debconf in the preinst.
I also want to close #94969, which is not that hard, but I seem to be unable
to use debconf to display a message in the postinst as well, the files get
mo
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 04:00:44PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> My understanding was that we're not using suidregister in
> postinst now, and instead setting the ownership/permissions in
> the package itself.
>
> So I moved this from postinst:
>
> if [ -x /usr/sbin/suidregister ];
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 04:00:44PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> My understanding was that we're not using suidregister in
> postinst now, and instead setting the ownership/permissions in
> the package itself.
>
> So I moved this from postinst:
>
> if [ -x /usr/sbin/suidregister ]
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 02:05:29AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:53:44PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:19:21PM -0400, MaD dUCK wrote:
> > > hi developers,
> > > this is my first message, i hope it's appropriate. there's talk going
> >
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 02:05:29AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:53:44PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:19:21PM -0400, MaD dUCK wrote:
> > > hi developers,
> > > this is my first message, i hope it's appropriate. there's talk going
> >
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:36:31AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I know a little about buildd, but I guess that it try to build a package
> and it if fail someone take its logs and submit a bug report.
> At the end of the build process I guess that the build environment is
> totally cleaned an
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:36:31AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I know a little about buildd, but I guess that it try to build a package
> and it if fail someone take its logs and submit a bug report.
> At the end of the build process I guess that the build environment is
> totally cleaned a
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:50:37PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I just noticed the debian/rules file for mirrormagic which I inherited from
> Joey Hess uses dh_testroot to check that the build is run as root (or
> fakeroot).
>
> I'm wondering what the justification for doing this is. It prevents
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:50:37PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I just noticed the debian/rules file for mirrormagic which I inherited from
> Joey Hess uses dh_testroot to check that the build is run as root (or
> fakeroot).
>
> I'm wondering what the justification for doing this is. It prevent
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 01:42:19AM +0400, Peter Novodvorsky wrote:
> "John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Current snapshot (please do not redistribute since it is not
> > finished): qemacs-0.2.tar.gz
>
> Current version of qemacs segafaults after a typing ~ 20 letters
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 01:42:19AM +0400, Peter Novodvorsky wrote:
> "John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Current snapshot (please do not redistribute since it is not
> > finished): qemacs-0.2.tar.gz
>
> Current version of qemacs segafaults after a typing ~ 20 letter
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 01:10:19PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> What I am proposing is a source package that generates *both* a "main"
> and a "contrib" .deb. What would the autobuilder do with that? In
> fact, how would the autobuilder even know that is the case? The
I guess it depends o
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 01:10:19PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> What I am proposing is a source package that generates *both* a "main"
> and a "contrib" .deb. What would the autobuilder do with that? In
> fact, how would the autobuilder even know that is the case? The
I guess it depends
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 12:32:54PM +0100, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> Is it ok to configure a package differently on one arch?
> I want to build solfege with --disable-oss-sound on m68k until
> the binutils/glibc problems are fixed.
>
> If I use --disable-oss-sound (only on m68k), the package conta
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 12:32:54PM +0100, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> Is it ok to configure a package differently on one arch?
> I want to build solfege with --disable-oss-sound on m68k until
> the binutils/glibc problems are fixed.
>
> If I use --disable-oss-sound (only on m68k), the package cont
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 01:34:07PM +0100, Peter van Rossum wrote:
>
> Yes, of course, and that is what I did. But the actual question was:
> how do I get dpkg-buildpackage to give the potato version a different
> *name*? Just renaming the files gives problems with the signature on
> the .changes/.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 01:34:07PM +0100, Peter van Rossum wrote:
>
> Yes, of course, and that is what I did. But the actual question was:
> how do I get dpkg-buildpackage to give the potato version a different
> *name*? Just renaming the files gives problems with the signature on
> the .changes/
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 03:37:12PM +0100, Fredrik Steen wrote:
> Describe the changes made and added a (Closes: Bug#86243)
> # cd ..
> # ls
> sntop-1.3.1/ sntop-1.3.1.orig.tar.gz
rename this to sntop_1.3.1.orig.tar.gz (note the underscore)
Christian
--
http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 03:37:12PM +0100, Fredrik Steen wrote:
> Describe the changes made and added a (Closes: Bug#86243)
> # cd ..
> # ls
> sntop-1.3.1/ sntop-1.3.1.orig.tar.gz
rename this to sntop_1.3.1.orig.tar.gz (note the underscore)
Christian
--
http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:18:56PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Yes, you are right. But there are not problems with hundreds of
> packages, are there?
No, only 80 known packages currently
http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/quinn/needs-failed
but an unknown number of not-yet-known proble
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:18:56PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Yes, you are right. But there are not problems with hundreds of
> packages, are there?
No, only 80 known packages currently
http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/quinn/needs-failed
but an unknown number of not-yet-known probl
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 12:44:24PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * "Christian T. Steigies"
>
> | On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:30:13PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
> | > Hi,
> | >
> | > how do you invoke dpkg-buildpackage for a binary-only NMU? In sec
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:30:13PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how do you invoke dpkg-buildpackage for a binary-only NMU? In section
> 8.2 "Guidelines for Porter Uploads", the Developer's Reference says:
>
> In a binary NMU, no real changes are being made to the source. You
>
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 12:44:24PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * "Christian T. Steigies"
>
> | On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:30:13PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
> | > Hi,
> | >
> | > how do you invoke dpkg-buildpackage for a binary-only NMU? In sec
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:30:13PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how do you invoke dpkg-buildpackage for a binary-only NMU? In section
> 8.2 "Guidelines for Porter Uploads", the Developer's Reference says:
>
> In a binary NMU, no real changes are being made to the source. You
>
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 06:49:24PM +0100, peter karlsson wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies:
>
> > And you will note m68k is not the fastest arch on the world
> > (allthough the nicest ;-)
>
> Hmm, perhaps I should dust off the Amiga 1200 that is lying in a
> desktop dr
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:45:34AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:40:31AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > [...] After all, non-free is not part of debian AFAIK,
> > thats why the buildds prefer to spend their time on main packages.
>
> This I un
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 06:49:24PM +0100, peter karlsson wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies:
>
> > And you will note m68k is not the fastest arch on the world
> > (allthough the nicest ;-)
>
> Hmm, perhaps I should dust off the Amiga 1200 that is lying in a
> desktop dr
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:45:34AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:40:31AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > [...] After all, non-free is not part of debian AFAIK,
> > thats why the buildds prefer to spend their time on main packages.
>
> This I un
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 11:43:14AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> On which machines? The machines list web page says that
> chroot is available on vore.debian.org (sparc). I used it
> to build a sparc port but I could not find other chroot-available
> machines.
>
> machines list: http://db.debi
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 11:43:14AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> On which machines? The machines list web page says that
> chroot is available on vore.debian.org (sparc). I used it
> to build a sparc port but I could not find other chroot-available
> machines.
>
> machines list: http://db.deb
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 04:21:00PM -0800, Mike Markley wrote:
> IMO the best name is the one that does the best job of expressing what it's
> called without being so generic as to cause potential name conflict. I'd
> personally go with libmetakit, with -dev, -tcl, -python if you split it up.
> In g
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 04:21:00PM -0800, Mike Markley wrote:
> IMO the best name is the one that does the best job of expressing what it's
> called without being so generic as to cause potential name conflict. I'd
> personally go with libmetakit, with -dev, -tcl, -python if you split it up.
> In
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 02:06:35PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Is it possible to ask for a summary of the change in procedure? If it is OK
> > to setgid in the package, then why was dh_suidregister being used in the
> > first
> > place?
>
> The explanation was posted to debian-devel-announce a
Hi,
I am using dh_suidregister in my packages, one of those actually has to
register files as sgid games. How do I do that now with dpkg-stateoverride?
Is it enough to just set the permissions in debian/rules (as before) and
just omit the dh_suidregister call? Or do I have to do something with
dpkg
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 02:06:35PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Is it possible to ask for a summary of the change in procedure? If it is OK
> > to setgid in the package, then why was dh_suidregister being used in the first
> > place?
>
> The explanation was posted to debian-devel-announce a few
Hi,
I am using dh_suidregister in my packages, one of those actually has to
register files as sgid games. How do I do that now with dpkg-stateoverride?
Is it enough to just set the permissions in debian/rules (as before) and
just omit the dh_suidregister call? Or do I have to do something with
dpk
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:46:01PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> I'm in Toronto, and I can probably sign your key (depends on the
> schedule). Dirk Eddelbuettel is another Debian developer in Toronto who
> can do that (in fact, he was the one who signed my key). I'm not sure if
> Dirk is subscribed to
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:46:01PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> I'm in Toronto, and I can probably sign your key (depends on the
> schedule). Dirk Eddelbuettel is another Debian developer in Toronto who
> can do that (in fact, he was the one who signed my key). I'm not sure if
> Dirk is subscribed t
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:23:06PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:26:32AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Jochen, I get this from lintian:
> > N: unknown interpreter
> > [repeat N times]
> > W: chbg: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
>
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:23:06PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:26:32AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Jochen, I get this from lintian:
> > N: unknown interpreter
> > [repeat N times]
> > W: chbg: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
>
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:50:53PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to pick up the orphaned chbg package
> and tried to pack the new upstream release.
> The files are at
>
> http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/chbg/
>
> Would anybody sponsor the package?
Stupid questi
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:50:53PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to pick up the orphaned chbg package
> and tried to pack the new upstream release.
> The files are at
>
> http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/chbg/
>
> Would anybody sponsor the package?
Stupid quest
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 01:06:48PM +0100, Marek Habersack wrote:
> yes, but you can't expect all the maintainers hava a park of machines of all
> architectures. And yet, the Debian OS runs different kernels and on
> different architectures. The conclusion is obvious.
I am pretty sure that if you a
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 01:06:48PM +0100, Marek Habersack wrote:
> yes, but you can't expect all the maintainers hava a park of machines of all
> architectures. And yet, the Debian OS runs different kernels and on
> different architectures. The conclusion is obvious.
I am pretty sure that if you
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 09:31:21PM -0500, Chris Ruffin wrote:
> Well, I posted a similar message to debian-devel and receieved a good
> analysis from Anthony Towns, release whiz and master of the cryptic
> output file. The actual culprit appears to be xlibs and libxaw6 (third
> level deps), which
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 09:31:21PM -0500, Chris Ruffin wrote:
> Well, I posted a similar message to debian-devel and receieved a good
> analysis from Anthony Towns, release whiz and master of the cryptic
> output file. The actual culprit appears to be xlibs and libxaw6 (third
> level deps), whic
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:54:31PM +0100, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> Either being an official Debian developper has any sense or not. If it's
> the latter then Debian better stop wasting time with this theatre *now*.
> If it does make sense to be a Debian developper (I sure do hope it does!)
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 04:03:58PM +0100, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
>
> > You have not yet proven your patience, which is next in the DAM process.
>
> You have read Kafka, haven't you? I don't remember wh
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:54:31PM +0100, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> Either being an official Debian developper has any sense or not. If it's
> the latter then Debian better stop wasting time with this theatre *now*.
> If it does make sense to be a Debian developper (I sure do hope it does!)
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 04:10:36PM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> Does this mean I can never become a maintainer? I believe that
> I have demonstrated my knowledge of debian's policy and skills with
> the packages that I've done.
You have not yet proven your patience, which is next in the DAM proces
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:14:29PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> How do you handel zour gpg keys when you build on debian machines?
> I would want to build my packages on a debian machine but would not
> want to have my gpg key on a machine out there.
You don't have your keys on the debian mac
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 04:03:58PM +0100, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
>
> > You have not yet proven your patience, which is next in the DAM process.
>
> You have read Kafka, haven't you? I don't remember wh
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 04:10:36PM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> Does this mean I can never become a maintainer? I believe that
> I have demonstrated my knowledge of debian's policy and skills with
> the packages that I've done.
You have not yet proven your patience, which is next in the DAM proce
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:14:29PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> How do you handel zour gpg keys when you build on debian machines?
> I would want to build my packages on a debian machine but would not
> want to have my gpg key on a machine out there.
You don't have your keys on the debian ma
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 04:20:54PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> # include
kernel-[headers|source] ?
Christian
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 04:20:54PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> # include
kernel-[headers|source] ?
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 10:34:16PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> You might like to compare with how other sdl-based games have been
> packaged, for instance defendguin (available in woody).
argh, no no, please not that. The one in incoming, but not the one installed
currently. I am trying to fix
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 10:34:16PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> You might like to compare with how other sdl-based games have been
> packaged, for instance defendguin (available in woody).
argh, no no, please not that. The one in incoming, but not the one installed
currently. I am trying to fix
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 02:18:51PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> i don't have woody yet; didn't know they existed. i'll upgrade one of my
> computers.
If you don't tell anybody, these packages work fine on potato:
> > /debian/dists/woody/main/binary-i386/libs/libsdl-image1.0_1.0.8-1.deb
> > /d
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 02:18:51PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> i don't have woody yet; didn't know they existed. i'll upgrade one of my
> computers.
If you don't tell anybody, these packages work fine on potato:
> > /debian/dists/woody/main/binary-i386/libs/libsdl-image1.0_1.0.8-1.deb
> > /
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 01:29:36PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> dear all,
>
> i'd like to package a friend's game, but it requires:
>
> >=libsdl1.0 which debian provides
> sdl_imagea library which debian doesn't provide
> sdl_mixera library which debian doesn't provide
Whats wrong
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 01:29:36PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> dear all,
>
> i'd like to package a friend's game, but it requires:
>
> >=libsdl1.0 which debian provides
> sdl_imagea library which debian doesn't provide
> sdl_mixera library which debian doesn't provide
Whats wrong
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 12:16:25PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am patient and I am not worry.
> But I think you should first send me above your message privately only
> before blaming me in such public way.
So that everybody else who is annoyed by the priority also send you a
private ma
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 12:16:25PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am patient and I am not worry.
> But I think you should first send me above your message privately only
> before blaming me in such public way.
So that everybody else who is annoyed by the priority also send you a
private m
Moin,
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 05:20:13PM +0100, Cesar Talon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First at all, this is my first mail here, so sorry if this isn't the best
> place
> to ask.
This is absolutely the best and only place to ask questions like this!
> The question is:
>
> I've been packaging it with the
Moin,
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 05:20:13PM +0100, Cesar Talon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First at all, this is my first mail here, so sorry if this isn't the best place
> to ask.
This is absolutely the best and only place to ask questions like this!
> The question is:
>
> I've been packaging it with the h
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 03:20:23PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> In one package (malaga) I finally settled on taking advantage of VPATH:
> I simply configured and built it in different directories for different
> set of options. I don't remember whether I had to patch upstream build
> sys
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 03:20:23PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> In one package (malaga) I finally settled on taking advantage of VPATH:
> I simply configured and built it in different directories for different
> set of options. I don't remember whether I had to patch upstream build
> sy
Moin,
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 02:37:02PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
>
> > is it possible to get bugreports of a package automatically forwarded/copied
> > upstream? The author of one of my packages wants that (without being
Hi,
is it possible to get bugreports of a package automatically forwarded/copied
upstream? The author of one of my packages wants that (without being the
maintainer himself).
Christian
Moin,
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 02:37:02PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
>
> > is it possible to get bugreports of a package automatically forwarded/copied
> > upstream? The author of one of my packages wants that (without being
Hi,
is it possible to get bugreports of a package automatically forwarded/copied
upstream? The author of one of my packages wants that (without being the
maintainer himself).
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Hi,
I have a little trouble with SDL_image which I maintain. I made two packages,
libsdl-image1.0 and libsdl-image-dev. Until recently SDL_image was built
with SDL1.0, the stable release. The current versions need SDL1.1, the
unstable release. Unfortunately I built and uploaded SDL_image with that,
Hi,
I have a little trouble with SDL_image which I maintain. I made two packages,
libsdl-image1.0 and libsdl-image-dev. Until recently SDL_image was built
with SDL1.0, the stable release. The current versions need SDL1.1, the
unstable release. Unfortunately I built and uploaded SDL_image with that
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 12:52:30PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> On 27 Sep 2000, Itai Zukerman wrote:
>
> > > For this situation, I would suggest that we start to be really strict, and
> > > use chroot jails for *all* builds.
>
>
> It may resolve the situation, but I would much more elgeant,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 12:52:30PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> On 27 Sep 2000, Itai Zukerman wrote:
>
> > > For this situation, I would suggest that we start to be really strict, and
> > > use chroot jails for *all* builds.
>
>
> It may resolve the situation, but I would much more elgeant,
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 11:27:08AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> Josip Rodin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 05:07:46PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > where do /usr/info/dir.gz and /usr/share/info/dir.gz come from?
> > >
> > >
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
