Paul Wise wrote:
> The INCLUDES = -I/usr/include change shouldn't be nessecary because
> /usr/include is in the default search path unless your compiler is
> utterly broken.
Having that "-I" may even cause problems for cross-compilers.
--
Nicolas
(I read mailing lists through Gmane. Please don'
Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> Man page is only a bad copy of the homepage.
> Regarding segfaults, yesterday evidently I've only chosen the right
> moment you were waiting for ;), but given that you already spent a lot
> of time and I didn't take it into account and given that I think I
> couldn't be us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:
> Aside from these remarks, the package seems OK, the manpage is a nice
> touch, and I can't seem to replicate the segfaults I was having when I
> attempted my ITP.
> I'd still suggest co-maintaining it though, just cause I
Paul Wise wrote:
>> I don't think I'm seeing the issue here. Care to elaborate a bit more?
>> Isn't that the whole idea behind patching and running autoreconf in the
>> first place? If we wanted the changed files produced by autoreconf in
>> the debian.tar.gz we wouldn't need to run it, right? What
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Leo "costela" Antunes
wrote:
> Paul Wise wrote:
>> I personally think Debian should remove menu and replace it with
>> upstreamed patches for FreeDesktop menu support.
>
> Agreed in the long run, but since there are AFAIK (haven't checked in a
> while) still some w
Paul Wise wrote:
> I personally think Debian should remove menu and replace it with
> upstreamed patches for FreeDesktop menu support.
Agreed in the long run, but since there are AFAIK (haven't checked in a
while) still some window-managers/desktop-environments that don't fully
support desktop fil
2009/12/31 Leo 'costela' Antunes :
> - [subjective] You don't seem to be shipping a menu entry.
I personally think Debian should remove menu and replace it with
upstreamed patches for FreeDesktop menu support.
> - [subjective] I don't believe the debian/clean files are really
> necessary. (thoug
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> They have been forcemerged almost 2 months ago [1]. To close both, in
> d/changelog, should I refer to both or referring to master bug (496586)
> is enough or being merged closing one of them, the other one is
> automa
Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> Leo "costela" Antunes wrote:
>> Was 0.3 already released somewhere? I can find no traces of it either on
>> the homepage, the maemo.org project page or SVN.
>
> No and yes. There are no 0.3 binary releases but I found this [1]: 7
> weeks ago, 0.3.0.3 became 0.3.0.7. We co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Wise wrote:
> Might be a good idea to poke upstream about actually releasing 0.3 properly.
Upstream poked.
> BTW, there are two ITPs, you should resolve that:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/549357
> http://bugs.debian.org/496586
They have been forcem
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No and yes. There are no 0.3 binary releases but I found this [1]: 7
> weeks ago, 0.3.0.3 became 0.3.0.7. We could change 0.3 in 0.3.0.7 or we
> could follow a svnrevision-based versioning; I packaged the latest
> revi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leo "costela" Antunes wrote:
> Was 0.3 already released somewhere? I can find no traces of it either on
> the homepage, the maemo.org project page or SVN.
No and yes. There are no 0.3 binary releases but I found this [1]: 7
weeks ago, 0.3.0.3 became 0
Hi Gabriele
Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "numptyphysics".
As mentioned in the ITP[0], I'd gladly co-maintain/sponsor/whatever
numptyphysics.
> * Package name: numptyphysics
> Version : 0.3-1
Was 0.3 already released somewhere? I can find no t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "numptyphysics".
* Package name: numptyphysics
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : Tim Edmonds
* URL : http://numptyphysics.garage.maemo.org/
* License : GPL-3
14 matches
Mail list logo
