Hi,
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 06:45:55PM +0100, Matej Kosik wrote:
> Is there a way how could I try to compile this package for all
> architectures and see if everything works? I must admit, I am working on
Sort of, if you are a debian developer. There are debian
machines for all supported archite
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:21:35AM +0200, Tomas Davidek wrote:
> * I store all the scripts in a tarball, so all I have to do is to unpack
> them in the respective directory during the "make install" stage (i.e.
> no compilation is needed). I succeeded to do so by introducing the
> followi
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 03:21:54PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> [People from debian-ocaml-mail, please keep -mentors CC'ed.]
>
> * John Skaller [Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:27:21 +1000]:
> > I could use a 'build-recommends' dependency,
> > but I understand 'recommends'
> > is only available for the b
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:50:14AM -0500, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
> I would really like to be a contributing member of Debian,
> but it is the chicken and egg thing. I can't help until I
> become a member, and until I become a member I'm not that
> enthusiastic.
It is not true that you can't hel
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:50:14AM -0500, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
> I would really like to be a contributing member of Debian,
> but it is the chicken and egg thing. I can't help until I
> become a member, and until I become a member I'm not that
> enthusiastic.
It is not true that you can't hel
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 08:41:21PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> Should changelog.Debian include changes that precede the inclusion
> in Debian ?
I don't think that this is an obligation. However, if it is more
conevenient for you to keep track of the changes you did then
I don't see a reason no
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 08:41:21PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> Should changelog.Debian include changes that precede the inclusion
> in Debian ?
I don't think that this is an obligation. However, if it is more
conevenient for you to keep track of the changes you did then
I don't see a reason no
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 08:06:31PM -0800, Aaron Matthew Read wrote:
> I am working on a repackaging of the SML/NJ package that splits the
> sml runtime component apart from the sml compiler. The idea is to
> facilitate the packaging of SML programs and libraries without
> requiring the user to inst
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 08:06:31PM -0800, Aaron Matthew Read wrote:
> I am working on a repackaging of the SML/NJ package that splits the
> sml runtime component apart from the sml compiler. The idea is to
> facilitate the packaging of SML programs and libraries without
> requiring the user to inst
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 08:41:10PM +, Bruno Barrera C wrote:
> become as new mantainer, but i got a problem that there is no chilean
> debian developers , who could sign my GPG key, and i dont have drive
> card.
> It is possible if I send my Chilean Identify Card, as a way to identify
> me?
H
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 08:41:10PM +, Bruno Barrera C wrote:
> become as new mantainer, but i got a problem that there is no chilean
> debian developers , who could sign my GPG key, and i dont have drive
> card.
> It is possible if I send my Chilean Identify Card, as a way to identify
> me?
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 02:32:08PM -0700, justin cunningham wrote:
> So I downloaded his source package orig.tar.gz, .dsc, diff.gz
> i386_changes -- basically all files except the .deb and extracted the
> source, applied the patch and cd into the source tree and ran 'fakeroot
> debuild' and got
>
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 02:32:08PM -0700, justin cunningham wrote:
> So I downloaded his source package orig.tar.gz, .dsc, diff.gz
> i386_changes -- basically all files except the .deb and extracted the
> source, applied the patch and cd into the source tree and ran 'fakeroot
> debuild' and got
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 01:01:04PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
> I recently packaged up KCDLabel, a very nice GUI CD Label creator. IT
> allows for both image and text manipulation, and I find it nice for
> making CD's for friends. From the description field:
In which way is this dif
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 01:01:04PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
> I recently packaged up KCDLabel, a very nice GUI CD Label creator. IT
> allows for both image and text manipulation, and I find it nice for
> making CD's for friends. From the description field:
In which way is this di
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 03:35:01PM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> According to the dh_movefiles man page,
>
> dh_install is a much better program that can do everything this
> one can, and more'.
>
> Yet with dh_install I was only able to cp -a files without the addition
> of rm them out of
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 03:35:01PM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> According to the dh_movefiles man page,
>
> dh_install is a much better program that can do everything this
> one can, and more'.
>
> Yet with dh_install I was only able to cp -a files without the addition
> of rm them out o
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 08:36:41PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> dpkg sucks; try apt-cache show g++ and check out the epoch in the
> version field...
Yes. "apt-cache show" reveals that g++ has epoch 2. This solved my problem,
thanks to James and everybody else who replied.
BTW, the upstream author
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 08:36:41PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> dpkg sucks; try apt-cache show g++ and check out the epoch in the
> version field...
Yes. "apt-cache show" reveals that g++ has epoch 2. This solved my problem,
thanks to James and everybody else who replied.
BTW, the upstream autho
===
ii g++2.95.4-7 The GNU C++ compiler.
However, when I try to build my package I get an error on an unsatisfied
build dependency:
% dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is texmacs
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.3.5.0-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Ral
===
ii g++2.95.4-7 The GNU C++ compiler.
However, when I try to build my package I get an error on an unsatisfied
build dependency:
% dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is texmacs
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.3.5.0-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintaine
Hi,
you posted to the debian developers list. Please send questions of
this kind to debian-mentors@lists.debian.org where beginners questions
are welcome (cc is set in this mail).
To answer your question: You have to set the DESTDIR variable when you
install the binaries in the package build dire
Hi,
you posted to the debian developers list. Please send questions of
this kind to [EMAIL PROTECTED] where beginners questions
are welcome (cc is set in this mail).
To answer your question: You have to set the DESTDIR variable when you
install the binaries in the package build directory. Most p
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:06:49PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Jimmy" == Jimmy Kaplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jimmy> I noticed in your protocol that you say the name on the IDs
> Jimmy> must match the name on the key. When I had my key signed, I
> Jimmy> showed ID that had th
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:06:49PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Jimmy" == Jimmy Kaplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jimmy> I noticed in your protocol that you say the name on the IDs
> Jimmy> must match the name on the key. When I had my key signed, I
> Jimmy> showed ID that had t
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:21:21PM -0400, Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
>
> I am the author of the GNU HaliFAX viewer and I have pre-packaged it
> for Debian GNU/Linux. I have been a maintainer since Saturday and
Welcome !
>
> In http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-upload.en.html,
> par
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:21:21PM -0400, Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
>
> I am the author of the GNU HaliFAX viewer and I have pre-packaged it
> for Debian GNU/Linux. I have been a maintainer since Saturday and
Welcome !
>
> In http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-upload.en.html,
> pa
> Stupid question, its ok that applicants look for sponsors before they have
> been assigned an AM? I'm just curious, because I just uploaded such a
> package...
It is in fact most welcome.
-Ralf.
> Stupid question, its ok that applicants look for sponsors before they have
> been assigned an AM? I'm just curious, because I just uploaded such a
> package...
It is in fact most welcome.
-Ralf.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
> In Thu, 21 Dec 2000 09:48:48 -0500 "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cum veritate scripsit :
>
> > Hello:
> >
> > I've applied as new mantainer a few days ago.
> > I haven't AM yet.
> >
> > Can I send an ITA in my current status?
>
> I don't know the general concensus about this (som
> In Thu, 21 Dec 2000 09:48:48 -0500 "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cum veritate scripsit :
>
> > Hello:
> >
> > I've applied as new mantainer a few days ago.
> > I haven't AM yet.
> >
> > Can I send an ITA in my current status?
>
> I don't know the general concensus about this (som
> possible now to get the license of that code. I think that the
> licenses are DFSG compliant, but they are not free licenses that
> are mentioned in the DFSG. Should I move on to debian-legal with
> that licenses ? I suppose I should.
Yes, you should. -Ralf.
> possible now to get the license of that code. I think that the
> licenses are DFSG compliant, but they are not free licenses that
> are mentioned in the DFSG. Should I move on to debian-legal with
> that licenses ? I suppose I should.
Yes, you should. -Ralf.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
Michael Moerz wrote:
> So my problem is now that in the source tree of asc is a
> subdirectory containing poligon triangulization code. asc
> makes use of this code for displaying 3d-objects.
> That triangulization code was written by someone else who
> is not upstream. There is no license accomp
Michael Moerz wrote:
> So my problem is now that in the source tree of asc is a
> subdirectory containing poligon triangulization code. asc
> makes use of this code for displaying 3d-objects.
> That triangulization code was written by someone else who
> is not upstream. There is no license accom
er D/g indicates this (D=DSA, g=Elgamal) :
%gpg --list-keys treinen
pub 1024D/E0BA04C1 2000-02-26 Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
uid Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sub 1024g/D3DF40EF 2000-02-26
^
|
So my main key is DSA and the sub
D/g indicates this (D=DSA, g=Elgamal) :
%gpg --list-keys treinen
pub 1024D/E0BA04C1 2000-02-26 Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
uid Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sub 1024g/D3DF40EF 2000-02-26
^
|
So my main key is DSA and the sub is
Hi,
the packaging manual (v 3.2.1.0) says in section 8.1:
All fields that specify BUILD-TIME relationships [...] may be restricted to
a certain set of architectures. [emphasis by me]
>From this I conclude that it is not possible to have a (binary) dependency
relationship restricted to a cert
Hi,
the packaging manual (v 3.2.1.0) says in section 8.1:
All fields that specify BUILD-TIME relationships [...] may be restricted to
a certain set of architectures. [emphasis by me]
>From this I conclude that it is not possible to have a (binary) dependency
relationship restricted to a cer
What is the best way to register netscape plugins with installation of
a package? This would be information of the type
Mime-type: application/x-oz-application
Suffix: oza
Application: /usr/bin/ozengine %s
Having this pluging installed automatically would be nice since my package
comes with docum
What is the best way to register netscape plugins with installation of
a package? This would be information of the type
Mime-type: application/x-oz-application
Suffix: oza
Application: /usr/bin/ozengine %s
Having this pluging installed automatically would be nice since my package
comes with docu
I'm building a package (mozart) where documentation is provided by
upstream as sgml (about 30 documents), from which a documentation
set can be produced in html, ps or pdf. Since the binary is quite
big (a .deb is about 3 MB) and since the documentation package in
any of these formats (compressed)
I'm building a package (mozart) where documentation is provided by
upstream as sgml (about 30 documents), from which a documentation
set can be produced in html, ps or pdf. Since the binary is quite
big (a .deb is about 3 MB) and since the documentation package in
any of these formats (compressed)
On my ITP of the mozart system, annonced on debian-devel, Stephane
Bortzmeyer replied
> On Thursday 1 June 2000, at 9 h 55, the keyboard of Ralf Treinen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > http://www.mozart-oz.org/
>
> Possible name clash with <http://mozart
44 matches
Mail list logo
