I have retracted the current version of kmscon I had uploaded at
mentors.debian.net to ask the upstream maintainer for a new release
(https://github.com/Aetf/kmscon/issues/42), so I can prepare a proper
release for Debian.
A new version of libtsm has just been accepted into the archive, closin
There has been a new upstream release 6.16.3 that my package has been
updated to. It includes a fix for the armhf compilation issue.
There is a new issue, however; though it compiles properly on armhf, the
program gives a bus error shortly after attempting to use it, and it
exits. The problem
* Team upload
* New upstream release 1.1.11
-- Ben Fiedler Tue, 18 Aug 2020 00:43:38
+0200
Regards,
Ben Fiedler
[1]:
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-emersion-go-smtp/-/merge_requests/1
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 9:16 AM Tong Sun
wrote:
>
> The RFS fixes all the following action items in the bug tracker
> (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/shc):
>
> A new upstream version is available: 4.0.1 high
> Failed to analyze the VCS repository. Please troubleshoot and fix the
> issue. high
>
Trying again after 2 days.
The RFS fixes all the following action items in the bug tracker
(https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/shc):
A new upstream version is available: 4.0.1 high
Failed to analyze the VCS repository. Please troubleshoot and fix the
issue. high
RFS: A sponsor is needed to update
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shc".
I've pushed it to Salsa:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/shc
The package was tested on both gbp and sbuild. It's also lintian-clean.
here is the build log:
https://paste.debian.net/
t TERM=linux in rules instead of upstream Makefile.
* Export HOME=/tmp/ in rules to avoid test failure due to /sbuild-nonexistent
* Autopkgtest test case missed runtime dependency: procps.
* Convert copyright into machine-readable format.
[ Vern Sun ]
* New upstream release. (Closes: #9089
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ranger
[ Vern Sun ]
* New upstream release. (Closes: #908982)
* Move to Python 3. (Closes: #910401)
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-python3.html
* Enable sensible-pager again, no offence.
* New CI tests, by reference
retitle 883840 RFS: spglib/1.10.3-1 [ITP] -- C library for crystal symmetry
determination
thanks
I have updated the package as per new upstream patch release of "spglib".
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lith
retitle 883840 RFS: spglib/1.10.2-1 [ITP] -- C library for crystal
symmetry determination
thanks
I have updated the package as per new upstream patch release of "spglib".
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
PhD student at Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7,
room V325
LT-1025
Hi,I have uploaded a new xz tarball to mentors.debian.org version 0.5-1
~Adam
Am 2017-04-28 um 14:58 schrieb Martin Kepplinger:
> Hi all,
>
> xf86-input-tslib is kind of dying in Debian, see
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/xf86-input-tslib
>
> tslib itself that this driver uses, has quite some users still. Now
> there is a new release, version 0.0.7 of this Xorg driver at
Hi all,
xf86-input-tslib is kind of dying in Debian, see
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/xf86-input-tslib
tslib itself that this driver uses, has quite some users still. Now
there is a new release, version 0.0.7 of this Xorg driver at a new
location:
https://github.com/merge/xf86-input-tslib/re
Your message dated Mon, 9 Jan 2017 16:58:32 + (UTC)
with message-id <643201752.2424866.1483981112...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#850706: RFS: libdebug/0.5.2-1 (new upstream release,
packaging updates)
has caused the Debian Bug report #850706,
regarding RFS: libdebug/0.5.2-
ch file back to pgpsigurlmangle, since pgpmode=auto may
silently ignore a missing upstream signature.
* Use the v4 substitution variables in the watch file.
* Re-enable PIE in the build hardening flags.
* New upstream release:
- re-enable parallel building after it was fixed upstream
- upda
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2016 20:37:23 +0100
with message-id <56f59373.8080...@debian.org>
and subject line sponsored.
has caused the Debian Bug report #819166,
regarding RFS: libsass-python/0.11.0-1 (new upstream release ; *urgent* : fix
for FTBFS)
to be marked as done.
This mean
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors, Gianfranco,
I am looking for a sponsor for an upgrade of the package "libsass-python".
This an upgrade of the previous version 0.9.3-1 which is marked for autoremoval
on 29 March because of FTBFS on some platforms. I worked with upstrea
Your message dated Mon, 21 Dec 2015 01:53:26 +0100
with message-id <56774d86.2090...@rezozer.net>
and subject line RFS: primesieve/5.6.0+ds-1 [new upstream release]
has caused the Debian Bug report #808411,
regarding RFS: primesieve/5.6.0+ds-1 [new upstream release]
to be marked as done.
control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 09:55:00PM +0100, Jerome Benoit wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the package primesieve [1] that
> I am maintaining on behalf of the Debian Science-Team.
> This version brings to Debian the lastest upstream version.
why is
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Mentors:
I am looking for a sponsor for the package primesieve [1] that
I am maintaining on behalf of the Debian Science-Team.
This version brings to Debian the lastest upstream version.
Thanks,
Jerome
[1] https://anon
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 03:49:08AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> On 13/12/15 03:19, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > * why don't you try to use the git repository in a sane way? just
> > importing .dsc you build somehow else is not really a good use of it,
>
> It is why I do NOT import dsc material, b
he package 4ti2 [1] that
>> I am maintaining on behalf of the Debian Science-Team.
>> This version is a `New upstream release' that fixes a broken
>> test and some cosmetic issues.
>
> I'm currently building it, and if it will I'll upload
Your message dated Sun, 13 Dec 2015 02:31:04 +
with message-id <20151213023104.gg3...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#807789: RFS: 4ti2/1.6.7+ds-1 [New Upstream Release]
has caused the Debian Bug report #807789,
regarding RFS: 4ti2/1.6.7+ds-1 [New Upstream Release]
to be mar
control: owner -1 !
control: tag -1 + pending
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 02:48:24AM +0100, Jerome Benoit wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the package 4ti2 [1] that
> I am maintaining on behalf of the Debian Science-Team.
> This version is a `New upstream rele
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Mentors:
I am looking for a sponsor for the package 4ti2 [1] that
I am maintaining on behalf of the Debian Science-Team.
This version is a `New upstream release' that fixes a broken
test and some cosmetic i
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Vern Sun wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for "ranger":
I don't intend to sponsor this but here is a review:
Why is this patch marked as not needing forwarding? It fixes a bug in
the upstream code and so it should be fixed upstream.
0004-closes-772351-thanks-R
any later version
* Section : utils
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/ranger/ranger_1.7.2-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* New upstream release.
* Quilt patch(0003) has been
Your message dated Sat, 26 Sep 2015 16:34:56 + (UTC)
with message-id <1792336195.1785517.1443285296145.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#799529: RFS: shc/3.8.9b-1 new upstream release
has caused the Debian Bug report #799529,
regarding RFS: shc/3.8.9b-1 new up
Hi Gianfranco,
Thanks for the review.
All have been fixed as instructed. Ref
https://github.com/suntong/shc-build/commits/master
And new build is uploaded to
http://mentors.debian.net/package/shc
The respective dsc file can be found at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/shc/shc_3.8
>> -shc (3.8.7-2) unstable; urgency=medium
>> +shc (3.8.7-2) unstable; urgency=low
>
>> well your previous uploader uploaded with medium instead of low, please
>> adapt the changelog accordingly
>
>
>Please, read this[1].
>
>
>[1] >https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730343
>
>So,
Hi Gianfranco,
2015-09-25 8:44 GMT-03:00 Gianfranco Costamagna :
> Control: owner -1 !
>
>
> Hi, lets review:
>
> changelog: please be more verbose: e.g bump std-version,
> -add patches
> -remove patches
> -refresh patches
> -drop README.source
>
>
>
> changelog:
> -shc (3.8.7-2) unstable; urgency
Control: owner -1 !
Hi, lets review:
changelog: please be more verbose: e.g bump std-version,
-add patches
-remove patches
-refresh patches
-drop README.source
changelog:
-shc (3.8.7-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+shc (3.8.7-2) unstable; urgency=low
well your previous uploader uploaded with
is command:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/shc/shc_3.8.9b-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* New upstream release
* Updated Standard-version to 3.9.6.
* redo the makefile patching from scratch
More information about changes can be obtained from
https://
Hi, Built&Signed&Uploaded, the package is in a really good shape
:)
Just a nitpick, you might want to mention copyright changes in the changelog
(this wasn't a showstopper since the license didn't change, the changes were
minimal)
keep up the good work!
cheers,
G.
Hi mentors.
Today, upstream announce a new maintenance release of Calamaris. I
updated the package in mentors with the new changes.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/calamaris/calamaris_2.99.4.2-1.dsc
Regards
Daniel
--
Daniel Echeverry
http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry
Linux us
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 05:47:51PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Thursday 09 April 2015 09:21:24 Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > I've been following the steps as best I can here [1] to upgrade my
> > package (qpid-proton) to the latest upstream release (0.9). However,
> > these steps result in a
On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 17:47:51 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> > What is the right way to go about this?
> First, fix your git repo before attempting an import:
> - watch file is broken
> - several files have git merge artifacts (try a «ack '<<<'» in your repo)
> - upstream and pristine-tar branche
On Thursday 09 April 2015 09:21:24 Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> I've been following the steps as best I can here [1] to upgrade my
> package (qpid-proton) to the latest upstream release (0.9). However,
> these steps result in a merge commit (actually, they result in a huge
> set of conflicts) and that
I've been following the steps as best I can here [1] to upgrade my
package (qpid-proton) to the latest upstream release (0.9). However,
these steps result in a merge commit (actually, they result in a huge
set of conflicts) and that strikes me as a Bad Thing (tm).
Why does GBP try to merge, rather
Your message dated Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:23:45 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: pyformex/0.9.1-1 -- new upstream release, fixes
#704458 #750351
has caused the Debian Bug report #750592,
regarding RFS: pyformex/0.9.1-1 -- new upstream release, fixes #704458 #750351
to be marked
Your message dated Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:36:39 -0300
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#753487: RFS: stda/1.3.1-1 -- new upstream release
(package already in Debian)
has caused the Debian Bug report #753487,
regarding RFS: stda/1.3.1-2 -- new upstream release (package already in Debian)
to
Perfect!
Thanks a lot for your work (as packager and as upstream).
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-09-14 11:45 GMT-03:00 Dimitar Ivanov :
> Hi Eriberto,
>
> may be my last message was not very clear or visually well-formated with the
> statment that the pakcage can be downloaded also from mentors.d.n (i
Hi Eriberto,
may be my last message was not very clear or visually well-formated with
the statment that the pakcage can be downloaded also from mentors.d.n
(it should be there since Fri Sep 5). And I just tested successfully :-)
fetching it by:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/m
Hi Dimitar,
A good work. However, the VCS is for your control. Please, upload your
package to mentors.d.n to make easier my work. As a tip for you, all
packages needing review must be put in mentors.d.n.
I will wait for you.
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-09-11 20:14 GMT-03:00 Dimitar Ivanov :
>
> On
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Dimitar Ivanov wrote:
Starting to use external GIT repository means that I need to change my work
flow and to integrate the .git-tree in my present source-tree (also adjusting
Makefile, etc) and how to structure the branches and tags before pushing
changes. So, I'm curr
* Eriberto Mota , 2014-08-22, 13:07:
Sorry, but when I said punctuation, I meant to put a dot in end of each
line. Example:
* maphimbu - histogram builder for 1-d numerical and text data.
* mintegrate - evaluate average/sum/integral/derivative of 1-d numerical data.
I'd like to recommend
Hi,
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014, Eriberto wrote:
Hi,
I saw you made a new revision (-2) of your package. However, the
1.3.1-1 not exist in Debian. So you must change 'unstable' by
'UNRELEASED' in d/changelog when saying about 1.3.1-1.
Done.
Well, but a short description is not a complete sente
2014-08-25 12:21 GMT-03:00 Dimitar Ivanov :
> Hi Eriberto,
Hi,
I saw you made a new revision (-2) of your package. However, the
1.3.1-1 not exist in Debian. So you must change 'unstable' by
'UNRELEASED' in d/changelog when saying about 1.3.1-1.
2. d/control:
>>
>> Sorry, but when I said pu
Your message dated Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:19:14 -0300
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#758966: RFS: confget/1.05-1 (new upstream release)
has caused the Debian Bug report #758966,
regarding RFS: confget/1.05-1 (new upstream release)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hi Eriberto,
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014, Eriberto Mota wrote:
2014-08-22 12:00 GMT-03:00 Dimitar Ivanov :
Hello Eriberto,
Hi!
I implemented most of the changes you requested.
1. d/compat: change to 9.
Done.
Not done. I can see 7.
Fixed.
2. d/control:
- Set 9 to debhelper.
- Consid
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 02:46:04AM -0300, Eriberto Mota wrote:
> tags 758966 moreinfo
> thanks
>
>
> Hi Peter.
Hi, and thanks a lot for looking at confget! :) (and at all the other
packages that you've sponsored or commented on recently!)
> Please,
>
> 1. d/copyright: I suggest you contract al
ve the build dependency on hardening-includes
> - no longer include the hardening Makefile snippet into the rules file
> - explicitly enable all the hardening features; they may be disabled
> in the future if confget should fail to build anywhere
> - use DEB_CFLAGS_MA
hardening features; they may be disabled
in the future if confget should fail to build anywhere
- use DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND to, well, append to CFLAGS
* Enable parallel building - not that it matters a lot in this case :)
* New upstream release:
- honors CPPFLAGS now, so the hardening
2014-08-22 12:00 GMT-03:00 Dimitar Ivanov :
> Hello Eriberto,
Hi!
> I implemented most of the changes you requested.
>>
>> 1. d/compat: change to 9.
>>
> Done.
Not done. I can see 7.
>> 2. d/control:
>> - Set 9 to debhelper.
>> - Consider change the priority to optional. Please, read it[1]
Hello Eriberto,
I implemented most of the changes you requested.
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Eriberto Mota wrote:
tags 753487 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Dimitar.
Please:
1. d/compat: change to 9.
Done.
2. d/control:
- Set 9 to debhelper.
- Consider change the priority to optional. Please, read it[1
tags 753487 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Dimitar.
Please:
1. d/compat: change to 9.
2. d/control:
- Set 9 to debhelper.
- Consider change the priority to optional. Please, read it[1].
- Create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can use github
or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git
Control: reopen -1
Uploaded new upstream version 1.0.1:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d-textures
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d-textures/sweethome3d-textures_1.0.1-1.dsc
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.
Your message dated Fri, 11 Jul 2014 08:36:52 +
with message-id <3024413.msMGNCaut2@hekla>
and subject line RFS: ngspice_26-1, a new upstream release
has caused the Debian Bug report #753813,
regarding RFS: ngspice_26-1, a new upstream release
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Jakub Wilk wrote:
That's an odd workflow, if you ask me. But oh well. Here's my quick review:
+ sed -n '/BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE/,/END PGP SIGNATURE/p' \
+ $(PNAME)_$${dvers}_source.changes >
$(PNAME)-$$vers.tar.gz.asc
I don't think you'll get a valid signature this
[I don't indend to sponsor this package. Sorry!]
* Dimitar Ivanov , 2014-07-09, 00:27:
* URL : http://gnu.mirendom.net/stda.html
[snip]
There doesn't seem to be anything newer than 1.2.1 posted at that URL.
This is correct. The reason for this is that, since I'm the upstream
aut
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Nicholas Breen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 02:43:32PM +0200, Dimitar Ivanov wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "stda"
* Package name: stda
Version : 1.3.1-1
Upstream Author : Dimitar Ivanov
* URL : http://gnu.mirendom.net/s
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 02:43:32PM +0200, Dimitar Ivanov wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "stda"
>
> * Package name: stda
>Version : 1.3.1-1
>Upstream Author : Dimitar Ivanov
> * URL : http://gnu.mirendom.net/stda.html
[snip]
There doesn't seem
is package, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/ngspice
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/n/ngspice/ngspice_26-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* Ne
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "stda"
* Package name: stda
Version : 1.3.1-1
Upstream Author : Dimitar Ivanov
* URL : http://gnu.mirendom.net/stda.html
* License : GPLv3+
Sectio
ool/main/p/pyformex/pyformex_0.9.1-3.dsc
More information about pyformex can be obtained from http://pyformex.org
Changes since the last upload:
New upstream release
Place architecture independent files under /usr/share
Fix bug #750351
Regards,
Benedict Verhegghe
--
To U
Hi IOhannes,
> On 2014-05-08 14:37, Nicolas wrote:
> >> so why did you change dh compat-level from 8 to 9 then?
> >>
> >>
> > I don't know exactly. There's no change that affect my package and
> > the others packages I work on used compat level 9
>
> that's a rather lame reason.
> if there is no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2014-05-08 14:37, Nicolas wrote:
>> so why did you change dh compat-level from 8 to 9 then?
>>
>>
> I don't know exactly. There's no change that affect my package and
> the others packages I work on used compat level 9
that's a rather lame reas
>
> > I'm looking for a sponsor for the package swiftmailer that is
> > already in debian. Upstream delivered a new release. There's no
> > major changes in debian packaging. I can build the package and
> > lintian did not complain
>
> so why did you change dh compat-level from 8 to 9 then?
>
>
I d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2014-05-06 20:16, Nicolas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the package swiftmailer that is
> already in debian. Upstream delivered a new release. There's no
> major changes in debian packaging. I can build the package and
> l
Hi all,
I'm looking for a sponsor for the package swiftmailer that is already in
debian. Upstream delivered a new release. There's no major changes in
debian packaging. I can build the package and lintian did not complain
about errors.
The package :
SwiftMailer
- licence : MIT
- version : 5
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Vern Sun wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for "ranger":
>
> * Package name: ranger
> * Version : 1.6.1-1
> * Upstream Author : Roman Zimbelmann
> David Barnett
> Abdó Roig-Maranges
>
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for "ranger":
* Package name: ranger
* Version : 1.6.1-1
* Upstream Author : Roman Zimbelmann
David Barnett
Abdó Roig-Maranges
* URL : http://ranger.nongnu.org/
* License : G
Dear mentors,
I have a new version:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/ranger/ranger_1.6.0-1.dsc
I am still looking for a sponsor.
on 2013-03-25(一) at 18:59(+0100), Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >Does this meaning to use `/usr/share/foo` to instead of
> >`/usr/share/pyshared/foo` look like b
dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libc/libcommons-codec-java/libcommons-codec-java_1.7-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* New upstream release.
* Remove the deprecated DMUA flag
* d/control: Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.4 (no changes needed).
* Vern Sun , 2013-03-25, 00:35:
4. python modules, private / public
Are Python modules included by this package supposed to by used by
other software?
I don't think so.
Otherwise, they should be moved to a private directory.
Does this meaning to use `/usr/share/foo` to instead of
`/usr/shar
dependency: libjs-jquery
* Update debian/rules
- added link to jquery library used by xlog manual
* Added xlog-data.lintian-overrides concerning the manual
license and the two changelog files, xlog and xlog-data
* New upstream release
Regards,
Nanakos Chrysostomos
signature.asc
D
dependency: libjs-jquery
* Update debian/rules
- added link to jquery library used by xlog manual
* Added xlog-data.lintian-overrides concerning the manual
license and the two changelog files, xlog and xlog-data
* New upstream release
Regards,
Nanakos Chrysostomos
signature.asc
D
on 2013-03-23(六) at 12:45(+0100), Jakub Wilk wrote:
> (I don't intend to sponsor this package, sorry.)
>
I really appreciate your patience and your support.
Thank you very much!
I have a new version:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/ranger/ranger_1.6.0-1.dsc
I am still looking fo
5.4-1? Also, this change to
1.5.3-1 entry looks unnecessary:
- * New upstream release.
+ * New upstream release
Lintian emits:
I: ranger: unused-override script-not-executable
usr/share/pyshared/ranger/data/ranger
There's also another override:
N: This script is considered a configuratio
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "ranger"
* Package name: ranger
* Version : 1.6.0-1
* Upstream Author : Roman Zimbelmann
David Barnett
* URL : http://ranger.nongnu.org/
* License : GNU GPL version 3 or any later
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ranger"
* Package name: ranger
Version : 1.5.5-1
Upstream Author : Roman Zimbelmann
David Barnett
URL : http://ranger.nongnu.org/
License : GNU GPL version 3 or any later version
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2012 04:14:17 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: presage/0.8.8-1 (updated package, new upstream
release)
has caused the Debian Bug report #676936,
regarding RFS: presage/0.8.8-1 (updated package, new upstream release)
to be marked as done.
This
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for an update of my package "presage".
This update packages a new upstream release, enables build
hardening and closes a wishlist bug (detect dbus-python via
Python).
Package name: presage
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2012 05:25:40 +
with message-id <20120525052540.ga30...@master.debian.org>
and subject line RFS: usbmuxd/1.0.8-1 (new upstream release)
has caused the Debian Bug report #671184,
regarding RFS: usbmuxd/1.0.8-1 (new upstream release)
to be marked as done.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ranger"
* Package name: ranger
Version : 1.5.4-1
Upstream Author : Roman Zimbelmann
David Barnett
URL : http://ranger.nongnu.org/
License : GNU GPL version 3 or any later version
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/usbmuxd/usbmuxd_1.0.8-1.dsc
More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.
Changes since the last upload:
usbmuxd (1.0.8-1) experimental; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
* debian/patches:
- 90-cve-2012-0065.patch:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the package "ranger".
>
Cheers,
--
Vern
vim -c ":s(^(ZnQr8va1puvan.(|:s)\d\(\S\)) \U\1)g|:1 normal g??"
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ranger".
Package name: ranger
Version : 1.5.3-1
Upstream Author : Roman Zimbelmann
David Barnett
URL : http://ranger.nongnu.org/
License : GNU GPL version 3 or any later versio
Hello there,
some general info, we are on -mentors after all :-)
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 02:33:06AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> [...]
> This bug appears to be done.
>
> Not sure who uploaded it, but the pts shows an upload.
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/burp/news/20120303T1
Your message dated Mon, 5 Mar 2012 21:29:24 -0500
with message-id
and subject line this appears to be done
has caused the Debian Bug report #661498,
regarding RFS: burp/1.3.1-1 -- Simple cross-platform network BackUp and Restore
Program (new upstream release)
to be marked as done.
This means
ckage/burp
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/burp/burp_1.3.1-1.dsc
More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.
Changes since the last upload:
* New upstream release ver
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:02:30 +0100
with message-id <4f49caf6.2090...@rezozer.net>
and subject line RFS: bibtool/2.54 (new upstream release) -- tool for BibTeX
database manipulation
has caused the Debian Bug report #661213,
regarding RFS: bibtool/2.54 (new upstream release) -
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Sa, 25 Feb 2012, lina wrote:
>> For the journal = jbioch,
>>
>> It transformed the Upper case into small case.
>>
>> supposed to be journal = JBIOCH
>
> Is "JBIOCH" a bibtex string defined via
> @string{JBIOCH="..."}
> ?
Ye
On Sa, 25 Feb 2012, lina wrote:
> For the journal = jbioch,
>
> It transformed the Upper case into small case.
>
> supposed to be journal = JBIOCH
Is "JBIOCH" a bibtex string defined via
@string{JBIOCH="..."}
?
I am not sure but maybe @strings in bibtex are case insensitive ...
do
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Benoît Knecht wrote:
> lina wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Benoît Knecht
>> wrote:
>> > lina wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:32 PM, lina wrote:
>> >> > There is a problem with bibtool (I installed by aptitude install
>> >> > bibtool just now)
lina wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Benoît Knecht wrote:
> > lina wrote:
> >> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:32 PM, lina wrote:
> >> > There is a problem with bibtool (I installed by aptitude install
> >> > bibtool just now)
> >> >
> >> > For the journal = jbioch,
> >> >>> >
> >> >
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Benoît Knecht wrote:
> Hi lina,
>
> lina wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:32 PM, lina wrote:
>> > There is a problem with bibtool (I installed by aptitude install
>> > bibtool just now)
>> >
>> > For the journal = jbioch,
>> >>> >
>> > It transformed th
Hi lina,
lina wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:32 PM, lina wrote:
> > There is a problem with bibtool (I installed by aptitude install
> > bibtool just now)
> >
> > For the journal = jbioch,
> >
> > It transformed the Upper case into small case.
> >
> > supposed to be journal = JBIOCH
>
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:32 PM, lina wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> Hi !
>>
>> I have just uploaded a revisited version:
>> 0] the typo were fixed;
>> 1] now the texdoc can find bibtool.pdf
>
> There is a problem with bibtool (I installed by aptitude install
>
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I have just uploaded a revisited version:
> 0] the typo were fixed;
> 1] now the texdoc can find bibtool.pdf
There is a problem with bibtool (I installed by aptitude install
bibtool just now)
For the journal= jbioch,
It t
1 - 100 of 328 matches
Mail list logo
