Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udftools":
* Package name : udftools
Version : 2.3-2
Upstream contact : Pali Rohár
* URL : https://github.com/pali/udftools
* License
l autoconf in debian/rules to fix compile issues (Closes: #982717)
(Patch by Dennis Filder)
Regards,
--
Pali Rohár
On Tuesday 05 January 2021 01:40:09 Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 5:21 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> >* New upstream release (Closes: #511059, #288455)
>
> Please put these bug closings on separate lines and include some
> descriptive information.
>
> You
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "igmpproxy":
* Package name: igmpproxy
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár
* URL : https://github.com/pali/igmpproxy
* License : BS
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udftools":
* Package name: udftools
Version : 2.3-1
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár
* URL : https://github.com/pali/udftools
* License
w upstream release
- Minor release fixing compilation errors on gcc 10 (Closes: #957893)
- Also corrected some minor spelling mistakes
Regards,
--
Pali Rohár
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udftools"
* Package name: udftools
Version : 2.2-1
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár
* URL : https://github.com/pali/udftools
* License : GPL
net/debian/pool/main/s/sslh/sslh_1.18-1.1.dsc
More information about sslh can be obtained from
http://www.rutschle.net/tech/sslh.shtml
Changes since the last upload:
* Detach sslh from terminal in init script (Closes: #919188)
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udftools"
* Package name: udftools
Version : 2.1-1
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár
* URL : https://github.com/pali/udftools
* License
On Monday 03 September 2018 01:15:28 Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 11:37:43PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Sunday 02 September 2018 21:33:03 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > Nitpick: these warnings are trivial to fix:
> > > W: udfclient sou
basically 3 different texts of BSD
licenses in source files.
> Then there are missing man pages...
I have already contacted upstream about manpage problems.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
am release
* Update Standards-Version to 4.2.1
* Update to debhelper 11
* Use https:// for copyright format URI
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "smpq"
* Package name: smpq
Version : 1.6-2
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár
* URL : https://launchpad.net/smpq
* License : GPL-3+
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "igmpproxy"
* Package name: igmpproxy
Version : 0.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com>
* URL : https://github.com/pali/igmp
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udftools"
* Package name: udftools
Version : 2.0-2
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com>
* URL : https://github.com/pali/udf
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udftools"
* Package name: udftools
Version : 2.0-1
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com>
* URL : https://github.com/pali/udf
ezula.net/en/mpq/stormlib.html.
Changes since the last upload:
* New upstream release
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "igmpproxy"
* Package name: igmpproxy
Version : 0.2-1
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com>
* URL : https://github.com/pali/igmp
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udftools"
* Package name: udftools
Version : 1.3-2
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com>
* URL : https://github.com/pali/udf
the last upload:
* New upstream release.
- CVE-2017-8305: Fix buffer overflow in strlcpy implementation
(Closes: #861347)
* Enable hardening.
* Install new man pages.
* Update debian/watch.
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ot change CFLAGS in debian/ruls (upstream fixed *FLAGS support)
* Update debian/watch (upstream does not provide PGP signed tarballs)
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
the last upload:
* New upstream release.
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udftools"
* Package name: udftools
Version : 1.3-1
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com>
* URL : https://github.com/pali/udf
On Saturday 24 December 2016 11:38:01 Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 09:41:29PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 23 December 2016 14:46:53 Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > > You use DAEMON_OPTS in the default file, while sysvinit seems to
>
On Friday 23 December 2016 14:46:53 Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hi again Pali Rohár,
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:29:59AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Now lintian on mentors shows warning:
> >
> > package-uses-experimental-debhelper-compat-version
> > 10
On Friday 23 December 2016 11:28:39 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > - debian/compat: why only 9? compat 10 is considered stable now
> > >
> > >and unless you have a good reason I would recommend that any
> > >new package should use compat 10. (please read
ly disables silent rules when building
> on buildds. Using Q environment variables isn't the normal thing
> though. Even better than to explicitly disable silent build would be
> to hook up Q to the automatic debhelper version (V=1?).
I added export Q =. Looks like it is working with current Makefile.
> > - Building in sbuild appears to work fine.
> >
> > - Package appears to work fine (though I don't have any llmnr
> >
> >device running at the moment, so I could only test name
> >resolution of my own system)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Christian
>
> Regards,
> Andreas Henriksson
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Updated to version 0.2.1-1
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/llmnrd/llmnrd_0.2.1-1.dsc
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
48880)
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "smpq"
* Package name: smpq
Version : 1.6-1
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com>
* URL : https://launchpad.net/smpq
* License
ezula.net/en/mpq/stormlib.html.
Changes since the last upload:
* New upstream release 9.21
* Remove static linked library from libstorm-dev
* Compile without pie hardening (shared library is already pic)
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
dard version
* Use debhelper 9
* Use hardening=+all
* Fix spelling in changelog
* Build only on linux-any
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udftools"
* Package name: udftools
Version : 1.2-2
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár
* URL : https://github.com/pali/udftools
* License : GPL-2+
On Sunday 30 October 2016 18:31:39 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "igmpproxy"
>
> * Package name: igmpproxy
>Version : 0.1-1
>
On Sunday 30 October 2016 18:31:39 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "igmpproxy"
>
> * Package name: igmpproxy
>Version : 0.1-1
>
Package is fixed and reupload on mentors... I hope now correctly.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
upload:
* New upstream release.
* Update Standards-Version.
* Change priority to optional.
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi! Now I updated package on mentors.debian.net. Look if it is better
now or needs something else...
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tuesday 05 July 2016 01:17:39 Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Control: owner -1 !
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> * Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com>, 2016-07-04, 18:13:
> >dget -x
> >https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aspell-sk/aspell-sk_2
> >.02-0-0
* Add Homepage and update Standards-Version.
* Fix Coding-System in aspell-sk.info-aspell.
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
istfiles from Depends: to Recommends: as smpq can work without
listfiles package, just is unable to unpack old archives. Also I added
pgp check to watch...
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Ok, I added description about generation of files in README.source file.
New package is uploaded on mentors.debian.net
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I updated udftools package, new version is on mentors.debian.net. Let me
know if it is OK now.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udftools"
* Package name: udftools
Version : 1.2-0.1
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com>
* URL : https://github.com/pali/udf
PING!
On Tuesday 24 May 2016 10:51:59 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hi! Now after month, any news regarding this package?
>
> On Wednesday 27 April 2016 12:53:06 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > Hi Pali and mentors,
> >
> > (redirecting the question to -mentors, because I don'
On Friday 27 May 2016 13:10:26 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> I'll have a look.
Now it is in sid: https://packages.debian.org/sid/udfclient
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
jected by ftpmasters!
>
> So, this point is really a showstopper for the inclusion in Debian of the tool
> (BTW if you want to ask ftpmasters about their opinion let me know their
> answer).
>
> I would like to avoid uploading and get a reject, but I would consider an
> upload
upload:
* New upstream release
* Remove upstream patch Makefile.patch
* Fix formatting of package description
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
even when they are not used and needed?
>
>
> you have to list *every* copyright and license on copyright file, regardless
> of it being used or not.
> This is a showstopper for ftpmasters.
Done, now all embedded libraries have entry in copyright file.
Package is now updated on men
opyright
file. That is all what I know and cannot do more. If there are or there
are not law problems it is probably question for other people...
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
to paragraph then??
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
Now I updated stormlib package on mentors.debian.net.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
w :-(
> >not sure here, I'm not a symbols-savvy man :(
> >please ask on -mentors and come back if you have fixes for them...
>
> man dpkg-gensymbols should help there...
Did not helped.
Anyway, symbols file supports regex, so I added: (regex|optional).*
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Monday 18 April 2016 19:09:49 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi
>
> >> 0.0.0~20150420
> >
> >Ok, I change it to that string.
>
> as said by Jakub, 0~20150420 is already fine
I did not get any email from Jakub.
Anyway, now I updated stormlib-listfiles package
sk, but I do not expect any change...
> otherwise, how could them notify users about new releases?
Package content (or hash) was changed. There is not other way. Has
debian/watch support for checking hash or Last-Modified header?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
" helps? And how to do that? Or better, how
to ignore all symbols expect those which are whitelisted specified in
debian/libstorm9.symbols file?
> dh_makeshlibs
> dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some new symbols appeared in the symbols
> file: see diff output below dpkg-gensymbols: warning:
> debian/libstorm9/DEBIAN/symbols doesn't match completely
> debian/libstorm9.symbols
>
> making makeshlibs sad is a build failure here!
>
> HTH,
>
> Gianfranco
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
version. Is that OK,
or is there other convention?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
olate trademarks... But if you are interested for details, then read:
http://zezula.net/en/mpq/namebreak.html
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
an-revision before.
File debian/libstorm9.symbols already contains *all* public functions
which can be used by other libraries. And all those functions do not
have any debian suffix.
So I do not understand why it show error message and even how to fix it.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
you sure there isn't any trademark violations there?
I'm not lawyer.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
ision on symbol
AsciiToLowerTable@Base and 215 others
==> What does this mean and how to fix it?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
ins also
static linked .a library. So stormlib build it too...
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
Hello, I'm still looking for a sponsor for package "smpq" and its
dependences. Please look at bug 819396. Thanks!
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "smpq"
* Package name: smpq
Version : 1.5-1
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com>
* URL : https://launchpad.net/smpq
* License
ttp://zezula.net/en/mpq/namebreak.html.
Changes since the last upload:
* Initial release (Closes: #819380)
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ezula.net/en/mpq/stormlib.html.
Changes since the last upload:
* Initial release (Closes: #819380)
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Monday 07 March 2016 17:49:00 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 07 March 2016 14:31:44 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > On 6 March 2016 at 21:16, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > But should not be cleandir part of that --buildsystem=bmake? Or
> >
On Monday 07 March 2016 14:31:44 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 6 March 2016 at 21:16, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > But should not be cleandir part of that --buildsystem=bmake? Or
> >> > why not?
> >>
> >> You're actually very ri
On Sunday 06 March 2016 10:24:05 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 6 March 2016 at 09:50, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > It is because "debian/rules clean" calls only "bmake clean"
> >> > which does not delete autogenerated file Make
On Sunday 06 March 2016 10:28:31 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Sunday 06 March 2016 10:24:05 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > On 6 March 2016 at 09:50, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > It is because "debian/rules clean" calls only "bmake clean"
On Sunday 06 March 2016 10:24:05 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 6 March 2016 at 09:50, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > It is because "debian/rules clean" calls only "bmake clean"
> >> > which does not delete autogenerated file Make
On Sunday 06 March 2016 08:59:53 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 6 March 2016 at 01:20, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > First dpkg-buildpackage call works, but calling it secondary fails
> > with:
> >
> > dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the m
On Friday 04 March 2016 22:59:10 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 4 March 2016 at 22:57, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Well, I did test it and it worked, otherwise I wouldn't have
> >> >> > proposed it.
> >> >
> >>
On Friday 04 March 2016 22:48:59 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 04/03/16 22:47, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 04 March 2016 22:40:35 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> >> > On 4 March 2016 at 22:29, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >>>>
On Friday 04 March 2016 22:40:35 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 4 March 2016 at 22:29, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I just wanted to note that with the latest bmake (20150606-1), it
> >> is enough to have this in your debian/rules:
&g
On Thursday 17 December 2015 15:51:51 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 14 December 2015 12:37:24 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > On 14/12/15 12:33, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > >> > you just dropping the patch into th
On Thursday 17 December 2015 15:51:51 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 14 December 2015 12:37:24 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > On 14/12/15 12:33, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > >> > you just dropping the patch into th
On Monday 14 December 2015 12:37:24 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 14/12/15 12:33, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> >> > you just dropping the patch into the right place.
> > I know where and how. But I do not like idea
ncy and upgrading if original
source code which patch modify changes.
And also I see using patches as last option. Are not Debian want to
reduce patches if they are not really needed?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
kage?
>
> cheers,
>
> G.
>
Hi Gianfranco, I did not updated package because I did not know that
some step is needed to do. My last uploaded version worked and I thought
that it was OK.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
not need to patch software just for compilation
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hello,
I added dirhash.h and vfs_dirhash.c files to debian/copyright as those
were missing. Other BSD files reported by licensecheck are not correctly
detected (they are not BSD licensed).
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
release (Closes: #791421)
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
* Handle ST_DOWNANDOUT state (Closes: #652418)
* Allow to specify custom script file via new param '-s' (Closes: #702495)
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
/init.d:
- Turn off ethernet interface autoprobing
* Handle ST_DOWNANDOUT state (Closes: #652418)
* Allow to specify custom script file via new param '-s' (Closes: #702495)
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
85 matches
Mail list logo
