I have the following build-depencies:
Build-Depends: debhelper, autoconf, guile1.4, libguile-dev, g++ (>= 2.95.2),
g++ (<< 3.0), xlibs-dev
This is because my package does not compile on gcc 3.0.
My installed version of g++ is 2.95-4:
% dpkg -l g++
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| St
I have the following build-depencies:
Build-Depends: debhelper, autoconf, guile1.4, libguile-dev, g++ (>= 2.95.2), g++ (<<
3.0), xlibs-dev
This is because my package does not compile on gcc 3.0.
My installed version of g++ is 2.95-4:
% dpkg -l g++
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| S
Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am I trying to do something stupid here?
g++ is 2.95.x and g++-3.0 is 3.0.x, so you just have to remove g++ (<< 3.0) I
guess.
--
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CV consultable à l'adresse : http://marant.org
Thus spoke Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-10-11 21:39:55:
> I have the following build-depencies:
>
> Build-Depends: debhelper, autoconf, guile1.4, libguile-dev, g++ (>= 2.95.2),
> g++ (<< 3.0), xlibs-dev
>
> This is because my package does not compile on gcc 3.0.
[...]
> Am I tryin
Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have the following build-depencies:
>
> Build-Depends: debhelper, autoconf, guile1.4, libguile-dev, g++ (>= 2.95.2),
> g++ (<< 3.0), xlibs-dev
>
> This is because my package does not compile on gcc 3.0.
That's the wrong solution; you need to fix yo
Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am I trying to do something stupid here?
For hppa, maybe (I'm not sure)
Build-Conflicts: g++-3.0
--
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CV consultable à l'adresse : http://marant.org
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 08:36:41PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> dpkg sucks; try apt-cache show g++ and check out the epoch in the
> version field...
Yes. "apt-cache show" reveals that g++ has epoch 2. This solved my problem,
thanks to James and everybody else who replied.
BTW, the upstream author
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 12:41:55AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> BTW, the upstream author tried to compile his program with gcc 3.01
> and did not succeed. I am not enough of an expert in C programming
> to solve a problem that he cannot solve. However, if anyone likes
> to help me on this I will b
Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am I trying to do something stupid here?
g++ is 2.95.x and g++-3.0 is 3.0.x, so you just have to remove g++ (<< 3.0) I guess.
--
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CV consultable à l'adresse : http://marant.org
Thus spoke Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-10-11 21:39:55:
> I have the following build-depencies:
>
> Build-Depends: debhelper, autoconf, guile1.4, libguile-dev, g++ (>= 2.95.2), g++ (<<
>3.0), xlibs-dev
>
> This is because my package does not compile on gcc 3.0.
[...]
> Am I tryin
Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have the following build-depencies:
>
> Build-Depends: debhelper, autoconf, guile1.4, libguile-dev, g++ (>= 2.95.2), g++ (<<
>3.0), xlibs-dev
>
> This is because my package does not compile on gcc 3.0.
That's the wrong solution; you need to fix yo
Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am I trying to do something stupid here?
For hppa, maybe (I'm not sure)
Build-Conflicts: g++-3.0
--
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CV consultable à l'adresse : http://marant.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 08:36:41PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> dpkg sucks; try apt-cache show g++ and check out the epoch in the
> version field...
Yes. "apt-cache show" reveals that g++ has epoch 2. This solved my problem,
thanks to James and everybody else who replied.
BTW, the upstream autho
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 12:41:55AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> BTW, the upstream author tried to compile his program with gcc 3.01
> and did not succeed. I am not enough of an expert in C programming
> to solve a problem that he cannot solve. However, if anyone likes
> to help me on this I will
14 matches
Mail list logo