Thanks guys, I went with _Alignof(double), which interestingly aligns to
8 bytes on amd64.
Thomas
Hi,
I am maintaining lcms2. In #749975, I received a patch to ensure correct
alignment for doubles von MIPS. I have forwarded the patch upstream[1], but
in the latest release, upstream has chosen a different way. It is now
possible to configure the alignment via a preprocessor variable
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 05:14:32PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Thomas Weber twe...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:14:11AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
IIRC inline is only a hint--it's not guaranteed to
be inlined if the compiler thinks it's more efficient
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:14:11AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:46:26PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about an inline constructor and debian/symbols.
The code looks like this:
class X {
public:
X() { some code
Hi,
I have a question about an inline constructor and debian/symbols.
The code looks like this:
class X {
public:
X() { some code };
}
According to http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Inline.html, this means
that the constructor is inlined.
So, can I mark such a
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:25:08PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Thomas Weber twe...@debian.org [111211 22:08]:
my upstream ships documentation in PDF format in the normal sources.
Upon build, I re-create those files[1]. The newly generated PDF files
differ from the originally shipped
Hi,
my upstream ships documentation in PDF format in the normal sources.
Upon build, I re-create those files[1]. The newly generated PDF files
differ from the originally shipped ones. So, I have a problem asserting
that debian/rules clean gives me the same source tree as dpkg-source
-x which
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:32:22AM +0100, bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
Le Tuesday 8 November 2011 23:47:56, Thomas Weber a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 12:21:16PM +0100, roucaries bastien wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Thomas Weber twe...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 12:21:16PM +0100, roucaries bastien wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Thomas Weber twe...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the process of converting Debian's Octave packages into a
structure with proper library packaging. The symbols file of these three
C
Hi,
I'm in the process of converting Debian's Octave packages into a
structure with proper library packaging. The symbols file of these three
C++ libraries has about 30k lines.
I'm pretty new to symbols handling, so I'm looking for advice on
how to handle this. Is there a simple way to reduce
Hi,
I maintain Octave in Debian. My upstream will switch to using libtool in
the next major release (ETA of that release is unknown, but somewhen in
2010).
In order to not screw up too badly, I'm looking for documentation on
developing/packaging libraries (both from a developer's view and a
Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2008, 13:09 + schrieb Neil Williams:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:43:03 +0100
Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would make things easier to release Lenny if all (or very
nearly all) activities in unstable that were unrelated to the release
*were* actually stopped.
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 04:00:18PM +0200, Andreas Schildbach wrote:
Is there any way to tell quilt about the debian package structure? The
way it works, it always looks in the current directory for the patches
and .pc directories.
What I'd like it to do is find the debian directory in the
Hi Jordi,
Am Montag, 18. Juni 2007 04:38 schrieb Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso:
The Debianised source tarball is found here:
http://www.cimat.mx/~jordi/debian/qtoctave_0.5.1-1.debian.tar.gz
There's something wrong with the tarball. According to the .dsc file:
04dd905a3bb001516045fc06eff46085
Hi,
Am Sonntag, 27. Mai 2007 06:17 schrieb John Pye:
Is there any way under Debian (and hopefully also Ubuntu) that I can
trigger gtk-debi or something like that when the user requests to use
the part of my program that depends on stuff they haven't installed yet?
What would be the best way
Hi,
[no need to CC me, I'm subscribed].
I'm trying to package Octaviz and I'm running into problems with
dpkg-shlibdeps. The package generates around 1000 binary
modules/plugins. Running dpkg-shlibdeps over these files makes for
really weird errors[1], due to the length of the command line
Hi,
Workaround: use a simple D hook script [1] to access via http method of apt
needed build depends which are stored in manually prepared apt repo (well, on
the same machine).
Have a look at pbuilder's OTHERMIRROR option (for http and ftp
repositories).
Improvement?: I think the
Hi,
is it possible to have two different binary packages with the same
source package name (but different upstream versions of the source)?
Reason: I'm about to package octave-forge for both Octave 2.1 and 2.9
(you can consider octave-forge as plugin, that needs to be compiled for
the
18 matches
Mail list logo
